Guest guest Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 Wah! Wah! Mukunda! Tumhare Appendix da jawaab nahi! Kishore Shah 1974 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2004 Report Share Posted July 18, 2004 Wah! Wah! Mukunda! Tumhare Appendix da jawaab nahi! Kishore Shah 1974 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2004 Report Share Posted July 20, 2004 Well, it was quite educative to receive two contrasting mails to my reply that I do Ultra Sonographies and rule out appendicitis. Ashok was shocked, and Neeti was impressed. I personally think that you should neither be shocked nor impressed. Today, USG is an integral part of a Gynaec's diagnosis. In fact, with the USG so close at hand, I am frightened that soon I may loose my clinical skills as I rely more and more on the machine. I need to clarify to both of you that USG as a diagnostic tool was discovered by Dr, Ian , a Gynaecologist. Ruling out appendicitis is an essential part in confusing Pelvic Inflammations, Ovarian torsions and Ectopic pregnancies. And, yes Neeti, I do appendicectomies too. It was my routine with all abdominal Hysterectomies. However, nowadays, most of the Hysterectomies that I do are Vaginal, hence there is no scope of removing the appendix. The logic was that once the abdomen is opened, it is best not to leave that troublesome part behind, unless your are aiming at earning some more at a repeat surgery. I don't know about the US, but here in India, you need to know a little about all your related branches. Naturally, I leave the complicated USGs to the radiologist. And Neeti, thanks for your informative write up. I agree with you. The finger is better at diagnosing the appendicitis than the machine. Yes, but as a Gynaec I have the advantage of using a USG machine, with abdominal palpation, PV and PR too! Gives me an added edge, or should I say, finger? Kishore Shah 1974 PS: Interestingly, my computer's spell check has suggested that I replace Sonographies with Pornographies. Hmm! Not a bad idea! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2004 Report Share Posted July 20, 2004 Well, it was quite educative to receive two contrasting mails to my reply that I do Ultra Sonographies and rule out appendicitis. Ashok was shocked, and Neeti was impressed. I personally think that you should neither be shocked nor impressed. Today, USG is an integral part of a Gynaec's diagnosis. In fact, with the USG so close at hand, I am frightened that soon I may loose my clinical skills as I rely more and more on the machine. I need to clarify to both of you that USG as a diagnostic tool was discovered by Dr, Ian , a Gynaecologist. Ruling out appendicitis is an essential part in confusing Pelvic Inflammations, Ovarian torsions and Ectopic pregnancies. And, yes Neeti, I do appendicectomies too. It was my routine with all abdominal Hysterectomies. However, nowadays, most of the Hysterectomies that I do are Vaginal, hence there is no scope of removing the appendix. The logic was that once the abdomen is opened, it is best not to leave that troublesome part behind, unless your are aiming at earning some more at a repeat surgery. I don't know about the US, but here in India, you need to know a little about all your related branches. Naturally, I leave the complicated USGs to the radiologist. And Neeti, thanks for your informative write up. I agree with you. The finger is better at diagnosing the appendicitis than the machine. Yes, but as a Gynaec I have the advantage of using a USG machine, with abdominal palpation, PV and PR too! Gives me an added edge, or should I say, finger? Kishore Shah 1974 PS: Interestingly, my computer's spell check has suggested that I replace Sonographies with Pornographies. Hmm! Not a bad idea! