Who's on First? Re: 2519 Digest 5. Re: SNK 5.

[Guest guest]

Correction to the correction which wasn't (or shouldn't have been) a correction.

Don gave a full response about the ACOEM mold statement, rather than my previous correction which said it was the Green Book. I was also remembering his full statement (from elsewhere) about the Green Book which he mentioned to Tony. But the essence was the comparison of evaluating each regardless of Who's on First.

Mix, shake (not stir) and I serve up confusion.

I just hope my lowly human error doesn't disqualify me from the lofty heights of the absoluteness of belief and posturing dressed up as science. It just too much fun! <grin>

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

-----

>

>

> Correction: Don's complete statement was about the Green Book, not ACOEM. But this does not

> change my question to Tony about his process of evaluating and accepting the ACOEM mold

> statement compared to that of the Green Book.

>

> Carl Grimes

> Healthy Habitats LLC

>

> -----

> >

> >

> > After Don's post of his complete statement about the ACOEM mold position statement,

> > considering how important words and procedures are, and with Tony's continuing challange of

> the

> > Green Book review process, I have the following question for Tony:

> >

> > Is the peer review process (and other relevant criteria) you have deemed sufficient for

> > supporting the ACOEM mold position statement consistent with the criteria you are

> > applying to the Green Book in your challange of it? If your decision methodology for each

> > is different, what are the differences and why.

> >

> > Carl Grimes

> > Healthy Habitats LLC

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>