Guest guest Posted July 7, 2003 Report Share Posted July 7, 2003 The photon sound beam emits light photons and the small pak emits radio frequencies not sound harmonics. The one patient was my ortho assistant. Has had no problems in almost two years now (no subject) So, the photon sound beam is an instrument that generates multiple harmonic audio tones.......this is good. If you know of this persons recovery, then please give us details so we may use this knowledge for the good of everyone. Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2003 Report Share Posted July 7, 2003 If this instrument does not emit sound frequencies, why do they call it the photon " SOUND " beam??? Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2003 Report Share Posted July 7, 2003 If this instrument does not emit sound frequencies, why do they call it the photon " SOUND " beam??? Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2003 Report Share Posted July 7, 2003 If this instrument does not emit sound frequencies, why do they call it the photon " SOUND " beam??? Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Khepri: It seems you are motivated more by anger than you are by true scientific endeavor. I am here to further the research into the Rife Technologies by using sound science...not pseudo science as it seems you and many others are prone to.....merely saying something works because someone says it does is a laughing stock to true science. Even Dr. Rife would question your findings...listen to his CD's....also, you stated in your response to me..... " why don't you share with all of us the reason why your here. " . Your use of the word " your " is incorrect. Next time, use spell check. Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Khepri: It seems you are motivated more by anger than you are by true scientific endeavor. I am here to further the research into the Rife Technologies by using sound science...not pseudo science as it seems you and many others are prone to.....merely saying something works because someone says it does is a laughing stock to true science. Even Dr. Rife would question your findings...listen to his CD's....also, you stated in your response to me..... " why don't you share with all of us the reason why your here. " . Your use of the word " your " is incorrect. Next time, use spell check. Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Labnuts@... wrote: > Khepri: It seems you are motivated more by anger than you are by true > scientific endeavor. For me the *only* true science is mathmatics...everything else fails in comparison. > I am here to further the research into the Rife Technologies by using > sound science...not pseudo science as it seems you and many others > are prone to.....merely saying something works because someone says > it does is a laughing stock to true science. Only if one choses to do so. IMO, all science is psuedo-science at one time or another...gravity, bah! > Even Dr. Rife would question your findings... Well, I would hope so.... > listen to his CD's....also, you stated in your response to > me..... " why don't you share with all of us the reason why your > here. " . Your use of the word " your " is incorrect. Next time, use > spell check. Kinda petty don't you think? As long as we're getting petty, it's a grammatical error, not a spelling error. LOL! Khepri P.s., IF you want " serious " research I would suggest to you that you may be in the wrong discussion group, try the bioeletromagnetism group instead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Labnuts@... wrote: > Khepri: It seems you are motivated more by anger than you are by true > scientific endeavor. For me the *only* true science is mathmatics...everything else fails in comparison. > I am here to further the research into the Rife Technologies by using > sound science...not pseudo science as it seems you and many others > are prone to.....merely saying something works because someone says > it does is a laughing stock to true science. Only if one choses to do so. IMO, all science is psuedo-science at one time or another...gravity, bah! > Even Dr. Rife would question your findings... Well, I would hope so.... > listen to his CD's....also, you stated in your response to > me..... " why don't you share with all of us the reason why your > here. " . Your use of the word " your " is incorrect. Next time, use > spell check. Kinda petty don't you think? As long as we're getting petty, it's a grammatical error, not a spelling error. LOL! Khepri P.s., IF you want " serious " research I would suggest to you that you may be in the wrong discussion group, try the bioeletromagnetism group instead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Khepri: A scientist, or one who pursues the truth, should always look upon things with a questionable mind.....don't you see that as the essence of research? Form a hypothesis and set about finding the proof for it. It's not a mystery... Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Khepri You spelled mathematics wrong.....use spell check next time. Tom Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2003 Report Share Posted July 22, 2003 Labnuts@... wrote: > Khepri: > A scientist, or one who pursues the truth, One who thinks his pursuing truth....besides, truth is relative in nature.....as I say, only mathematics are absolute... >should always look upon things > with a questionable mind.....don't you see that as the essence of research? What makes you think I can't?...: ) > Form > a hypothesis and set about finding the proof for it. It's not a mystery... And is that not what the people on the list are doing? It's the way they are going about it you seem to have a problem with... Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal evidence....one can draw certain conclusions and make certain assumptions based on that evidence... Tell me, wo's going to front you money for a double-blind based on nothing more than a theory...when absolutely *no* preliminary research has been done? I'm sure one could dig up a venture capitalist somewhere, but generally the answer is no one.... The people on the list are at differing stages of their research, experimentation, and understanding of all involved in Rife type tech, I personally don't feel it's constructive to stand in the " middle of the room " griping about methods or assumptions....We just end up in an endless loop of arguing instead of getting to the work at hand...IMO. Also, if you care to read the group description of Yahoo version is meant to be open to everyone, for the " serious " types created the message board.... You think I don't understand where you're coming from but you're wrong...I've played your role on another Yahoo group to the point I wanted to rip my hair out...and I don't have much left! LOL! I ended up staying away from the group and pursuing other thiongs for a whilem and eventually migrated back....I've now wandered away from that group again.....I'll probably wander back until I can't stand the nonsense once more... I'm not trying to tell you what to do, just relaying what I've done in your shoes.... Khepri > > Tom > Arcadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Who is Dr. Klein Ridgley and who is Sara? With whom am I conversing? And, when did Dr. Ridgley get involved in the discussion? Dr. Hart Arcadia, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Sara: Do you always address yourself by your middle name? Dr. Hart Arcadia, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Khepri: Please use spell check when sending e-mails. It makes for a much better flow of your fragmented reasoning. Tom Arcadia, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Sara: I'm just trying to get it correct. Same as I would in any research effort I am involved in unlike others in this group. Tom Arcadia, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Hi Khepri, You two really are having a go! One says " questionable " when I presume he means " questioning " . I hope you don't have a questionable mind! The other says " can't " when I presume he means " don't " . I'm sure you can, and believe you probably do (look upon things with a questioning mind)! It's all rather amusing really. I enjoyed and endorse most of the rest of your discussion. Cheers - Les Catterall -- khepri wrote: > > <snip> > > >should always look upon things > > with a questionable mind.....don't you see that as the essence of research? > > What makes you think I can't?...: ) > > <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2003 Report Share Posted July 23, 2003 Agreed. Please let us keep personal messages private. Dick http://www.royalrife.com . New email - drloyd@... . To buy or sell used equipment, check out http://www.royalrife.com/board . Post your recovery story using Rife therapies at http://www.royalrife.com/board .. Re: Re: (no subject) Tom, I originally asked you specifically not to bring these off topic questions to the list. You are now writing to me privately through the list. FYI, Klein is my maiden name and the name I got my degree on, and Ridgley is my married name, and legally I go by both. I have no middle name. I have absolutely no idea how this is of any interest to you and how this enriches the Rife list? Maybe we should ask other listees and the moderator? Sara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2012 Report Share Posted August 7, 2012 This post is from: BuckWildJC@... > > > 1. Weigh yourself with clothes on, after dinner... as well as in the > morning, without clothes, before breakfast, because it's nice to see how > much weight you've lost overnight. > > 2. Never weigh yourself with wet hair. > > 3. When weighing, remove everything, including glasses. In this case, > blurred vision is an asset. Don't forget the earrings, these things can > weigh at least a pound. > > 4. Use cheap scales only, never the medical kind, because they are always > five pounds off...to your advantage. > > 5. Always go to the bathroom first. > > 6. Stand with arms raised, making pressure on the scale lighter. > > 7. Don't eat or drink in the morning until AFTER you've weighed in, > completely naked, of course. > > 8. Weigh yourself after a haircut, this is good for at least half a pound > of hair (hopefully). > > 9. Exhale with all your might BEFORE stepping onto the scale (air has to > weigh something, right?). > > 10. Start out with just one foot on the scale, then holding onto the > towel rack in front of you, slowly edge your other foot on and slowly let > off of the rack. Admittedly, this takes time, but it's worth it. You will > weigh at least two pounds less than if you'd stepped on normally. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.