Guest guest Posted July 13, 2006 Report Share Posted July 13, 2006 It is great that you have been able to get your parents to actually begin exercising. Any exercise will greatly improve their quality of life. The best exercise for them is any exercise that they will enjoy doing and will look forward to doing. Keep it simple to start, advance slowly and keep it enjoyable. Simple rubber bands which can be purchased at any sports store can be very useful. For about $20 you can get a variety exercise bands and you can easily devise exercises appropriate for their level of fitness. Most of the kits contain the rubber bands come with varying exercises illustrated. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct, USA --- " Kahl.Matt " wrote: > Hi, > > My parents are both in their early 60's and have > realized they'll need > exercise and a better diet to stick around and be > mobile. My sis and I > got them an exercise bike and elliptical and now we > want to incorporate > resistance training. Now since they are very out of > shape and just > starting out I'm leaning towards a used Soloflex, > even though I prefer > free weights myself. I'm leaning this way because I > think it might be > safer and less intimidating. I've never personally > tried one though so > I'm looking for input. Will they make real strength > gains and increase > or stabilize bone density as much or close to what > they would with free > weights? I would think they answer would be yes > since the bands provide > an concentric and eccentric action. 15 years ago I > talked them into a > Nordicflex Gold and it was complete garbage because > it had no eccentric > action resulting in size without any strength > increase whatsoever. Any > opinions or advice? > > Thanks, > Matt Kahl > Milwaukee, WI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2006 Report Share Posted July 13, 2006 I would recommend an EFI Total Gym. It allows the person to do exercises in very functional patterns and with less-than-bodyweight if they need to. I use one quite a lot for rehab. Good luck. Cowell Raleigh, NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2006 Report Share Posted July 13, 2006 > > Hi, > > My parents are both in their early 60's and have realized they'll need > exercise and a better diet to stick around and be mobile. My sis and I > got them an exercise bike and elliptical and now we want to incorporate > resistance training. Now since they are very out of shape and just > starting out I'm leaning towards a used Soloflex, even though I prefer > free weights myself. I'm leaning this way because I think it might be > safer and less intimidating. I've never personally tried one though so > I'm looking for input. Will they make real strength gains and increase > or stabilize bone density as much or close to what they would with free > weights? I would think they answer would be yes since the bands provide > an concentric and eccentric action. 15 years ago I talked them into a > Nordicflex Gold and it was complete garbage because it had no eccentric > action resulting in size without any strength increase whatsoever. Any > opinions or advice? *** Matt, I´ve been working with elderly people for more than two years now, and it is amazing what one can learn about it. One always have to be very careful in giving the body the enough time to asimilate and adapt itself to the demand of training, and if we are talking about your parents in their early 60´s and out of shape, we probably need to be even more carefully. A good advice is to control the Heart rate and if you do not have any of those heart rate bands, what you can do instead is to control that they can talk without been out of breath. What you say about incorporate resistance training, it will be important to preserve muscle mass and mobility. What I do with the people who I´m working with is to combine resistance training with exercise for coordination and mobility and I do not use to do resistance exercise for every muscle, just multiarticular movements becuase monoarticular exercise, like doing biceps, triceps can elevate blood pressure. In my experience, they may need more time to adapt and recover after each session, but elderly people can adapt very well to training if we know how to go progressively and always remember one thing, is the enjoy the class, much better! Good luck Matt!! Sebastian Scoles Buenos Aires, Argentina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Just to add some definition to this conversation about terminology. It is considered derogatory to say " elderly. " The correct terminology is now older person. They are categorized as the youngest old (60-74) , the old (75-84) and the oldest old (85 and up). Steve , M.Ed., CSCS, USAW Lynchburg, VA ________________________________ From: Supertraining on behalf of Eddie White Sent: Mon 7/24/2006 10:02 AM To: Supertraining Subject: Re: Training for the elderly I would be careful about labeling someone elderly even if they were my parents. I did a meet this weekend that had several power lifters in their 60's and early seventy's lifting some substantial weights. I doubt if they think of themselves as elderly. Maybe novice, intermediate, or experienced athletes would be a better choice. Every year some man or woman re-define the age limits of some sport. I read an article recently of a man in his seventies who averages 3 hour marathons and faster. We are now seeing drug free squats in one ply suits from 70 year olds over 600 pounds. Many 50 year olds are benching over 500. We have 60 year old triathletes who are very competitive. My parents play tennis about everyday and they are in their late seventies. So I guess I'm speaking for those over fifty when I say don't call us elderly, maybe you can apply that to those over 100 or maybe not. Eddie White Blue Springs, Mo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 I agree with you wholeheartedly. As