Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 In my opinion, I think leg curls are okay to use, especially if during hip extension movements, the glutes take all the work. As long as the hamstrings are lagging behind in physical development, using leg curls (or other isolation movements for the hamstrings) is fine. Baggett gave me this analogy (or something similar to it): If the triceps in the bench press is holding you back, you should spend more time on assistance exercises that develop the triceps. Generally, since free weights could transfer strength to athletic activities more than machines due to the principle of specificity, they should be used the most. However, free weights (and other " specific, functional training " ) usually doesn't develop the strength of the hamstrings that well. In effect, the hamstrings lag behind in development. I think this is the only time I will permit the use of machines in training. Many others say that leg curls do not develop functional strength for sports.. I do not care if they think it doesn't, as long as the hamstrings look like pancakes I think as long as you develop the sarcomeric fibers of your hamstrings, and train your body to incorporate those new adaptations into whole body movements (e.g. deadlifts/sprints/etc.), you will be fine. Edderic Ugaddan Hillside, NJ =============================== " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ====================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Running uses the hamstrings as does cycling if you are doing a complete motion, pulling, as well as pushing on the pedals. I am sure there are many sports for which stronger hamstrings would be beneficial. Davy Laconia, NH on 6/28/07 5:09 PM, Bruce J. Nadler M.D. at niptuckfitness@... wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ============================ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 > > What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls > in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural > motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their > full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons > or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? > ***** I wrote the below sometime ago - criticisms greatly appreciated: " " It would be prudent to militate against the use of the leg curl exercise, as the exercise is not compatible to either the structure or function of the hamstring muscle group (1). The hamstring muscle group includes the semitendinosus, the semimembranosus and the biceps femoris; the functions of which are as knee flexor and hip extensor. It has been suggested that the vulnerability of injury to the hamstring muscle group is due to their anatomical arrangement (2). These muscles have a pennate-elastic structure and are biarticular meaning that a change in the length is brought about by movement in two joints (1). Flexion of the knee and the hip occurs simultaneously during most daily activities (2). With regard to the " strength " of the hamstring muscle group Mann (3) suggested the muscle group " strength " should be as great as possible as it is the most critically stressed muscle group in the lower extremity in both running and jumping. It is also noted by other researchers that there is a greater contribution from the hip extensors during faster running speeds (4, 5). Subsequently, it could be suggested that athletes should incorporate hip extensor exercises for example, Olympic Lifting, prone reverse hypers, glute-ham-gastroc raises. 1. Klomp, R. and F. Bosch. Running (Versioning): Biomechanics and Exercise Physiology in Practice. Churchill Livingstone. 2004. p. 46. 2. sen, J., and P. Holmich. Evidence based prevention of hamstring injuries in sport. Br. J. Sports Med. 39:(6) 319-23. 2005. 3. Mann. R. Coaches Roundtable: Speed development. Natl. Strength Cond. Assoc. J. 5:(6) 12–20. 1984. 4. Worrell, T.E., and D.H. Perrin. Hamstring muscle injury: The influence of strength, flexibility warm-up, and fatigue. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 16: 12-18. 1992. 5. Young, W., D. Benton, G. Duthie., and J. Pryor. Resistance Training for Short Sprints and Maximum-speed Sprints. Strength and Cond. J. 23:(2) 7–13. 2001. Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Good point. I'm curious why this type of machine became popular in the first place. Hip extension machines would make more sense from an athletic as well as aesthetic perspective. Why are hip extension machines fairly unpopular, but leg curl machines are? Espy, MS, CSCS Phoenix, AZ ======================= " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ========================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 ly the invention of such machines is just another way to try to " dumb things " down for people. If you squat down and pick up objects or small children in your home, you need the strength of your hamstrings. No need to get on a trapeze and if you are doing trapeze in your home, no, I don't want to know about it.. Hate to say it but most of it probably stems from a reluctance to get under a bar and get their butts down. Full back squat below parallel will test your legs on all grounds, and if you don't think so, try it. <grin>. Not feeling enough ham? get your feet out wider lol. And get off the ! Actual lifting might even help your aesthetics. Want to help it further, try a conventional deadlift. The 3:2 ratio my hams enjoy vs quads obviously came from SOMEWHERE. I don't do leg curls lol. Nothing a little squat DOMS can't cure.... The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA ============================== -------------- Original message -------------- Good point. I'm curious why this type of machine became popular in the first place. Hip extension machines would make more sense from an athletic as well as aesthetic perspective. Why are hip extension machines fairly unpopular, but leg curl machines are? Espy, MS, CSCS Phoenix, AZ ======================= " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ========================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Edderic Ugaddan wrote: " " However, free weights (and other " specific, functional training " ) usually doesn't develop the strength of the hamstrings that well. In effect, the hamstrings lag behind in development. " " ***** Can you please explain and provide supporting evidence for the above statement. Thanks Bill West Chester, Pa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I am sure that one of the reasons that the leg curl machine is so popular is that it has been around since the beginning. Universal and Nautilus both made them an indespensible part of the gym. I have never yet walked into a gym and there was a glute ham raise machine or a reverse hyperextension machine in place of a leg curl machine. I typically only see competitive athletes using this equipment. Although the glute ham raise and the reverse hyperextension machine are far superior, most of the time I find that the only people who know what they are are people who constantly educate themselves in the training of athletes. I hate to say it but most people who go to the gym are like cattle, they just do what they are told and go through the motions and never really educate themselves as to what other training options are out there that are better. Todd Gaudreau Williston, North Dakota USA ================================== Espy wrote: Good point. I'm curious why this type of machine became popular in the first place. Hip extension machines would make more sense from an athletic as well as aesthetic perspective. Why are hip extension machines fairly unpopular, but leg curl machines are? Espy, MS, CSCS Phoenix, AZ ======================= " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ========================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Do leg curls have any place in rehabilitation following injury? Bruce J. Nadler M.D. Los Angeles, CA ===================================== Espy wrote: Good point. I'm curious why this type of machine became popular in the first place. Hip extension machines would make more sense from an athletic as well as aesthetic perspective. Why are hip extension machines fairly unpopular, but leg curl machines are? Espy, MS, CSCS Phoenix, AZ ======================= " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ========================== Bruce J. Nadler, M.D. Nip Tuck Fitness LA Certified Personal Trainer American College of Sports Medicine International Sports Sciences Assoc. www.niptuckfitness.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I can say from patients I've worked with recovering from post ACL surgeries that they didn't fair well and that their rehab took longer and also felt wasn't as complete. It would make sense being that there is a tremendous shear force loaded upon the ACL with the patient lying prone and the leg flexed and 30 to 50 degrees with weighted resistance. Why would anyone want additional shear forces on the ACL right after surgically positioning and attaching it? There are several other medthods of stretching the tissues without loading the ligament in this fashion. My professional opinion would be the hamstring curl is beneficial with those who have good hamstring flexibility, and no prior knee ligament issues, for asthetic purposes and obviously strengthening as well, but I also have no clinincal data, as how this exercise would relate to specific advantage in any one given sport or physical endeavor. J. Forbes Director of Player Development Athletic Spinal Fitness Institute Ridgefield, WA > ======================= > " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: > What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls > in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural > motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their > full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons > or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? > > ========================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 > > Do leg curls have any place in rehabilitation following injury? > **** Prof. Per Tesch and Hans Berg developed the below device. The YO-YO technology has been shown by research to be effective in reducing injuries and strengthening the hamstring muscle group complex: http://www.yoyotechnology.com/hot.html http://www.yoyotechnology.com/videoclips_5.html Askling et al., state: " " The working principle of this device is based on setting a flywheel into rotational motion via concentric muscle action and then decelerating the motion via eccentric muscle action. By performing the eccentric action over a smaller angular displacement and hence with a greater muscle torque than the concentric on an eccentric overload is accomplished. " " Additional information: Hamstring injuries occur during the eccentric action, when the muscle develops tension while lengthening (1, 2). Eccentric forces are substantially greater during higher velocities of running (3). Paradoxically the role of the muscle-complex as an absorber of energy needs to be emphasised for the prevention and optimisation of hamstring injuries. Indeed, specific eccentric action emphasis knee flexion training may be effective in preventing hamstring injuries (4, 5, 6, 7). The Nordic hamstring exercise (Figure 1) was utilized in the Brockett et al. and Mjolsnes et al. studies and may be effective in preventing injuries to the hamstring muscle group (5, 6, 7). It is noted that accentuation of the eccentric action is considered to be an effective means of increasing flexibility and developing strength concurrently (8, 9). The exercise was used in the special preparation of European sprinters during the 1980's (10). Key benefits of the exercise are that it requires no expensive equipment and it can be done anywhere; the only prerequisite being that the knees must be cushioned. It would be advisable to carefully periodize the Nordic hamstring exercise into a program as eccentric training tends to produce muscle soreness, referred to as 'delayed onset muscle soreness,' to a significant degree predominantly in beginner trainees or individuals unused to eccentric activity (11). Adaptation will occur providing training continues and, consequently, muscle soreness will diminish (12). It remains to be determined whether specific eccentric action training at the hip joint would be beneficial for the prevention and optimisation of hamstring injuries. http://www.ostrc.no/en/News-archive/News-archive-2004/New-paper--- Effective-hamstrings-strength-training-program2/ http://www.ostrc.no/en/Project/056---Prevention-of-hamstrings-strains- in-football-/Treningsprogram-Nordic-Hamstrings-/ 1. Kujala, U.M., S. Orava, M. Jarvinen. Hamstring injuries. Current trends in treatment and prevention. Sports Med. 23:(6) 397-404. 1997. 2. Stanton, P. and C. Purdam. (1989). Hamstring injuries in sprinting - the role of eccentric exercise. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 10: 343-349. 3. Mero, A., and P.V. Komi. Force-, EMG-, and elasticity-velocity relationships at submaximal, maximal, and supramaximal running speeds in sprinters. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 55: 553–561. 1986. 4. Askling, C., J. Karlsson, A. Thorstensson. Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 13:(4) 244-50. 2003. 5. Brockett, C.L., D.L. , U. Proske. Human hamstring muscles adapt to eccentric exercise by changing optimum length. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33:(5) 783-90. 2001. 6. Brockett, C.L., D.L. , U. Proske. Predicting hamstring strain injury in elite athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36:(3) 379- 87. 2004. 7. Mjolsnes, R., A. Arnason, T. Osthagen, T. Raastad, R.A. Bahr. 10- week randomized trial comparing eccentric vs. concentric hamstring strength training in well-trained soccer players. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 14:(5) 311-7. 2004. 8. , R.T., and W.D. Bandy. The effect of eccentric training for increasing hamstring flexibility of high school males. J. Athl. Train. 39:354–358. 2004. 9. Siff, M.C. Superstretch - The Science behind the Art. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Witwatersrand, WITS 2050, South Africa. pp. 22-25. 1994. 10. Lüchtenbeg, D. EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE: Specific strength training for running—Part II. Natl. Strength Cond. Assoc. J. 11:(5) 43–51. 1989. 11. Friden, J., M. Sjøstrøm., and B. Ekblom. Adaptive response in human skeletal muscle subjected to prolonged eccentric training. Int. J. Sports Med. 4(3):177-83. 1983. 12. Friden, J., M. Sjøstrøm., and B. Ekblom. Myofibrillar damage following intense eccentric exercise in man. Int. J. Sports Med. 4:170-176. 