Guest guest Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Ok...but heme iron is an important source for women under menopausal age and especially active women who need to stave off anemia, a much closer danger in that say driving around or living without enough red blood cells due to anemia can be an immediate danger to you and those around you!  I've done my own reading on heme vs non-heme sources and concluded I need to push heme iron here for that purpose.  Someday post menopause I may need to re-evaluate this requirement for so much beef in diet but that's some ways down the road from the general trends in transitions for women as they age....sigh. I've had anemia - that was a very prevalent side effect of being overtrained by that extremely insensitive and ineffective coach I worked with for 14 months.  Maybe that's why my body craves beef so much too, in addition to the more obvious needs of a lot of muscle mass on board?  I don't get the same effectiveness when I switch to pork by the way (pork loin or tenderloin, trimmed down of all fat first) and chicken?  I don't know how anybody does the chicken breast diet.  If I want to use aversion therapy for meat consumption, consuming even well prepared chicken breast pretty much does it for me! Maybe inactive women face less anemia?  Just a possible guess there....since athletes also tend to abuse and challenge their bodies far more than those just sitting there eating cheesy poofs and mainlining soda? I certainly won't get anything to help anemia if I take the original poster's implied advice and use creatine instead!  So I'd be double in protein deficit for my muscles and without iron intake for my blood cells if I took the original poster's advice.  Not only that, given all the uncertainty in the study and provisos, I'm guessing their real audience should be people who smoke, eat a lot of fast food (highly fatted red meat or processed meat products), and are inactive, coupled with family history of such problems. Whether men should mainline heme containing foods is a question related to their risk of disease overall, heart problems being the one I think they should really be concerned with first and foremost...! Thank you for the clarification and by the way, I think they might have a typo in the first paragraph that's posted - perhaps in the highest and lowest quintile comments? The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT/LMT, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA ======================== Re: Red Meat original article I came across the original article that started this discussion. It should be noted that the news media carried a synopsis of the article before it was offically published. The article is a 16 page pdf document with a great deal of detail. The original article is in March 23 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine. You can find this in any hospital library. The article is far too long to post here so if anyone is interested they should read the original article. I have excerpted several passages from the articles Results and Conclusions written by the authors. My impression is that the study is valuable in that it points us in a good direction but there are still too many variables to makes specific conclusions about individual's risk and the authors themselves point this out. From studies such as this others can and probably will come up with more focused studies to better define the specific risks. For example this partial excerpt from the study{ " Diet is thought to influence the incidence of several cancers but it is very difficult to unravel which aspects of diet are important. Being overweight, for example, is strongly associated with an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, but the evidence that the intake of red meat (beef, pork, and lamb) and of processed meat (for example, bacon, ham, and sausages) is linked to cancer risk is much weaker " . Some criticized my posting on this subject. After reading more of the original article I stand my my original post. The following should also be of interest many in this discussion group. " In general, those in the highest quintile of red meat intake tended to be slightly younger, less educated, less physically active, and less likely to consume fruits, vegetables, and alcohol than those in the lowest quintile. In contrast, those in the highest quintile of red meat intake were more likely to have a higher total energy intake, a higher BMI, and more likely to be a current smoker. Women in the highest quintile of red meat intake were also more likely to be married than those in the lowest quintile " . Below are the excerpts I have chosen. =========================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.