Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Good thinking Kishore and good probing Neeti. If this is an MGIMSian then that is the end of the story. However Kishore still has not answered if non MGIMSians can become group members. I just happened to notice on that day when I was browsing the group site that Baingan Bhurta had just registered as new member. And all I did was express my security concerns. Though it was fun when Neeti made her dramatic entry ..I think we should have another code that no anonymous mails ( atleast) will be allowed and every one has to sign their name with the batch or if staff - position etc. That will allay security concerns I and other members have. <<Dear Dr.Ashok,Why are you comparing this egroup to bedroom?I'm new and totally vegetarian,is it that bad here?Being a child specialist you must approve of a camera in kids room,for safety reasons.And the members of this egroup appear to be so childish to me,so i'm in favour of a camera.>> Dear Baingan...what is more immature and childish then hiding behing fictitious identity to express your opinions...if you do belong to the MGIMS community From Kishore's mail- <<Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond recognition.>> From Neeti's mail - <<I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity.>> Hey folks...whats up with you ? Till his / her 's identity is proven how do you know that this person is innocuous ? How do we know that this is not another Gauri Shankar Goel or may be he is Gauri himself ? As you can see this anonymity business can pretty unhealthy. So can we cut this crap and pass some resolutions Kishoreda !!!! Ashok Bhaskar 1984 neeti_suri86 wrote: I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Good thinking Kishore and good probing Neeti. If this is an MGIMSian then that is the end of the story. However Kishore still has not answered if non MGIMSians can become group members. I just happened to notice on that day when I was browsing the group site that Baingan Bhurta had just registered as new member. And all I did was express my security concerns. Though it was fun when Neeti made her dramatic entry ..I think we should have another code that no anonymous mails ( atleast) will be allowed and every one has to sign their name with the batch or if staff - position etc. That will allay security concerns I and other members have. <<Dear Dr.Ashok,Why are you comparing this egroup to bedroom?I'm new and totally vegetarian,is it that bad here?Being a child specialist you must approve of a camera in kids room,for safety reasons.And the members of this egroup appear to be so childish to me,so i'm in favour of a camera.>> Dear Baingan...what is more immature and childish then hiding behing fictitious identity to express your opinions...if you do belong to the MGIMS community From Kishore's mail- <<Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond recognition.>> From Neeti's mail - <<I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity.>> Hey folks...whats up with you ? Till his / her 's identity is proven how do you know that this person is innocuous ? How do we know that this is not another Gauri Shankar Goel or may be he is Gauri himself ? As you can see this anonymity business can pretty unhealthy. So can we cut this crap and pass some resolutions Kishoreda !!!! Ashok Bhaskar 1984 neeti_suri86 wrote: I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Good thinking Kishore and good probing Neeti. If this is an MGIMSian then that is the end of the story. However Kishore still has not answered if non MGIMSians can become group members. I just happened to notice on that day when I was browsing the group site that Baingan Bhurta had just registered as new member. And all I did was express my security concerns. Though it was fun when Neeti made her dramatic entry ..I think we should have another code that no anonymous mails ( atleast) will be allowed and every one has to sign their name with the batch or if staff - position etc. That will allay security concerns I and other members have. <<Dear Dr.Ashok,Why are you comparing this egroup to bedroom?I'm new and totally vegetarian,is it that bad here?Being a child specialist you must approve of a camera in kids room,for safety reasons.And the members of this egroup appear to be so childish to me,so i'm in favour of a camera.>> Dear Baingan...what is more immature and childish then hiding behing fictitious identity to express your opinions...if you do belong to the MGIMS community From Kishore's mail- <<Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond recognition.>> From Neeti's mail - <<I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity.>> Hey folks...whats up with you ? Till his / her 's identity is proven how do you know that this person is innocuous ? How do we know that this is not another Gauri Shankar Goel or may be he is Gauri himself ? As you can see this anonymity business can pretty unhealthy. So can we cut this crap and pass some resolutions Kishoreda !!!! Ashok Bhaskar 1984 neeti_suri86 wrote: I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Lets not for this baingan thing.... Wonder if this person had named himself or herself Lal Maas if Kishore and Neeti would still think of this person as innocuous ; )) Somebody who wants to hide his / her identity cannot be innocuous ! BTW Kishore here in the US most of us doctors are not listed in telephone directories. We pay a special fee to be unlisted. Ashok Bhaskar ' 84 Ashok Bhaskar wrote: Good thinking Kishore and good probing Neeti. If this is an MGIMSian then that is the end of the story. However Kishore still has not answered if non MGIMSians can become group members. I just happened to notice on that day when I was browsing the group site that Baingan Bhurta had just registered as new member. And all I did was express my security concerns. Though it was fun when Neeti made her dramatic entry ..I think we should have another code that no anonymous mails ( atleast) will be allowed and every one has to sign their name with the batch or if staff - position etc. That will allay security concerns I and other members have. <<Dear Dr.Ashok,Why are you comparing this egroup to bedroom?I'm new and totally vegetarian,is it that bad here?Being a child specialist you must approve of a camera in kids room,for safety reasons.And the members of this egroup appear to be so childish to me,so i'm in favour of a camera.>> Dear Baingan...what is more immature and childish then hiding behing fictitious identity to express your opinions...if you do belong to the MGIMS community From Kishore's mail- <<Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond recognition.>> From Neeti's mail - <<I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity.