Re: What can Dr Goldberg offer that is different?

[Guest guest]

Can you tell me more about gaspretin and the CS diet? Never heard of them.

My son always has loose stools, too, even GFCF. Who did you see, a GI doc,

immunologist, ???

Thanks, Becky

What can Dr Goldberg offer that is different?

> Hi,

>

> I am the one who wrote about my son responding so well to the

> penicillin shot with regard to his OCD behaviors. I am writing now

> to find out if it is worthwhile to see Dr Goldberg given my son's

> history and current status. This is really my first exposure to this

> list and Dr Goldberg. My son is now 4.75, and we have been doing

> many biomedical and behavioral interventions since he was 2.5. He

> has been under the treatment of Jerry Kartzinel, MD, Amy Holmes, MD,

> and since Dr Amy's retirement, Neubrander, MD. My son has made

> considerable progress and might now be desrcibed as high funtioning.

> He has speech, but it is still way behind developmentally. He is

> smart and learns fast. He is social and loves people. He is not a

> big stimmer, though lately he has been verbally scripting a lot, and

> has A LOT of routines which remind me of OCD like behaviors. He has

> had loose stools all his life. But the good news is we finally got

> that problem solved with the combination of a gaspretin shot and the

> SC (Specific carbohydrate)diet. I have become a big beleiver in this

> diet. We did GFCF for years and on top of that Feingold, low sugar,

> anti-yeast, rotation diet, you name it. Nothing really worked long

> term for his loose stools. Until the SC Diet. It was a miracle for

> my son's digestive problems. I would say we are very much on the

> road to recovery with , but he stil has a ways to go language-

> wise, socially (due to lack of enough conversational language), and

> he still has some behavioral (mostly his routines) issues.

>

> So, my question, what can Dr Goldberg do that his other physician's

> can't? I mean this question sincerly and really want specific and

> real answers. As you know, it can be quite costly seeing all these

> doctors, and to be quite honest, I feel the most progress has

> made has been due to the SC Diet, gaspretin (1 dose only) and his

> educational and behavioral programs. The doctors have probably

> contributed the least to his progress, though they have helped his

> nutritional status and we have done some chelation with uncertain

> results . All thoughts are appreciated.

>

> Beth

>

>

>

> Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

> the original author, and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

> opinion of the Research Institute.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi,

Gaspretin is the porcine version of secretin. We obtained it from

www.pharmaworld.com with a doctor's prescription. One of our DAN

doctor's wrote for it. I don't think the Gaspretin brand is

available now, but Secrapan is, and that is also porcine secretin.

After 1 IV dose of gaspretin my son's stools became normal. I

attribute sustaining this response to the Specific Carbohydrate

Diet. It takes GFCF one step further. It is scientifically sound.

No grains are allowed. Only meat, eggs, certain cheeses (those with

no lactose), vegetables, fruit, nuts and nut flours. You can read

all about it in Elaine Gottschal's book " Breaking the Vicsious Cycle " .

There are a couple devoted to the subject, one is

called " ElainesChildren " . I have found it very helpful. let me know

if you have any other questions.

Beth

> Can you tell me more about gaspretin and the CS diet? Never heard

of them.

> My son always has loose stools, too, even GFCF. Who did you see, a

GI doc,

> immunologist, ???

>

> Thanks, Becky

> What can Dr Goldberg offer that is different?

>

>

> > Hi,

> >

> > I am the one who wrote about my son responding so well to the

> > penicillin shot with regard to his OCD behaviors. I am writing

now

> > to find out if it is worthwhile to see Dr Goldberg given my son's

> > history and current status. This is really my first exposure to

this

> > list and Dr Goldberg. My son is now 4.75, and we have been doing

> > many biomedical and behavioral interventions since he was 2.5. He

> > has been under the treatment of Jerry Kartzinel, MD, Amy Holmes,

MD,

> > and since Dr Amy's retirement, Neubrander, MD. My son has

made

> > considerable progress and might now be desrcibed as high

funtioning.

> > He has speech, but it is still way behind developmentally. He is

> > smart and learns fast. He is social and loves people. He is not

a

> > big stimmer, though lately he has been verbally scripting a lot,

and

> > has A LOT of routines which remind me of OCD like behaviors. He

has

> > had loose stools all his life. But the good news is we finally

got

> > that problem solved with the combination of a gaspretin shot and

the

> > SC (Specific carbohydrate)diet. I have become a big beleiver in

this

> > diet. We did GFCF for years and on top of that Feingold, low

sugar,

> > anti-yeast, rotation diet, you name it. Nothing really worked

long

> > term for his loose stools. Until the SC Diet. It was a miracle

for

> > my son's digestive problems. I would say we are very much on the

> > road to recovery with , but he stil has a ways to go

language-

> > wise, socially (due to lack of enough conversational language),

and

> > he still has some behavioral (mostly his routines) issues.

> >

> > So, my question, what can Dr Goldberg do that his other

physician's

> > can't? I mean this question sincerly and really want specific and

> > real answers. As you know, it can be quite costly seeing all

these

> > doctors, and to be quite honest, I feel the most progress

has

> > made has been due to the SC Diet, gaspretin (1 dose only) and his

> > educational and behavioral programs. The doctors have probably

> > contributed the least to his progress, though they have helped his

> > nutritional status and we have done some chelation with uncertain

> > results . All thoughts are appreciated.

> >

> > Beth

> >

> >

> >

> > Responsibility for the content of this message lies strictly with

> > the original author, and is not necessarily endorsed by or the

> > opinion of the Research Institute.

> >

> >

> >