Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Weights or running or both?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Barry,

Congratulations on getting yourself into an exercise program. Sounds

like you are doing quite well. You can still run for cardio pulmonary

fitness and increase your leg strength. Run sprints. Start by running

10 yards at 70% of full effort and decelerate within 5 yards (sorry

about the imperial measurement). Decelerating withing 5 yards is v.

important. This is the eccentric phase of your running and will likely

make you sore even at this relatively light effort. Do this 10 times

with 60 sec. rest between each sprint. This workout should be fairly

easy for you given your current state of conditioning. Be sure to

check your heart rate between sprints while resting. When you finish,

check your heart rate twice, once immediately and again one minute

later. How fast your heart rate drops is a good indicator of coronary

fitness. You can manipulate the variables, (distance sprinted, rest

time, sprint effort) as you become more fit. Two or three times a week

should be plenty.

Another training modality I find extremely effective is sprint rows on

a Concept II Rowing Ergometer. Rowing is essentially the pull movement

of power cleans done sitting down. So you can crank up your heart rate

and burn lots of calories without impeding your Weightlifting. A great

alternative to sprints, particularly on bad weather days. Does all

this make sense?

W.G.

Ubermensch Sports Consultancy

San Diego, CA. USA

>

> I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies to

> those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be

> called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In

> other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and

> have " love handles " even when my weight is down.

>

> I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have

> lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30

> km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week.

>

> I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing

> weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch about

> 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those have

> come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training will

> see further improvement.

>

> My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is

> working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem to

> lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off running

> for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week.

>

> I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good

> runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and used

> to be quite strong in my youth).

>

> The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness level

> and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running.

> However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work

> against each other.

>

> Does anyone in this group have any thoughts?

>

> Barry Eagar

>

> Brisbane, Australia

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Barry

There is an activity that kills two birds - aerobics and weight

training - in one shot: kettlebells. As one of the promoters said,

they allow you to lose fat without the dishonor of aerobics or

dieting. Probably most comprehensive free info on this subject can

be found on www.dragondoor.com forum and www.bodybuilding.com.

Main advantage of KB is in their ballistic exercises. Snatching them

for numbers will send your heart rate to the maximum. Check it out.

You can send me an email (eugenesmet@...), I have some info

that I can send you. And no, I don't sell KBs or related products :-)

Eugene

Sydney, Australia

**[Mod: Please don't forget to sign your post with your full name - many thanks

in advance]

>

> I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies

to

> those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be

> called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In

> other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and

> have " love handles " even when my weight is down.

>

> I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have

> lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30

> km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week.

>

> I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing

> weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch

about

> 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those

have

> come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training

will

> see further improvement.

>

> My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is

> working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem

to

> lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off

running

> for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week.

>

> I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good

> runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and

used

> to be quite strong in my youth).

>

> The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness

level

> and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running.

> However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work

> against each other.

>

> Does anyone in this group have any thoughts?

>

> Barry Eagar

>

> Brisbane, Australia

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Barry, it's reasonably well established that if you want to do both

at a high level it won't really work because of contradictory

physiological implications.

However, keeping in good aerobic shape while you weight train is

certainly a plus. (I note Dave Draper's recent multiple bypass

surgery -- and wish him well of course.)

Aerobic conditioning improves arterial compliance (elasticity),

probably cholesterol profile and particle size, and markers of

inflammation.

Run and do weights by all means, just don't run more than, say, 45

minutes three of four times a week. It will help your weight

management as well. Alternate the days if you can, or at least split

the day up into morning and evening.

I do both, but I admit I won't be winning any weightlifting or

bodybuilding competitions (or marathons) any time soon :-).

Gympie, Australia

>

> I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies

to

> those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be

> called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In

> other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and

> have " love handles " even when my weight is down.

>

> I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have

> lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30

> km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week.

>

> I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing

> weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch

about

> 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those

have

> come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training

will

> see further improvement.

>

> My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is

> working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem to

> lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off running

> for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week.

>

> I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good

> runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and used

> to be quite strong in my youth).

>

> The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness

level

> and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running.

> However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work

> against each other.

>

> Does anyone in this group have any thoughts?