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2004 Report Share Posted July 20, 2004 Dear All, I was happy to see that my jokes on Appendix have created a quite a hot academic discussion. (Kucchh Halchal Ho To Hi Mazaa Hai Na......! :-)) Here are few points I will like to add- 1) As Kishore rightly pointed out USG etc are meant for ruling out other diagnosis rather than diagnosing Appendicitis. In before USG days surgeons here used to look appendix in an plain X- ray abdomen and if asked they will say " It is to rule out ureteric stone we do X-ray. " ( Ofcourse after looking at the quality of the X ray performed by them was nothing can be diagnosed on it. Patient not prepared, Smallest Portable Xray Machine and 8th class passed compounder operating the same. The result used to be Photooo rather than X ray.:-) Is Ka Ek Kissa a Appendix at the end of this message) 2) Every appendicitis does not need surgery at all. With proper conservative management you can save so many surgeries. The appendix needs opening only if it is obstructed and leading to perforation. One of my Gynaecologist freind from Bhusawal has a Surgeon wife. He was stating that, " Being gynaecologist we need not do appendicectomies to feed ourselves. So when we do only indicated appendicectomies we have hardly 3 to 5 appendix surgeries in an year!!! " 3) The appendicectomy surgery has a very bad reputation. A son of my gynaecologist freind from Mumbai had pain in abdomen which was not quite fitting in Chronic appendicitis. So surgery was not performed. He was treated medically for an year or two for the intermittent pain in abdomen. without releif.All investigations also were in vain to point out the diagnosis. Then one of our surgeon freind from Nandurbar had visited his place. He after putting hand on his tummy said , " This boy needs laparatomy. I feel he is having Meckel's Diverticulum. " And Laparatomy proved his diagnosis. Moral of the story a)clinical judgment goes above all the investigations. Eyes can not see what mind doesn't know!! Now Kissa a Appendix --- Again this is a true story told by a senior GP over here.One surgeon had started his practice newly and he was enthusiastic for surgery. When one patient of pain in Lt illiac fossa went to him, he took an X ray and advised him immediate admission and an emergency appendicectomy. The patient came home weeping for preperation of admission. His neibour was clever enough. He said " Look man, you have pain on Left side and my relative operated for appendix had pain on right side. Let us go to our old GP. and confirm the need for surgery. " These two went to the GP. he after examining felt that it was just Dyspepsia and gave him Unienzyme tablet. and asked him to get the Xray plate from the surgeon. The patient went to surgeon to get it. The surgeon concerned had done only screening. Considering that what a villager will know he carelessly removed one Xray from his plates and handed over to him. GP after loking at the Xray said very seriously, " You really need a surgery. You have a twin pregnancy in your tummy. " The patient went back to surgeon and got back his fees for consultation and Xray. Thanks god for the good old days. Those days CPA was not there!!!!! Mukund(1974) Re: Appendicitis Well, it was quite educative to receive two contrasting mails to my reply that I do Ultra Sonographies and rule out appendicitis. Ashok was shocked, and Neeti was impressed. I personally think that you should neither be shocked nor impressed. Today, USG is an integral part of a Gynaec's diagnosis. In fact, with the USG so close at hand, I am frightened that soon I may loose my clinical skills as I rely more and more on the machine. I need to clarify to both of you that USG as a diagnostic tool was discovered by Dr, Ian , a Gynaecologist. Ruling out appendicitis is an essential part in confusing Pelvic Inflammations, Ovarian torsions and Ectopic pregnancies. And, yes Neeti, I do appendicectomies too. It was my routine with all abdominal Hysterectomies. However, nowadays, most of the Hysterectomies that I do are Vaginal, hence there is no scope of removing the appendix. The logic was that once the abdomen is opened, it is best not to leave that troublesome part behind, unless your are aiming at earning some more at a repeat surgery. I don't know about the US, but here in India, you need to know a little about all your related branches. Naturally, I leave the complicated USGs to the radiologist. And Neeti, thanks for your informative write up. I agree with you. The finger is better at diagnosing the appendicitis than the machine. Yes, but as a Gynaec I have the advantage of using a USG machine, with abdominal palpation, PV and PR too! Gives me an added edge, or should I say, finger? Kishore Shah 1974 PS: Interestingly, my computer's spell check has suggested that I replace Sonographies with Pornographies. Hmm! Not a bad idea! ------------------------------ Website: www.mgims.org ------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.