Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Thinking, thanking

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

He realized that he was

> glad that he had come so far, had read so much, and had come to

under-

> stand things so much better. Anyway, that's what he was thinking,

and

> that he ought to say, " Thank you " .

Well, speaking for thousands of your cousins... " You are welcome " .

I also have appreciated the internet and the access to the different

AS/autism bulletin boards and articles by autistics like and

and Jim Sinclair and jypsy....

Camille - calls herself oddizm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Camille wrote:

> I also have appreciated the internet and the

> access to the different AS/autism bulletin

> boards and articles by autistics like

> and and Jim Sinclair and jypsy....

Yes, I look to all of them as our best

advocates, but there is also Jerry, ,

and Juli right alongside them. There are

also many more who I am hoping will be able

to " get our message across " .

Clay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Camille wrote:

>

> > I also have appreciated the internet and the

> > access to the different AS/autism bulletin

> > boards and articles by autistics like

> > and and Jim Sinclair and jypsy....

>

> Yes, I look to all of them as our best

> advocates, but there is also Jerry, ,

> and Juli right alongside them. There are

> also many more who I am hoping will be able

> to " get our message across " .

Ack, I should have said, Jane, Jerry, and

Juli. I'd like to see a compilation of some

their best articles put forward in a book, like

" Women From Another Planet? " . It's an idea.

Clay, who had to get up again at 4 AM to correct

this major omission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jane, Jerry, and Juli, jypsy and jim and then there are

and who need to change their names to start with " j " .

:-)

Camille

> >

> > > I also have appreciated the internet and the

> > > access to the different AS/autism bulletin

> > > boards and articles by autistics like

> > > and and Jim Sinclair and jypsy....

> >

> > Yes, I look to all of them as our best

> > advocates, but there is also Jerry, ,

> > and Juli right alongside them. There are

> > also many more who I am hoping will be able

> > to " get our message across " .

>

> Ack, I should have said, Jane, Jerry, and

> Juli. I'd like to see a compilation of some

> their best articles put forward in a book, like

> " Women From Another Planet? " . It's an idea.

>

> Clay, who had to get up again at 4 AM to correct

> this major omission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top-posting uncharacteristically and dragging out an old post (still

trying to catch up from when I was gone):

1. Actually, when I was born, there was talk of naming me " " .

<grin>

2. If people were serious about some sort of book along the lines of

_WfAP_ (but with some other particular focus), I would really like to

contribute (and *possibly* help with the editing/producing/etc

process, although certainly not be the main editor).

3. If #2 happens, can someone email me directly? I'm still nomail

from this list.

, disgruntled by the book her articles (the oldest ones that are

most palatable to NTs, no less, of course) *are* in, but definitely

wanting to contribute to some sort of *worthwhile* book that could

affect people positively (and who knows some other people who might

contribute well to some kind of autistic self-advocacy-centered book)

> > >

> > > > I also have appreciated the internet and the

> > > > access to the different AS/autism bulletin

> > > > boards and articles by autistics like

> > > > and and Jim Sinclair and jypsy....

> > >

> > > Yes, I look to all of them as our best

> > > advocates, but there is also Jerry, ,

> > > and Juli right alongside them. There are

> > > also many more who I am hoping will be able

> > > to " get our message across " .

> >

> > Ack, I should have said, Jane, Jerry, and

> > Juli. I'd like to see a compilation of some

> > their best articles put forward in a book, like

> > " Women From Another Planet? " . It's an idea.

> >

> > Clay, who had to get up again at 4 AM to correct

> > this major omission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrote:

> 2. If people were serious about some sort of book along

> the lines of _WfAP_ (but with some other particular focus),

> I would really like to contribute (and *possibly* help with

> the editing/producing/etc process, although certainly not

> be the main editor).

