Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Barry, Congratulations on getting yourself into an exercise program. Sounds like you are doing quite well. You can still run for cardio pulmonary fitness and increase your leg strength. Run sprints. Start by running 10 yards at 70% of full effort and decelerate within 5 yards (sorry about the imperial measurement). Decelerating withing 5 yards is v. important. This is the eccentric phase of your running and will likely make you sore even at this relatively light effort. Do this 10 times with 60 sec. rest between each sprint. This workout should be fairly easy for you given your current state of conditioning. Be sure to check your heart rate between sprints while resting. When you finish, check your heart rate twice, once immediately and again one minute later. How fast your heart rate drops is a good indicator of coronary fitness. You can manipulate the variables, (distance sprinted, rest time, sprint effort) as you become more fit. Two or three times a week should be plenty. Another training modality I find extremely effective is sprint rows on a Concept II Rowing Ergometer. Rowing is essentially the pull movement of power cleans done sitting down. So you can crank up your heart rate and burn lots of calories without impeding your Weightlifting. A great alternative to sprints, particularly on bad weather days. Does all this make sense? W.G. Ubermensch Sports Consultancy San Diego, CA. USA > > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies to > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and > have " love handles " even when my weight is down. > > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30 > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week. > > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch about > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those have > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training will > see further improvement. > > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem to > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off running > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week. > > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and used > to be quite strong in my youth). > > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness level > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running. > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work > against each other. > > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts? > > Barry Eagar > > Brisbane, Australia > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Barry There is an activity that kills two birds - aerobics and weight training - in one shot: kettlebells. As one of the promoters said, they allow you to lose fat without the dishonor of aerobics or dieting. Probably most comprehensive free info on this subject can be found on www.dragondoor.com forum and www.bodybuilding.com. Main advantage of KB is in their ballistic exercises. Snatching them for numbers will send your heart rate to the maximum. Check it out. You can send me an email (eugenesmet@...), I have some info that I can send you. And no, I don't sell KBs or related products :-) Eugene Sydney, Australia **[Mod: Please don't forget to sign your post with your full name - many thanks in advance] > > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies to > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and > have " love handles " even when my weight is down. > > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30 > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week. > > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch about > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those have > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training will > see further improvement. > > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem to > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off running > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week. > > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and used > to be quite strong in my youth). > > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness level > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running. > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work > against each other. > > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts? > > Barry Eagar > > Brisbane, Australia > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 Barry, it's reasonably well established that if you want to do both at a high level it won't really work because of contradictory physiological implications. However, keeping in good aerobic shape while you weight train is certainly a plus. (I note Dave Draper's recent multiple bypass surgery -- and wish him well of course.) Aerobic conditioning improves arterial compliance (elasticity), probably cholesterol profile and particle size, and markers of inflammation. Run and do weights by all means, just don't run more than, say, 45 minutes three of four times a week. It will help your weight management as well. Alternate the days if you can, or at least split the day up into morning and evening. I do both, but I admit I won't be winning any weightlifting or bodybuilding competitions (or marathons) any time soon :-). Gympie, Australia > > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies to > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and > have " love handles " even when my weight is down. > > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30 > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week. > > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch about > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those have > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training will > see further improvement. > > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem to > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off running > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week. > > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and used > to be quite strong in my youth). > > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness level > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running. > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work > against each other. > > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts? > > Barry Eagar > > Brisbane, Australia > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 Hi Hannu, I used to run, but no longer. I believe I am too heavy to do it currently. I got sore ankles and knees when I tried it. So I switched to HIIT and do hill climbs instead. Luckily there is no sign of knee or ankle pain. Oh, I used to do some running on the beach. That was pretty good. It is a full body workout. Best wishes Sharah Sydney, Australia ================ hannu.leinonen@... wrote: Tamare Cobbins wrote about Bill s reply: That statement is funny, " The only time you should run is if someone bigger than you is chasing you? " .......................... <<<Thanks Bill, we