1983. Hope the latter adds to the discussion Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 In view of these responses, would isolated training of the hamstrings, as provided by the leg curl machines, create a physiologic muscle imbalance and be counter-productive for athletic activity? Would it create a condition making the individual more prone to injuries? I've been trying to track down the source to a ratio I once read of quadriceps to hamstring strength. This was determined by comparing leg extension to leg curl results. Bruce J. Nadler M.D. Los Angeles, CA ========================= Todd Langer wrote: Bruce, It would depend on the way you injured the muscle, no? It seems most hammy's are hurt at the initiating of leg swing and/or right during landing (eccentric/isometric); so, it's unlikely to happen during a concentric contraction. As I alluded to earlier a standing machine allows for more realistic usage of the hammys in the eccentric phase and could probably be utilized in rehab. Again, IMO it's not the ideal exercise, but it can have benefits.... Todd Langer, MSc, CES/Rolfer Boulder, CO =========================== Re: Leg Curls Do leg curls have any place in rehabilitation following injury? Bruce J. Nadler M.D. Los Angeles, CA ===================================== Espy <threectraining@... <mailto:threectraining%40yahoo.com> > wrote: Good point. I'm curious why this type of machine became popular in the first place. Hip extension machines would make more sense from an athletic as well as aesthetic perspective. Why are hip extension machines fairly unpopular, but leg curl machines are? Espy, MS, CSCS Phoenix, AZ ======================= " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " <niptuckfitness@... <mailto:niptuckfitness%40yahoo.com> > wrote: What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? ========================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 > > In view of these responses, would isolated training of the hamstrings, as provided by the leg curl machines, create a physiologic muscle imbalance and be counter-productive for athletic activity? Would it create a condition making the individual more prone to injuries? > I've been trying to track down the source to a ratio I once read of quadriceps to hamstring strength. This was determined by comparing leg extension to leg curl results. > ***** Do read the recent " Push and Pull " thread as members of the list discussed the above extensively. Do read: Agonist-antagonist ratios change with joint angle, velocity of movement, pattern of joint action, with multi-articular action. Ratios are influenced by the demands of the sport. According to s and Reid a 0.60 to 0.70 muscle strength ratio is an inappropriate hamstrings-to-quadriceps balance even when torque outputs are correct for the effect of gravity. Bennell et al. and Dauty et al. also found that isokinetic strength testing does not predict hamstring injury in athletes. Monitoring the muscles EMGrms activity during " functional " tests such as the vertical jump may be used to facilitate diagnoses and direct treatment strategies of hamstring injuries. Charlie Francis also wrote (see CFTS for more info): " " I don't like the sound of your ham/quad ratio test. It sounds like you've been assessed and rehabbed on a Cybex or Orthatron machine. In all my years of experience, I've never run across a happy result with this kind of equipment. First of all, the basic premise that you can assess ham/quad ratios, as they apply to sprinting in this way, is bullshit. Since the rate of movement around the knee during ground contact (when real force is needed) approaches zero, then the unloaded rate of movement can approach 1500 degrees per second! Let's see a machine test that! I was once called in by an NFL team to assess the injury to their star receiver. It turned out that he'd been on the Orthatron for a year and the harder he worked, the worse the hamstring got. Finally, he missed a full season! Once proper therapy was instituted, he came back for a dream season. I should also point out that hamstring injuries in football players cannot always be avoided because they often occur during intense deceleration, something sprinters shouldn't have to worry about. " " References Magalhaes J., J. Oliveira , A. Ascensao, J. Soares. Concentric quadriceps and hamstrings isokinetic strength in volleyball and soccer players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 44:(2) 119-25. 2004. Bennell, K., H. Wajswelner, P. Lew, A. Schall-Riaucour, S. , D. Plant, J. Cirone. Isokinetic strength testing does not predict hamstring injury in Australian Rules footballers. Br J Sports Med. 32: (4) 309-14. 1998. Dauty M., M. Potiron-Josse, P. Rochcongar. Consequences and prediction of hamstring muscle injury with concentric and eccentric isokinetic parameters in elite soccer players. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 46:(9) 601-6. 