Will the Real Quack Please Stand Up?

[Guest guest]

this is realy really odd. I did not send this message to the group. But

it has my email address on it?

Ilanit Tof wrote:

Will the Real Quack Please Stand Up?

International Medical

Veritas Association

“H.I.V. causes AIDS. This is not a controversial claim

but an established fact, based on more than 20 years of solid science.

It is as certain as the descent of humans from apes and the falling of

dropped objects to the ground,” wrote , professor of

microbiology and immunology at Cornell University, in an

editorial published in the N.Y. Times in early June 4, 2006. He ended

his editorial saying, “It is sad when selling magazines and vitamin

supplements is considered more important than promoting public health

and scientific truth. The truth is that H.I.V. does exist; that it

causes AIDS and that antiretroviral drugs can prevent H.I.V.

transmission and death from AIDS. To deny these facts is not just wrong

— it's deadly.” These are all strong words that not everyone in the

medical world agrees with.

The

medications currently used to treat patients with AIDS, such

as AZT, protease inhibitors, and glucocorticoids,

are highly toxic.

They can even cause AIDS in asymptomatic patients, and make the disease

worse

in patients with AIDS. These drugs do not have any therapeutic value.

Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati.

"I have a large population of people who have chosen

not to take any antiretrovirals," says Abrams, M.D., director of

the AIDS program at San Francisco General Hospital. "They've

watched all their friends go on the antiviral bandwagon and die." A

study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1995 showed

that one of the things that long-term AIDS survivors had in common was

that they didn't take antiretroviral drugs. Governments and the mass

media are hot to sell and spend billions of dollars on their AIDS

medications, which are really similar to the chemotherapy used in

cancer patients in that both are poisonous and kill instead of heal. At

the heart of pharmaceutical terrorism is this attack on the immune

system in drug programs used in cancer treatment, AIDS, and in massive

vaccination programs which are killing and maiming people at alarming

rates, especially in populations with already weakened immune systems

made weak by malnutrition and starvation.

Extremely

low T4 cell counts commonly thought to result from

HIV infection are actually very common in people

who are

HIV-negative. Conditions that result in these

changes include

injections of foreign protein, malnutrition,

psychological stress, chronic

prescription and non-prescription drug use and social isolation.

"AIDS" is not something new that appeared suddenly

around 1980. It's a collection of old diseases that have been around

for as long as medical history, that began showing up in clusters at

greater than the average incidence,” wrote Professor Tracey

PhD. who wrote about the early hysteria that is still perpetuated by

the medical media. “It was caused by a new virus that was 100% lethal

and about to explode out into the population at large. You could catch

it from sex, toilet seats, your dentist, from breathing the air, and

once you did there was no defense. ‘One in five heterosexuals could be

dead from AIDS at the end of the next three years.’ Our species could

be staring at extinction.”

Thus the most aggressive medical strategies were

called upon but nothing that was thought in the early days was real.

The antiretroviral drugs that have been used during the past two

decades are among the most dangerous drugs in use. Manto

Tshabalala-Msimang, the health minister of South Africa has described

antiretrovirals as poisons, and they are. Most allopathic medicines are

poisons but the antiretrovirals are particularly toxic. There is

nothing astonishing about his view since properly prescribed medicines

kill over 100 thousand people a year in the United States alone.

The reasons

for hospital admission among HIV+ infected patients

have changed over time. Classical opportunistic

infections are

now less frequent, while drug toxicity seems to

be

more relevant.

"Mitochondrial toxicity is a serious side effect of

antiretroviral drugs, especially nucleoside reverse transcriptase

inhibitors (NRTI)," explained Foli and colleagues at the

Research Institute for Genetic and Human Therapy, based in Pavia,

Italy, and Washington DC, IRCSS Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia, and

the University of Modena in Modena, Italy.[1] Metabolic

complications, including diabetes mellitus, are more common among

HIV-infected persons compared to those who are HIV negative. The use of

antiretroviral agents increases the risk of this complication.[2]

Two or

three years ago there was a rash of positive HIV and

hepatitis patients in Baltimore among people who

would otherwise

not be expected to have a positive test. When studied all of these

people had received the influenza vaccine four to

six weeks

prior and this was rapidly covered up by the

press.