need to loosen up now and then :-) Anything that makes your heard pump over 110 r/min is aerobic exercises – and it does not even have to be sports. Just work harder and you’ll get your aerobic dose. I am interested in HIIT, but also very aware of the risk of over exercising. When you go to high intensities, it is effective, but you need to recover. We all know this, but in practice it’s easy to over do training. (Well for me at least.) I’ve been monitoring my energy consumption/ workload and I am doing from 1000 to 1100 METh in 4 weeks. (from 200 – 400 METh is sports). (This is from 15 up to 40 hours of sports per week.) This is possible because I use very low intensity training. (I play a lot of golf, with a heart beat rate about 100 r/m.) In textbooks this should not have an impact on aerobic capacity, but it has had.) I don’t have anything against running. I’ve been three times jogging this week – about 10 km each. Walking, jogging, riding a bike, swimming or skiing are the first things that come in mind when we start an aerobic training. If we were intuitive, we could figure out very many other ways to develop aerobic capacity. And it just might be done during work or very much in shorter period of time – like in HIIT. I run because I have the time for it – and it is easy. What I don’t like about running is that it kills my knees.>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 It doesn't but we already know this . Damien Chiappini Pittsburgh,PA. Re: Re: Weights or running or both? Please explain how a movement performed with a kettlebell has some inherent advantage over a similar movement performed with a dumbbell or swingbell or clubbell or sack of sand? Hobman Saskatoon, Canada > Barry > > There is an activity that kills two birds - aerobics and weight > training - in one shot: kettlebells. As one of the promoters said, > they allow you to lose fat without the dishonor of aerobics or > dieting. Probably most comprehensive free info on this subject can > be found on www.dragondoor. com forum and www.bodybuilding. com. > > Main advantage of KB is in their ballistic exercises. Snatching them > for numbers will send your heart rate to the maximum. Check it out. > You can send me an email (eugenesmetbigpond (DOT) com), I have some info > that I can send you. And no, I don't sell KBs or related products :-) > > Eugene > Sydney, Australia > **[Mod: Please don't forget to sign your post with your full name - > many thanks in advance] > > > > > > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies > to > > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be > > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In > > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and > > have " love handles " even when my weight is down. > > > > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have > > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30 > > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week. > > > > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing > > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch > about > > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those > have > > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training > will > > see further improvement. > > > > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is > > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem > to > > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off > running > > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week. > > > > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good > > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and > used > > to be quite strong in my youth). > > > > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness > level > > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running. > > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work > > against each other. > > > > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts? > > > > Barry Eagar > > > > Brisbane, Australia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 Kettlebells are just a tool. 'They' sit on the ground and do nothing until you chose to use them. 'Kettlebells' is not a verb. Chip Conrad Bodytribe Fitness Sacramento, CA www.physicalsubculture.com > > > > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies > to > > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be > > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In > > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and > > have " love handles " even when my weight is down. > > > > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have > > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30 > > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week. > > > > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing > > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch > about > > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those > have > > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training > will > > see further improvement. > > > > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is > > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem > to > > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off > running > > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week. > > > > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good > > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and > used > > to be quite strong in my youth). > > > > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness > level > > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running. > > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work > > against each other. > > > > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts? > > > > Barry Eagar > > > > Brisbane, Australia > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 I have a 50 year old female client who does absolutely no aerobics or running of any kind, just strength training, and only twice weekly at that. After a recent stress test her doctor told her that not only was she in excellent shape, she outperformed a few of the Orlando Magic. I do zero aerobics, and zero running. I played tennis with a client for two hours on Sunday, and despite the heat and constant movement, I barely got my heart rate up. I'll take a couple heavy compound lifts over a jog for conditioning any day. Drew Baye Orlando, FL High Intensity Training HYPERLINK " http://www.baye.com/ " www.baye.com _____ From: Supertraining [mailto:Supertraining ] On Behalf Of Schaefer Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:46 PM To: Supertraining Subject: Re: VS: Weights or running or both? And I reiterate my position that if you lift vigorously enough, you do NOT require conventional " aerobic " training to be " HEALTHY. " I deadlift and do farmer's walk for my conditioning of my heart as well as my body and soul. That's what works for ME. farmer's WALK, not RUN. Want to sling kettles, or dance the macarena, or do step aerobics, or swim, what have you, do as YOU see fit. I am fit and do as I see fit! So quit trying to push those of us NOT interested in RUNNING into running. We have our reasons, whether they are the comfort of joints, our disposition, or whether we truly DO string garlic to prevent the incursion of runners....perhaps we should, as they are determined we should RUN? <grin>. I don't recall Mel clocking any low number miles, yet he was an extremely fit and flexible man...lol. I also don't think you'd have enjoyed success turning say, Steve Prefontaine, into a powerlifter? We most enjoy those activities that use our strengths, and there is a good deal of reason NOT to plod about doing something miserable that does NOT serve us a good purpose....only if you lift max singles constantly, or fail to work hard enough, could i see you as NEEDING to go engage in an activity of misery waiting for some apparatus to go BEEP so you can go HOME? Why so little respect for strength athletes AS athletes while you tout Olympic decathletes? We would beat them on the platform, sorry! I would agree they're highly fit, but they're also highly specialized.