Guest guest Posted August 31, 2006 Report Share Posted August 31, 2006 It's just their life cycle... if you feed a child more- they don't grow faster.. it's genetically controlled for them, same as us. But I've always wonder what their LIFE-SPAN is.. If they're slow growers maybe they have a long life. Have you ever read anything about that? Barb > > Domingue and Woody, without a citation, attribute the slow growth of > mycobacteria to the slow assimilation of nutrients thru the > hydrophobic cell envelope. > > Has anyone heard anything that could account for the slow generation > time of Bb even in rich culture medium? It's probably not the envelope > in this case. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2006 Report Share Posted August 31, 2006 > It's just their life cycle... if you feed a child > more- they don't grow faster.. it's genetically controlled for them, > same as us. > > But I've always wonder what their LIFE-SPAN is.. > If they're slow growers maybe they have a long life. > > Have you ever read anything about that? > > Barb Unless you count binary fission (or other division events that may take place) as ending thier lives - then they can only be (usually) deathless and ageless. It seems they don't die unless killed. Nystrom has written some stuff about this or related, including " Conditional senescence: death of the immortals. " His intersts run toward the question of aging, proper, but he also knows alot about bacteria. I agree Bb is intrinsically programmed for a lower max growth rate than eg staph, I just wonder why and how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.