>

> Barry Eagar

>

> Brisbane, Australia

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Hannu,

I used to run, but no longer. I believe I am too heavy to do it currently. I

got sore ankles and knees when I tried it. So I switched to HIIT and do hill

climbs instead. Luckily there is no sign of knee or ankle pain. Oh, I used to

do some running on the beach. That was pretty good. It is a full body workout.

Best wishes

Sharah

Sydney, Australia

================

hannu.leinonen@... wrote:

Tamare Cobbins wrote about Bill s reply:

That statement is funny, " The only time you should run is if someone bigger

than you is chasing you? "

..........................

<<<Thanks Bill, we need to loosen up now and then :-)

Anything that makes your heard pump over 110 r/min is aerobic exercises –

and it does not even have to be sports. Just work harder and you’ll get your

aerobic dose.

I am interested in HIIT, but also very aware of the risk of over exercising.

When you go to high intensities, it is effective, but you need to recover.

We all know this, but in practice it’s easy to over do training. (Well for

me at least.)

I’ve been monitoring my energy consumption/ workload and I am doing from

1000 to 1100 METh in 4 weeks. (from 200 – 400 METh is sports).

(This is from 15 up to 40 hours of sports per week.) This is possible

because I use very low intensity training. (I play a lot of golf, with a

heart beat rate about 100 r/m.) In textbooks this should not have an impact

on aerobic capacity, but it has had.)

I don’t have anything against running. I’ve been three times jogging this

week – about 10 km each. Walking, jogging, riding a bike, swimming or skiing

are the first things that come in mind when we start an aerobic training.

If we were intuitive, we could figure out very many other ways to develop

aerobic capacity. And it just might be done during work or very much in

shorter period of time – like in HIIT.

I run because I have the time for it – and it is easy. What I don’t like

about running is that it kills my knees.>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It doesn't but we already know this .

Damien Chiappini

Pittsburgh,PA.

Re: Re: Weights or running or both?

Please explain how a movement performed with a kettlebell has some

inherent advantage over a similar movement performed with a dumbbell

or swingbell or clubbell or sack of sand?

Hobman

Saskatoon, Canada

> Barry

>

> There is an activity that kills two birds - aerobics and weight

> training - in one shot: kettlebells. As one of the promoters said,

> they allow you to lose fat without the dishonor of aerobics or

> dieting. Probably most comprehensive free info on this subject can

> be found on www.dragondoor. com forum and www.bodybuilding. com.

>

> Main advantage of KB is in their ballistic exercises. Snatching them

> for numbers will send your heart rate to the maximum. Check it out.

> You can send me an email (eugenesmetbigpond (DOT) com), I have some info

> that I can send you. And no, I don't sell KBs or related products :-)

>

> Eugene

> Sydney, Australia

> **[Mod: Please don't forget to sign your post with your full name -

> many thanks in advance]

>

>

> >

> > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall (apologies

> to

> > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be

> > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In

> > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and

> > have " love handles " even when my weight is down.

> >

> > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have

> > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30

> > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week.

> >

> > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing

> > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch

> about

> > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those

> have

> > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training

> will

> > see further improvement.

> >

> > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is

> > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem

> to

> > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off

> running

> > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week.

> >

> > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good

> > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and

> used

> > to be quite strong in my youth).

> >

> > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness

> level

> > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running.

> > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work

> > against each other.

> >

> > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts?

> >

> > Barry Eagar

> >

> > Brisbane, Australia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Kettlebells are just a tool. 'They' sit on the ground and do

nothing until you chose to use them. 'Kettlebells' is not a verb.

Chip Conrad

Bodytribe Fitness

Sacramento, CA

www.physicalsubculture.com

> >

> > I am a 43 yr old male. I weigh 82 kgs and am 1.75m tall

(apologies

> to

> > those still on the imperial system). I guess I have what could be

> > called an " endomorphic " (is that term still used?) body type. In

> > other words, I " thicken " really easily around the middle and

> > have " love handles " even when my weight is down.

> >

> > I have been training fairly regularly for about 9 months and have

> > lost 10kgs in that time. I run about three times a week (20 to 30

> > km's a week) and do weights once or twice a week.

