Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 I have been meaning to ask this question...how does one know whether something is a savant ability, or just a talent? I know there is a difference. Of course, an " idiot savant " is a person that is very good at one skill but nothing else. But I have met many people that stated they had a " savant ability " or multiple " savant abilities, " and I was wondering, what qualifies something as being a savant ability? I have a thought. I'm reminded of the " intervention vs. development " concept and I am looking at a parallel " savant ability vs. talent " concept; not all talents autistic people have are savant abilities! Just as not all development is the result of an intervention. I have read that when a spectrum person tries to be more social, the savant abilitiy/abilities they have become weaker. Having experienced a loss of one of my talents during elevated levels of social interaction, I think I have an ability that may be a savant ability. My guess is that a savant ability is one that comes naturally, in which the individual needs no training. My guess, also, is that a savant ability is often substancially above an individual's other abilities. But I am just not sure. Which is why I am asking. I have several talents. I am good at acting, I am good at art (though I can't draw or sketch; I can only paint and sculpt). I am a good pianist and I am a good writer. I can maintain all these abilities regardless of how social I am. But I also write music. I've been making up songs since before I could talk. I taught myself to play a keyboarded instrument when I was about 3, and as soon as my family bought a piano when I was 7 I started being able to play my sister's lessons by ear (it never occured to me to look at her books) and within weeks I was able to play the piano by ear fairly accurately. This was several years after the small electric organ broke, leaving me with no instrument except voice. I can be cleaning my apartment or walking my dog or reading or anything and suddenly a song that I've never heard before will get into my head. I then feel the need to rush to a piano and play this song (easily, by ear). The only hard part is writing it down, but I've invented a system for rapid transcription. I can quickly write down some appropriate accompanyment and within a few minutes, I'll have written a new song. I can also take a poem someone else wrote and write music for it in a few minutes, and I can just sit at the piano and my fingers will write something new. I sometimes capture the music my mind and hands compose so effortlessly, and sometimes I do not. I express emotion through my music and I've discovered that when I watch films, I use the music rather than the nonverbal communication the actors are using to figure out the emotions. When the music is wrong, it's a bad movie, but so long as the music is right, it is a good movie, no matter how " bad " it is. Writing music to be comes completely naturally and effortlessly...writing DOWN music in my own technique is at least somewhat inefficient although not always fast enough and sometimes I lose part of a song before I can transcribe it...even though I read music quite well, I lack an internal metronome and perfect pitch and have a terrible time transcribing my compositions into sheet music. Even with software for that purpose I have a terrible time with it. But the actual invention of new music, and the ability to play that music on a keyboarded instrument, is completely effortless for me. When I am more social, it is an ability I lack entirely. For example, when I was in my first relationship, I was only able to write one song during the entire duration of the relationship (3 months) because I was being much more social than usual. During the week that we were broken up during this time period, I was able to write dozens and dozens of songs. It is not simply that I lacked the angst needed to write music, or something like that. I can write music while in a relationship if I do not need to be social. So...how can I tell if I have a savant ability or if it's just a talent? And, for that matter, are my artistic abilities also savant abilities? How can I paint something or sculpt something if I cannot sketch it? That baffled all my art teachers. I would ask, " Can I please just not do the sketch? I know exactly what I want to do, but I can't draw it. " After this had happened a few times, my teachers were willing to just let me go right to the finished product and skip their fruitless attempts to have me do a sketch first. (Sketches were not part of the grade but they prevented the wasting of materials so sketching was standard). If neither of these is a savant ability, then what is an savant ability? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 nah, I know this is not directly related to what you're talking about, but I would like to know your method for writing down music. I've had no success trying to learn standard musical notation. I write ragtime (and have a piece posted in the Files area) and figure it might help immensely. I'm often in the same fix you're in, with a beautiful melody in my head that is lost forever once I go to my computer (I use Finale Notepad). I've noticed that as some of my more obviously autistic quirks have faded over time (the rocking, for example) some of my abilities have also. I haven't been able to create a cartoon, or come up with a single idea for a cartoon, in nearly a decade. I wonder if what's happening to both of us is related somehow. > I have read that when a spectrum person tries to be more social, the savant abilitiy/abilities they have become weaker. Having experienced a loss of one of my talents during elevated levels of social interaction, I think I have an ability that may be a savant ability. