Guest guest Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 Dear Marguerite,I meant to reference some of the efficacy studies in the previous email. Please forgive me for leaving that out. Of course I am "mindful" of the different philosophies out there - many of these are indeed reviewing and evaluating our own NFP studies!!! Effectiveness Studies on NFP: 1998-2007* 1 year Perfect Use Typical UseHilgers/OM/CRM 0.50 3.2/OM/CRM 0.14 17.12European STM/2x check 2.6European STM/1x check 8.5Burkhart Fixed Day 9-19 11.00Arevalo Standard Day 8-19 4.8 12.00Arevalo Two Day Method 3.5 13.70Fruendl BBT/Lady Comp 5.30Bonnar Urine LH/Persona 6.2 12.1 /span>Indian Billings OM Trial 1.5&n bsp; 15.9Fehring Mucus + EHFM 2.1 14.2 Effectiveness Rates of NFP Methods by Trussell using 1995 NSFG data (Trussell, Contraceptive Failure in the U.S., Contraception 70 (2004) 89-96Periodic Abstinence 25 Calendar 9 Ovulation Method 3 Symptothermal 2 Effectiveness of NFP (Kambic, R - CMR, Vol 11; Winter/Spring 2000. Based on meta analysis of 23 ovulation methods and 15 STM studies) Single index methods 97% 84%Multiple index methods 98% 90% *Marquette NFP Online Heal Course Dr. Peck, MD, CCD, AAFP, Marquette NFP InstructorPecks Family Practice, PLC1688 W Granada Blvd, Ste 2AOrmond Beach, FL 32174 fax: cell: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.