And I'd really like to see such a book. I recently came

across a curebie parent on another List who said " Love my

son, sure, but to accept his " gift " ? - Never!!! " What he

wrote about his son really made me sick, he was disgusted

and ashamed, just a typical hysterical parental reaction to

the " bad " news that his son has autism.

So, what I would suggest for a focus of such a book is merely

a compilation of such essays dealing with the topic, chosen

by the authors themselves. I know these essays already exist,

and it would be little problem to put them together with an

eye toward countering CAN and other curebie groups. Please??

If some of you have differences, put them aside, and just

put this thing together. Possible title? " Yes, we can " .

(There was a book by Sammy Jr. - " Yes, I can " .)

Clay

> > > > > I also have appreciated the internet and the

> > > > > access to the different AS/autism bulletin

> > > > > boards and articles by autistics like

> > > > > and and Jim Sinclair and jypsy....

> > > >

> > > > Yes, I look to all of them as our best

> > > > advocates, but there is also Jerry, ,

> > > > and Juli right alongside them. There are

> > > > also many more who I am hoping will be able

> > > > to " get our message across " .

> > >

> > > Ack, I should have said, Jane, Jerry, and

> > > Juli. I'd like to see a compilation of some

> > > their best articles put forward in a book, like

> > > " Women From Another Planet? " . It's an idea.

> > >

> > > Clay, who had to get up again at 4 AM to correct

> > > this major omission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > 2. If people were serious about some sort of book along

> > the lines of _WfAP_ (but with some other particular focus),

> > I would really like to contribute (and *possibly* help with

> > the editing/producing/etc process, although certainly not

> > be the main editor).

> And I'd really like to see such a book. I recently came

> across a curebie parent on another List who said " Love my

> son, sure, but to accept his " gift " ? - Never!!! " What he

> wrote about his son really made me sick, he was disgusted

> and ashamed, just a typical hysterical parental reaction to

> the " bad " news that his son has autism.

Yes. I am getting so tired of that response my brain shuts off to

prevent me from losing my temper. Demonstrates a fundamental

misunderstanding of what I believe about autism, and usually includes

an accusation in it that I am several things I am not.

> So, what I would suggest for a focus of such a book is merely

> a compilation of such essays dealing with the topic, chosen

> by the authors themselves. I know these essays already exist,

> and it would be little problem to put them together with an

> eye toward countering CAN and other curebie groups. Please??

> If some of you have differences, put them aside, and just

> put this thing together. Possible title? " Yes, we can " .

> (There was a book by Sammy Jr. - " Yes, I can " .)

I don't really like " Yes, we can " . But titles could be decided later.

It doesn't have to be just essays that already exist, either. It

would be interesting to have discussions that formed into essays, as

well, like WfAP does.

Would also be an incredible amount of hard work for whoever took on

the job of editing it.

One thing I would like to get across in such an essay -- because it's

been bugging me lately -- are the assumptions people seem to have with

the no-cure perspective. For instance, people expect me, on my views

on cure *alone*, to have a number of viewpoints and abilities I

*don't* have. Such as that I oppose autistic people getting better

lives, getting help with problems that *do* bother us, etc. Or that I

am someone with (or even capable of) a job, a so-called " independent "

life, speech, toilet-training, a life partner, a college degree, a

life free of serious self-injury, a life free of several associated

conditions I do have, an ability to think quickly, or the ability to

do a zillion " basic " things that despite much attempt to do/learn them

I really can't do. My few observable-outsiderly talents may be

spectacular to some, but someone once summed it up best with " My

islands of ability have steep cliffs. " Plus the cliffs move around

and bounce up and down out of the ocean a lot, to continue the analogy

a bit.

But I would like to write such a thing in a way that didn't simply

evoke pity or self-pity, because that's not my intent. Nor would I

like it to sound like I'm " more autistic " or something. Just that the

stereotype of what they expect an anti-cure autistic person to be like

-- very NT-world " successful " -- is incredibly false and damaging and

erases the presence of people like me, and erases the complexity of

the viewpoint. Also that *calling* people like me and others

similar-or-'more-able' " cured " is probably costing the lives currently

of a lot of autistic people dying on the streets/other places because

they can't get services or money or anything because people like to

call them " cured " once they can [speak, type, whatever the current

" cured " criteria is].