>> Hey folks...whats up with you ? Till his / her 's identity is proven how do you know that this person is innocuous ? How do we know that this is not another Gauri Shankar Goel or may be he is Gauri himself ? As you can see this anonymity business can pretty unhealthy. So can we cut this crap and pass some resolutions Kishoreda !!!! Ashok Bhaskar 1984 neeti_suri86 wrote: I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Lets not for this baingan thing.... Wonder if this person had named himself or herself Lal Maas if Kishore and Neeti would still think of this person as innocuous ; )) Somebody who wants to hide his / her identity cannot be innocuous ! BTW Kishore here in the US most of us doctors are not listed in telephone directories. We pay a special fee to be unlisted. Ashok Bhaskar ' 84 Ashok Bhaskar wrote: Good thinking Kishore and good probing Neeti. If this is an MGIMSian then that is the end of the story. However Kishore still has not answered if non MGIMSians can become group members. I just happened to notice on that day when I was browsing the group site that Baingan Bhurta had just registered as new member. And all I did was express my security concerns. Though it was fun when Neeti made her dramatic entry ..I think we should have another code that no anonymous mails ( atleast) will be allowed and every one has to sign their name with the batch or if staff - position etc. That will allay security concerns I and other members have. <<Dear Dr.Ashok,Why are you comparing this egroup to bedroom?I'm new and totally vegetarian,is it that bad here?Being a child specialist you must approve of a camera in kids room,for safety reasons.And the members of this egroup appear to be so childish to me,so i'm in favour of a camera.>> Dear Baingan...what is more immature and childish then hiding behing fictitious identity to express your opinions...if you do belong to the MGIMS community From Kishore's mail- <<Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond recognition.>> From Neeti's mail - <<I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity.>> Hey folks...whats up with you ? Till his / her 's identity is proven how do you know that this person is innocuous ? How do we know that this is not another Gauri Shankar Goel or may be he is Gauri himself ? As you can see this anonymity business can pretty unhealthy. So can we cut this crap and pass some resolutions Kishoreda !!!! Ashok Bhaskar 1984 neeti_suri86 wrote: I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2004 Report Share Posted August 10, 2004 Lets not for this baingan thing.... Wonder if this person had named himself or herself Lal Maas if Kishore and Neeti would still think of this person as innocuous ; )) Somebody who wants to hide his / her identity cannot be innocuous ! BTW Kishore here in the US most of us doctors are not listed in telephone directories. We pay a special fee to be unlisted. Ashok Bhaskar ' 84 Ashok Bhaskar wrote: Good thinking Kishore and good probing Neeti. If this is an MGIMSian then that is the end of the story. However Kishore still has not answered if non MGIMSians can become group members. I just happened to notice on that day when I was browsing the group site that Baingan Bhurta had just registered as new member. And all I did was express my security concerns. Though it was fun when Neeti made her dramatic entry ..I think we should have another code that no anonymous mails ( atleast) will be allowed and every one has to sign their name with the batch or if staff - position etc. That will allay security concerns I and other members have. <<Dear Dr.Ashok,Why are you comparing this egroup to bedroom?I'm new and totally vegetarian,is it that bad here?Being a child specialist you must approve of a camera in kids room,for safety reasons.And the members of this egroup appear to be so childish to me,so i'm in favour of a camera.>> Dear Baingan...what is more immature and childish then hiding behing fictitious identity to express your opinions...if you do belong to the MGIMS community From Kishore's mail- <<Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond recognition.>> From Neeti's mail - <<I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity.>> Hey folks...whats up with you ? Till his / her 's identity is proven how do you know that this person is innocuous ? How do we know that this is not another Gauri Shankar Goel or may be he is Gauri himself ? As you can see this anonymity business can pretty unhealthy. So can we cut this crap and pass some resolutions Kishoreda !!!! Ashok Bhaskar 1984 neeti_suri86 wrote: I fully agree with you Kishore,this baingan was sitting silent until Ashok messed up with his innocuous identity. Now i was going through members list and was surprised to see that we also have " kool_kela " " kelly jon23 " and " gujju girl " " bkt20042003 " " bm2omcjv " " chakribmw " " drmlee " " docmoneycadone " " lobeyets " and " unearth123 " etc.etc on our list........then why are we after only baingan bhurta? Kishore,is it possible to crack the identity code of all these mysterious IDs.......so that Ashok and others feel safe sharing their personal infos. Concerned and worried ( Neeti'86 PS:I've one question for Kishore,why did you equate this poor mashed creature with god?????That seems kind of verbal abuse......poor baingan!!!!!! > God and Baingans work in mysterious ways. > > Hmm! Let's see if we can solve this mystery of the Bhurta. > > Firstly, this Baingan has registered itself in July 2004 on our site. > However, from the tenor and tone of its mail, it seems to be an old > hand. So I think that it is safe to assume that the Baingan is an > alias of somebody who is already a member. > > Another thing is the reference in the mail to my old Pav Bhaji + > Baingan joke. That indicates an old hand! > > The fact that the id reads as something like baingan_bhurta means that > we can discount Neeti's theory that it is either the FBI or CID. They > would have an id like gbush@g... > > The fact that this vegetable knows that Harinath Sir related to Ashok > means that either it is an old member or has stayed in Sevagram at > some point of its vegetative cycle. The fact that it uses a word like > " Thela " further reinforces this point. It calls Harinath Sir as " Sir " > means that it is a student, or maybe a junior staff. > > Now the motive. Why would anyone want to register him / her self as a > vegetable? We can eliminate offhand the suggestion of Ashok that this > veggy is on the prowl for credit card numbers, which are never > displayed on our site, or phone numbers, which are readily available > in any directory with less of a bother! My thinking is that this > vegetable is more of the elfish disposition and wants to play naughty > pranks. Harmless, of course, because, I would not allow any malicious > mail to percolate through. > > Of course, this Baingan never mailed anything until Ashok provoked it > to answer. The answer itself is full of leg pulling and rib prodding. > So I conclude that this is a harmless vegetable, mashed beyond > recognition. > > There, now I feel like Langdon cracking the " Da Vinci Code " . > > Kishore Shah 1974 ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.