Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Our attorney, who suggestes an LLC, said that none of our personal assets are at risk, only those of the LLC. A judgment could max out our malpractice limit and take all that our office possesses but I don't think it can go beyond that into personal assets..........but maybe my attorney was wrong Rian Mintek, MD Re: Practice Types The recent Family Practice Management journal article on this topic concluded by stating that the author generally recommends a sole proprietorship to new solo docs and an S-Corp to new groups. Of course, everyone should carry malpractice insurance as well as practice liability insurance. Everyone's personal assets are at risk in the case of a malpractice award exceeding your insurance limits (rare as this is), no matter what type of practice you are in. I believe this is the more likely scenario then someone slipping on my sidewalk & winning a suit past my insurance limits. That being said, may none of us ever be involved in any such suits!Sharon At 03:13 PM 5/17/2006, you wrote: I did not respond to the poll. Been too busy to even read the messages. But this one caught my eye. I am a sole proprietor. Five years ago, when setting all of this up, I did consult an attorney and an accountant about the best type of practice to set up. I was advised to just take the sole proprietor route. When I asked about liabilities, I was told that in my state, even as a small corp, litigants had successfully argued that personal assetts should be reach-able, since the solo dr. is the corp and the corp is the solo doctor. I was told that this probably wouldn't matter, but we put the house in the wife's name anyway, just to be safe. So maybe the risk of being a sole proprietor varies from state to state?Greg Brock DO wrote:> As I mentioned before, I sure hope those 7 people that responded as > “sole proprietor” are either mistaken or have checked with a good > health care attorney because that is supposedly an absolute no-no, > unless you want to risk everything you own.>> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 It cost us $500 to set up as an LLC and beyond that it is only a $75 fee/year to the State of Michigan. As long as we "meet" once/year and document our mtg in simple notes that we give to our attorney to file in our LLC folder, we've met all requirements. Rian Mintek (the P in our PLLC) a Mintek (sec/treas but not a "member") RE: Practice Types I hear that you can get insurance to protect your personal assets. I guess one should weigh the costs of the extra insurance vs. the costs of the corp structure, annual fees, taxes etc. Moitri Brock DO wrote: Was that a recent FPM article? I’d like to search for it on their website to see if they are really advising a sole proprietorship. Everything I’ve ever read says absolutely no way should you ever operate as a sole proprietor (ian ANY business, not just medicine). The way I understood it is that you are personally liable regardless of whether you have liability coverage or not (policy limits may not matter). You basically have no shield between you & the practice in a sole proprietorship, they are one & the same. -----Original Message-----From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Sharon McCoy Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:10 PMTo: Subject: Re: Practice Types The recent Family Practice Management journal article on this topic concluded by stating that the author generally recommends a sole proprietorship to new solo docs and an S-Corp to new groups. Of course, everyone should carry malpractice insurance as well as practice liability insurance. Everyone's personal assets are at risk in the case of a malpractice award exceeding your insurance limits (rare as this is), no matter what type of practice you are in. I believe this is the more likely scenario then someone slipping on my sidewalk & winning a suit past my insurance limits. That being said, may none of us ever be involved in any such suits!Sharon At 03:13 PM 5/17/2006, you wrote: I did not respond to the poll. Been too busy to even read the messages. But this one caught my eye. I am a sole proprietor. Five years ago, when setting all of this up, I did consult an attorney and an accountant about the best type of practice to set up. I was advised to just take the sole proprietor route. When I asked about liabilities, I was told that in my state, even as a small corp, litigants had successfully argued that personal assetts should be reach-able, since the solo dr. is the corp and the corp is the solo doctor. I was told that this probably wouldn't matter, but we put the house in the wife's name anyway, just to be safe. So maybe the risk of being a sole proprietor varies from state to state?Greg Brock DO wrote:> As I mentioned before, I sure hope those 7 people that responded as > “sole proprietor” are either mistaken or have checked with a good > health care attorney because that is supposedly an absolute no-no, > unless you want to risk everything you own.>> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 In Illinois it's double, I think. I am a single member LLC but I know in some states it is not possible. > It cost us $500 to set up as an LLC and beyond that it is only a $75 > fee/year to the State of Michigan. As long as we " meet " once/year and > document our mtg in simple notes that we give to our attorney to file > in our LLC folder, we've met all requirements. >  > Rian Mintek (the P in our PLLC) > a Mintek (sec/treas but not a " member " ) >> Re: Practice Types >>>  >>> The recent Family Practice Management journal article on this topic >>> concluded by stating that the author generally recommends a sole >>> proprietorship to new solo docs and an S-Corp to new groups. Of >>> course, everyone should carry malpractice insurance as well as >>> practice liability insurance.  Everyone's personal assets are at >>> risk in the case of a malpractice award exceeding your insurance >>> limits (rare as this is), no matter what type of practice you are >>> in. I believe this is the more likely scenario then someone >>> slipping on my sidewalk & winning a suit past my insurance limits. >>> That being said, may none of us ever be involved in any such suits! >>> >>> Sharon >>> >>> At 03:13 PM 5/17/2006, you wrote: >>> >>> I did not respond to the poll. Been too busy to even read the >>> messages. >>> But this one caught my eye. I am a sole proprietor. Five years ago, >>> when >>> setting all of this up, I did consult an attorney and an accountant >>> about the best type of practice to set up. I was advised to just take >>> the sole proprietor route. When I asked about liabilities, I was told >>> that in my state, even as a small corp, litigants had successfully >>> argued that personal assetts should be reach-able, since the solo >>> dr. is >>> the corp and the corp is the solo doctor. I was told that this >>> probably >>> wouldn't matter, but we put the house in the wife's name anyway, >>> just to >>> be safe. So maybe the risk of being a sole proprietor varies from >>> state >>> to state? >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> Brock DO wrote: >>> >>> > As I mentioned before, I sure hope those 7 people that responded as >>> > “sole proprietor†are either mistaken or have checked with a good >>> > health care attorney because that is supposedly an absolute no-no, >>> > unless you want to risk everything you own. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 In Illinois it's double, I think. I am a single member LLC but I know in some states it is not possible. > It cost us $500 to set up as an LLC and beyond that it is only a $75 > fee/year to the State of Michigan. As long as we " meet " once/year and > document our mtg in simple notes that we give to our attorney to file > in our LLC folder, we've met all requirements. >  > Rian Mintek (the P in our PLLC) > a Mintek (sec/treas but not a " member " ) >> Re: Practice Types >>>  >>> The recent Family Practice Management journal article on this topic >>> concluded by stating that the author generally recommends a sole >>> proprietorship to new solo docs and an S-Corp to new groups. Of >>> course, everyone should carry malpractice insurance as well as >>> practice liability insurance.  Everyone's personal assets are at >>> risk in the case of a malpractice award exceeding your insurance >>> limits (rare as this is), no matter what type of practice you are >>> in. I believe this is the more likely scenario then someone >>> slipping on my sidewalk & winning a suit past my insurance limits. >>> That being said, may none of us ever be involved in any such suits! >>> >>> Sharon >>> >>> At 03:13 PM 5/17/2006, you wrote: >>> >>> I did not respond to the poll. Been too busy to even read the >>> messages. >>> But this one caught my eye. I am a sole proprietor. Five years ago, >>> when >>> setting all of this up, I did consult an attorney and an accountant >>> about the best type of practice to set up. I was advised to just take >>> the sole proprietor route. When I asked about liabilities, I was told >>> that in my state, even as a small corp, litigants had successfully >>> argued that personal assetts should be reach-able, since the solo >>> dr. is >>> the corp and the corp is the solo doctor. I was told that this >>> probably >>> wouldn't matter, but we put the house in the wife's name anyway, >>> just to >>> be safe. So maybe the risk of being a sole proprietor varies from >>> state >>> to state? >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> Brock DO wrote: >>> >>> > As I mentioned before, I sure hope those 7 people that responded as >>> > “sole proprietor†are either mistaken or have checked with a good >>> > health care attorney because that is supposedly an absolute no-no, >>> > unless you want to risk everything you own. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 I am a single member LLC also, but I don’t think there is any ongoing annual fee in Ohio. I can not recall how much it was to set it up but I know it was $500 or less & just required a brief application to the secretary of state’s office (of Ohio). Also, I was not aware that I had to “meet” once a year as an LLC. I thought only applied to true corporations (S-corp or C-corp)? Basically, since I set it up it has been a maintenance free entity type. Re: Practice Types The recent Family Practice Management journal article on this topic concluded by stating that the author generally recommends a sole proprietorship to new solo docs and an S-Corp to new groups. Of course, everyone should carry malpractice insurance as well as practice liability insurance. Everyone's personal assets are at risk in the case of a malpractice award exceeding your insurance limits (rare as this is), no matter what type of practice you are in. I believe this is the more likely scenario then someone slipping on my sidewalk & winning a suit past my insurance limits. That being said, may none of us ever be involved in any such suits! Sharon At 03:13 PM 5/17/2006, you wrote: I did not respond to the poll. Been too busy to even read the messages. But this one caught my eye. I am a sole proprietor. Five years ago, when setting all of this up, I did consult an attorney and an accountant about the best type of practice to set up. I was advised to just take the sole proprietor route. When I asked about liabilities, I was told that in my state, even as a small corp, litigants had successfully argued that personal assetts should be reach-able, since the solo dr. is the corp and the corp is the solo doctor. I was told that this probably wouldn't matter, but we put the house in the wife's name anyway, just to be safe. So maybe the risk of being a sole proprietor varies from state to state? Greg Brock DO wrote: > As I mentioned before, I sure hope those 7 people that responded as > “sole proprietor” are either mistaken or have checked with a good > health care attorney because that is supposedly an absolute no-no, > unless you want to risk everything you own. > > > ------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 I am a single member LLC also, but I don’t think there is any ongoing annual fee in Ohio. I can not recall how much it was to set it up but I know it was $500 or less & just required a brief application to the secretary of state’s office (of Ohio). Also, I was not aware that I had to “meet” once a year as an LLC. I thought only applied to true corporations (S-corp or C-corp)? Basically, since I set it up it has been a maintenance free entity type. Re: Practice Types The recent Family Practice Management journal article on this topic concluded by stating that the author generally recommends a sole proprietorship to new solo docs and an S-Corp to new groups. Of course, everyone should carry malpractice insurance as well as practice liability insurance. Everyone's personal assets are at risk in the case of a malpractice award exceeding your insurance limits (rare as this is), no matter what type of practice you are in. I believe this is the more likely scenario then someone slipping on my sidewalk & winning a suit past my insurance limits. That being said, may none of us ever be involved in any such suits! Sharon At 03:13 PM 5/17/2006, you wrote: I did not respond to the poll. Been too busy to even read the messages. But this one caught my eye. I am a sole proprietor. Five years ago, when setting all of this up, I did consult an attorney and an accountant about the best type of practice to set up. I was advised to just take the sole proprietor route. When I asked about liabilities, I was told that in my state, even as a small corp, litigants had successfully argued that personal assetts should be reach-able, since the solo dr. is the corp and the corp is the solo doctor. I was told that this probably wouldn't matter, but we put the house in the wife's name anyway, just to be safe. So maybe the risk of being a sole proprietor varies from state to state? Greg Brock DO wrote: > As I mentioned before, I sure hope those 7 people that responded as > “sole proprietor” are either mistaken or have checked with a good > health care attorney because that is supposedly an absolute no-no, > unless you want to risk everything you own. > > > ------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.