Would really like to address the issue in a complex way. Which takes

a *lot* of work. (Writing is *not* easy for me, it's just something

I'm good at and have worked very hard for -- two *very* different things.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jolin wrote:

> WfAP? Enlighten me.

" Women from another Planet? " is a recent book published

with several authors you know of.

> > > wrote:

> >

> > > > 2. If people were serious about some sort of book along

> > > > the lines of _WfAP_ (but with some other particular focus),

> > > > I would really like to contribute (and *possibly* help with

> > > > the editing/producing/etc process, although certainly not

> > > > be the main editor).

> >

> > > And I'd really like to see such a book. I recently came

> > > across a curebie parent on another List who said " Love my

> > > son, sure, but to accept his " gift " ? - Never!!! " What he

> > > wrote about his son really made me sick, he was disgusted

> > > and ashamed, just a typical hysterical parental reaction to

> > > the " bad " news that his son has autism.

> >

> > Yes. I am getting so tired of that response my brain shuts off to

> > prevent me from losing my temper. Demonstrates a fundamental

> > misunderstanding of what I believe about autism, and usually

includes

> > an accusation in it that I am several things I am not.

> >

> > > So, what I would suggest for a focus of such a book is merely

> > > a compilation of such essays dealing with the topic, chosen

> > > by the authors themselves. I know these essays already exist,

> > > and it would be little problem to put them together with an

> > > eye toward countering CAN and other curebie groups. Please??

> > > If some of you have differences, put them aside, and just

> > > put this thing together. Possible title? " Yes, we can " .

> > > (There was a book by Sammy Jr. - " Yes, I can " .)

> >

> > I don't really like " Yes, we can " . But titles could be decided

later.

> >

> > It doesn't have to be just essays that already exist, either. It

> > would be interesting to have discussions that formed into essays,

as

> > well, like WfAP does.

> >

> > Would also be an incredible amount of hard work for whoever took

on

> > the job of editing it.

> >

> > One thing I would like to get across in such an essay -- because

it's

> > been bugging me lately -- are the assumptions people seem to have

with

> > the no-cure perspective. For instance, people expect me, on my

views

> > on cure *alone*, to have a number of viewpoints and abilities I

> > *don't* have. Such as that I oppose autistic people getting

better

> > lives, getting help with problems that *do* bother us, etc. Or

that I

> > am someone with (or even capable of) a job, a so-

called " independent "

> > life, speech, toilet-training, a life partner, a college degree, a

> > life free of serious self-injury, a life free of several

associated

> > conditions I do have, an ability to think quickly, or the ability

to

> > do a zillion " basic " things that despite much attempt to do/learn

them

> > I really can't do. My few observable-outsiderly talents may be

> > spectacular to some, but someone once summed it up best with " My

> > islands of ability have steep cliffs. " Plus the cliffs move

around

> > and bounce up and down out of the ocean a lot, to continue the

analogy

> > a bit.

> >

> > But I would like to write such a thing in a way that didn't simply

> > evoke pity or self-pity, because that's not my intent. Nor would

I

> > like it to sound like I'm " more autistic " or something. Just

that the

> > stereotype of what they expect an anti-cure autistic person to be

like

> > -- very NT-world " successful " -- is incredibly false and damaging

and

> > erases the presence of people like me, and erases the complexity

of

> > the viewpoint. Also that *calling* people like me and others

> > similar-or-'more-able' " cured " is probably costing the lives

currently

> > of a lot of autistic people dying on the streets/other places

because

> > they can't get services or money or anything because people like

to

> > call them " cured " once they can [speak, type, whatever the current

> > " cured " criteria is].