I read the various posts concerning training for the elderly I suddenly realized that the posters were discussing me and my generation. I am 65, row approximately 10-12 K on the indoor rower 6 times weekly. There are many athletes at my localy Y who are my elders and are very active.. My father had a routine of going to the Y every day, swam 1/2 hr and worked out on the nautilus and tread mill for another 1/2 hr. He did this up until the day before he died, at age 79 of a ruptured brain aneurysm. He did not learn to swim or use a treadmil or Nautilaus until he was in his mid-60s. He did this on his own without the help of a trainer. At the Boston World Rowing championships also known as the Crash-B, I witnessed very competitive athletes in their 70's and 80's. It is important not to look at chronological age but rather physiological age. As I have mentioned in previous posts I have a patient who is presently 98 lives on her own and her biggest complaint to me is that she can no longer keep up with her older sister. I usually think of the elderly as the 80+ age group. I guess most of us think of the elderly as being anyone a generation older than us. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct, USA --- Eddie White wrote: > I would be careful about labeling someone elderly > even if they were my > parents. I did a meet this weekend that had several > power lifters in > their 60's and early seventy's lifting some > substantial weights. I > doubt if they think of themselves as elderly. Maybe > novice, > intermediate, or experienced athletes would be a > better choice. Every > year some man or woman re-define the age limits of > some sport. I read > an article recently of a man in his seventies who > averages 3 hour > marathons and faster. We are now seeing drug free > squats in one ply > suits from 70 year olds over 600 pounds. Many 50 > year olds are benching > over 500. We have 60 year old triathletes who are > very competitive. My > parents play tennis about everyday and they are in > their late seventies. > So I guess I'm speaking for those over fifty when I > say don't call us > elderly, maybe you can apply that to those over 100 > or maybe not. > > > Eddie White > Blue Springs, Mo. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 What's in a word other than the connotations others make of them. There was a time when elder was bestowe a certain dignity, such as elder statesmen. I am not sure what the origin of the word is, but I suspect that it simply means older than me. Rose is a Rose- a rose by any other name is still a Rose. ( I don't remember the author) <<Websters online dictionary Main Entry: elder Function: noun 1 : one living in an earlier period 2 a : one who is older : SENIOR <a child trying to please her elders> b : an aged person 3 : one having authority by virtue of age and experience <the village elders> Main Entry: elder statesman Function: noun : an eminent senior member of a group or organization; especially : a retired statesman who unofficially advises current leaders >> What was politically correct several years ago has now become politically incorrect. I getting too old to keep track of the various naunces. Who comes up with these any way. There is a well respect travel educational program called " Elder hostel " which caters to individuals between the ages of 50-70. I guess they should change their name to " Older Hostel " . Elder Hostel sounds more dignified to me than Older Hostel. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct, USA --- " , (HSHP) " wrote: > Just to add some definition to this conversation > about terminology. It is considered derogatory to > say " elderly. " The correct terminology is now older > person. They are categorized as the youngest old > (60-74) , the old (75-84) and the oldest old (85 and > up). > > Steve , M.Ed., CSCS, USAW > Lynchburg, VA > > ________________________________ > > From: Supertraining on behalf of > Eddie White > Sent: Mon 7/24/2006 10:02 AM > To: Supertraining > Subject: Re: Training for the > elderly > > > > I would be careful about labeling someone elderly > even if they were my > parents. I did a meet this weekend that had several > power lifters in > their 60's and early seventy's lifting some > substantial weights. I > doubt if they think of themselves as elderly. Maybe > novice, > intermediate, or experienced athletes would be a > better choice. Every > year some man or woman re-define the age limits of > some sport. I read > an article recently of a man in his seventies who > averages 3 hour > marathons and faster. We are now seeing drug free > squats in one ply > suits from 70 year olds over 600 pounds. Many 50 > year olds are benching > over 500. We have 60 year old triathletes who are > very competitive. My > parents play tennis about everyday and they are in > their late seventies. > So I guess I'm speaking for those over fifty when I > say don't call us > elderly, maybe you can apply that to those over 100 > or maybe not. > > Eddie White > Blue Springs, Mo. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Ralph, I am making my statement from what I have learned working with Sports and Exercise Psychologist who specialize in working with older populations. Since this group prides itself on research, it will be hard to publish much if we use " elderly " in our scholarly material. Steve M.Ed., CSCS, USAW Lynchburg, VA ________________________________ From: Supertraining on behalf of Ralph Giarnella Sent: Mon 7/24/2006 1:28 PM To: Supertraining Subject: RE: Re: Training for the elderly What's in a word other than the connotations others make of them. There was a time when elder was bestowe a certain dignity, such as elder statesmen. I am not sure what the origin of the word is, but I suspect that it simply means older than me. Rose is a Rose- a rose by any other name is still a Rose. ( I don't remember the author) <<Websters online dictionary Main Entry: elder Function: noun 1 : one living in an earlier period 2 a : one who is older : SENIOR <a child trying to please her elders> b : an aged person 3 : one having authority by virtue of age and experience <the village elders> Main Entry: elder statesman Function: noun : an eminent senior member of a group or organization; especially : a retired statesman who unofficially advises current leaders >> What was politically correct several years ago has now become politically incorrect. I getting too old to keep track of the various naunces. Who comes up with these any way. There is a well respect travel educational program called " Elder hostel " which caters to individuals between the ages of 50-70. I guess they should change their name to " Older Hostel " . Elder Hostel sounds more dignified to me than Older Hostel. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct, USA --- " , (HSHP) " <smith.s@... <mailto:smith.s%40lynchburg.edu> > wrote: > Just to add some definition to this conversation > about terminology. It is considered derogatory to > say " elderly. " The correct terminology is now older > person. They are categorized as the youngest old > (60-74) , the old (75-84) and the oldest old (85 and > up). > > Steve , M.Ed., CSCS, USAW > Lynchburg, VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 Just twenty years ago the first book concerning training for " the aging " appeared: Jan and Terry Todd were inspired by the likes of Sam Loprinzi, Grimek, Pudgy Stockton, and Karl Nordberg to break new ground with a book specifically addressed to training in the senior years. I'll add that both Jan and Terry Todd are living proof of life long training. Ironically, only three years later Tufts scientists published on sarcopenia; a host of research publications has followed since, many of them concerning research groups of adults in the 60s-80s age range, undertaking supervised strength training three times weekly on circuits of machines for twelve weeks, with lean body mass increases of 8-10 pounds and strength increments of 100-170% not being uncommon. Now even the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta has on its website a link to download a 125+ page pdf file of a Tufts publication emphasizing the importance of strength training to offset the systemic outcomes of sarcopenia symptoms both for the sedentary and for those doing only aerobics. My first experiences with senior powerlifting occured more the forty years ago as Karl Nordberg progressed through his late sixties, then his seventies, his bench press climbing from 350 in his sixties to upwards of 460 by his mid to late 70s. Despite that his ability to hold an empty Olympic bar at arm's length, twirling it like a baton was phenomenal. As was his habit of grabbing the hub of a 45 lb plate with a pinch grip from the floor, lifting it outward and holding it in a forward raise. Having turned 62 today, I can attest to being stronger and more fit and more muscular than ever. In part, Steve Hollman's x-reps modification of his Points of Flexion system of training has been the biggest single blessing in my training over the last two years. Wish I'd had that available 30-40 years ago. I'm tending to look upon physicians who chalk up ailments as " that's aging " or " it's just your age " as incompetent " ageists " out of touch with close to two decades of scientific findings. That is to say, " normal aging " is looking to me to be a deficiency condition - a deficiency of training, diet/nutrition, a sense of consumer advocacy with respect to physicians and health care (and coaching!), and a real need for Jon Kabat-Zinn's application of buddhist mindfulness technique to Hans Seyle's findings on stress. best regards, Ken ONeill Long Life Fitness Austin, Texas kayoneill@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 I'm pretty sure that would be Will Shakespeare, Ralph - Romeo and t? That which we call a rose would still smell as sweet. (Ok i don't have it before me, but that's reasonably close). Basically that regardless of the name used for such a thing, it would remain just as it is, without alteration. But I'd have to say the concept of the word " elderly " has some symptoms lately of joining " fat/obese " and other adjectives? " elderly " has a connotation of helplessness, of resignation, retirement from the active life? Yet in this day and age where I know of at least one 80 yo world level powerlifter i can name off hand, I'd have to say there is something to this whole notion that there are no true " elderly " as a whole group breakdown any more. Perhaps a better set of notions would be " fit minded/active older adults " , " older adults who are deteriorating by way of lack of interest in their own care " (as one group might be thought of) and " older adults less fit by reason of debilitating disease " ? When some of the master lifters defeat the open division youngsters for the open world teams, does that not say there's a different standard in operation? I mean, Harriet Hall is in her mid-50's now and still a great OPEN lifter? fewer feel they are " shuffling off to masters " at age 40...lol... The concept of " youth " too can be seen as having similar groups, as there are a number of unfit/overweight youth nowadays, who could be said to be less caring of their health... I don't think it's as simple as an age now. For example, Madeline Albright at age 69 has said she " works out with weights several times a week and has a 400 pound leg press " . Picture THAT as " elderly " ! When that was mentioned to a few high school kids, they were shocked to hear she outlifted them...and promptly vowed they would NOT be outdone by an " old lady " ! However in their mindset, anyone over 21 could be " old " lol.... somedays I think they're on the lookout for the wagon to haul their parents and everyone above their age off to some mythical old folks' refuge where