Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

CERPS

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I have recently written a self-paced learning module for Vergie

titled " How to Teach New and Expectant Parents " (predetermined

topic by LER Online)Jan Ellen was kind enough to do peer review-

thanks J-E! If you have time to take a look, I would love to hear

what you think.

When the phone is not ringing, I try to fill the gaps by doing free

lance writing. This is the first lactation module, although I have

done others for nursing and MD's. I like Internet learning because

it is so much cheaper that conferences, although I believe it can't

replace them for networking and the give and take of a group setting.

Anyway, here is the link. Feel free to email your comments off list.

http://leron-line.com/Teaching_Classes.htm

Altman

All The Best

Columbia, SC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Guest guest

The first one that has me puzzled:

18. How did the number of feeds per 24 hours for partially breastfed babies compare to those of exclusively breastfed babies?

a. the same amount

b. one more

c. one less

d. two less

The text says that average frequency was "6.4 +/- 1.4 feeds per 24 hours for exclusively bf newborns and 5.5 +/- 1.9 feeds per 24 hours for supplemented breastfed newborns."

Wouldn't that mean that partially bf babies averaged about one less (should be "one fewer") feed/day? The "correct" answer is "one more".

It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money Finance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hello,

I give you my answer

(sorry for my english, I’m French, often read you, but not often answer)

:

a) the same amount

If you only read the

average, you could think c) one less. But the text also gives us the standard

deviation (or some thing like that).

So we can calculate: 6.4-1.4

= 5 and 5.5+1.9=7.4. If we draw two bars: 5 to 6.4 and a second from 5.5 to

7.4, we can see that they intersect from 5.5 to 6.4. So, the difference is not

statistically different.

So, for me, we can not

conclude that one average is different from the other.

What du you thing of that

result?

e

De :

[mailto: ] De la part de HWLaP@...

Envoyé : lundi 14 avril 2008

01:27

À :

Objet : Re:cerps

The first one that has me puzzled:

18. How did the number of feeds per 24

hours for partially breastfed babies compare to those of exclusively breastfed

babies?

a. the same amount

b. one more

c. one less

d. two less

The text says that average frequency was

" 6.4 +/- 1.4 feeds per 24 hours for exclusively bf newborns

and 5.5 +/- 1.9 feeds per 24 hours for supplemented breastfed

newborns. "

Wouldn't that mean that partially bf

babies averaged about one less (should be " one fewer " ) feed/day?

The " correct " answer is " one more " .

It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice

on AOL Money Finance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...