biological point of view

[Guest guest]

So, do I understand correctly that certain organisms/bacteria will be

drawn to 'something' in nature (like the tree sap and the leaves in the

puddle) and form a symbiotic clump so to speak if they happen to be there

together at the same time? And these combinations do not occur every

where because of the differences in variables? Or am I way off here?

It does sound that the tea which is described bu Norbert Hoffman is tea

made from this growth. It does not mention any fermenting of tea with the

growth. This extract could bery well be beneficial, but just different

from kombucha tea. Somehow I assumed that kombucha was already known then

too.

Is this how kefir grains came into existance?

Thanks,

maria.

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 12:20:10 -0400 " mark n suze "

writes:

Thing is tho, i know the abnormal growths developing in the bark of

certain trees, often creating huge irregular tumors. Analysis has show

that they are sometimes associated w/ various micoplasma (like xtra tiny

viruses, sorta), which has nothing to do w/ any symbiotic yeast/bacterial

organisms. I would really like to understand the utter jump in logic

that occurred associating these two entirely different phenomena......i

only find that a beneficial tea is made from them. As-far-as i'm

concerned, from a biological point-of-view, any relationship between the

two is utter non-sense

blessings

mark