Re: Ever Increasing Compressions ??

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the reply H. Very informative & interesting. Myself, I enjoy

the 100 rep Sit @ home system, but I'd like a change every now & then.

I've been going over the claims & training programs offered by personal trainers

on youtube etc. Seems to be the benchmark is intensive strength workouts either

with machines, barbells, dumbbells or just simple bodyweight exercises.

The purpose is to do 'less time' but very intensive workouts every second day,

with 8-10 reps per exercise but intensity is rated at as close to 100% as you

can go and where say reps 9 & 10 are the end of the road for your muscles. You

must be on the verge of collapse by #10 and more reps are impossible. A short

rest, preferably only 30 secs & onto the next exercise. Give it ten reps of

full-on effort & collapse again. 30 seconds or more of rest and move onto the

next exercise, etc etc.

The steel bow is excellent here as one can change spring tension, if you are

reaching full compression. How do you feel the above " 'full-on' 10 rep system "

will go (as per above) with the bullworkers OR is compressing & holding

compression near on 100% effort for 10-15 seconds in an isometric hold once or

twice or thrice more effective with the bullworkers??

>

> Gentlemen,

> I have been experimenting, though I do not think I am going into new territory

as much as neglected.

> The principle of Isometric holds for strength increase was the main selling

point for the Bullworker. Gert Koelbel quoted the study of 60-70% effort gave

optimum results... and while this does produce excellent results, my curiosity

goes back to whom I considered the strongest man, pound for pound of days past,

Zass and his Isometric training.

>

> The majority of the public would be very content to have a high level of

fitness, which I feel is best attained through Iso-Motion movement. However,

there are a few individuals that would very much so want to increase their

strength level into the realm of way above average. At 5'6 " tall and 165 lbs,

Zass performed feats of strength most power lifters cannot achieve

today.  How?

>

> First and foremost, I BELIEVE, genetics is the #1 factor... then his lifestyle

coupled with his training methods.  His lifestyle involved a certain degree

of agility and stamina, which determined a high level of fitness... what he did

from that point was based on Isometric exercise, gradual progression with very

high levels of exertion, but always worked up to, never rushed. His feats of

strength speak for themselves and need no explanation.

>

> In my 60th year, I am still fortunate to be able to compete at a very high

level in Masters Wrestling. This calls for agility, stamina and strength.

Coincidentally, I am 5'6 " and weigh 170 lbs and by no means am I even close to

Zass's stature... but his method is very beneficial.

>

> I believe I have proved the stamina & agility possibilities with the

Sit-at-Home program, but when I switched to the " Endurance " training, a new

dimension was opened to me, but still on a stamina and strength basis. I wanted

to see how much emphasis on strength could be used without sacrificing the

flexibility and agility. 

>

> I have recently incorporated high Isometric level holds in my Iso-Motion

routine and have been extremely impressed with the results. These holds are

applied at no particular point other than when I feel inclined to do them.  I

have practiced this routine with the Bullworker; Bow Extension, Iso-Bow and the

Iso-Gym.  Each one has its own merits of application, but all go in the same

direction... STRENGTH & AGILITY.  It is my desire to combine both.

>

> Now for the answer to the question: I only increase the level of compression

consciously with the Isometric hold.  I started slowly in my compression and

slowly increased the level every time. Different positions produce different

levels of compression, but I was 3 weeks into the program before I truly felt

the " power-burn " of pushing the envelope. My Iso-Motion compression levels

increase naturally due to my increase in overall strength.  I do not use the

powermeter due to the fact, I know my body and how much to push it. There are

days I push further, but the feeling is always the same and I rest on weekends.

>

> Again, this is all combined with Iso-Motion movement, which I feel is superior

to only Isotonic movement. Iso-Motion exercises the body in " everyday " movement

and strengthens the body. Exercise fitness routines are actually moving in this

direction.

>

> I hope this helps and I welcome comments and results... just give

me personal statements.

> Opinions are nice, but without testing are just that... opinions.

>

> I have learned that certain bodies respond a little differently, but still

move in the general direction for results. A scientific test is nice, but I am

not doing one, nor shall I. To me the proof is in the results and I have always

tested my routines and have never been hesitant to move away from negative or

towards or positive results.

>

> Respectfully,

>

> Bullworker

>

>

> ________________________________

>

> To: bullworkerclub

> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:23 AM

> Subject: Ever Increasing Compressions ??

>

>

>  

> For ;

>

> , you posted this on facebook.....

> " Im always trying to maximize the benefit of a Bulworker exercise, I am

leaning towards the benefits of the combination of Iso-Motion with a " strong "

Isomertic hold interspersed at varying points in the movements. The benefits of

tendon strength development is not to be neglected in one's overall fitness

routine. While the Isometric hold needs to be increased incrementally, it needs

to be increased consistently. By increasing the hold in slow increments, minimal

joint stress is maximized through the strength gain. "

>

> Question: Can you comment some more on those last two sentences? Am i

increasing the applied pressure whilst in the iso-motion / isometric hold? Does

this also apply to regular isometric 7-10 second compressions?

