Guest guest Posted May 17, 2005 Report Share Posted May 17, 2005 Barb I do not know what that underpad was, but it should become 'historical' as soon as you can get someone else to carefully remove it all. Have them bag it carefully and do not use a vacuum cleaner to pick up the mess, just a whisk and dust pan. Jim H. White SSAL Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition >I have all wool carpet that looks beautiful even though it is about 40 > years old to my calculations. House was in family before I had it. > However pad under it is clumbling. It is type i've never seen before, > dark brown, looks like crushed cardboard now. Do you think that that > could be causing air quality problems. I'm the one who feels better > when I leave my home. PUtting a fresh air intake has made a huge > difference but I still feel better when I go out. > > >> Bob >> Right on! >> >> It takes a long while to clean carpet that has not been kept clean; > five minutes a square yard is not too long for carpet that is several > years old. Even longer is required in some cases. This has been well > proven with > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always > been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such > material available in our efforts to advance understanding of > environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, > and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' > of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US > Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the > material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have > expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for > research and educational purposes. For more information go to: > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use > copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go > beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Jim, Your advice has me puzzled this time. Wouldn't using a whisk and dust pan result in even more (larger size fractions) suspended particulate in the air than a vacuum cleaner? How about using a HEPA vac, or even a shop-vac as long as the vac itself was outside and only the suction hose was inside? Respectfully, Curtis Redington, RS Environmental Quality Specialist City of Wichita Dept. of Environmental Health Re: Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition Barb I do not know what that underpad was, but it should become 'historical' as soon as you can get someone else to carefully remove it all. Have them bag it carefully and do not use a vacuum cleaner to pick up the mess, just a whisk and dust pan. Jim H. White SSAL Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition >I have all wool carpet that looks beautiful even though it is about 40 > years old to my calculations. House was in family before I had it. > However pad under it is clumbling. It is type i've never seen before, > dark brown, looks like crushed cardboard now. Do you think that that > could be causing air quality problems. I'm the one who feels better > when I leave my home. PUtting a fresh air intake has made a huge > difference but I still feel better when I go out. > > >> Bob >> Right on! >> >> It takes a long while to clean carpet that has not been kept clean; > five minutes a square yard is not too long for carpet that is several > years old. Even longer is required in some cases. This has been well > proven with > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always > been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such > material available in our efforts to advance understanding of > environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, > and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' > of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US > Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the > material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have > expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for > research and educational purposes. For more information go to: > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use > copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go > beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Curtis The most dangerous part of the particulate is the really fine stuff and a normal vacuum just spews that right into your face. When I tested for resuspension of fines there was much less with gentle sweeping than normal vacuuming. Either the HEPA (but with a non-powered head) or the shop vac (same limitation) that was outdoors, or had a hose on the outlet that went outdoors, would do just fine. It is possible to send up a lot of dust by sweeping, or very little if you are careful. I supposed that the user, in this case, would be careful. Jim H. White SSAL Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition > > >>I have all wool carpet that looks beautiful even though it is about 40 >> years old to my calculations. House was in family before I had it. >> However pad under it is clumbling. It is type i've never seen before, >> dark brown, looks like crushed cardboard now. Do you think that that >> could be causing air quality problems. I'm the one who feels better >> when I leave my home. PUtting a fresh air intake has made a huge >> difference but I still feel better when I go out. >> >> >>> Bob >>> Right on! >>> >>> It takes a long while to clean carpet that has not been kept clean; >> five minutes a square yard is not too long for carpet that is several >> years old. Even longer is required in some cases. This has been well >> proven with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> FAIR USE NOTICE: >> >> This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always >> been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such >> material available in our efforts to advance understanding of >> environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, >> and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' >> of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US >> Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the >> material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have >> expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for >> research and educational purposes. For more information go to: >> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use >> copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go >> beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Jim, Okay, I discovered it is a horsehair pad. The house is old. The padding is old fashioned and old but horsehair I think has a reputation for being real sturdy but over 45 years maybe a long time. I don't know if it is breaking down or not now, just is dusty under the carpet. The dust is same color as horsehair so I assume after 45 years or so this is from at least some breakdown of fibers. Are you suggesting that if it isn't in good condition I just remove pad but not carpet????????? I would assume although carpet still is in very good condition, I wouldn't put old carpet back down over new padding but I don't know. Maybe this is reasonable. It would depend on cost. Thanks, Barb > Barb > I do not know what that underpad was, but it should become 'historical' as > soon as you can get someone else to carefully remove it all. Have them bag > it carefully and do not use a vacuum cleaner to pick up the mess, just a > whisk and dust pan. > Jim H. White SSAL > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: " barb1283 " <barb1283@y...