> >

> > I enjoy the running, but recently have become excited about doing

> > weights and am enjoying learning to olympic lift. I can snatch

> about

> > 50kg's and can clean about 90kg's. So, nothing stupendous! Those

> have

> > come off a much lower base and I am sure that continued training

> will

> > see further improvement.

> >

> > My quandary is this. I am beginning to sense that my running is

> > working against my weightlifting. When I am running well, I seem

> to

> > lose that sense of strength and power I have when I lay off

> running

> > for about 2 weeks and just do weights 2 or 3 times a week.

> >

> > I prefer how I feel when I do weights. Also, I'm not a very good

> > runner (never have been, even though I played decent rugby and

> used

> > to be quite strong in my youth).

> >

> > The problem is that I am concerned about maintaining my fitness

> level

> > and it would seem a shame to lose what I have gained running.

> > However, it doesn't seem too smart to do two activities that work

> > against each other.

> >

> > Does anyone in this group have any thoughts?

> >

> > Barry Eagar

> >

> > Brisbane, Australia

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I have a 50 year old female client who does absolutely no aerobics or

running of any kind, just strength training, and only twice weekly at that.

After a recent stress test her doctor told her that not only was she in

excellent shape, she outperformed a few of the Orlando Magic.

I do zero aerobics, and zero running. I played tennis with a client for two

hours on Sunday, and despite the heat and constant movement, I barely got my

heart rate up. I'll take a couple heavy compound lifts over a jog for

conditioning any day.

Drew Baye

Orlando, FL

High Intensity Training

HYPERLINK " http://www.baye.com/ " www.baye.com

_____

From: Supertraining [mailto:Supertraining ]

On Behalf Of Schaefer

Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 2:46 PM

To: Supertraining

Subject: Re: VS: Weights or running or both?

And I reiterate my position that if you lift vigorously enough, you do NOT

require conventional " aerobic " training to be " HEALTHY. " I deadlift and do

farmer's walk for my conditioning of my heart as well as my body and soul.

That's what works for ME. farmer's WALK, not RUN.

Want to sling kettles, or dance the macarena, or do step aerobics, or swim,

what have you, do as YOU see fit. I am fit and do as I see fit!

So quit trying to push those of us NOT interested in RUNNING into running.

We have our reasons, whether they are the comfort of joints, our

disposition, or whether we truly DO string garlic to prevent the incursion

of runners....perhaps we should, as they are determined we should RUN?

<grin>. I don't recall Mel clocking any low number miles, yet he was an

extremely fit and flexible man...lol. I also don't think you'd have enjoyed

success turning say, Steve Prefontaine, into a powerlifter? We most enjoy

those activities that use our strengths, and there is a good deal of reason

NOT to plod about doing something miserable that does NOT serve us a good

purpose....only if you lift max singles constantly, or fail to work hard

enough, could i see you as NEEDING to go engage in an activity of misery

waiting for some apparatus to go BEEP so you can go HOME?

Why so little respect for strength athletes AS athletes while you tout

Olympic decathletes? We would beat them on the platform, sorry!

I would agree they're highly fit, but they're also highly specialized.-..we

are highly specialized for the strength sports, and frankly ENOUGH of

dismissing the fitness and aerobic capacity building traits of LIFTING.

It is that very jingoistic approach that states we must RUN or get on some

silly elliptical as the ONLY way for our hearts to work out properly that

would cause me to consider placing chalk blocks at the doorstep of my house

to prevent you coming in....as a talisman against such prejudice WITHOUT

EVIDENCE! the POPULAR notion that one must be a runner, or perform strictly

aerobic moves for the heart is not correct, and I believe there's a posting

on this thread that supports this. Why the medical community and researchers

are slow to see this perhaps is a mystery, Dr. Ralph has suggested

previously that the number of docs who lift weights may be far lower than

those who run or do other notably aerobic activities?

By the way, the stiffer TRAIL " running " shoes make excellent shoes for heavy

leg press..... as well as walking to my car carrying my gym bag <grin>. They

don't cause as much wobble as the squishy shoes in farmer's walk either...

To each their own.