>

[Guest guest]

Faris,I like the 100% concept, but as with any exercise program... there must be a progressive build-up to it. To promote 100% from the get-go, is going to cause problems with joints and muscles.I still like the 10 reps with the Isometric hold for rep #10. It is a great intro to the progression ladder.There are several other combos, but all involve building up to the 100%.Respectfully, Bullworker To: bullworkerclub Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:51 PM Subject: Re: Ever Increasing Compressions ??

Thanks for the reply H. Very informative & interesting. Myself, I enjoy the 100 rep Sit @ home system, but I'd like a change every now & then.

I've been going over the claims & training programs offered by personal trainers on youtube etc. Seems to be the benchmark is intensive strength workouts either with machines, barbells, dumbbells or just simple bodyweight exercises.

The purpose is to do 'less time' but very intensive workouts every second day, with 8-10 reps per exercise but intensity is rated at as close to 100% as you can go and where say reps 9 & 10 are the end of the road for your muscles. You must be on the verge of collapse by #10 and more reps are impossible. A short rest, preferably only 30 secs & onto the next exercise. Give it ten reps of full-on effort & collapse again. 30 seconds or more of rest and move onto the next exercise, etc etc.

The steel bow is excellent here as one can change spring tension, if you are reaching full compression. How do you feel the above "'full-on' 10 rep system" will go (as per above) with the bullworkers OR is compressing & holding compression near on 100% effort for 10-15 seconds in an isometric hold once or twice or thrice more effective with the bullworkers??

>

> Gentlemen,

> I have been experimenting, though I do not think I am going into new territory as much as neglected.

> The principle of Isometric holds for strength increase was the main selling point for the Bullworker. Gert Koelbel quoted the study of 60-70% effort gave optimum results... and while this does produce excellent results, my curiosity goes back to whom I considered the strongest man, pound for pound of days past, Zass and his Isometric training.

>

> The majority of the public would be very content to have a high level of fitness, which I feel is best attained through Iso-Motion movement. However, there are a few individuals that would very much so want to increase their strength level into the realm of way above average. At 5'6" tall and 165 lbs, Zass performed feats of strength most power lifters cannot achieve today. Â How?

>

> First and foremost, I BELIEVE, genetics is the #1 factor... then his lifestyle coupled with his training methods.  His lifestyle involved a certain degree of agility and stamina, which determined a high level of fitness... what he did from that point was based on Isometric exercise, gradual progression with very high levels of exertion, but always worked up to, never rushed. His feats of strength speak for themselves and need no explanation.

>

> In my 60th year, I am still fortunate to be able to compete at a very high level in Masters Wrestling. This calls for agility, stamina and strength. Coincidentally, I am 5'6" and weigh 170 lbs and by no means am I even close to Zass's stature... but his method is very beneficial.

>

> I believe I have proved the stamina & agility possibilities with the Sit-at-Home program, but when I switched to the "Endurance" training, a new dimension was opened to me, but still on a stamina and strength basis. I wanted to see how much emphasis on strength could be used without sacrificing the flexibility and agility.Â

>

> I have recently incorporated high Isometric level holds in my Iso-Motion routine and have been extremely impressed with the results. These holds are applied at no particular point other than when I feel inclined to do them.  I have practiced this routine with the Bullworker; Bow Extension, Iso-Bow and the Iso-Gym.  Each one has its own merits of application, but all go in the same direction... STRENGTH & AGILITY.  It is my desire to combine both.

>

> Now for the answer to the question: I only increase the level of compression consciously with the Isometric hold.  I started slowly in my compression and slowly increased the level every time. Different positions produce different levels of compression, but I was 3 weeks into the program before I truly felt the "power-burn" of pushing the envelope. My Iso-Motion compression levels increase naturally due to my increase in overall strength.  I do not use the powermeter due to the fact, I know my body and how much to push it. There are days I push further, but the feeling is always the same and I rest on weekends.

>

> Again, this is all combined with Iso-Motion movement, which I feel is superior to only Isotonic movement. Iso-Motion exercises the body in "everyday" movement and strengthens the body. Exercise fitness routines are actually moving in this direction.

>

> I hope this helps and I welcome comments and results... just give me personal statements.

> Opinions are nice, but without testing are just that... opinions.

>

> I have learned that certain bodies respond a little differently, but still move in the general direction for results. A scientific test is nice, but I am not doing one, nor shall I. To me the proof is in the results and I have always tested my routines and have never been hesitant to move away from negative or towards or positive results.

>

> Respectfully,

>

> Bullworker

>

>

> ________________________________

>

> To: bullworkerclub

> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:23 AM

> Subject: Ever Increasing Compressions ??

>

>

> Â

> For ;

>

> , you posted this on facebook.....

