Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 Sharon: As I stated just today on the abmd list, there are no formulas as each child is a universe unto her/himself as far as the extent of their injury and their response to treatment. Also, when I do use ALA now I have found the transdermal to be much better, though the Hg does go out in the stool and will aggravate any inflammation that is already there. If you are having success, I will never argue with that. I just think it is imperative to keep a close eye on the gut pathogens, which I am sure you are doing. As I have said, I love ALA, take 250mg a day myself, but have found that too many children's inflamed guts cannot handle the impetus it gives to pathogen overgrowth, and fairly quickly. Dr. Amy Holmes used to say, if you think DMSA stimulates yeast, ALA will do it 50 times moreso. Hopefully your little guy has a better gut integrity and is able to benefit from the good effects and not succumb to the pathogen-stimulating effect. So I say, continue what works and keep a close eye out for the yeastie-beasties! And I always think loving moms are the best doctors of all! Best wishes, Jaquelyn Dr. McCandless/experience with ALA Dr. McCandless, You wrote on another list that you really don't like to use ALA any more at all because of the gut pathogen issues you've experienced. Were the problems you've seen immediate, or did they creep up later? The reason I'm asking is we're doing ALA only chelation every other weekend now and are on round 6 with some nice results. We've been on TTFD off and on this past year and consistently now for 4 months. We've battled the gut bugs, but seem to have them reasonably under control. The reason we chose to do chelation in addition to the TTFD is because although it was helping, we felt that Jack really needed some more help detoxing. He's had a lot of signs of mitochondrial issues (our genetic doc at Duke suggested doing a muscle biopsy, but we already do most of the supps. recommended in the mito cocktail anyway and didn't feel the need to put a 3 year old showing improvements through that). Because ALA is recommended in some mito issues, and because Jack has had a nice reponse to biotin and pantethine (this was really great), we decided to try the other nutrient that shares the same transporter - ALA. So really we're using it on a low dosage chelation protocol, but for other reasons than removing metals. The last round we switched to transdermal ALA and I really like it a lot. We're using a small amount (.1cc which equals 10mg) every 3 hours. Previously we had used oral at 8 mg every 3 hours. We've seen some really nice changes since adding the ALA, but also some number obsession issues that seem to be under control now. I get really nervous when someone who treats hundreds (if not thousands) of kids and is as well regarded as you, doesn't like to use something we're using. Jack is a gut kid (he was a gut kid as an infant -- antral web gi obstruction) but has improved so much in this area as well. Sorry to run so long, I'm just now re-evaluating whether ALA is worth the risks for us even though we've seen some nice progress. I know the bottom line is to keep the gut healthy... Sharon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2004 Report Share Posted January 2, 2004 Dr. McCandless, You wrote on another list that you really don't like to use ALA any more at all because of the gut pathogen issues you've experienced. Were the problems you've seen immediate, or did they creep up later? The reason I'm asking is we're doing ALA only chelation every other weekend now and are on round 6 with some nice results. We've been on TTFD off and on this past year and consistently now for 4 months. We've battled the gut bugs, but seem to have them reasonably under control. The reason we chose to do chelation in addition to the TTFD is because although it was helping, we felt that Jack really needed some more help detoxing. He's had a lot of signs of mitochondrial issues (our genetic doc at Duke suggested doing a muscle biopsy, but we already do most of the supps. recommended in the mito cocktail anyway and didn't feel the need to put a 3 year old showing improvements through that). Because ALA is recommended in some mito issues, and because Jack has had a nice reponse to biotin and pantethine (this was really great), we decided to try the other nutrient that shares the same transporter - ALA. So really we're using it on a low dosage chelation protocol, but for other reasons than removing metals. The last round we switched to transdermal ALA and I really like it a lot. We're using a small amount (.1cc which equals 10mg) every 3 hours. Previously we had used oral at 8 mg every 3 hours. We've seen some really nice changes since adding the ALA, but also some number obsession issues that seem to be under control now. I get really nervous when someone who treats hundreds (if not thousands) of kids and is as well regarded as you, doesn't like to use something we're using. Jack is a gut kid (he was a gut kid as an infant -- antral web gi obstruction) but has improved so much in this area as well. Sorry to run so long, I'm just now re-evaluating whether ALA is worth the risks for us even though we've seen some nice progress. I know the bottom line is to keep the gut healthy... Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2004 Report Share Posted January 4, 2004 Sharon: An additional note; the tiny amount of ALA you're using is quite safe (a good diet will provide that much), and is probably providing its benefits as the great antioxidant it is rather than actually chelating - have you tested urine metals to see if you are getting excretion at this dosing? Dr. JM Dr. McCandless/experience with ALA Dr. McCandless, You wrote on another list that you really don't like to use ALA any more at all because of the gut pathogen issues you've experienced. Were the problems you've seen immediate, or did they creep up later? The reason I'm asking is we're doing ALA only chelation every other weekend now and are on round 6 with some nice results. We've been on TTFD off and on this past year and consistently now for 4 months. We've battled the gut bugs, but seem to have them reasonably under control. The reason we chose to do chelation in addition to the TTFD is because although it was helping, we felt that Jack really needed some more help detoxing. He's had a lot of signs of