Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Rich, What dose of selenium would you suggest trying? I don't recall if the Autism book discusses selenium and dosages, but I will check. Thanks! > > Hi, all. > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects them from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich > > > Here is my earlier post from last January: > > Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group. > > Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my > thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to > CFS. > > First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult > to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The > symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do > not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see. > > Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, > i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal > as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms > of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must > have some aspects of pathophysiology in common. > > Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene > expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression > is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the > misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology. > > Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila > reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that > the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells > (monocytes and lymphocytes) is " identical " in CFS and Lyme disease. > This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in > these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything > about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two > disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that > happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not > saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these > mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the > two is the same.) > > As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset > of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks > as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use > of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione > peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much > the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the > second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the > people do not have normal glutathione function. > > As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I > now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in > autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion > brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops > that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe > (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine > and sulfate. > > So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use > glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is > depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal > activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed > identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the > glutathione system in Lyme disease as well. > > With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the > literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my > attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references > that support these statements. > > (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found > that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that > causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present > in the culture medium. > > (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively > into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it > into the bacterium. > > (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in > three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The > others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with > a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with > a mass of 34 kilodaltons. > > (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a > substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release > their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a > cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in > order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells. > > (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the > principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or > sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high > concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). > Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the > responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it > can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced > nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism > of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human > cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose > phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) > In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione > peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells. > > (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected > with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye > rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found > to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione > peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a > marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After > antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute > symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione > levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase > activity was still significantly below normal, and the > malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested > that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and > inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > > I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates > acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the > Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione > peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or > chronic or post-) Lyme disease. > > One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione > peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor > for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that > Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS > (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the > literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether > anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured? > > It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes > glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein > thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute > phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, > but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium > level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though > it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this > lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of > glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the > similarities in symptomatology and the " identical " gene expression > in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. > It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by > other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, > once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this > is exciting! > > If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long- > term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this > remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism > treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the > treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I > think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, > selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with > positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some > experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other > treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of > neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria > themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme > disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these > treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks > for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly. > > Rich > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 A good hypothesis, Rich, except that chronic lyme disease is usually not just borrelia burgdorferi. I've concluded that from six years of my own history and listening to many many other histories very closely. Just one strain of lyme, even given our polymorphisms, almost never throws us into this kind of global disability. Burgdorfer found six bugs in the tickgut in the 1980's. Google Eva Sapi, she's at Univ of Connecticut and associated with Yale, or I'll email you her URL privately. YOu might want to talk with her, I intend to at some point as she's finally doing the work that should have been done twenty years ago. She's trying to isolate the other organisms. Some are commonly talked about and its my personal opinion that babesia is extremely bad and synergistic with lyme. It releases some kind of bad toxin from its plastid, and its very oxidizing to red blood cells and damages their glutathione which they are then not very well able to recycle. If you can do some pubmed research on babesia in any form, and/or