Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Hi Judith, It is often the Aspie Way (and I count myself as one to them) to try to be logical and unemotional when problem solving. Just think Spock, in the original Star Trek TV series. When trying to adjudicate, an Aspie will often try to get you to look at all sides of the issue. It is not intended as disregard or malice at all, it's just that Aspies have a strong sense of justice. Also, we have an all-abiding desire to keep the peace. Unfortunately, sometimes upholding " justice " can over-ride common sense, and keeping the peace may be nothing more than the " path of least resistance. " What the Aspie needs to learn is that when someone close to them commiserates with them, they aren't really asking for advice. What they are REALLY asking for is for the Aspie to support them in their conclusions and subsequent actions. If, rather, in response, the Aspie tells the person not to jump to conclusions, the non-Aspie will be thinking, " auuuuugh, is he LISTENING at all??? Whose SIDE is he on? " The non-Aspie will ultimately interpret the Aspie's detached and impartial response as a sign of extreme disloyalty. Before I go on, I will point out that when someone knowingly or unknowingly says something that is untrue about another person, it is in my nature to want to set the record straight. This is especially so when the victim of the misinformation is " unpopular " and therefore, even if others know that what's being said about the person is wrong, they don't want to stick their necks out to defend them. Well, I will. That trait is very counterintuitive for political longevity, though. If I were on " Survivor " I think I'd be one of the first voted off, LOL. That being said, your situation is different, and here is where judgement, and in the Aspie's difficulty in transferring lessons learned in one experience, to a new experience, sometimes fails them. They may be relying on an old " script " when presented with a novel (and unthinkable) problem, such as a family member stealing from another family member. So lesson #1 for staying in long term marriage is - when push comes to shove, a spouse should always take the side of their spouse! (Unless, of course, the spouse is completely paranoid and crazy, but in that event then there are more serious problems than can be dealt with in a discussion group like this.) In an intimate relationship, trust and respect are very important, and if one spouse does not feel " backed up " by the other, then the bonds of intimacy, respect and trust begin to break down. Your husband needs to learn to take it on faith that when you make a statement, you have reasonable grounds to support that it is true, such as in the instance of the relative (if I recall correctly) who has stolen from you. This probably extends to many other issues, eg. if you say the family car is making a " funny noise " he needs to listen to you and respond, and either look at it himself or agree to let you take it to a mechanic. If your partner doesn't listen to you on minor or major issues, after a very short while you will feel that he/she does not respect you, and you'll be wondering what keeps him/her in the relationship besides, ah, you know. Eventually it will ruin the dynamics of your marriage and you'll be living as brother and sister, not husband and wife. Maybe this is what your husband really needs to understand. Is this about right? - Helen, 52, self-dx'd AS, dx'd ADD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.