> >

> > Would really like to address the issue in a complex way. Which

takes

> > a *lot* of work. (Writing is *not* easy for me, it's just

something

> > I'm good at and have worked very hard for -- two *very* different

things.)

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> So, what I would suggest for a focus of such a book is merely

> a compilation of such essays dealing with the topic, chosen

> by the authors themselves.

The other thing is, how narrow or wide would the topic be?

Women from Another Planet had a fairly wide range of topics. Would

this book, presuming it ever happened, be focused solely on being

anti-cure, or on other issues surrounding autism as well? Would it be

rigidly arranged, or less rigid (Women from Another Planet was not

very rigidly arranged)?

What *would* the overriding topic of such a book be? Would we look

beyond a few mailing lists for authors? What viewpoints would be

acceptable, and what viewpoints would not (and what viewpoints would

we be willing to accept diversity on in order to include *other*

important viewpoints)? What person would agree to edit and try to

publish this monster (which is a really hard thing to do)?

What format would the writing be in, and how rigid would we be about

that? Would it be combination poetry/essays like Women from Another

Planet? Would some of it be about our lives as well as our ideas?

How much?

Who would the book be aimed at, and how would they find out it existed?

Etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrote:

Clay wrote:

> > So, what I would suggest for a focus of such a book

> > is merely a compilation of such essays dealing with

> > the topic, chosen by the authors themselves.

>

> The other thing is, how narrow or wide would the topic be?

I see it as a book that would dispel the " They're defective,

let's cure them or exterminate them " ideas of CAN and other

curebie groups. To let parents of newly diagnosed autistics

know that they can choose to deal with their children in a

constructive way, instead of playing the blame game and

living in denial and false hope. To help them understand

that we DO grow up, and may or may not still need services.

To tell them that they do NOT have absolute rights to do with

their children as they think best, and that what they might

try to do can be far more destructive than they can imagine.

> Women from Another Planet had a fairly wide range of topics.

> Would this book, presuming it ever happened, be focused solely

> on being anti-cure, or on other issues surrounding autism as

> well? Would it be rigidly arranged, or less rigid (Women

> from Another Planet was not very rigidly arranged)?

I have seen such a book, a large white one, (can't remember the

name of it, didn't buy it cause it cost $50.00+) that had an

article by Dave Spicer. (I read that part at B & N.) It was

basically an anthology by different writers.

> What *would* the overriding topic of such a book be? Would

> we look beyond a few mailing lists for authors? What view-

> points would be acceptable, and what viewpoints would not

> (and what viewpoints would we be willing to accept diversity

> on in order to include *other* important viewpoints)? What

> person would agree to edit and try to publish this monster

> (which is a really hard thing to do)?

I've suggested the over-all theme. I can't answer all of the

questions, but the authors already suggested would know which

of their articles would be pertinent. I'd start with Jim's

" Don't Mourn For Us " and then the main article on the right

side of 's website. There should certainly be room for

some diversity, but on the subject of " acceptance of a child's

diagnosis " and what to do next, how much diversity would there

be?

> What format would the writing be in, and how rigid would we

> be about that? Would it be combination poetry/essays like

> Women from Another Planet?

Unfortunately, I haven't yet bought WfaP, had some trouble

ordering at Amazon. I wouldn't think it needs poetry, but

there may be some poems which " hit the nail on the head " .

> Would some of it be about our lives as well as our ideas?

> How much?

That would be up to the authors, what they wish to say of

their own lives.

> Who would the book be aimed at, and how would they find

> out it existed?

Aimed at parents of autistic children. The usual ways?

And might I remind the prospective authors of the concept

of *royalties*?

Clay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Unfortunately, I haven't yet bought WfaP, had some trouble

> ordering at Amazon.

Try ordering it at www.1stbooks.com instead. That's direct from the

publisher. You can either get it in PDF format or hardcopy(book)

format. Book format takes roughly a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...