Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 My 2 cents... I am not sure why something said by others on another site is a threat to this group. **I am not threatened Catie.....Rather felt the need to stand up for the organization that most of us here have worked hard to support. Being the owner of CAST all of these years has shown that many members never post. They just lurk/read and gather info. If these new parents read what I read on the other group, they would be horribly mislead into thinking that ISOP had no role in ET and that we were an illegitimate charity. These are horribly incorrect allegations! To me these comments are discrediting not only ISOP, but all parties involved who have worked tirelessly for years in making ET w/ EDF & The Mehta Method available to our children. The answer to that question was that I have never seen it published nor is it used readily by ISOP approved doctors or centers. **All change is slow in the medical world (ins. reimbursement issues).....The docs who publish the articles will ultimately decide what to call ET in America...One thing is for certain, ET w/ EDF is not Risser casting and ET wasnt applied to infants as way to correct until Mehta started doing it.... The string was meant to show that casting is a best practice and a cast by many names may still be a good cast. **Anyone can apply a cast..Our goal in making a clear differentiation between techniques is to inform parents, so they can make the best care decision for their rapidly growing child. Many docs in the US have never been exposed to EDF, only Risser.....A baby will not fit on a Risser frame (unless its been modified) and if the child's lordosis needs addressing, then the 3-dimensional approach is most effective. I have learned over the years that if parents go into the docs requesting a cast, they may get it.....But, many are done without the correct frame, no windows, incorrect materials, etc....Ive seen ambulatory children go to being non ambulatory because the child was casted with arms/legs (due to no frame & modifications).....I have seen photos of skin breakdown that went almost to the bone and caused serious infection.....I have seen a lot and thats why I feel it so very important that the cast types/differences are made clear to the parents..... There are many doctors that are not listed on this group that apply a Risser cast with a modified table and Mehta modifications that are still referred to as Risser or Derotational casts. ** I bet there are....And, there will more and more. My hope is that the database will double this year. I will not add a name to the list unless I know 100% that the the doc understands the principles of the ET Method, the correct/modified frame is used, etc.....And no, they dont have to be " knighted " by Mehta......Naturally, the dear lady cant train everyone....Thats why other docs are currently being phased in for future trainings and have agreed that they will inform ISOP of who has been privy to training.... The moderator of the other site advocated that it was time to put the past in the past and continue good works. **Thats all I have ever wanted and feel this could be accomplished if ISOP/ were not continually being bashed on the group. I dont allow it here and I was hoping that it wasnt going on there either...But, I know what I saw and am blown away that this has continued for so long.... They have great advice like many on this site and I have never heard them utter to a parent new or old that they should disregard their physician because of a cast name. **I prefer that CAST members make clarifications between casts/techniques, as this will help new parents make the best choice for their child, who only has a small window of time to benefit from ET. No one on CAST has given the advice to disregard the advice they have been given by their physician. Our goal is to educate on ET w/ EDF & The Mehta Method and obviously we all realize ultimately that its the parents decision in the long run. I personally didn't use the term brainwash, but I have been laughed at by experts in the field of scoliosis for asking if they apply Mehta casts? **Join the club. Its very sad, but there will always be those who will try and minimize her role. I pray they continue to apply modifications that can only benefit those children who come after my child has ended his journey with this disorder. The only way to do this is to allow them to be recognized for their accomplishments and embrace the changes. **Me too. Modifications to improve are always a good thing and thats how advances in medicine are made. Modifications that are not appreciated are ones that are due to lack of equipment/ET knowledge, when it is readily available and has been for years. Im glad you are in Chicago, as you will never have to worry about not having the right frame, or a doc with no ET experience. I hope this is not my demise from this group. **?? This is just my opinion and in no way was intended to bash , ISOP or CAST. **I dont feel bashed by you and appreciate the dialogue. This type of dialogue is healthy and positive. Thanks Catie. Sincerely, HRH > So I haven't posted for nearly 3 months. I think it is necessary to post > a comment at this time though. I am not sure why something said by others > on another site is a threat to this group. I am an advocate for my child > on this group and another group. I try hard not to bash anyone, but I am > not afraid to offer a difference in opinion. I was fully aware of the > string of posts that were offered and I was a member of the original > string of posts that related to the term " Mehta Cast " . The answer to that > question was that I have never seen it published nor is it used readily by > ISOP approved doctors or centers. The string was meant to show that > casting is a best practice and a cast by many names may still be a good > cast. There are many doctors that are not listed on this group that apply > a Risser cast with a modified table and Mehta modifications that are still > referred to as Risser or Derotational casts. There are good parents > out there advocating for their children who are not a part of this > community. They like have been hurt by comments relating to > their parenting or treatment of there children. It causes resentment. > The moderator of the other site advocated that it was time to put the > past in the past and continue good works. They have great advice like > many on this site and I have never heard them utter to a parent new or > old that they should disregard their physician because of a cast name. > The questions have to be asked, but the parents need to feel confident in > the answers there doctors give them. I am glad no one on here feels > threatened by the site. I personally didn't use the term brainwash, but > I have been laughed at by experts in the field of scoliosis for asking if > they apply Mehta casts? I now understand fully where these experts are > coming from and NO my Chicago Doctor was not one of them. Min Mehta is a > pioneer and her research > and modifications have been commended both on this site and the other. > It is my hope that the vast community of Orthopedic Surgeons currently > casting continue to advance and far surpass anything that has been done > so far. I pray they continue to apply modifications that can only > benefit those children who come after my child has ended his journey with > this disorder. The only way to do this is to allow them to be recognized > for their accomplishments and embrace the changes. > I hope this is not my demise from this group. I have made > some good contacts off post with fellow Chicago parents. I appreciate > difference in opinions. That is what makes us all good advocates for our > children. With that said there are great parents who are fabulous > advocates for the scoliosis cause, their children, and their > doctors/centers who are no longer a part of this group. Keep that in mind > before you assume otherwise, address issues such as this off post to their > private emails. If you don't have them ask for them. This is just my > opinion and in no way was intended to bash , ISOP or CAST. > > Sincerely, > Catie,Cody(8) & 's(14mo)mom (in 2nd cast 67 degrees-47 out of cast > correction) Chicago Shriners > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.