2003. Edgerton, V.R., S.L. Wolf, D.J. Levendowski, R.R. Roy. Theoretical basis patterning EMG amplitudes to assess muscle dysfunction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 28:(6) 744–751. 1996. Siff, M.C. Recommended Strength Ratios – Part 1. Fit. and Sports Rev. Int. 29: (1) 12-14. 1994. s, D., and J.G. Reid. Biomechanics of hamstring strains in sprinting events. Canadian J. Sport Sci. 13(3): 88. =================== Carruthers Wakefield, UK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 I have not heard or read of a potential for strength and muscle growth imbalance, with quads and hams as compared to the classic imbalance of chest and back. Is there such a thing? Which reminds me I used to use [bend] my legs loads in the deadlift. I now tend not to as much, as the more legs are involved the longer a rep seems to take to complete. Not in range of motion for the back. It just seems like a greater distance is traveled by the hips when using legs a lot, which perhaps makes the lift longer and harder. Is this a general rule or is it very much dependent on the individual? Thanks Greenland Sussex UK > > ly the invention of such machines is just another way to try to " dumb things " down for people. If you squat down and pick up objects or small children in your home, you need the strength of your hamstrings. No need to get on a trapeze and if you are doing trapeze in your home, no, I don't want to know about it.. > > Hate to say it but most of it probably stems from a reluctance to get under a bar and get their butts down. Full back squat below parallel will test your legs on all grounds, and if you don't think so, try it. <grin>. Not feeling enough ham? get your feet out wider lol. And get off the ! > > Actual lifting might even help your aesthetics. Want to help it further, try a conventional deadlift. The 3:2 ratio my hams enjoy vs quads obviously came from SOMEWHERE. I don't do leg curls lol. > > Nothing a little squat DOMS can't cure.... > > The Phantom > aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing powerlifter > Denver, Colorado, USA > > ============================== > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > Good point. I'm curious why this type of machine became popular in the first place. Hip extension machines would make more sense from an athletic as well as aesthetic perspective. Why are hip extension machines fairly unpopular, but leg curl machines are? > > Espy, MS, CSCS > Phoenix, AZ > > ======================= > " Bruce J. Nadler M.D. " wrote: > What is the feeling of the group with regard to the use of leg curls > in training? Unless one is a trapeze artist, there is no natural > motion of which I can think that loads the ham strings during their > full range of motion. Is this exercise purely for aesthetic reasons > or does it impart a functional usefulness as well? > > ========================== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 Regarding leg curls: no studies here, just some experiential information and some questions for your consideration. I have used leg curl machines for strengthening generally and to train quick twitch initiation by firing on cue (internal or externally supplied) to accelerate a light medium to medium heavy weight (say a 8 to 12 rep max selection) with a " catch' and controlled return to near full extension; before firing again on cue. This (compensated acceleration training and controlled eccentric return) seems to be beneficial to both strength and rate of force production for nearly all who have tried it. As a bonus, some report fewer leg cramps and injury during recovery and activity, respectively. I am not making claims to any proofs nor am I advocating this training for any specific application. Just reporting limited experiential and anecdotal testimony for your consideration and comment as you may wish. Secondly, I have tried prone striders on the machines available to me since I read of them in an NSCA publication and runners seem to " like them " . The 'standard' machine will not allow shorter people to so utilize the apparatus, but taller individuals can get a good purchase with the leading foot and achieve solid ground force input through that foot during execution of the curl with the other leg. It certainly 'feels' different than the totally 'open' chain variety with transfer (?) coming though the lumbar-pelvic connection. With effort, the upper leg can also be raised during this exercise, as well, thereby executing a partial range hip extension. Any comments concerning these variations would be most welcome, especially as to modality and specificity to goals of transfer to acl protection (reference general strengthening and quick twitch training for the female athlete), and application to running " kick " or sprinting. Thanks in advance for thoughtful critique, Boardman Chicago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 Frans Bosch from the Netherlands is here in Chicago at Loyola University for the USATF Level