-..we are highly specialized for the strength sports, and frankly ENOUGH of dismissing the fitness and aerobic capacity building traits of LIFTING. It is that very jingoistic approach that states we must RUN or get on some silly elliptical as the ONLY way for our hearts to work out properly that would cause me to consider placing chalk blocks at the doorstep of my house to prevent you coming in....as a talisman against such prejudice WITHOUT EVIDENCE! the POPULAR notion that one must be a runner, or perform strictly aerobic moves for the heart is not correct, and I believe there's a posting on this thread that supports this. Why the medical community and researchers are slow to see this perhaps is a mystery, Dr. Ralph has suggested previously that the number of docs who lift weights may be far lower than those who run or do other notably aerobic activities? By the way, the stiffer TRAIL " running " shoes make excellent shoes for heavy leg press..... as well as walking to my car carrying my gym bag <grin>. They don't cause as much wobble as the squishy shoes in farmer's walk either... To each their own. ======================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 I have been following this interesting thread and I feel that much of the thread goes to the question of what is general fitness. Here are a few of my thoughts: 1)Are marathon runners fit? They certainly have fantastic c/v fitness but a very specific type. They are totally adapted to long distance running. They are fit for their pursuit but nothing else. I doubt if they could complete a minimal pushup/chin/dip test. Or even a test on a rowing machine. They are very specialized athletes just as heavy weight powerlifters are in their chosen pursuit. I doubt if most powerlifters can run a few kms. They do not train for that. Adding muscle mass would certainly be healthy for the marathon runner but counter productive to his athletic pursuit. The opposite for the heavy weight powerlifter. So does ultra endurance or ultra strength have anything to do with health or fitness? I doubt it. 2) I remember Mel Siff pointing out that all fitness tests are inherently specific i.e. if you cycle you will do better on a cycling fitness test than on a running or rowing test. So why is running given such status? 3) When I was in the army we were tested for fitness by running 2000m. (about 1.4 miles). This seems to me a good standard in that the effort is divided nearly evenly between aerobic and anarobic energy systems. I think a person looking for general fitness (aerobic/anaerobic) could probably best attain it by training in this parameter. I don't think that it must be running and the sessions can certainly be abbreviated. Here is one of my favorite swim w/o's: 10x50m. swim with patrner. You go, he rests and then switch. Swim is done on about 90% effort. I also switch strokes. It is accepted that the ration between swimming and running is 1:4 so a 50m. swim is like a 200m. run. Just some random thoughts. Yehoshua Zohar Karmiel, Israel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2007 Report Share Posted April 29, 2007 Do both or at least some form of CV training (swim, walk, bike,). If you read the series of books by Ken most of his findings about aerobic exercise are still valid today. In one of his books (I Can't remember for sure which) he cites a study about aerobic fitness and HDL levels. The higher the level of fitness the higher the HDLs ( " good " cholesterol). Which in turn relates to the Framinghan study that basically says the higher propotion of HDLs the lower your risk for cardiovascular disease. The good news is even modest amounts of aerobic exercise casn bring improvement in HDL levels. Just stay active and have fun. Ray **Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published!** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2007 Report Share Posted April 30, 2007 Here are some VO2 numbers I dug out for strength and power athletes. The study is a bit old but I could not find anything more up to date, but there probably is. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53(2):97-105. Neuromuscular, anaerobic, and aerobic performance characteristics of elite power athletes. Hakkinen K, Alen M, Komi PV. These are the averages in the range. VO2 is the accepted measure of cardiorespiratory fitness. (mg/kg/minute) Wrestlers -- 57.8 Bodybuilders -- 50.8 Powerlifters -- 41.9 From my own knowledge, give or take a few points: Amateur endurance runners are usually in the range 60-70. Elite endurance athletes 75-85 Elite running team sports 65-70 Amateur team sports 55-65 VO2 is related to health for a number of end points, eg, cardiovascular, diabetes, some cancers, and at the micro level, HDL, CRP/inflammation, and a few other emerging things. Of the strength and power athletes, it's clear to see that the wrestlers are in reasonably good shape, 58 is a good level of fitness. Boxers are going to be somewhere over 60 I would think. So, if you're interested in cardiorespiratory fitness, perhaps the lesson here is that you have to move your legs, and the more you move, the fitter you get. And I accept that VO2 is only one measure of fitness. Strength is another. Get both. (IMHO :-). Gympie, Australia > > Do both or at least some form of CV training (swim, walk, bike,). If > you read the series of books by Ken most of his findings about > aerobic exercise are still valid today. In one of his books (I Can't > remember for sure which) he cites a study about aerobic fitness and HDL > levels. The higher the level of fitness the higher the HDLs ( " good " > cholesterol). Which in turn relates to the Framinghan study that > basically says the higher propotion of HDLs the lower your risk for > cardiovascular disease. The good news is even modest amounts of aerobic > exercise casn bring improvement in HDL levels. Just stay active and > have fun. > > Ray > **Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published!** > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.