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 Here is a good site that not only offers a definition of Savant Syndrome, but also explains it in some detail: http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant/faq.cfm BTW, the terms " idiot " and " idiot savant " are not only hopelessly out of date, but also politically incorrect and inaccurate to boot. Using such labels shows a gross misunderstanding of the whole concept of intelligence. The concept of multiple intelligences is well established and the classic IQ tests focus on only two or three. Colin (Who also screwed up school IQ tests, became bored and realised that the IBM cards were two-sided, and thus, when punched, only one correct answer per question meant that the other side was already determined.) Quoting Newstead : > nah, > > I know this is not directly related to what you're talking about, but I > would like to know your method for writing down music. I've had no success > trying to learn standard musical notation. I write ragtime (and have a > piece > posted in the Files area) and figure it might help immensely. I'm often in > the same fix you're in, with a beautiful melody in my head that is lost > forever once I go to my computer (I use Finale Notepad). > > I've noticed that as some of my more obviously autistic quirks have faded > over time (the rocking, for example) some of my abilities have also. I > haven't been able to create a cartoon, or come up with a single idea for a > cartoon, in nearly a decade. I wonder if what's happening to both of us is > related somehow. > > > > I have read that when a spectrum person tries to be more social, the > savant abilitiy/abilities they have become weaker. Having experienced a > loss of one of my talents during elevated levels of social interaction, I > think I have an ability that may be a savant ability. > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 I am making myself a note to reply to this tomorrow. I will take a photo of my method and scan it in and add an explanation but it will take a while and I need to get offline right now and probably won't have time to come back to it. If I haven't replied in 2 days send me a message to remind me I was supposed to because if I haven't got to it by then I've forgotten what the reminder means. Newstead wrote:nah, I know this is not directly related to what you're talking about, but I would like to know your method for writing down music. I've had no success trying to learn standard musical notation. I write ragtime (and have a piece posted in the Files area) and figure it might help immensely. I'm often in the same fix you're in, with a beautiful melody in my head that is lost forever once I go to my computer (I use Finale Notepad). I've noticed that as some of my more obviously autistic quirks have faded over time (the rocking, for example) some of my abilities have also. I haven't been able to create a cartoon, or come up with a single idea for a cartoon, in nearly a decade. I wonder if what's happening to both of us is related somehow. > I have read that when a spectrum person tries to be more social, the savant abilitiy/abilities they have become weaker. Having experienced a loss of one of my talents during elevated levels of social interaction, I think I have an ability that may be a savant ability. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 I knew the term idiot savant seemed outdated to me but not knowing the contemporary term I used it anyway. I saw a news program about " idiot savants " when I was a child and when I first saw the word " savant " as an adult I had no idea what it meant because I expected the word to be something like " Idiasuffant " because I didn't know the first part was actually " idiot. " I take it the term is supposed to mean " mentally retarded person incapable of self-care that has a single or a small cluster of savant abilities " since the old meaning of idiot now means a person with very low IQ. I should learn to apologize for my use of outdated terms in advance but in the mid-80s when I learned about the phenomenon, that was still what they called it, at least in the news. To give you some perspective about when this was in my life and in history, I think it was in the news because Rain Man had recently premiered (at least that would make sense because they mentioned the film in the report) and I was born in 1979 so I was in elementary school at the time this aired. I remember that Norma Rashid was the narrator and that, therefore, it was on NBC, and may have been a local program rather than on national news because she was a local television anchor, along with Jerry Springer (back before he had his own talk show he actually had rather good nightly commentaries) and someone else who I cannot recall because he was the sports caster so I did not care. I appreciate the information. I will have to check out that web site. Colin Wessels wrote: Here is a good site that not only offers a definition of Savant Syndrome, but also explains it in some detail: http://www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/savant/faq.cfm BTW, the terms " idiot " and " idiot savant " are not only hopelessly out of date, but also politically incorrect and inaccurate to boot. Using such labels shows a gross misunderstanding of the whole concept of intelligence. The concept of multiple intelligences is well established and the classic IQ tests focus on only two or three. Colin (Who also screwed up school IQ tests, became bored and realised that the IBM cards were two-sided, and thus, when punched, only one correct answer per question meant that the other side was already determined.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2003 Report Share Posted November 5, 2003 Subject: Re: What is a savant ability? nah, I know this is not directly related to what you're talking about, but I would like to know your method for writing down music. I've had no success trying to learn standard musical notation. I write ragtime (and have a piece posted in the Files area) and figure it might help immensely. I'm often in the same fix you're in, with a beautiful melody in my head that is lost forever once I go to my computer (I use Finale Notepad). I've noticed that as some of my more obviously autistic quirks have faded over time (the rocking, for example) some of my abilities have also. I haven't been able to create a cartoon, or come up with a single idea for a cartoon, in nearly a decade. I wonder if what's happening to both of us is related somehow. > I have read that when a spectrum person tries to be more social, the savant abilitiy/abilities they have become weaker. Having experienced a loss of one of my talents during elevated levels of social interaction, I think I have an ability that may be a savant ability. > i stopped creative writing when depression went. i was never a savant though, just some splinter abilities. a savant has an ability developed to extraordinary capabilities at the expense of others. out of respect to savants, i would not like to see that term watered down to include talents. __________________________________________________________________ McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network. Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397 Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now! http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2003 Report Share Posted November 5, 2003 Musical notation takes too long. Much too long to be useful. I am a former Finale Notepad user but now a Finale user. My husband was a music theory/composition major for 5 years and he luckily bought Finale when he was in college, but the only real advantages to that are the ability to strike a note on a keyboard instead of having to punch it in, and being able to write longer songs without breaking them up into multiple songs. I invented this method for writing music rather spontaneously and I've refined it a little over the years. The advantage is that it's rather fast, but the disadvantage is that you really have to have a good memory or be quick to come up with words (even if they are entirely meaningless). And, depending on how you write, it may or may not be useful. The big priority is getting the actual notes down. I can sit at the piano and play whatever is in my head by ear, sometimes with a few mistakes but generally what I want it to sound like. As I play the melody, I think of words that will reflect the lengths of the notes. This is really hard to explain. The words are basically discarded once I have the song memorized. But I have learned the hard way that I must have the words written down with the song because otherwise I might not play it for a while and then I'll find the song and I'll be like, " I have no idea what this is supposed to sound like. I can't figure it out at all. " Sometimes I end up figuring it out. Of course you know how different 2-eights quarter half note quarter sounds from quarter quarter half note dot quarter eighth. Yet if I just write down notes I don't know how to play them because I do not know their value. So if I were to write, for instance, ABCDE, I have no idea what that sounds like if I do not know how long to hold the notes. I use the words to remind me of how long to hold each note. Think about a song you know that has words. You could play the song without the words because you know how long to hold each note because you know the words. In my case, I can use the words, " I am waiting for the traffic light to change, " and these words will not have anything to do with the song but everything to do with how long to hold the notes. I am waiting for the traffic light to change...I'd consider that as eigthth, eigthth, eighth, eighth, eighth, eighth, quarter, eighth, half note. The notes I hear are D E F# G F# E F# D E I would have no idea how this sounded, if I wrote just this snipplet down, just this line of notes, capital letters and sharp or flat signs, unless I had some way to know how long to hold each note before proceeding. That is why I use the words. Now, for accompanyment, I would play through this melody and automatically I'd be able to figure out what notes would work with these and I'd end up writing out D E F# G F# E F# D E D B A Other chords could certainly work, and the accompanyment has yet to be added, but through this basic formula, I can go back later and play what I wrote: I am wait-ing for the light to change D E F# G F# E F# D E D B A (next line here) It's not perfect, but it's much quicker than traditional music notation, at least for me. The same thing in music notation that I get out of this much simpler format is the same as this melody: http://www.beseeingyou.net/anon/pics/snipofmusic.jpg Maybe this method will not work for you at all. I have never tried to explain it before so I am not sure if it came across well or not. This is something so basic to my life...it's like trying to explain how to walk. It's not as automatic as digesting food or something but I have done it so long that I don't know how to explain how it's done. I have noted that if I fail to write the accompanyment down or if I fail to write down the words, I often regret it. So I keep doing that. Also, it's important to sometimes include arrows. If you put " C G A " it will seem obvious to go from middle C to the G above it to the A above that G, when you may actually mean to go from middle C to the G below middle C and then to the A above middle C. In which case you need an arrow or the word " low " for the G and an arrow or the word " High " for A or else you may forget and then not recognize the song later when you try to play it. I just use " Hi " and " Lo " for these because they're shorter, or arrows. I generally just memorize my accompanyment so I don't need to write it down unless there is something unusual about it that I want to make sure not to forget. Multiple notes played at once are easy to add, for example if I have my example of C G A but I want to add more to it I'd do it this way...it would be: CG(lo)A(hi) C F But say I wanted to add some harmony notes in, it would look like this: E F CG(lo)A(hi) C F If the E is supposed to be below the C and the F is supposed to be above the A I can use arrows or hi and lo but I will keep the melody note in the melody line because otherwise I might not be able to play it properly later, or else I'll use a symbol that means " chord " above the melody note and then write a chord off to the side, such as B A Eb B Let me know if this made sense! I can take a picture of my writen-out version if that would make more sense, but I questioned whether or not I'd need to since I can type it just as easily. Newstead wrote: nah, I know this is not directly related to what you're talking about, but I would like to know your method for writing down music. I've had no success trying to learn standard musical notation. I write ragtime (and have a piece posted in the Files area) and figure it might help immensely. I'm often in the same fix you're in, with a beautiful melody in my head that is lost forever once I go to my computer (I use Finale Notepad). I've noticed that as some of my more obviously autistic quirks have faded over time (the rocking, for example) some of my abilities have also. I haven't been able to create a cartoon, or come up with a single idea for a cartoon, in nearly a decade. I wonder if what's happening to both of us is related somehow. > I have read that when a spectrum person tries to be more social, the savant abilitiy/abilities they have become weaker. Having experienced a loss of one of my talents during elevated levels of social interaction, I think I have an ability that may be a savant ability. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.