we will be tended by those technologically patient who will reset our VCR clocks for us and other stereotypical nonsense.... I think that the general idea of classification one's age can result in less responsive treatment for athletes of a certain age. I think the medical community as a whole should be more aware that as people age they are not necessarily becoming sedentary. After all, these are people seeking to avoid debilitating aspects of aging and thus with care for their own well being wish to maintain this as long as possible? And there's an argument that anyone of a certain age who works out actively even in the recreational or fitness sense is an athlete... not an elite athlete, but not all who work out of ANY age could say that! I have a client who got major resistance from her doctor when she tore her meniscus when she mentioned getting an MRI and discussing repairs.... He failed to recognize her regularly performing 3-5 mile mountain hikes and doing three-day-long bowling tournaments as " being an athlete " and tried to convince her to " leave it alone and don't worry about it, you're just getting OLD. " . It took her three more doctors to find one that would help her aggressively rehab her knee to a useful level for her sport! Had they asked, they would have discovered that at age 68, she was throwing a bowling ball that was over 10% of her full bodyweight... Perhaps it's a result of a generation refusing to " go gently into that good night " ... and like it or not, the Boomers have raised the bar for those in their own group, and by doing so raised expectations of the generation ahead of them, and those who follow... The concept of aging has less to do with resting and more to do with reacting! The Phantom aka Schaefer, CMT, CSCS, competing master and open powerlifter Denver, Colorado, USA It was written: > What's in a word other than the connotations others > make of them. There was a time when elder was bestowe > a certain dignity, such as elder statesmen. I am not > sure what the origin of the word is, but I suspect > that it simply means older than me. > > Rose is a Rose- a rose by any other name is still a > Rose. ( I don't remember the author) > > > <<Websters online dictionary > > Main Entry: elder > Function: noun > 1 : one living in an earlier period > 2 a : one who is older : SENIOR <a child trying to > please her elders> b : an aged person > 3 : one having authority by virtue of age and > experience <the village elders> > > Main Entry: elder statesman > Function: noun > : an eminent senior member of a group or organization; > especially : a retired statesman who unofficially > advises current leaders >> > > What was politically correct several years ago has now > become politically incorrect. I getting too old to > keep track of the various naunces. Who comes up with > these any way. > > There is a well respect travel educational program > called " Elder hostel " which caters to individuals > between the ages of 50-70. I guess they should > change their name to " Older Hostel " . Elder Hostel > sounds more dignified to me than Older Hostel. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct, USA > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 I wrote that post with a little tongue in cheek. I can understand the need to seperate out the various age groups for purposes of scientific study as you stated. I too have seen that same distinction made in various studies. From a scientific point of view it certainly makes sense. Elderly still sounds better than older. Ralph Giarnella MD Southington Ct, USA --- " , (HSHP) " wrote: > Ralph, > > I am making my statement from what I have learned > working with Sports and Exercise Psychologist who > specialize in working with older populations. Since > this group prides itself on research, it will be > hard to publish much if we use " elderly " in our > scholarly material. > > Steve M.Ed., CSCS, USAW > Lynchburg, VA > > ________________________________ > > From: Supertraining on behalf of > Ralph Giarnella > Sent: Mon 7/24/2006 1:28 PM > To: Supertraining > Subject: RE: Re: Training for the > elderly > > > > What's in a word other than the connotations others > make of them. There was a time when elder was > bestowe > a certain dignity, such as elder statesmen. I am not > sure what the origin of the word is, but I suspect > that it simply means older than me. > > Rose is a Rose- a rose by any other name is still a > Rose. ( I don't remember the author) > > <<Websters online dictionary > > Main Entry: elder > Function: noun > 1 : one living in an earlier period > 2 a : one who is older : SENIOR <a child trying to > please her elders> b : an aged person > 3 : one having authority by virtue of age and > experience <the village elders> > > Main Entry: elder statesman > Function: noun > : an eminent senior member of a group or > organization; > especially : a retired statesman who unofficially > advises current leaders >> > > What was politically correct several years ago has > now > become politically incorrect. I getting too old to > keep track of the various naunces. Who comes up with > these any way. > > There is a well respect travel educational program > called " Elder hostel " which caters to individuals > between the ages of 50-70. I guess they should > change their name to " Older Hostel " . Elder Hostel > sounds more dignified to me than Older Hostel. > > Ralph Giarnella MD > Southington Ct, USA > > --- " , (HSHP) " <smith.s@... > <mailto:smith.s%40lynchburg.edu> > > wrote: > > > Just to add some definition to this conversation > > about terminology. It is considered derogatory to > > say " elderly. " The correct terminology is now > older > > person. They are categorized as the youngest old > > (60-74) , the old (75-84) and the oldest old (85 > and > > up). > > > > Steve , M.Ed., CSCS, USAW > > Lynchburg, VA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.