Re: mitochondria 16569 base pairs, circular. Frequency?

[Guest guest]

At 02:48 AM 12/16/2003, you wrote:

>Has anyone a record of labwork establishing frequencies (to avoid) on

>human mitochondria. As a circle diameter, Char's # would make it out

>to be about 428.4 and harmonics 856.8,etc. The CAFL has these

>numbers frequently in the " A " s and lightly into the " C " s, where they

>seem to fizzle out.

428 looks to be pretty well dispersed throughout the

CAFL. Go to the page, do a ctl-F (Find), enter 428,

and repeatedly hit " Find Next " .

turf

[Guest guest]

At 02:48 AM 12/16/2003, you wrote:

>Has anyone a record of labwork establishing frequencies (to avoid) on

>human mitochondria. As a circle diameter, Char's # would make it out

>to be about 428.4 and harmonics 856.8,etc. The CAFL has these

>numbers frequently in the " A " s and lightly into the " C " s, where they

>seem to fizzle out.

428 looks to be pretty well dispersed throughout the

CAFL. Go to the page, do a ctl-F (Find), enter 428,

and repeatedly hit " Find Next " .

turf

[Guest guest]

Although one may derive a frequency using Char's theorm, there is more too

it than that. One key factor is the inherent sensitivity of the segment or

strand to EM fields. Not all are! There have been studies that have located

certain base pair sequences that are EM sensitive.

Jim Bare

>At 02:48 AM 12/16/2003, you wrote:

>>Has anyone a record of labwork establishing frequencies (to avoid) on

>>human mitochondria. As a circle diameter, Char's #

[Guest guest]

Although one may derive a frequency using Char's theorm, there is more too

it than that. One key factor is the inherent sensitivity of the segment or

strand to EM fields. Not all are! There have been studies that have located

certain base pair sequences that are EM sensitive.

Jim Bare

>At 02:48 AM 12/16/2003, you wrote:

>>Has anyone a record of labwork establishing frequencies (to avoid) on

>>human mitochondria. As a circle diameter, Char's #

[Guest guest]

> Has anyone a record of labwork establishing frequencies (to avoid)

on

> human mitochondria. As a circle diameter, Char's # would make it

out

> to be about 428.4 and harmonics 856.8,etc. The CAFL has these

> numbers frequently in the " A " s and lightly into the " C " s, where

they

> seem to fizzle out. This could indicate a problem. Let's try to

> establish just what freq could damage human mitochondria, eh? Del

There are several points to consider...

First and most important, is that the DNA construction in cells of

humans, mammals and other organisms(eukaryotic cells) is quite

different and more complex than the simpler DNA of bacteria

(prokaryotic cells) or viruses.

Second, even if the theorem could be used in the case of human cells,

using a diameter measurement would not be an appropriate use of the

theorem. DNA is a highly conductive substance and the energy will

run along the axis of the DNA strand, not across a theoretical circle

lacking a conducting mechanism.

Also, when a databank or other information source characterizes the

item as " circular DNA " , this simply means that the two ends of a

linear DNA connect. The result is not necessarily a perfect

circle...it can be any flexible curved shape. The DNA in human cells

actually twists and curls upon itself many times into very compact

form. There is an entire science devoted to this phenomenon alone.

Finally, as recently pointed out by Aubrey, frequency is only a

number, and cannot stand as a singular concept in this technology.

The other factors of power level, waveform, and other aspects of the

delivery method all work in conjunction with frequency to make an

effective system against pathogens.

Hoping this is helpful.

Char