> "Im always trying to maximize the benefit of a Bulworker exercise, I am leaning towards the benefits of the combination of Iso-Motion with a "strong" Isomertic hold interspersed at varying points in the movements. The benefits of tendon strength development is not to be neglected in one's overall fitness routine. While the Isometric hold needs to be increased incrementally, it needs to be increased consistently. By increasing the hold in slow increments, minimal joint stress is maximized through the strength gain."

>

> Question: Can you comment some more on those last two sentences? Am i increasing the applied pressure whilst in the iso-motion / isometric hold? Does this also apply to regular isometric 7-10 second compressions?

>

[Guest guest]

Yes, the ten reps & hold on #10. Forgot that one. Thanks for the reminder. I

take your point about too much too soon. Being just a year behind you , old

fella, I pulled a little too much, too enthusiastically, too early, on the

iso-bow when it arrived and discovered I have arthritis in some finger joints.

Thanks for your replies.

> >

> > Gentlemen,

> > I have been experimenting, though I do not think I am going into new

territory as much as neglected.

> > The principle of Isometric holds for strength increase was the main selling

point for the Bullworker. Gert Koelbel quoted the study of 60-70% effort gave

optimum results... and while this does produce excellent results,

my curiosity goes back to whom I considered the strongest man, pound for

pound of days past, Zass and his Isometric training.

> >

> > The majority of the public would be very content to have a high level of

fitness, which I feel is best attained through Iso-Motion movement. However,

there are a few individuals that would very much so want to increase their

strength level into the realm of way above average. At 5'6 " tall and 165 lbs,

Zass performed feats of strength most power lifters cannot achieve

today.  How?

> >

> > First and foremost, I BELIEVE, genetics is the #1 factor... then his

lifestyle coupled with his training methods.  His lifestyle involved a

certain degree of agility and stamina, which determined a high level of

fitness... what he did from that point was based on Isometric exercise, gradual

progression with very high levels of exertion, but always worked up to, never

rushed. His feats of strength speak for themselves and need no explanation.

> >

> > In my 60th year, I am still fortunate to be able to compete at a very high

level in Masters Wrestling. This calls for agility, stamina and strength.

Coincidentally, I am 5'6 " and weigh 170 lbs and by no means am I even close to

Zass's stature... but his method is very beneficial.

> >

> > I believe I have proved the stamina & agility possibilities with the

Sit-at-Home program, but when I switched to the " Endurance " training, a new

dimension was opened to me, but still on a stamina and strength basis. I wanted

to see how much emphasis on strength could be used without sacrificing the

flexibility and agility. 

> >

> > I have recently incorporated high Isometric level holds in my Iso-Motion

routine and have been extremely impressed with the results. These holds are

applied at no particular point other than when I feel inclined to do them.

 I have practiced this routine with the Bullworker; Bow Extension, Iso-Bow

and the Iso-Gym.  Each one has its own merits of application, but all go in

the same direction... STRENGTH & AGILITY.  It is my desire to combine both.

> >

> > Now for the answer to the question: I only increase the level of compression

consciously with the Isometric hold.  I started slowly in

my compression and slowly increased the level every time. Different

positions produce different levels of compression, but I was 3 weeks into the

program before I truly felt the " power-burn " of pushing the envelope. My

Iso-Motion compression levels increase naturally due to my increase in overall

strength.  I do not use the powermeter due to the fact, I know my body and

how much to push it. There are days I push further, but the feeling is always

the same and I rest on weekends.

> >

> > Again, this is all combined with Iso-Motion movement, which I feel is

superior to only Isotonic movement. Iso-Motion exercises the body in " everyday "

movement and strengthens the body. Exercise fitness routines are actually moving

in this direction.

> >

> > I hope this helps and I welcome comments and results... just give

me personal statements.

> > Opinions are nice, but without testing are just that... opinions.

> >

> > I have learned that certain bodies respond a little differently, but still

move in the general direction for results. A scientific test is nice, but I am

not doing one, nor shall I. To me the proof is in the results and I have always

tested my routines and have never been hesitant to move away from negative or

towards or positive results.

> >

> > Respectfully,

> >

> > Bullworker

> >

> >

> > ________________________________

> > From: FarisMee <faris_mee@>

> > To: bullworkerclub

> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:23 AM

> > Subject: Ever Increasing Compressions ??

> >

> >

> >  

> > For ;

> >

> > , you posted this on facebook.....

> > " Im always trying to maximize the benefit of a Bulworker exercise, I am

leaning towards the benefits of the combination of Iso-Motion with a " strong "

Isomertic hold interspersed at varying points in the movements. The benefits of

tendon strength development is not to be neglected in one's overall fitness

routine. While the Isometric hold needs to be increased incrementally, it needs

to be increased consistently. By increasing the hold in slow increments, minimal

joint stress is maximized through the strength gain. "

> >

> > Question: Can you comment some more on those last two sentences? Am i

increasing the applied pressure whilst in the iso-motion / isometric hold? Does

this also apply to regular isometric 7-10 second compressions?

> >

>