Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Legal Remedies

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I applied for Disability here in the United States last year. I was

initially denied. I understand that they deny everyone the first time.

Currently I am on my first appeal. I am struggling to get them to

understand how disabling this condition is and how greatly it affects my

life. How hard it is to live with it, and do the " normal " things most

people take for granted.

We'll see what happens. So far it seems that they don't consider what we

have a disability. Even though it is a disabling condition. Go figure!?

I hope that changes. I'll let you know what happens.

-Rand

geoff_olding wrote:

>

>

> Has anybody taken or considered taking action under either the Americans

> with Disability Act of 1990, or the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

> (for the UK)?

>

>

>

> I should first say that I am from the UK and not a lawyer, so please

> don't take any action without seeking proper advice, but for a layman's

> interpreration, here goes:

>

>

>

> *The Americans with Disability Act 1990

> (*http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm#Anchor-43793

> <http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htm#Anchor-43793>)**

>

>

>

> /Definition of disability (Section 12102, part 2)/

>

> The term " disability " means, with respect to an individual

>

> (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or

> more of the major life activities of such individual;

>

> (B) a record of such an impairment; or

>

> © being regarded as having such impairment

>

> /Responsibility of Employer (Section 12112, b5)/

>

> (A) not making reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental

> limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability who

> is an applicant or employee, unless such covered entity can demonstrate

> that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation

> of the business of such covered entity; or

>

> *Disability Discrimination Act 1995

> (*http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_1

> <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_1>)**

>

>

>

> /Definition of Disability

> /(http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_2#pt1-l1g1

> <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_2#pt1-l1g1>)//

>

>

>

> Subject to the provisions of Schedule 1, a person has a disability for

> the purposes of this Act if he has a physical or mental impairment which

> has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry

> out normal day-to-day activities.

>

>

>

> /Responsibility of Employer

> /(http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_2#pt2-pb1-l1g6

> <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_2#pt2-pb1-l1g6>)

>

>

>

> (1) Where—

>

> (a) any arrangements made by or on behalf of an employer, or

>

> (B) any physical feature of premises occupied by the employer,

>

> place the disabled person concerned at a substantial disadvantage in

> comparison with persons who are not disabled, it is the duty of the

> employer to take such steps as it is reasonable, in all the

> circumstances of the case, for him to have to take in order to prevent

> the arrangements or feature having that effect.

>

>

>

> /Responsibility of Service Providers (shops, restaurants, public

> services etc.)

> (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_4#pt3-pb1-l1g21

> <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/ukpga_19950050_en_4#pt3-pb1-l1g21>)/

>

>

>

> Where a provider of services has a practice, policy or procedure which

> makes it impossible or unreasonably difficult for disabled persons to

> make use of a service which he provides, or is prepared to provide, to

> other members of the public, it is his duty to take such steps as it is

> reasonable, in all the circumstances of the case, for him to have to

> take in order to change that practice, policy or procedure so that it no

> longer has that effect.

>

>

>

>

>

> I shall take these acts together, as they seem be to very similar, at

> least as far as definitions and employment rights are concerned.

>

>

>

> Surely it is the case that:

>

>

>

> * Sufferers from 4S, along with sufferers from other hearing

> problems such as hypercasusis and tinnitus, fall into the

> definition of " disabled " .

> * The " reasonable adjustments " that employers must make must include

> noises which are not required for the proper functioning of the

> business, including irritants from co-workers.

> * All shops and other services in the UK must cut out excessive

> noise, including piped music.

>

>

>

> In theory, I would have thought we were in a better position than the

> physically disabled, since a lot of what is " reasonable " could be cut

> out at zero or minimal cost.

>

>

>

> Any thoughts on this or any other aspects of the acts?

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...