Dr. Eva Snead (Feb 2000)

The complexity and wide variety of antiretroviral

combination therapies often make causal relationships between a

specific antiretoviral agent and a given toxicity difficult. Fat

maldistribution, or lipodystrophy, has had a major adverse impact on

the quality of life of many HIV-infected patients. While its etiology

remains uncertain, it has been associated with both HIV infection and

antiretroviral therapy. An advisory warning for lipodystrophy is now

included in labeling for all antiretrovirals used to treat HIV

infection.[3]

Osteopenia

or osteoporosis in women was associated with

HIV infection and with specific antiretroviral

agents.[4]

s Hopkins University

Division of Infectious Diseases and AIDS

Initiating HIV treatment at a CD4 cell count above 350

cells/mm3 with newer anti-HIV drugs would reduce illness and death

caused by HIV, limit treatment side-effects, be cost-effective, and

reduce the onward transmission of HIV, according to four US HIV doctors

writing in the December 2004 edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases.

However, an alternative viewpoint written by two American HIV

clinicians published in the same edition of the journal rebuts each of

these arguments and concludes that there is little evidence that there

is any benefit from starting HAART at a higher CD4 cell count, and that

significant risks of toxicities and resistance remain even with newer

antiretroviral drugs.

Concerns about side-effects remain. Even though newer

protease inhibitors do not appear to cause the lipid abnormalities of

early drugs in this class, the authors note that the DAD study found an

increased risk of cardiovascular events even after controlling for

lipid profiles. The authors also note “reductions in bone density,

increases in insulin resistance, and a small but still present risk of

lipodystrophy” even with the newer less-toxic drugs and regimens.[5]

President

Thabo Mbeki of South Africa is

reluctant to expand access to antiretroviral

drugs.

But aggressively insists that his view is the

only view and that alternative perspectives on AIDS and H.I.V are a

genuine menace to public health and he takes particular aim at

government health officials in South Africa who do not bow down to the

prevailing mainstream medical assumptions. He seems so very certain yet

we find Dr. Abigail Zugar, also in the Times saying, “Not everyone who

is infected gets sick. Not everyone who is treated gets well. Some

people progress along the road from initial infection to progressive

immune deficiency to life-threatening illness at the expected pace,

then with treatment head right back again to health. Others stall along

the way, sick or well, defying our dire predictions and happy

reassurances alike.”[6]

Thousands

get potent antiretrovirals but die anyway.

A survey of almost 3,000 people enrolled in five US

antiretroviral trials between December 1996 and December 2001 plotted a

dogged doubling of the death rate every 12 months, from 3.9 percent

after one year of follow-up, to 7.9 percent after two, and to 13.1

percent after three.[7]

A team of

scientists headed by Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos in Perth, Western

Australia, examined each of the proteins

used to make the HIV tests and showed that there are potential non-HIV

sources for all of them, including normal cell constituents released

when immune cells become over stimulated and disordered. There is now

strong evidence that the nonspecific nature of the HIV test is causing

millions to test false positive. And the World Health Organization has

allowed doctors to diagnose AIDS in Africa even without

the use of the HIV test, simply on the basis of a combination of

symptoms such as fever, persistent cough, diarrhea, or weight loss. The

statistics for African AIDS are tenuous because the HIV antibody tests

are rarely used there. They are simply too expensive to use on any kind

of regular basis, so HIV prevalence rates are based on loose estimates,

which are really just about anyone’s guess. “Why condemn a continent (Africa) to death

because of HIV when you have other explanations for why people are

falling sick?” said Papadimitriou, professor of pathology at the University of Western

Australia. “HIV is a metaphor for a lot of

quasi-related phenomena," Papadimitriou said. "No one has ever proved

its existence as a virus. We don't believe it exists."

