3a. Re: 3. Re: media coverage: need help to refute

[Guest guest]

-- V --- lambic ale and KT are significantly different ...

the only thing they share is the Acetobacter bacterium and

what is important, as is the point of the web site (the

university study) was that it was very likely a very

specific maybe unclassified subspecies of Acetobacter

bacterium [found only in one location, as notes]

because everything else being equal the university was not

able to reproduce lambic.

If one wants a higher alcoholic content in their KT they can

add some sugar and a " champagne yeasts " and do a secondary

fermentation with an airlock.

Ed Kasper LAc. Licensed Acupuncturist & Herbalist

Santa Cruz, CA.

............original message ........................

3a. Re: 3. Re: media coverage: need help to refute

From: (in Belgium)

Yes Ed, you are right. They live only in the Senne valley

around

Brussels and nowhere else. I wanted to point the difference

between

the real Lambic which can only be brewed in a little area

around

Brussels and KT which is brewed around the world. I found

this link in

English:

http://www.bierebel.com/en/index.php?page=lambic_gueuze

(in Belgium)

3b. Re: 3. Re: media coverage: need help to refute

Posted by: " Baker " vbaker@... vbaker555

Date: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:47 am (PDT)

But the significant difference is that this is called

" lambic ale " and it

has an alcoholic content, as opposed to KT which does not,

generally

speaking, because the acetobacter eat it up.

--V

At 11:27 PM 8/30/2006, you wrote:

>Yes Ed, you are right. They live only in the Senne valley

around

>Brussels and nowhere else. I wanted to point the difference

between

>the real Lambic which can only be brewed in a little area

around

>Brussels and KT which is brewed around the world. I found

this link in

>English:

>http://www.bierebel.com/en/index.php?page=lambic_gueuze

>

> (in Belgium)