Guest guest Posted May 8, 2003 Report Share Posted May 8, 2003 No , had/has NO neck issues. That was the first thing the cranialfacial surgeon checked. NOTHING! All she had was Scaphy. She was never put on her back until she was 7 days old and that was only when I changed her diaper, I'm not talented like the nurses were. hehe....j Dustie > In a message dated 5/8/2003 2:51:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > djones@l... writes: > > > How did you get so smart? > > hehe...When was NICU, they literally put her on her sides. She > > wasn't on her back with head to either side. Is that what you were > > saying or that sleeping on their sides made the muscles stretch > > Dustie, > From Jeanne at CTI of course!! ) She has a wealth of knowledge on the > subject, and is the designer of the DOC band! Check out more details on her > at <A HREF= " http://www.cranialtech.com/AboutOurCompany/foundersLetter.html " > http://www.cranialtech.com/AboutOurCompany/foundersLetter.html</A> > > she's my new plagio goddess I think the way it was explained is that the > kids are sleeping on their backs, with their heads rotated from side to side- > (right mods?) but now that you say was on her side, hmmmmm.... My > opinion (key word) is that even on the sides they can become overstretched, > but my question is, did also have tort or any neck issues? I know > 's son developed tort from laying him on his right side, but he did not > have scaphy. You can picture that laying on the side would cramp one muscle, > and overextend the other- > Thanks Dustie, your making me think way harder than I wanted to today! ) > > ' mom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.