Guest guest Posted February 3, 2003 Report Share Posted February 3, 2003 Hello all,I have been using this F155 for a week now and it`s great! A whole lot of options and the software is easy to use.A few things Ive noticed since getting it. This is the first time I can say I got " hits " that I am certain of. Only one clearly localized and that is 787 in my colon area,and this seems tp quickly produce gas. The other hits consist of: I feel " pressurized " like a blown up ballon,especially in my hands. {a friend of mine noticed this also.] Also behind my eyes. And my breathing gets deep with some freqs. Especially in the high 700`s. Also while sitting there,I feel like someone turned up the gravity,and most times when I look it`s 787. Some freqs seem to hit me more times 10,and some not. 7270 is one. I also feel spacy.{yes,more than usual}and a little sick/tired kind of feeling. Also I find my heart pounding at times.I check my blood pressure and it`s normal. I am trying different pulsing. Mostly I stick with 64. I do have a queastion. Why dont we pulse under 20? I set up a general set as on Calf and Times ten each of them back to back and looping. After two loops I had to shut it down. It was too intense. These are the results I was hoping for and Im very exited. I want to thank Robin for his help.He is always there to support this device and answer questions. And for the reverse CALF. It`s great to get a hit and look it right up! And for the CALF palm program.And all his help. And Jim Bare for all his help on the list.It was listening to Jim on the radio three years or more ago that got me into this stuff. And all others as well. And I`d like to thank the acadamy....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 > I do have a queastion. Why dont we pulse under 20? It was an arbitrary decision. Bare's original statement was to " use 16 Hz from 500 to 1000 or so. Use 64 at 1500 up. " I thought I was still getting a bit better response from using 64 down to 1250, so that is how I made the template. When I asked Jim what to use at lower frequencies, he responded, maybe 4 or 8? I did not want to use something that low on the 20-500 freqs since it seems like higher pulse rates work well in the this range, too. So I set it to use 5% of the frequency as the pulse rate for frequencies 1250 and below - Jim thought that a good idea, hence the template. It may in fact be better to just use, perhaps, multiples of 4 for the pulse rate, but this template works well for me. As for frequencies 20 and below, they seem to work just as well without pulsing. turf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 > I do have a queastion. Why dont we pulse under 20? It was an arbitrary decision. Bare's original statement was to " use 16 Hz from 500 to 1000 or so. Use 64 at 1500 up. " I thought I was still getting a bit better response from using 64 down to 1250, so that is how I made the template. When I asked Jim what to use at lower frequencies, he responded, maybe 4 or 8? I did not want to use something that low on the 20-500 freqs since it seems like higher pulse rates work well in the this range, too. So I set it to use 5% of the frequency as the pulse rate for frequencies 1250 and below - Jim thought that a good idea, hence the template. It may in fact be better to just use, perhaps, multiples of 4 for the pulse rate, but this template works well for me. As for frequencies 20 and below, they seem to work just as well without pulsing. turf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 > > > I do have a queastion. Why dont we pulse under 20? > > It was an arbitrary decision. Bare's original statement was > to " use 16 Hz from 500 to 1000 or so. Use 64 at 1500 up. " > I thought I was still getting a bit better response from > using 64 down to 1250, so that is how I made the template. > When I asked Jim what to use at lower frequencies, he > responded, maybe 4 or 8? I did not want to use something > that low on the 20-500 freqs since it seems like higher > pulse rates work well in the this range, too. So I > set it to use 5% of the frequency as the pulse rate for frequencies > 1250 and below - Jim thought that a good idea, hence the > template. It may in fact be better to just use, perhaps, multiples > of 4 for the pulse rate, but this template works well > for me. As for frequencies 20 and below, they > seem to work just as well without pulsing. > > turf Thanks ,Just for the record,I am getting good hits pulsing at 64 down to the 300`s so far, where I got no hits before using 6 to 9 pulses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 > Thanks ,Just for the record,I am getting good hits pulsing at 64 > down to the 300`s so far, where I got no hits before using 6 to 9 > pulses. I will give that a try. It is easy enough to make all the frequencies in the set pulse at 64 - just remove or comment out the second duty statement. Once we get a good handle on the best pulse rates to use for the different ranges, I will change the template file to reflect it. Have you tried 64 pulse at freqs below 300Hz? turf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 > > Thanks ,Just for the record,I am getting good hits pulsing at 64 > > down to the 300`s so far, where I got no hits before using 6 to 9 > > pulses. > > I will give that a try. It is easy enough to make all the > frequencies in the set pulse at 64 - just remove or > comment out the second duty statement. Once we > get a good handle on the best pulse rates to use > for the different ranges, I will change the template > file to reflect it. > > Have you tried 64 pulse at freqs below 300Hz? > > turf Yes, I am pulsing everything at 64 for now with 75 duty.The reason is I never had many hits with lower freqs at all anyway,so I pulsed them.I am working mostly with freqs above that.Ive only had this f155 about a week.I started by running the most common freqs first{727,728,787,ect.}and I have had a lot of hits so I am running these longer,and multiplying many of them by 10. Some lower freqs like 120 and 72,73,I have had a few possible hits,but nothing strong.This is about the same results I had without pulsing. Some strong hits are reported here in the spinal area with a set that included many low freqs{1.2,ect}pulsed at 64,but I havnt gotten around to checking if the lower one`s were the hits.I will pass on info as I get it. By the way,I think your template is very good and a logical approach.I just havent gotten around to trying it yet.So many freqs,so little time. :~} Thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 Hi ; What type of equipment are you driving/running with the F155? Overseer > Hello all,I have been using this F155 for a week now and it`s great! > A whole lot of options and the software is easy to use.A few things > Ive noticed since getting it. > > This is the first time I can say I got " hits " that I am certain of. > > Only one clearly localized and that is 787 in my colon area,and this seems tp quickly produce gas. > > The other hits consist of: > I feel " pressurized " like a blown up ballon,especially in my hands. > {a friend of mine noticed this also.] > Also behind my eyes. > And my breathing gets deep with some freqs. Especially in the high > 700`s. > Also while sitting there,I feel like someone turned up the gravity,and > most times when I look it`s 787. > > Some freqs seem to hit me more times 10,and some not. 7270 is one. > > I also feel spacy.{yes,more than usual}and a little sick/tired kind of > feeling. > Also I find my heart pounding at times.I check my blood pressure and > it`s normal. > I am trying different pulsing. Mostly I stick with 64. > > I do have a queastion. Why dont we pulse under 20? > > I set up a general set as on Calf and Times ten each of them back to > back and looping. After two loops I had to shut it down. It was too > intense. These are the results I was hoping for and Im very exited. > > I want to thank Robin for his help.He is always there to > support this device and answer questions. > And for the reverse CALF. It`s great to get a hit and look it > right up! And for the CALF palm program.And all his help. > And Jim Bare for all his help on the list.It was listening to Jim on > the radio three years or more ago that got me into this stuff. > > And all others as well. > > And I`d like to thank the acadamy....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 > > > Hi ; What type of equipment are you driving/running with the F155? > > Overseer > Hello O, It`s Don Tunney`s Device. Rife Technology.RBT4SPG RB300a Tuner Blackface linear CLA amp{I get from 125-175 forward power} 18 " argon filled tube with internal electrodes. Uniden 510xl CB Pyramid PS-36KX power supply. 6 " coax cables F155 w/palm pilot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.