Guest guest Posted December 16, 2006 Report Share Posted December 16, 2006 Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved their life that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally to blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out these castrating drugs. I just feel like punching them. I still hate the pychatrist the worst though. Their making 100 of thousands of dollars by castrating people by drugs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 no i dont blame those people who felt the need to take antidepressants and had some benefit from taking them for some people thats their honest experience . I am fucking livid about the whole culture of secrecy and playing down of psychiatric side effects while we all service the moronic brain doctors we call psychiatrists who have done more to harm people than help them. My doctor who originally drugged me with Prozac has just sent me a letter in which he says " I unreservedly appologise " and admits pressuring me into taking Prozac.His original response was to avoid all responsibility but i made him face up to the fact that he did force me into it. I urge all of you to do the same and to ask your doctors and psychiatrists to either justify the course of treatment they subjected you to or face legal action . FUCK PSYCHIATRY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2006 Report Share Posted December 17, 2006 Very interesting. If his letter amounts to some sort of admission of coercion, I would take it to the next step. Send a copy of his letter to the UK medical governing bodies and sue the bastard. Make an example of him. If more " psychiatrists " were made examples of, they would think twice about pushing these poisons. Vornan > > > > no i dont blame those people who felt the need to take antidepressants > and had some benefit from taking them for some people thats their > honest experience . > > I am fucking livid about the whole culture of secrecy and playing down > of psychiatric side effects while we all service the moronic brain > doctors we call psychiatrists who have done more to harm people than > help them. > > My doctor who originally drugged me with Prozac has just sent me a > letter in which he says " I unreservedly appologise " and admits > pressuring me into taking Prozac.His original response was to avoid all > responsibility but i made him face up to the fact that he did force me > into it. > > I urge all of you to do the same and to ask your doctors and > psychiatrists to either justify the course of treatment they subjected > you to or face legal action . FUCK PSYCHIATRY. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved their life > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally to > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out these > castrating drugs. Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and cruel to blame your fellow victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do help people and save lives. I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side effects have proved long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time machine and choosing a different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd decide. I do know that no treatment would have been a really bad option. As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the case with just about all large corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one concern--short-term profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the process, just so long as it doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I watched The Constant Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its particulars, but I have no doubt the gist of it is fairly true to life.) Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been lurking in the shadows off and on for quite a while. River Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 Yeah the doctor has appologised for a number of things in his letter, thanked me for bringing my complaint to his attention and outlined how he will do things differently in his surgery in future,describing it as " a learning experience " . He appologised for having " encouraged/`forced` " me into taking Prozac.This is all a complete change of tune. When i saw him earlier this year he asked me why i had been prescribed Prozac in 1996 (despite that he was the GP who prescribed it).I asked him if he wanted the " reality or what the record shows " and he actually laughed at me. I was very angry at this appointment and told him " there was nothing ever wrong with me that i needed brain-altering drugs for " .He then had the audacity to note on my records after that appointment that i " needed to go on SSRI`s for 4 months " I dont give a flying toss about his `appology` and he has invited me into his surgery to discuss and resolve anything im unhappy about obviously wanting to deal with this all `in-house`.I will be passing on my complaint to the healthcare commission in England now that its gone through its initial stage and he can talk to them about it. If there is any possibility that i can sue him i will on principle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 so he actually admitted in the letter that he forced you? sounds to me like you caught him and that will stand in court. - In SSRIsex , " kevinbennett23us " wrote: > > > Yeah the doctor has appologised for a number of things in his > letter, thanked me for bringing my complaint to his attention and > outlined how he will do things differently in his surgery in > future,describing it as " a learning experience " . > > > He appologised for having " encouraged/`forced` " me into taking > Prozac.This is all a complete change of tune. > > > When i saw him earlier this year he asked me why i had been > prescribed Prozac in 1996 (despite that he was the GP who prescribed > it).I asked him if he wanted the " reality or what the record shows " > and he actually laughed at me. > > I was very angry at this appointment and told him " there was nothing > ever wrong with me that i needed brain-altering drugs for " .He then > had the audacity to note on my records after that appointment that > i " needed to go on SSRI`s for 4 months " > > > I dont give a flying toss about his `appology` and he has invited me > into his surgery to discuss and resolve anything im unhappy about > obviously wanting to deal with this all `in-house`.I will be passing > on my complaint to the healthcare commission in England now that its > gone through its initial stage and he can talk to them about it. > > If there is any possibility that i can sue him i will on principle > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 I blame myself more than drug companies and doctors. Sure, they deserve some blame, but I'm responsible for my own actions. I'm just unneccessarily paying for a mistake I made 6 years ago. My #1 goal is to get better, getting " revenge " on those I feel are responsible won't move me any closer to recovery. The best revenge is to get better and live a good life. As the saying goes. Luther > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved their life > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally to > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out these > > castrating drugs. > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and cruel to blame your fellow > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do help people and save lives. > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side effects have proved > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time machine and choosing a > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd decide. I do know that no > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the case with just about all large > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one concern--short-term > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the process, just so long as it > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I watched The Constant > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its particulars, but I have no doubt the > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been lurking in the shadows off and > on for quite a while. > > River > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 I don't understand why you would choose to blame yourself. I think people who harm others should be held accountable for their actions, whoever they are. Without any accountability, civilization would fall apart and we would return to anarchy. You were deceived about the long-term safety of these drugs and based on the information you were given, you didn't make any mistake. You were just given false information. Vornan > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > their life > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally > to > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out > these > > > castrating drugs. > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > cruel to blame your fellow > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do help > people and save lives. > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side > effects have proved > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > machine and choosing a > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > decide. I do know that no > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the case > with just about all large > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > concern--short-term > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > process, just so long as it > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > watched The Constant > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > lurking in the shadows off and > > on for quite a while. > > > > River > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2006 Report Share Posted December 18, 2006 I don't understand why you would choose to blame yourself. I think people who harm others should be held accountable for their actions, whoever they are. Without any accountability, civilization would fall apart and we would return to anarchy. You were deceived about the long-term safety of these drugs and based on the information you were given, you didn't make any mistake. You were just given false information. Vornan > > > > > Its the idiots that say antidepressents helped them or saved > their life > > > that is making these antidepressents so popular. Their equally > to > > > blame as the evil pychatrists and drug companies who give out > these > > > castrating drugs. > > > > Your anger is understandable, but it seems both pointless and > cruel to blame your fellow > > victims. It may surprise you to know that antidepressants do help > people and save lives. > > I'm extremely dismayed that what I was told were temporary side > effects have proved > > long-lasting, but if I had the option of stepping into a time > machine and choosing a > > different course of treatment, I'm honestly not sure what I'd > decide. I do know that no > > treatment would have been a really bad option. > > > > As for the drug companies, sure, they're horrible. As is the case > with just about all large > > corporations today, the pharmaceutical industry has only one > concern--short-term > > profit--and they don't care how many people are hurt in the > process, just so long as it > > doesn't affect the bottom line. (By an uncanny coincidence, I > watched The Constant > > Gardener earlier tonight. The story is fictional in its > particulars, but I have no doubt the > > gist of it is fairly true to life.) > > > > Hello, by the way. This is my first post, although I've been > lurking in the shadows off and > > on for quite a while. > > > > River > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.