========================

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I have been following this interesting thread and I feel that much of the thread

goes to the question of what is general fitness. Here are a few of my thoughts:

1)Are marathon runners fit? They certainly have fantastic c/v fitness but a very

specific type. They are totally adapted to long distance running. They are fit

for their pursuit but nothing else. I doubt if they could complete a minimal

pushup/chin/dip test. Or even a test on a rowing machine. They are very

specialized athletes just as heavy weight powerlifters are in their chosen

pursuit. I doubt if most powerlifters can run a few kms. They do not train for

that. Adding muscle mass would certainly be healthy for the marathon runner but

counter productive to his athletic pursuit. The opposite for the heavy weight

powerlifter. So does ultra endurance or ultra strength have anything to do with

health or fitness? I doubt it.

2) I remember Mel Siff pointing out that all fitness tests are inherently

specific i.e. if you cycle you will do better on a cycling fitness test than on

a running or rowing test. So why is running given such status?

3) When I was in the army we were tested for fitness by running 2000m. (about

1.4 miles). This seems to me a good standard in that the effort is divided

nearly evenly between aerobic and anarobic energy systems. I think a person

looking for general fitness (aerobic/anaerobic) could probably best attain it by

training in this parameter. I don't think that it must be running and the

sessions can certainly be abbreviated. Here is one of my favorite swim w/o's:

10x50m. swim with patrner. You go, he rests and then switch. Swim is done on

about 90% effort. I also switch strokes. It is accepted that the ration between

swimming and running is 1:4 so a 50m. swim is like a 200m. run.

Just some random thoughts.

Yehoshua Zohar

Karmiel, Israel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Do both or at least some form of CV training (swim, walk, bike,). If

you read the series of books by Ken most of his findings about

aerobic exercise are still valid today. In one of his books (I Can't

remember for sure which) he cites a study about aerobic fitness and HDL

levels. The higher the level of fitness the higher the HDLs ( " good "

cholesterol). Which in turn relates to the Framinghan study that

basically says the higher propotion of HDLs the lower your risk for

cardiovascular disease. The good news is even modest amounts of aerobic

exercise casn bring improvement in HDL levels. Just stay active and

have fun.

Ray

**Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you

wish them to be published!**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Here are some VO2 numbers I dug out for strength and power athletes.

The study is a bit old but I could not find anything more up to date,

but there probably is.

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53(2):97-105. Neuromuscular,

anaerobic, and aerobic performance characteristics of elite power

athletes. Hakkinen K, Alen M, Komi PV.

These are the averages in the range. VO2 is the accepted measure of

cardiorespiratory fitness. (mg/kg/minute)

Wrestlers -- 57.8

Bodybuilders -- 50.8

Powerlifters -- 41.9

From my own knowledge, give or take a few points:

Amateur endurance runners are usually in the range 60-70.

Elite endurance athletes 75-85

Elite running team sports 65-70

Amateur team sports 55-65

VO2 is related to health for a number of end points, eg,

cardiovascular, diabetes, some cancers, and at the micro level, HDL,

CRP/inflammation, and a few other emerging things.

Of the strength and power athletes, it's clear to see that the

wrestlers are in reasonably good shape, 58 is a good level of

fitness. Boxers are going to be somewhere over 60 I would think.

So, if you're interested in cardiorespiratory fitness, perhaps the

lesson here is that you have to move your legs, and the more you

move, the fitter you get. And I accept that VO2 is only one measure

of fitness. Strength is another. Get both. (IMHO :-).

Gympie, Australia

>

> Do both or at least some form of CV training (swim, walk, bike,). If

> you read the series of books by Ken most of his findings

about

> aerobic exercise are still valid today. In one of his books (I Can't

> remember for sure which) he cites a study about aerobic fitness and

HDL

> levels. The higher the level of fitness the higher the HDLs ( " good "

> cholesterol). Which in turn relates to the Framinghan study that

> basically says the higher propotion of HDLs the lower your risk for

> cardiovascular disease. The good news is even modest amounts of

aerobic

> exercise casn bring improvement in HDL levels. Just stay active and

> have fun.

>

> Ray

> **Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of

residence if you wish them to be published!**

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...