Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 I was checking the accuracy of my F160 today. The meter was a Fluke bench model which reads within +/- 1 Hz with a 3 MHz frequency standard. The F160 has an error of about 23 ppm. So at 1,000,000 it reads 1,000,023. At 10,000,000 it reads 10,000,228. On the other hand, at 10,000 the meter reads 10,000. At 100,000 it reads 100,002. Certainly plenty accurate enough, especially in view of the fact that we often do sweeps with it. The much more expensive and very high quality unit that Aubrey Scoon and others have used for a dual pad device claims a maximum error of 20 ppm. I checked my year and a half old F-SCAN 2 and at 1,000,000 it was within 8 Hz for an error of 8 ppm. The maximum error that the factory allows is 12 ppm. Loyd http://www.royalrife.com Re: Re: What kind of modulation? > > The frequency accuracy available using digitial control is something > unheard of in Hoylands and Rife's days. For that matter, take a look at > just about any commercial frequency generator on the market to today, and > most will say .5% accuracy. The commercial digitals aren't much better. At > 1 MHz 0.5 % is 5000 Hz! > > I would think that Rife's old instruments could count on accuracy in the > full % range. > > 11,780,000 Hz. Was it possible Rife or Hoyland achieved 1% or better > repeatable accuracy? With a vernier tuner ? He may have, for the frequency > wasn't given as 11,781,000 or 11,779,000 Hz. > > 1% of 11,780,00 works out to ...+/- 178,000 Hz! For every additional 1 % > instability/inaccuracy add 178,000 Hz ! > > Then again if the reciever used to measure, was equally as inaccurate as > the transmitter, one might actually get a a cancellation of errors and > arrive at the correct frequency. > > Jim Bare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 Jeff, Jim, and other list members what do you find to be the highest frequency used for treating sick people? I have a chip for my project that will produce sine waves to 50Mhz but the is a cheaper on that will work to 15Mhz which looks too low for me. Can I have suggestions on upper frequency ranges please? My project looks as though it will not be able to be built as a kit because they don't make DIL packages anymore only small surface mount chips! The project is coming along well though. Once I proved that it works as described I will look at possible manufacture and construction, I would then program the units at home and test them! Regards Frequency Accuracy > Here is some data that may bear on the frequency accuracy question. > The DIRP function on the FSCAN will pick up peaks from malignant cells > which are typically no more than 10hz wide in the 11mhz range. I have > found grouped peaks within a 1000hz range from 11.3mhz up to over > 11.8mhz, depending on tumor, which generated radical and immediate > effects on malignant cells. > > Skin cancer is a good model because you can visually see impact of > frequencies. Last month on 7/11 I did a DIRP on a basal cell carcinoma > that had appeared overnight and was 3/8 " in diameter and 1/8 " high and > growing fast. > > A DIRP yielding the following frequencies: > > 11546700 > 11546730 > 11546750 > 11546760 > 11546870 > 11546900 > > Applying the electrodes at these frequencies for about a minute each > using a wobble of 5hz eliminated the tumor in less than 10 minutes. > There was noticeable shrinkage within 15 minutes and within a day only > red spots in an area 1/8 " in diameter from dead tissue. > > At my pre-Rife Conference Workshop on October 1, I will show photos of > this before, 15 minutes after, a day after, and three weeks after. > > So in the case of the FSCAN, the frequencies may or may not be within > a few hertz. However, the DIRP function combined with the transmission > of identified frequencies is exact within a few hertz in a relative > sense. > > My view is that our technology is much more exact than what Rife used > and that it requires us to be much more exact in terms of frequency > than Rife was to get good results. You cannot blast away at 11.78mhz > and kill malignant cells unless you have a system with so much fuzz > and/or harmonics that you completely cover the region 11.3mhz to > 11.9mhz. Then, by chance, you cover the frequencies needed using a > shotgun effect. > > Jeff Sutherland > > ------------------- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.733 / Virus Database: 487 - Release Date: 8/2/04 -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.733 / Virus Database: 487 - Release Date: 8/2/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 Just to give you a idea how thing have progressed the chip I am using in my generator is quoted at 1 part per 4 billion if it is only close to this it would make me very happy indeed, in all reality anything less that 1ppm would be great. Regards Re: Frequency Accuracy > I was checking the accuracy of my F160 today. The meter was a Fluke bench > model which reads within +/- 1 Hz with a 3 MHz frequency standard. > > The F160 has an error of about 23 ppm. So at 1,000,000 it reads 1,000,023. > At 10,000,000 it reads 10,000,228. On the other hand, at 10,000 the meter > reads 10,000. At 100,000 it reads 100,002. Certainly plenty accurate > enough, especially in view of the fact that we often do sweeps with it. The > much more expensive and very high quality unit that Aubrey Scoon and others > have used for a dual pad device claims a maximum error of 20 ppm. > > I checked my year and a half old F-SCAN 2 and at 1,000,000 it was within 8 > Hz for an error of 8 ppm. The maximum error that the factory allows is 12 > ppm. > > Loyd http://www.royalrife.com > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.733 / Virus Database: 487 - Release Date: 8/2/04 -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.733 / Virus Database: 487 - Release Date: 8/2/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 2004 Report Share Posted August 4, 2004 In many situations, drift is much more valuable than accuracy. Loyd http://www.royalrife.com Re: Frequency Accuracy > Just to give you a idea how thing have progressed the chip I am using in my > generator is quoted at 1 part per 4 billion if it is only close to this it > would make me very happy indeed, in all reality anything less that 1ppm > would be great. > Regards > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.