Guest guest Posted June 27, 2007 Report Share Posted June 27, 2007 Hello all, I am attempting to apply for my limited permit and am receiving mixed reviews on who can actually supervise me during the transition from permit to liscense. I am a Dance/Movement Therapist and have an off site ADTR supervisor, but need more hours. I actually have an onsite LCAT at work who is willing to supervise me, however she is an Art Therapist. The application and most LCAT's I have spoken with say that this is ok, so long as I am receiving the supervision requirements under the ADTA standards. However, I recently saw and email stating otherwise. Can someone please clarify this for me. As having on-site supervision is very important to me not only because it is on site, but also because it is free and unfortunately I don't currently have enought money to pay for an additional supervisor. Thank you!! Lamphear Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Hello and everyone, You can absolutely get supervision hours towards earning your license from any on site LCAT. The thing I would like to warn you about is counting your experience hours. I am under the impression that you can not count working or supervision hours until the day you have your permit in your hand, and then only from the supervisor listed on the permit- no retroactive supervision hours or work hours. Please, if anyone has had a different experience, let me know. Keenan, MPS, limited permit holder (!) It's here! Your new message!Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 Hello and and everyone, There is one caveat. After reading 's original email, in a panic I called the office and after what seemed like an endless wait, was able to speak with someone in person who explained the law a little more clearly in reference to those in a limited permit situation. You are right that the supervision hours must be by the person you listed on your application from your facility. However, if you applied for your permit in 2006 and were able to obtain it in 2006, you ARE able to use hours counted retroactively before you actually obtained the permit if employed by certain programs that fall under the guidelines of the sunset provision as per article 163 of the law: Note: Sunset provision for individuals employed by certain programs Section 17-a of chapter 676 of the Laws of 2002, as amended by section 1 of chapter 419 of the Laws of 2003, provides: " Nothing in this act shall prohibit or limit the activities or services on the part of any person in the employ of a program or service operated, regulated, funded, or approved by the department of mental hygiene or the office of children and family services, or a local government unit as that term is defined in article 41 of the mental hygiene law or a social services district as defined in section 61 of the social services law, provided, however, this section shall not authorize the use of any title authorized pursuant to article 153 or 163 of the education law, except as otherwise provided by such articles, except that this section shall be deemed repealed on January 1, 2010. " It later then goes on to say under the sunset provision that: " the provisions of such article 163 requiring a license or limited permit to practice under such article shall not be enforced until January 1, 2007 with respect to any individual who applied for a license pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 8411 of the education law, unless such individual has otherwise been denied a license thereunder. " So basically (in English!), this was explained to mean that if you work in such a location, and were able to obtain permit in hand before the end of 2006, you can count hours retroactively without problem. In my case, I applied for my permit in June of 2006 after getting a job at a city hospital and obtained it a whopping 6 months later in December of 2006. So technically, I was told that I AM able to count those retroactive hours because I was still exempt as per the sunset provisions of article 163 of the law. The person who I spoke with also explained hypothetically that if I hadn't received my permit until say, February, I would NOT be able to count January hours, but that I still could count hours from 2006 when I was in the exempt status. Certainly no good reason could be given as to why 2007 applicants are penalized for the extremely slow processing of their applications. It seems to me that applicants should be allowed to count hours from the date application is received if the permit is eventually issued. (Don't they have one of those " RECEIVED " date stamp thingys?) Nonetheless, if anyone is in a similar situation to me (received permit in 2006 & worked in an exempt facility), hope this helps calm your anxiety. Good luck to everyone in this process! Beers, MA, CCLS (and soon to be LCAT!!!) > > Hello and everyone, > You can absolutely get supervision hours towards earning your license from any on site LCAT. The thing I would like to warn you about is counting your experience hours. I am under the impression that you can not count working or supervision hours until the day you have your permit in your hand, and then only from the supervisor listed on the permit- no retroactive supervision hours or work hours. Please, if anyone has had a different experience, let me know. > Keenan, MPS, limited permit holder (!) > > > --------------------------------- > It's here! Your new message! > Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.