mitochondrial issues (our genetic doc at Duke suggested doing a muscle biopsy, but we already do most of the supps. recommended in the mito cocktail anyway and didn't feel the need to put a 3 year old showing improvements through that). Because ALA is recommended in some mito issues, and because Jack has had a nice reponse to biotin and pantethine (this was really great), we decided to try the other nutrient that shares the same transporter - ALA. So really we're using it on a low dosage chelation protocol, but for other reasons than removing metals. The last round we switched to transdermal ALA and I really like it a lot. We're using a small amount (.1cc which equals 10mg) every 3 hours. Previously we had used oral at 8 mg every 3 hours. We've seen some really nice changes since adding the ALA, but also some number obsession issues that seem to be under control now. I get really nervous when someone who treats hundreds (if not thousands) of kids and is as well regarded as you, doesn't like to use something we're using. Jack is a gut kid (he was a gut kid as an infant -- antral web gi obstruction) but has improved so much in this area as well. Sorry to run so long, I'm just now re-evaluating whether ALA is worth the risks for us even though we've seen some nice progress. I know the bottom line is to keep the gut healthy... Sharon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2004 Report Share Posted January 4, 2004 Even though it's a small dose, we can definitely tell a difference on the 'on' days. He's very chatty (a little excessive) and hyper. He probably does get a little yeasty too. But he always manages to do something new that we consider positive, so that's why we've kept at it and are on round 6. I'm also relying on teacher and therapists reports too (I don't tell them what we're doing). I do agree with you that he's probably getting more benefit from it from an antioxidant standpoint than a chelation one. I've done urine tests several times this year on the TTFD and then 2 times on the TTFD + ALA. In Nov. I did a urine while on TTFD+ALA and we saw Thallium in the elevated range (almost to the very elevate/red portion). We had never seen thallium pulled like that. He also had arsenic, cadmium, and nickel (all around middle of green). In the past he has had arsenic that is at the high end of the ref range (within the green). He's also had cadmium that's at the high end of the ref. range. Last week, we just got our urine and stool tests (first stool test done) back from a round of TTFD + ALA and this is what we saw: Urine: tiny amount of antimony (first time we've seen it and he had very high hair antimony), arsenic and cadmium 1/3 in the ref. range, small amounts of lead and mercury for the first time lower 1/4 of ref. range, high ref. range of nickel and thallium, low ref. range tungsten. Stool: uranium and arsenic elevated in the low end of yellow, antimony in middle of green/ref. range, bismuth/cadmium/copper/lead/nickel/thallium/tungsten all around 1/3 mark in green ref. range. So even though we're not seeing a ton of metals coming out in high amounts, I think the fact that we're seeing some coming out means his body is starting to do what it's suppose to. I'm pretty convinced he's toxic based on his hair tests in the past. Also the tests I've done have been random, so it's a bit of a gamble. We've also been on TTFD off and on this year (for 4 months straight now). By the way the Dec. test is the first time we've seen mercury since last Feb. We saw it in our pre-TTFD urine test (I had started oral gsh to ramp up to the transdermal and I really think that helped him detox some -- he could not tolerate the GSH orally by the way, but does fine transdermally) and then in one test several weeks into the TTFD. Dr. McCandless, if you're interested in seeing his urine/stool tests, I'm happy to scan them and email them to you. Thank you for your reply and good info. Sharon > > Sharon: An additional note; the tiny amount of ALA you're using is quite safe (a good diet will provide that much), and is probably providing its benefits as the great antioxidant it is rather than actually chelating - have you tested urine metals to see if you are getting excretion at this dosing? Dr. JM > > > Dr. McCandless/experience with ALA > > > Dr. McCandless, > You wrote on another list that you really don't like to use ALA any > more at all because of the gut pathogen issues you've experienced. > Were the problems you've seen immediate, or did they creep up later? > > The reason I'm asking is we're doing ALA only chelation every other > weekend now and are on round 6 with some nice results. We've been on > TTFD off and on this past year and consistently now for 4 months. > We've battled the gut bugs, but seem to have them reasonably under > control. > The reason we chose to do chelation in addition to the TTFD is > because although it was helping, we felt that Jack really needed some > more help detoxing. He's had a lot of signs of mitochondrial issues > (our genetic doc at Duke suggested doing a muscle biopsy, but we > already do most of the supps. recommended in the mito cocktail anyway > and didn't feel the need to put a 3 year old showing improvements > through that). Because ALA is recommended in some mito issues, and > because Jack has had a nice reponse to biotin and pantethine (this > was really great), we decided to try the other nutrient that shares > the same transporter - ALA. So really we're using it on a low dosage > chelation protocol, but for other reasons than removing metals. The > last round we switched to transdermal ALA and I really like it a > lot. We're using a small amount (.1cc which equals 10mg) every 3 > hours. Previously we had used oral at 8 mg every 3 hours. > We've seen some really nice changes since adding the ALA, but also > some number obsession issues that seem to be under control now. > > I get really nervous when someone who treats hundreds (if not > thousands) of kids and is as well regarded as you, doesn't like to > use something we're using. Jack is a gut kid (he was a gut kid as an > infant -- antral web gi obstruction) but has improved so much in this > area as well. > > Sorry to run so long, I'm just now re-evaluating whether ALA is worth > the risks for us even though we've seen some nice progress. I know > the bottom line is to keep the gut healthy... > Sharon > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.