III Sprint Summit. He advocates training the hamstrings in isometric conditions, and sees no value in a tradtiional hamstring curl. Ken Jakalski Lisle High School Lisle, IL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 Hi Henk! Thanks for your insights! From your experience, how widespread is the use of the BK approach to training and technique in the Netherlands? Frans is doing five sessions over three days here in Illinois. Ken Jakalski Lisle HS Lisle, Illinois Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 After a grade 3 hamstring tear quite a few years ago I try to take care of my hamstrings, particularly as I gear up for some masters sprinting. As and others have pointed out, current knowledge suggests that the hamstring in runners is most susceptible at the 'catch point' at the end of the swing phase where the hamstring pulls knee extension up ready for the stance phase. One exercise I do is 'eccentric catches' with the standing leg curl machine. This is probably similar to what Boardman has described below. For a set of 10-12 raise the weight, pause, then let it drop suddenly, catching it near the bottom of extension and return under control to starting point and repeat. This is an attempt to simulate the swing phase to some extent while developing addtional strength. I really don't know if this is useful, so like I welcome comments. I also do deads, RDLs, squats and good mornings to try to strengthen and stretch hamstrings. As far as I can tell, Nordics are a floor glute-ham raise, which I find difficult but persist. You can do them alone by hooking feet under a barbell or something similar - good demo here. http://www.kvusa.com/wl/floorghr.htm Also, if you don't have a glute-ham bench a lat pulldown station or similar can be used -- calf raise should work. Face away from machine, kneel on seat and hook ankles under adjusted knee pads, then drop onto a strategically placed bench or fitness ball if you need to. Gympie, Australia > > Regarding leg curls: no studies here, just some experiential information and > some questions for your consideration. > > I have used leg curl machines for strengthening generally and to train quick > twitch initiation by firing on cue (internal or externally supplied) to > accelerate a light medium to medium heavy weight (say a 8 to 12 rep max selection) > with a " catch' and controlled return to near full extension; before firing > again on cue. This (compensated acceleration training and controlled eccentric > return) seems to be beneficial to both strength and rate of force production > for nearly all who have tried it. As a bonus, some report fewer leg cramps and > injury during recovery and activity, respectively. I am not making claims > to any proofs nor am I advocating this training for any specific application. > Just reporting limited experiential and anecdotal testimony for your > consideration and comment as you may wish. > > Secondly, I have tried prone striders on the machines available to me since I > read of them in an NSCA publication and runners seem to " like them " . The > 'standard' machine will not allow shorter people to so utilize the apparatus, > but taller individuals can get a good purchase with the leading foot and achieve > solid ground force input through that foot during execution of the curl with > the other leg. It certainly 'feels' different than the totally 'open' chain > variety with transfer (?) coming though the lumbar-pelvic connection. With > effort, the upper leg can also be raised during this exercise, as well, thereby > executing a partial range hip extension. > > Any comments concerning these variations would be most welcome, especially as > to modality and specificity to goals of transfer to acl protection (reference > general strengthening and quick twitch training for the female athlete), and > application to running " kick " or sprinting. > > Thanks in advance for thoughtful critique, > Boardman > Chicago > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2007 Report Share Posted July 3, 2007 Good to see that a Dutch coach that has impact in the US and good for him. The experience in Holland with the " new " concept " can be described very briefly: trial-and-error. His fastest sprinter ran 10.40 and was continuously injured, (no miracle if you look at the exercises) I am curious how he can teach US sprint coaches who to do things right, but maybe you got more talents to waste that we have. It's OK to learn from mistakes, but better to learn from the mistakes of others, since my athletes are too precious to get wasted by somebody else's brainstorms. The concept is great, just too bad it has to be executed by " fragile " human beings. Henk Kraaijenhof Amstelveen Holland Hi Henk! > > Thanks for your insights! From your experience, how widespread is the > use > of the BK approach to training and technique in the Netherlands? Frans > is > doing five sessions over three days here in Illinois. > > Ken