Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

AAP Rep. to Federal Vaccine Board on payroll of Merck, Sanofi Aventis, GlaxoKline, Wyeth, Merck Laboratories

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Come to Washington DC on Oct. 7 and 8,

Power of Parents Rally

Stop the Mercury. Stop the Lies.

www.achamp.org

What do you have to do to have a conflict-of-interest in the eyes of the

American Academy of Pediatrics? Margararet Rennels, MD, the official AAP

representative to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is also on or

has been on the payroll of Merck, Merck Laboratories, Sanofi Aventis, Wyeth

Vaccines, and GlaxoKline. She will be making a presentation at the AAP

Convention on the vaccine industry's plans for our children in the next 3 years.

Prepare for evermore vaccines.

See the following for confirmation:

http://www.idsociety.org/Template.cfm?Section=Home & CONTENTID=10156 & TEMPLATE=/Con\

tentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm

The ACIP is not some unimportant federal commission, and they are anything but

" advisory " . This is the federal board that decides what is the " recommended

schedule " of vaccines. Most states will adopt these recommendations without

question and make them mandatory for children to attend school or daycare. In

effect, the ACIP are the Federal Vaccine Commissars.

And the truly frightening thing about this is that conflicts of these types are

the norm on the ACIP. If a member of the Security and Exchange Commission had

similar conflicts they would be guilty of a felony. In the world of public

health it is a standard operating procedure. And who are they working for, our

children's health or their employers bottom line?

Here's more conflicts from the ACIP meeting minutes for February:

Those reporting potential conflicts of interest were Dr. Greg Poland (grants

from Chiron, VaxGen, and Merck Research Laboratories), Dr. Treanor (Wyeth,

MedImmune), and Dr. Levin (clinical trials for GlaxoKline [GSK], Merck, and

Merck’s DSMB).

Check them out and others at:

http://www.cdc.gov/nip/ACIP/minutes/acip-min-feb05.rtf

Here's a synopsis of Rennels presentation:

Vaccine Update: The Next 1000 Days

S356

Monday, October 10, 2005 1:30 PM-3:30 PM

The U.S. immunization program has been enormously successful in

improving the health of infants, children and adolescents. The near

future holds hope for the program to be raised to the next level with the

possible addition of conjugated meningococcal, Tdap, rotavirus, MMRV and human

papillomavirus vaccines to the childhood and adolescent immunization schedule.

The objectives of this seminar are to review the current program, discuss

vaccines and vaccine recommendations on the horizon, and outline major policy

and service issues these changes will bring.

The question is: Is there any relationship between a pediatrician and the

vaccine manufacturers that would be perceived as a conflict-of-interest

according to the prevailing ethics in the AAP? I think the answer is clear.

This has got to stop. And only we can stop it.

Come to Washington DC on Oct.7 and 8.

Power of Parents Rally

Stop the Mercury. Stop the Lies.

www.achamp.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:

The situation is actually worse. Rennels is the chair of the AAP's

Committee on Infectious Diseases. The AAP COID also determines the

" routinely recommended vaccine " schedule. It is a joint effort with

ACIP, AAP, and the American Acedemy of Family Physicians. The ACIP

recommendations if accepted by CDC are the ones the government will pay

for under the Vaccines for Children program and they are coverd under

the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. AAP's recomendations are made

to the member physicians of AAP who give vaccines that are not paid for

by the govenment. The private market is about half the market and the

government program is about half. Thus the AAP COID has as much

influence as ACIP in determining what becomes " routine " . This makes

Rennel's position - as chair of COID in addition to liaison to ACIP -

more problematic. It's a governance issue that the AAP board should look at.

SB

Gilmore wrote:

>

>Come to Washington DC on Oct. 7 and 8,

>Power of Parents Rally

>Stop the Mercury. Stop the Lies.

>www.achamp.org

>

>

>

>What do you have to do to have a conflict-of-interest in the eyes of the

American Academy of Pediatrics? Margararet Rennels, MD, the official AAP

representative to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is also on or

has been on the payroll of Merck, Merck Laboratories, Sanofi Aventis, Wyeth

Vaccines, and GlaxoKline. She will be making a presentation at the AAP

Convention on the vaccine industry's plans for our children in the next 3 years.

Prepare for evermore vaccines.

>

>See the following for confirmation:

>

>

>http://www.idsociety.org/Template.cfm?Section=Home & CONTENTID=10156 & TEMPLATE=/Co\

ntentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm

>

>

>

>

>The ACIP is not some unimportant federal commission, and they are anything but

" advisory " . This is the federal board that decides what is the " recommended

schedule " of vaccines. Most states will adopt these recommendations without

question and make them mandatory for children to attend school or daycare. In

effect, the ACIP are the Federal Vaccine Commissars.

>

>And the truly frightening thing about this is that conflicts of these types are

the norm on the ACIP. If a member of the Security and Exchange Commission had

similar conflicts they would be guilty of a felony. In the world of public

health it is a standard operating procedure. And who are they working for, our

children's health or their employers bottom line?