> > > > >I have all wool carpet that looks beautiful even though it is about 40 > > years old to my calculations. House was in family before I had it. > > However pad under it is clumbling. It is type i've never seen before, > > dark brown, looks like crushed cardboard now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 I have a Shop Vac but not hepa vac. I have been looking at them but haven't purchased one. I could check to see if I can get extra length of hose for it. > Curtis > The most dangerous part of the particulate is the really fine stuff and a > normal vacuum just spews that right into your face. When I tested for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Barb Yes, just replace the pad. You cannot get carpet like that anymore. You did, I hope get the gist of several previous messages: use a HEPA vacuum, or a central vacuum cleaner that is vented outdoors; and it takes at least 5 minutes per square yard to clean a carpet that has not been well vacuumed all along. Vacuum in four directions, if possible. Jim Re: Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition > Jim, > Okay, I discovered it is a horsehair pad. The house is old. The > padding is old fashioned and old but horsehair I think has a > reputation for being real sturdy but over 45 years maybe a long > time. I don't know if it is breaking down or not now, just is dusty > under the carpet. The dust is same color as horsehair so I assume > after 45 years or so this is from at least some breakdown of fibers. > Are you suggesting that if it isn't in good condition I just remove > pad but not carpet????????? I would assume although carpet still is > in very good condition, I wouldn't put old carpet back down over new > padding but I don't know. Maybe this is reasonable. It would > depend on cost. > Thanks, > Barb > > >> Barb >> I do not know what that underpad was, but it should > become 'historical' as >> soon as you can get someone else to carefully remove it all. Have > them bag >> it carefully and do not use a vacuum cleaner to pick up the mess, > just a >> whisk and dust pan. >> Jim H. White SSAL >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: " barb1283 " <barb1283@y...> >> > >> >I have all wool carpet that looks beautiful even though it is > about 40 >> > years old to my calculations. House was in family before I had > it. >> > However pad under it is clumbling. It is type i've never seen > before, >> > dark brown, looks like crushed cardboard now. > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always > been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such > material available in our efforts to advance understanding of > environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, > and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' > of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US > Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the > material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have > expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for > research and educational purposes. For more information go to: > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use > copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go > beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Jim, Thanks for the reply. I had envisioned some carpet installer, handy-man, or husband raising huge clouds of particulate as the floor was hurriedly swept with a shop broom that has seen better days. Even with careful sweeping, it would seem difficult to actually remove the notorious " fines " without a significant percentage becoming suspended. I'll acquiesce to your far greater experience, however, and share your hope that the person doing the sweeping is doing so carefully. Curtis Redington, WDEH Re: Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition Curtis The most dangerous part of the particulate is the really fine stuff and a normal vacuum just spews that right into your face. When I tested for resuspension of fines there was much less with gentle sweeping than normal vacuuming. Either the HEPA (but with a non-powered head) or the shop vac (same limitation) that was outdoors, or had a hose on the outlet that went outdoors, would do just fine. It is possible to send up a lot of dust by sweeping, or very little if you are careful. I supposed that the user, in this case, would be careful. Jim H. White SSAL Cleaning Carpet & Pad Condition > > >>I have all wool carpet that looks beautiful even though it is about 40 >> years old to my calculations. House was in family before I had it. >> However pad under it is clumbling. It is type i've never seen before, >> dark brown, looks like crushed cardboard now. Do you think that that >> could be causing air quality problems. I'm the one who feels better >> when I leave my home. PUtting a fresh air intake has made a huge >> difference but I still feel better when I go out. >> >> >>> Bob >>> Right on! >>> >>> It takes a long while to clean carpet that has not been kept clean; >> five minutes a square yard is not too long for carpet that is several >> years old. Even longer is required in some cases. This has been well >> proven with >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> FAIR USE NOTICE: >> >> This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always >> been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such >> material available in our efforts to advance understanding of >> environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, >> and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' >> of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US >> Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the >> material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have >> expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for >> research and educational purposes. For more information go to: >> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use >> copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go >> beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.