Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 >My vote is for companies that are committed to human rights and sustainable >practices. - So why don't you give this list instead of singling out only one of the bad guys? The bad guy list includes: Exxon Mobil. Nike. GWG Colgate Palmolive. Bristol Meyers. Proctor and Gamble. General Foods. Ogilve -Nabisco. Royal Duch Shell. De Beers. Chevron. IBM. This list goes on ad idfinum. rusty OT: Wal-Mart > Hello Fellow Brewers, > > I really enjoy reading all of the fascinating information here. However, > everytime I read about somebody shopping at Wal-Mart, it sends a twinge of > pain through my heart. I know that might seem like an extreme reaction, > but Wal-Mart supports global human slavery by selling products that are > manufactured by workers who aren't paid fair wages nor do they have good > working conditions. Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean it isn't > happening. Add to that the fact that also don't pay their employees > fairly or offer health benefits, they run local businesses out of town and > while they may have started offering some " green " products and organic > produce, they have an overall negative effect on the world. For more > information about these claims, please see the website below > > http://www.coopamerica.org/programs/rs/profile.cfm?id=306 > > Money is energy and if you put your energy into a company that doesn't > support human rights then you are saying its okay to treat other human > beings like dirt so that you don't have to pay too much. > > I understand that there will be people on this list who may take issue > with my point of view, but remember, it is just my opinion. I felt > inspired to send this email in the hope of raising other people's > awareness. Where and how we spend our money can have a profound effect. > It's like voting, but with money. My vote is for companies that are > committed to human rights and sustainable practices. > > my 2 cents > > hannah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 >>> Hello Fellow Brewers, ##### Hi Hannah, >>> Wal-Mart supports global human slavery by selling products that are ...... ##### I appreciate your concern, however the Mom & Pop corner grocery store no doubt stocks and sells many of the same items from the same sources as Wal-Mart. >>> Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean it isn't happening. ##### Certainly true and applicable to everthing we do not grow, prepare, create, manufacture from 'scratch' ourselves. >>> they run local businesses out of town ##### Yes and that is sad. Today's greedy business practices with wholesalers charging astronomical prices for small orders and so many people trying to live on minimal wages and part-time jobs and out of work heads of households together with high cost rents, medical bills, education, travel etc. make it impossible for most families to shop at the more expensive local businesses. ##### And how do we know the local businesses are honest, fair, generous, and only use what you and I consider righteous sourced materials? With regard to local businesses: " Just because we can't see it doesn't mean it isn't happening. " >>> you are saying its okay to treat other human beings like dirt so that you don't have to pay too much. ##### Maybe we, they, are not saying anything so profound because we, they are just too busy and consumed with trying to survive in this (starting from the top down with Governments) dishonest, greedy, immoral, amoral, harsh, sick, sad, war-torn, poverty-stricken world.. >>> I felt inspired to send this email in the hope of raising other people's awareness. .. ##### It is good to be aware, but the problems are overwhelming. >>> My vote is for companies that are committed to human rights and sustainable practices. ##### How are you able to absolutely discern which ones those are; AND which ones are they? >>> my 2 cents ###### and mine. Best wishes, neb > > hannah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Thank You Hannah! I have had the same reaction to the mentions of wal-mart shopping throughout this group and I appreciate your response. I am aware that there are other evils in the world as well, and not all local companies are perfect but that is not NOT an excuse to disregard the blatently known evils. the possiblity of potential corruption is not the same as KNOWN corruption. It should be worth our while to investigate the companies where we shop. talk to the employees ask the community, if there isn't a community, work to create one. once you've done the research, it is done - energy well spent. also, research the best ways to get bargains. I work for a local organic grocery store that struggles to get by but we go out of our way to offer discount options, usually in the form of discount shopping days, special orders and buying in quantity. and not all corporate companies are evil, costco for example is wal-mart's largest competitor and though they sell a lot of commercial junk, they are capable of taking great care of their employees. Americans are notoriously lazy, we are experts at finding cop-out arguments for why we shouldn't be inconvienced (i.e. the local store MAY be coruptly run). lets work to change our reputation. > > Hello Fellow Brewers, > > I really enjoy reading all of the fascinating information here. However, everytime I read about somebody shopping at Wal-Mart, it sends a twinge of pain through my heart. I know that might seem like an extreme reaction, but Wal-Mart supports global human slavery by selling products that are manufactured by workers who aren't paid fair wages nor do they have good working conditions. Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean it isn't happening. Add to that the fact that also don't pay their employees fairly or offer health benefits, they run local businesses out of town and while they may have started offering some " green " products and organic produce, they have an overall negative effect on the world. For more information about these claims, please see the website below > > http://www.coopamerica.org/programs/rs/profile.cfm?id=306 > > Money is energy and if you put your energy into a company that doesn't support human rights then you are saying its okay to treat other human beings like dirt so that you don't have to pay too much. > > I understand that there will be people on this list who may take issue with my point of view, but remember, it is just my opinion. I felt inspired to send this email in the hope of raising other people's awareness. Where and how we spend our money can have a profound effect. It's like voting, but with money. My vote is for companies that are committed to human rights and sustainable practices. > > my 2 cents > > hannah > > > > http://www.hannahcrum.com > " Well behaved women rarely make history. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > Groups are talking. We & acute;re listening. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 > and not all corporate companies are evil, costco for > example is wal-mart's largest competitor and though they sell a lot of commercial junk, they are capable of taking great care of their employees. > Americans are notoriously lazy, > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Sorry Audrey, I KNOW I should have let you have the last word, but I PROMISE this is mine on his subject. How about this? : Wal-mart is owned by " notoriously lazy " Americans in the United States. Costco is owned by Chinese in China. Best wishes, neb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 23, 2006 Report Share Posted July 23, 2006 " That is an urban legend.going around the internet. Costco is not chinese owned: " Isn't it funny how things get misinterpreted? Cosco is Chinese owned - I think it stands for Chinese Overseas Co., but I can't be positive. Costco is a totally different story. It was easier when it was Price Club. Beverle > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 Hey, Neb I don't actualy shop at either store, not walmart anymore. I do try to read the banded list. >-Audrey <snipet> Sorry Audrey, > > I KNOW I should have let you have the last word, but I PROMISE this is > mine on his subject. > > How about this? : > > Wal-mart is owned by " notoriously lazy " Americans in the United States. > > Costco is owned by Chinese in China. > > Best wishes, neb > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 To me there is a big and crucial difference between WalMart and Costco, and that is that Costco actually pays their employees a living wage. That said, however, I need also to say that although I have my preferences about where I spend my money, and to me those are political choices, I also know that some people are just barely hanging on in the U.S. and do not have the luxury of choice. Not really. That of course is part of the political issue that is being discussed. But it is not about laziness-- it is about the structural truths of late capitalist society. It's sort of like a pyramid scheme, where those at the bottom of the pyramid are losing out, but those at the top got obscenely wealthy. It's not fair to characterize as " lazy " those whose lives have been affected by this very real restructuring of U.S. society such that their choices have narrowed to acute survival level. This is a class issue. And to me it is morally wrong that people can work 40 hours a week and not be able to support themselves, much less a family, but that is today's reality. It is one thing to make a statement about the (incredibly) negative impact Walmart has had on U.S. society, it is another thing to blame the people who shop there for the economic realities that created and sustain Walmart. Such blame does nothing toward creating solutions for a better world, and is bound to fail as a strategy for change. I strongly suggest voting in people who support a living wage as a starting point. So I propose that we stop this thread because it is Off Topic to begin with and has been inappropriately divisive. -- (one of the moderators) ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2006 Report Share Posted July 28, 2006 right on, victoria ... it's time that people start realizing that they are voting against their best interests... i know it's off-topic, but somehow everything these days does mean the most ... xox peace... helen Re: Re: OT: Wal-Mart To me there is a big and crucial difference between WalMart and Costco, and that is that Costco actually pays their employees a living wage. That said, however, I need also to say that although I have my preferences about where I spend my money, and to me those are political choices, I also know that some people are just barely hanging on in the U.S. and do not have the luxury of choice. Not really. That of course is part of the political issue that is being discussed. But it is not about laziness-- it is about the structural truths of late capitalist society. It's sort of like a pyramid scheme, where those at the bottom of the pyramid are losing out, but those at the top got obscenely wealthy. It's not fair to characterize as " lazy " those whose lives have been affected by this very real restructuring of U.S. society such that their choices have narrowed to acute survival level. This is a class issue. And to me it is morally wrong that people can work 40 hours a week and not be able to support themselves, much less a family, but that is today's reality. It is one thing to make a statement about the (incredibly) negative impact Walmart has had on U.S. society, it is another thing to blame the people who shop there for the economic realities that created and sustain Walmart. Such blame does nothing toward creating solutions for a better world, and is bound to fail as a strategy for change. I strongly suggest voting in people who support a living wage as a starting point. So I propose that we stop this thread because it is Off Topic to begin with and has been inappropriately divisive. -- (one of the moderators) ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2006 Report Share Posted July 30, 2006 Thank you for saying what I meant to say and did not. I hear that Walmart is going to be forced to pay it's employees a minimum of $10.00 an hour. health, which you know then whom will be forced to pay for those benefits in the end, so they can keep their profits. I agree about the O.T.! so this was all I wanted to add, as an update info. -Audrey > > <snippet. > I also > know that some people are just barely hanging on in the U.S. and do not > have the luxury of choice. Not really. > But > it is not about laziness-- > -- > (one of the moderators) > > > ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ > --A.J. Muste > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.