>

>Here's more conflicts from the ACIP meeting minutes for February:

>

>Those reporting potential conflicts of interest were Dr. Greg Poland (grants

from Chiron, VaxGen, and Merck Research Laboratories), Dr. Treanor (Wyeth,

MedImmune), and Dr. Levin (clinical trials for GlaxoKline [GSK], Merck, and

Merck’s DSMB).

>

>Check them out and others at:

>

>http://www.cdc.gov/nip/ACIP/minutes/acip-min-feb05.rtf

>

>

>Here's a synopsis of Rennels presentation:

>

>Vaccine Update: The Next 1000 Days

>S356

>Monday, October 10, 2005 1:30 PM-3:30 PM

>

>The U.S. immunization program has been enormously successful in

>improving the health of infants, children and adolescents. The near

>future holds hope for the program to be raised to the next level with the

possible addition of conjugated meningococcal, Tdap, rotavirus, MMRV and human

papillomavirus vaccines to the childhood and adolescent immunization schedule.

The objectives of this seminar are to review the current program, discuss

vaccines and vaccine recommendations on the horizon, and outline major policy

and service issues these changes will bring.

>

>

>

>

>The question is: Is there any relationship between a pediatrician and the

vaccine manufacturers that would be perceived as a conflict-of-interest

according to the prevailing ethics in the AAP? I think the answer is clear.

>

>This has got to stop. And only we can stop it.

>

>Come to Washington DC on Oct.7 and 8.

>Power of Parents Rally

>Stop the Mercury. Stop the Lies.

>www.achamp.org

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say prepare yourself, Margaret, lift your sleeve and recieve the jab

yourself.

!

AAP Rep. to Federal Vaccine Board on payroll of

Merck, Sanofi Aventis, GlaxoKline, Wyeth, Merck Laboratories

>

> Come to Washington DC on Oct. 7 and 8,

> Power of Parents Rally

> Stop the Mercury. Stop the Lies.

> www.achamp.org

>

> What do you have to do to have a conflict-of-interest in the eyes of the

> American Academy of Pediatrics? Margararet Rennels, MD, the official AAP

> representative to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is also

> on or has been on the payroll of Merck, Merck Laboratories, Sanofi

> Aventis,

> Wyeth Vaccines, and GlaxoKline. She will be making a presentation at

> the AAP Convention on the vaccine industry's plans for our children in the

> next 3 years. Prepare for evermore vaccines.

>

> See the following for confirmation:

>

>

> http://www.idsociety.org/Template.cfm?Section=Home & CONTENTID=10156 & TEMPLATE=

> /ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm

>

>

>

> The ACIP is not some unimportant federal commission, and they are anything

> but " advisory " . This is the federal board that decides what is the

> " recommended schedule " of vaccines. Most states will adopt these

> recommendations without question and make them mandatory for children to

> attend school or daycare. In effect, the ACIP are the Federal Vaccine

> Commissars.

>

> And the truly frightening thing about this is that conflicts of these

> types

> are the norm on the ACIP. If a member of the Security and Exchange

> Commission had similar conflicts they would be guilty of a felony. In the

> world of public health it is a standard operating procedure. And who are

> they working for, our children's health or their employers bottom line?

>

> Here's more conflicts from the ACIP meeting minutes for February:

>

> Those reporting potential conflicts of interest were Dr. Greg Poland

> (grants from Chiron, VaxGen, and Merck Research Laboratories), Dr.

> Treanor (Wyeth, MedImmune), and Dr. Levin (clinical trials for

> GlaxoKline [GSK], Merck, and Merck's DSMB).

>

> Check them out and others at:

>

> http://www.cdc.gov/nip/ACIP/minutes/acip-min-feb05.rtf

>

>

> Here's a synopsis of Rennels presentation:

>

> Vaccine Update: The Next 1000 Days

> S356

> Monday, October 10, 2005 1:30 PM-3:30 PM

> The U.S. immunization program has been enormously successful in

> improving the health of infants, children and adolescents. The near

> future holds hope for the program to be raised to the next level with the

> possible addition of conjugated meningococcal, Tdap, rotavirus, MMRV and

> human papillomavirus vaccines to the childhood and adolescent immunization

> schedule. The objectives of this seminar are to review the current

> program, discuss vaccines and vaccine recommendations on the horizon, and

> outline major policy and service issues these changes will bring.

>

>

>

>

> The question is: Is there any relationship between a pediatrician and the

> vaccine manufacturers that would be perceived as a conflict-of-interest

> according to the prevailing ethics in the AAP? I think the answer is

> clear.

>

> This has got to stop. And only we can stop it.

>

> Come to Washington DC on Oct.7 and 8.

> Power of Parents Rally

> Stop the Mercury. Stop the Lies.

> www.achamp.org

>

>

>

> --------------------------------------------------------

> Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Classical Homeopath

> Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK

> $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account

> vaccineinfo@... voicemail US 530-740-0561

> (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail

> Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm

> Vaccine Dangers On-Line course -

> http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm

> Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm

> ANY INFO OBTAINED HERE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS MEDICAL

> OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION TO VACCINATE IS YOURS AND YOURS ALONE.

> ******

> " Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down.

> Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy

> knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy

> information

> and religions destroy spirituality " .... Ellner

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...