Jakalski > Lisle HS > Lisle, Illinois > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2008 Report Share Posted April 16, 2008 Anything that improves the strength of a muscle improves it's functionality. It is a myth that an exercise movement must mimic a sport or vocational movement to benefit it or that an exercise is somehow not " functional " if it doesn't do so. There are times when isolated (a relative term, there is no such thing as pure isolation, even with machines) movements can be beneficial. Drew Baye www.baye.com Orlando, FL > The leg curl, from a functional stand point is a waste of time. It does > not mimmick any movement pattern in nature, and furthermore, isolates the > hamstrings in a way the leg was not designed for. I would not recommend > them. > > Garrison, CSCS > Mesa, AZ > > To: Supertraining@...<Supertraining%40yahoogroups.comFrom>: > tonypit45@... <tonypit45%40gmail.comDate>: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 > 19:08:02 -0500Subject: Leg Curls > > Hello Everyone,I'm hoping for some advice.From the perspective of > technique, I've been working to place more of theload into the glutes and > hamstrings for deadlifts and cleans. Thatnecessitates that I develop an > effective program to strengthen my glutes andhamstrings. The first and most > obvious step is to focus on learning thetechnique properly by doing > deadlifts and cleans using a lighter weight. Ialso find that there are > several exercises that work my hamstringseffectively, especially Romanian > deadlifts and various forms of lunges. Idon't have access to a glute/ham > machine, but I do glute/ham raises byanchoring my ankles. I also do reverse > hyperextensions off a bench withankle weights.It seems to me that leg curls > also work the hamstrings effectively.However, I have read articles that say > increases in strength from leg curlsdo not transfer to movements like > deadlifts and cleans (in much the same waythat many say increases in > strength from leg extensions do not transfer toother movements). Basically, > there seems to be a fairly large body ofopinion that leg curls are a waste > of time. I was wondering if there arepeople in our forum who could shed some > light on that subject. Pitruzzello, Ph.D.Chicago, IL > > ============================= > > -- Drew Baye High Intensity Training www.baye.com Marc Mero Body Slam 279 Ave. Suite 1102 Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 407 678-BODY (2639) www.mmbodyslam.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2008 Report Share Posted April 17, 2008 There seems to be a lot of dogma creeping into posts. Machines are bad. Feet have to be on the floor, etc. (Not to slam the people who said these things - they are just two examples I remember and I agreed with their overall advice). I think the general gist of the posts were correct tho. Doing leg curls, while it might have a minor carry-over to deadlift strength, is certainly not an efficient way to increase hamstring strength for the deadlift. Good mornings and RDL have far more transfer. Glute-ham-gastroc as a machine (Dr. Yessis designed and I believe still sells an excellent model) would have way more carry over than a leg curl. I just don't see much efficiency in the leg curl movement. I'd much sooner see assistance continued with the RDL (is the original poster using good technique and initiating a stretch reflex right at the amortization phase?) and adding good mornings, glute-ham-gastroc (if available), pull-thrus, swings and power cleans or snatches from the hang. Any of those assistance has far more carryover than a leg curl. Simply as a matter of efficiency a leg curl would be very low on my list of exercises. And I prefer not to use machines, obviously, but there are some places and some pervasive reasons to use machines. And to train with your feet off the floor. To simply say these practices are 'bad' is really a mistake. There is a time and place for almost every movement, including those on machines. Just not too many, IMO. :^) Drew Baye wrote: > If you recall, what I said was " there is probably little a leg curl > will do > for you if you're already doing deadlifts, except for provide work for the > short head of the biceps femoris, which only crosses the knee and not the > hip like the rest of the hamstrings. " > > I find the opinions here very interesting. If people in sports > training are > ridiculing the use of machines (when and where appropriate - there are > right > and wrong uses) it probably has more to do with unsubstantiated bias or > misinformation being peddled as fact than any real understanding of the > subject. Just my opinion > > While some exercises will be more appropriate than others in some > circumstances, anything that increases the strength of a muscle will > improve > its function in other movements. > > Drew Baye > Orlando, FL > > __._ -- Hobman Saskatoon, CANADA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.