Guest guest Posted October 18, 2005 Report Share Posted October 18, 2005 I was using the glue as picture word to illustrate the actin and > myosin filaments becoming rigidly bound. Now the bigger idea. We have football player or runner that is having hamstring " cramping " and also reduced stride length, power and endurance. Or we simply have kid with tight hamstrings that is affecting athletic ability. The kid is stretching all the time but to no avail. Kid is not " injured " so not sports rehab problem and therefore wanders into to see strength and conditioning expert to improve the function of his hamstring muscles. Kid naturally thinks strength and conditioning expert because he wants " muscle " that will possess power, endurance and natural flexibility. The kid does this because wants more production. As strengthening coach what strength and conditioning procedures would you do you to train the kid to make him be natural talent again or actually possess the proper physiologically functioning hamstring? That is one that would exist in a normal " resting " length that was ready to be stretched in locomotion to produce a even greater contraction because a resting tension now develops. I am interested in how you would train the muscle to produce better physiological function. Is this not a major training problem in sports? When examining physiological functions of the hamstring it appeared that locomotion and maintaining posture were it. I am all for exercising the hamstring to make it " stronger " but the problem appears to be that unlike biceps it is not existing in a non working normal resting stretched length. If existing in normal stretched length and then when in locomotion it was stretched to greater than normal length prior to contraction a large amount of resting tension would be properly developing into the muscle before the contraction actual contraction takes place. But this appears to not be happening why? The rational appeared to be the role the hamstring was playing maintaining the poor posture. In the poor posture or loss of the lumbar lordosis the center of mass of the upper trunk is moved more anterior to the hips. The weight of the trunk was not increasing but its effective weight or what is known as resistance arm was increasing relative to the effective effort arm of the hamstrings. As the poor posture or loss of lordosis moved the center of mass forward the hamstring in the " closed system " are required by as observed biomechanical engineering the muscle as leverage system to work harder and harder and begin to exist in worse and worse chronic " non resting " stretched length. This rational lead us to realize that we had to produce strengthen procedures that would reduce the demand the on the hamstrings so they could function for locomotion like a muscles that was existing in a normal resting length. When I hear some one has tight hamstrings I naturally think sit up exercise as strengthening exercise to induce proper posture to align center of mass of trunk over hips and thereby reducing the chronic fatigue work on the hamstring. Scherger, Ridgefield wa > > > Scherger stated: > > We found that the tight torn hamstrings went hand and hand with the > > stiff bad back. The rational being with in poor global posture, the > > center of mass of trunk is moved to the anterior. When this occurs > > the hams now becomes chronically devoted to maintaining the upright > > posture then locomotion. The athlete becomes a postural maintaining > > machine instead of a locomotion machine. When the hams do this they > > go into a chronic fatigue and when this happens to a muscle the > > actin myosin fibers glue together and they lose their ability to > > lengthen. > > > > Casler writes: > > > > Glue together??? what are you talking about? > > > > Actin and myosin " don't " lengthen!!! > > > > Scherger replying to what Casler wrote above. > > > > To clarify from Guyton Textbook of Medical Physiology fourth > > edition; Page 90 Muscle Fatigue. Prolonged and strong contraction > > of a muscle leads to the well-known state of muscle fatigue. This > > results simply from inability of the contractile and metabolic > > processes of the muscle fibers to continue supplying the same work > > output. The nerve continues to function properly but the > > contraction of the muscle becomes weaker and weaker because of the > > depletion of energy supplies in the muscle fibers themselves. If a > > muscle becomes fatigued to an extreme extent, it is likely to become > > continually contracted and will remain contracted and rigid for many > > minutes even without an action potential as a stimulus. This is > > called a physiological contracture of the muscle. It is believed to > > result from a peculiar feature of the contractile process itself: > > Because ATP is required to make actin and myosin separate during the > > process of muscle relaxation. Otherwise the myosin and actin > > filaments will continue to be attracted to each other. In extreme > > muscle fatigue, then as the ATP has been depleted the actin and > > myosin filaments will become rigidly bound. End of paragraph. > > Casler writes: > > Hi , > > That is the description of a simple " muscle cramp " . > > No where does it say that " the actin myosin fibers glue together " . > > Also as I stated, actin and myosin don't lengthen, they resist lengthening. > > And you suggest, " I " take your courses to someone in a college biomechanics > lab. > > Regards, > > Casler > TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems > Century City, CA > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2005 Report Share Posted October 18, 2005 Scherger wrote: I was using the glue as picture word to illustrate the actin and > myosin filaments becoming rigidly bound. Casler writes: , you claim to have knowledge of Physiological and Biomechanical processes, yet use this type of language? No one I have ever worked with would describe a muscle cramp by stating the actin and myosin were " glued " . Scherger wrote: When examining physiological functions of the hamstring it appeared that locomotion and maintaining posture were it. I am all for exercising the hamstring to make it " stronger " but the problem appears to be that unlike biceps it is not existing in a non working normal resting stretched length. If existing in normal stretched length and then when in locomotion it was stretched to greater than normal length prior to contraction a large amount of resting tension would be properly developing into the muscle before the contraction actual contraction takes place. But this appears to not be happening why? The rational appeared to be the role the hamstring was playing maintaining the poor posture. In the poor posture or loss of the lumbar lordosis the center of mass of the upper trunk is moved more anterior to the hips. The weight of the trunk was not increasing but its effective weight or what is known as resistance arm was increasing relative to the effective effort arm of the hamstrings. As the poor posture or loss of lordosis moved the center of mass forward the hamstring in the " closed system " are required by as observed biomechanical engineering the muscle as leverage system to work harder and harder and begin to exist in worse and worse chronic " non resting " stretched length. Casler writes: If the hips are rotated in such a way as to " flatten " the Lumbar curve the hamstrings " shorten " , not lengthen. Adding lumbar curve " stretches " the hamstrings. Scherger wrote: This rational lead us to realize that we had to produce strengthen procedures that would reduce the demand the on the hamstrings so they could function for locomotion like a muscles that was existing in a normal resting length. Casler writes: It seems your whole premise is skewed, or am I missing something? Scherger wrote: When I hear some one has tight hamstrings I naturally think sit up exercise as strengthening exercise to induce proper posture to align center of mass of trunk over hips and thereby reducing the chronic fatigue work on the hamstring. Casler writes: Since this seems to be the " foundation " of your program, can you please explain " HOW " a sit-up can, " induce proper posture to align center of mass of trunk over hips and thereby reducing the chronic fatigue work on the hamstring " ? Regards, Casler TRI-VECTOR 3-D Force Systems Century City, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.