Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

BioEra vs BioExplorer

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I have been looking to BioEra and BioExplorer. In my opinion BioEra is

much more flexible, allows to define simulated source of the signal,

allows to read and write to different format files (.edf, .pcm, .wav,

..xls, etc) , allows to transform to frequency domain (FFT) and to

process the frequency vectors, and many other options.

However just few design example are available:

OneRewardBinauralBeats.bpd, OneRewardContinuousTone.bpd,

OneRewardMidi.bpd, OneRewardOneInhibitPacman.bpd,

OneRewardOneInhibitRacerGame.bpd, OneRewardVideo.bpd.

When I look at brain-trainer website, I see that many material is

available on BioExplorer (i.e. Quick start package, TCL assestment,

TCL artifacter, ABCD plan and protocol service, NeuroInnovation

Designs for BioExplorer) but none it seems to be available on BioEra.

if I choose BioEra, do I risk to be left on my own? Is anybody working

with it and developing packages as for BioExplorer?

Thanks, ilario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...