It is important to note that opinions on AIDS vary

widely. For instance Research by a prestigious retro virologist named

Duesberg, who was a member of the National Academy of Sciences

(an exclusive club of about a thousand of the elite scientists of the

world who have made major contributions in their field) argues that an

infectious agent cannot be the cause of AIDS. Rather, the cause is

toxicological. In ‘Infectious AIDS,’ and in ‘Inventing The AIDS Virus,’

two highly respected books by him, Duesberg provides a short history

showing how the toxic effects of certain allopathic drugs became part

of the case definition of the diseases they were supposed to remedy. In

both books Duesberg demonstrates that AIDS cannot be caused by a

microbe. He believes that HIV may be a (non-causal) serological marker

for risk behavior, like the toxic long-term use of drugs. Although our

immune systems have been assaulted by increased food processing and

chemicals, pesticide drift and runoff, topsoil erosion, increased

background radiation, vaccination, fluoridation (the list is extensive)

for the last 60 or so years, AIDS became noticeable in high enough

numbers only after a new quality of drugging began around 1970.

Duesberg believes that the highly immunosuppressive amyl and alkyl

nitrite inhalants, amphetamines, Quaaludes, cocaine, heroine, and

others—with exponential increases in usage every decade—are what tipped

the scales.

“Medical politics is the art of sheer power. There

is no compromise: you go right for the jugular vein before your own is

torn out. There's no room for compromise because

churches never compromise on canon law....in medical politics there is

a rigid authoritarian power structure which can be moved only through

winner-take-all power plays. Historically, doctors who have dared to

change things significantly have been ostracized and have had to

sacrifice their careers in order to hold to their ideas. Few doctors

are willing to do either," wrote Dr Mendelsohn. Dr.

demonstrates this art calling everyone a quack who does not agree with

his view of H.I.V as the cause of AIDS. In reality there are a lot of

quacks in health care, many who don’t know what they are doing, who

have undergone little training and/or those who have little perceptual

discipline. But allopathic doctors who cannot stand any truth but the

ones they believe in are the cruelest and the most dangerous because

people in large numbers die at their hands due to their unsustainable

rigid belief systems.

There are three very basic reasons put forward by some

scientists for doubting the official theory that HIV causes Aids,

according to Professor Tracey.[8]

1) After

billions of dollars HIV researchers are still unable to explain how HIV

a conventional retrovirus with a very simple genetic organization

damages the immune system.

2) In the

absence of any model of how HIV "causes" Aids, the evidence that is

introduced to support the thesis is epidemiological and therefore

fundamentally correlational. The epidemiological

evidence is both the strength and weakness of the thesis. On

the one hand there is a marked presence of HIV in those with the

condition, which has been defined as Aids. On the other

hand we can map that epidemiology and when we do we discover that it

was and remains overwhelmingly within highly specific risk groups.

3) Predictions

made about the likely course of the "epidemic" have failed

spectacularly.

Dr. ’s attacks on others merits ridicule and

disdain. titles his

essay Deadly Quackery and he sounds big, but it’s the littlest

people who call others quacks. In reality there is no open discussion

in medicine, no science, no truth, justice or humanity and it is time

and nature which will decide things in the long run. Yes, the blood and

suffering will flow but there are limits to everything in the end and

truth will prevail, even if it means the destruction via massive

poisoning of humanity.

God is the truth in the end and He is indestructible,

fortunately for us He cannot be poisoned. I have a childhood friend who

defined God as Nature but in the local earth sense it is unfortunate

that nature on earth can be destroyed with pollution and poison, and

mankind with it. The real threat to humanity is not a virus but man

himself. His attitudes and actions, especially among the super rich

reek of madness. This is nowhere more true than in the world of

medicine which has become an instrument of death and suffering not

health and healing.

Mark Sircus Ac., OMD

Director International Medical Veritas Association

http://www.imva.info

..

--

Ilanit Tof - Signature

Ilanit

Ms Ilanit Tof

B.A. (Psychophysiology/Psychology)

Advanced Diploma Healing with Wholefoods

PhD Holistic Nutrition (candidate)

Little Tree Oriental Healing Arts

Helping you grow to new heights of wellbeing

with Oriental Traditions and Modern Nutrition

ilanit@...

www.littletree.com.au

--

Ilanit Tof - Signature

Ilanit

Ms Ilanit Tof

B.A. (Psychophysiology/Psychology)

Advanced Diploma Healing with Wholefoods

PhD Holistic Nutrition (candidate)

Little Tree Oriental Healing Arts

Helping you grow to new heights of wellbeing

with Oriental Traditions and Modern Nutrition

ilanit@...

www.littletree.com.au