I'll email you some stuff. Please work this into your hypothesis. If you don't find enuf info on babesia it's possible to study malaria although one recognizes that drawing parallels is a little bit dicey. In addition, there's something about the mycotoxins involved with borrelia, and anergy to fungus. I posted some stuff Kathleen (very brilliantly) wrote about this. So there is a whole picture that is complex that has to do with borrelia, babesia, and downstream issues with fungi that are directly related to the infection, not just indirectly as opportunistic stuff. In addition, lymies seem to get strep problems, from what I've seen, not always, but mysteriously frequently, AND shingles, especially in the kids. Dr. the lyme pediatrician long ago commented on the strange connection btw varicella ie shingles, and his kids--way too many had shingles. And adult lymies get it mysteriously often. THere may be some completely unidentified virus in the ticks too. So you've got vulnerable polymorphisms, maybe already metal issues, and then you get a particular SOUP of bugs either from repeated tickbites or ticks with multiple bugs (it is increasingly likely to get several bugs in a mere single tickbite these days). So to understand this is more complex than just borrelia. It would be GREAT if you would help on that. If I can send along any info I have I will look for it. Okay, back to sleep. > > Hi, all. > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects them from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich > > > Here is my earlier post from last January: > > Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group. > > Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my > thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to > CFS. > > First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult > to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The > symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do > not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see. > > Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, > i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal > as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms > of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must > have some aspects of pathophysiology in common. > > Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene > expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression > is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the > misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology. > > Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila > reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that > the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells > (monocytes and lymphocytes) is " identical " in CFS and Lyme disease. > This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in > these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything > about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two > disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that > happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not > saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these > mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the > two is the same.) > > As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset > of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks > as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use > of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione > peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much > the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the > second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the > people do not have normal glutathione function. > > As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I > now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in > autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion > brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops > that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe > (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine > and sulfate. > > So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use > glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is > depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal > activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed > identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the > glutathione system in Lyme disease as well. > > With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the > literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my > attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references > that support these statements. > > (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found > that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that > causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present > in the culture medium. > > (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively > into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it > into the bacterium. > > (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in > three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The > others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with > a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with > a mass of 34 kilodaltons. > > (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a > substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release > their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a > cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in > order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells. > > (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the > principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or > sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high > concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). > Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the > responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it > can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced > nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism > of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human > cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose > phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) > In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione > peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells. > > (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected > with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye > rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found > to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione > peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a > marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After > antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute > symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione > levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase > activity was still significantly below normal, and the > malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested > that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and > inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > > I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates > acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the > Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione > peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or > chronic or post-) Lyme disease. > > One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione > peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor > for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that > Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS > (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the > literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether > anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured? > > It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes > glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein > thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute > phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, > but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium > level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though > it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this > lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of > glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the > similarities in symptomatology and the " identical " gene expression > in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. > It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by > other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, > once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this > is exciting! > > If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long- > term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this > remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism > treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the > treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I > think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, > selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with > positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some > experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other > treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of > neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria > themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme > disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these > treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks > for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly. > > Rich > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi, Rich. Okay. So here is my response for you regarding this Lyme-Yasko treatment scenario, with some info about my case you may or may not have forgotten. Of course I've long been diagnosed with CFS. I also was diagnosed with lyme by one LLMD, by one non-LLMD as well as had lyme ruled-out for me by another LLMD and a CFS specialist who happened to be Dr Cheney. Aside my many other tests and history indicating CFS as my primary diagnosis, I had three western blots from three seperate testing labs show positivity for lyme in me while tests for lyme co-infections showed negative. Long story short, I did lots of many several antibiotics intended to treat chronic lyme to no avail, except one, a sulfa antibiotic(the name illudes me at the moment). And the outstanding benefit from this one abx lasted just one day on the fifth day of use after an oral surgery when I also happen to be on my sixth month of ampligen and had completed my 26th of 40 dives of hyperbaric oxygen therapy(HBOT). As I had not noticed any benefit like this one day from ampligen, a previous oral surgery(same kind) and HBOT up to this point, it seem as if they didn't directly cause the herx that I experienced for ten minutes on this fifth day of the sulfa abx use resulting in a complete release of my key right side brain pain and fatigue, which allowed for one very good refreshing night of sleep and an excellent following day(I literally felt like I popped completely out of the CFS hole, albeit short lived). I think connected to this moment is the fact that I do now know I have a CYP2C9 SNP which makes several drugs, including specifically sulfa abxs, more potent and potentially more toxic at normal recommended doses. This makes me think, given the back drop of your glutathione depletion-methylation block hypothesis for CFS and the current symptom benefit RenewPro provides me now similar to what Ampligen provided then, that the sulfur based sulfa abx at souped-up levels in my body may have indeed caught an infection of some sort, perhaps lyme, off guard. As I do now as I was then, I was taking a daily multi with selenium in it and I can conceive of how glutathione peroxidase might have come up a bit and hydrogen peroxide brought down a bit in this overall scenario temporarily, causing lyme to go to spriochette form just long enough for my immune system with the sulfa abx to do some killing of it. I can also conceive that my glutathione status overall must still have been low at that time, despite Ampligen's downstream benefit to my RnaseL enzyme system and the sulfur provided by this one sulfa abx, and this combined with now suspected heavy metal toxin build-up might be why this amazing pop out the CFS hole could not hold despite continuing on with these efforts. As far as the HBOT, I think I've read since doing it that it can potentially increase oxidation which seems to rule it out as a good help for CFS, but perhaps there is another take on it that I'm not aware? Whatever the case, as you can see I like many PWCs haven't been afraid of throwing everything, including the kitchen sink, the bathtub and The House(a good down payment for one at least!), at CFS inorder to get well, but more importantly, do my connections jibe with what you're thinking may be possible with Yasko treatments for lyme? I've never felt confident that lyme must be THE infection in me connected to my symptoms, but I see a potential for it given this new information about higher hydrogen peroxide levels encouraging its stealthy cystic form. " rvankonynen " <richvank@...> wrote: > > Hi, all. > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects them from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi Rich, I do have a concern about this hypothesis. Here is what I wrote earlier from Jill April talk: " I just wanted to comment on something I learned from watching the presentations from the April DAN! Conference. In Jill second presentation, she suggested that the methylation cycle is not malfunctioning in girls b/c of the effects of estrogen in upregulating the enzymes. She said she doesn't know yet what the cause is in girls. This is consistent with my normal creatinine. A friend who is very sick just found out her creatinine is normal, after 6+ years of CFS " Has Sue T had her glutathione measured to see if it has come up ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 >In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic Lyme >disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so that Bb >will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by the immune >system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity of >glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be brought up >to normal. How do we do this? Rich, The production of hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils is inhibited by the imidazole class of abx (and by some other abx like minocycline-see many studies on acne). I guess this observation is the basis for the old refrain from non-LLMDs: " it's the anti-inflamatory effects of the abx that is suppressing your symptoms although all the bugs are gone and you're just producing inflammation in the absence of bacteria " Quote from the acne study below: " Metronidazole, which is effective in the treatment of acne, markedly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils. The drug is known to have no significant effect on the growth of Propionibacterium acnes. " Many chronic Lyme patients and treating physicians have, in recent years, found the imidazoles to be a valuable addition to the abx regimens for their cyst busting properties (as per Brorsons) but the suppression of the production of hydrogen peroxide by PMN might indeed be part of the reason for the good results seen with the imidazoles. I personally notice a very rapid improvement in my most obvious inflammatory symptoms after starting an imidazole (within hours) FWIW Rich, do you have specific refs to the relationship btwn Bb and selenium depletion? Nelly http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search & DB=PubMed Report Increased hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils from patients with acne inflammation Hirohiko Akamatsu, MD, PhD, Takeshi Horio, MD, PhD, and Kazuhiro Hattori, MD, PhD Abstract BackgroundReactive oxygen species generated by neutrophils are closely correlated with the pathogenesis of a variety of inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible role of reactive oxygen species generated by neutrophils in the mediation of acne inflammation. MethodsBacterial phagocytotic stimuli, mediated by opsonin activity, were applied to whole blood, and neutrophil hydrogen peroxide production was measured. ResultsPatients with acne inflammation showed a significantly increased level of hydrogen peroxide produced by neutrophils compared to patients with acne comedones and healthy controls. There were no marked differences in the level of hydrogen peroxide produced by neutrophils between patients with acne comedones and healthy controls. In addition, patients with acne inflammation treated by oral administration of minocycline hydrochloride, a drug that inhibits hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils, showed a significant decrease in the ability of neutrophils to produce hydrogen peroxide in accordance with a decrease in the inflammatory activity of acne lesions. ConclusionsThe present study seems to suggest that acne inflammation is mediated in part by hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search & DB=pubmed The Possible Role of Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Neutrophils in Mediating Acne Inflammation H. Akamatsu, T. Horio Department of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan Dermatology 1998;196:82-85 (DOI: 10.1159/000017876) Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by neutrophils in mediating acne inflammation. Antibiotics used for the treatment of acne significantly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils, when compared to other antibiotics. Metronidazole, which is effective in the treatment of acne, markedly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils. The drug is known to have no significant effect on the growth of Propionibacterium acnes. The proportion of linoleic acid is markedly decreased in acne comedones. Linoleic acid significantly suppressed ROS generated by neutrophils. The ability of neutrophils to produce ROS was significantly increased in patients with acne inflammation. These results seem to reveal the involvement of ROS generated by neutrophils in the disruption of the integrity of the follicular epithelium, which is responsible for inflammatory processes of acne. Author Contacts Hirohiko Akamatsu, MD Department of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University 10-15, Fumizono-cho Moriguchi 570 (Japan) Tel. 6 992 1001, Fax 6 992 5965 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi Rich, Thanks for your hypothesis which is probably one of the clues of the Lyme problem. As Jill wrote, unfortunately, the sickest chronic Lymies are those who catch a soup of different micro-organisms. In my case, after I had tried the anti-malaria treatments, it became evident that the BIG devil inside my body is babesiosis. Maybe there is also a mechanism which allows babesiosis to raise levels of H2O2 or something else that put the two of them bugs out of reach of antimicrobials. Worse: I assume antibiotics contribute to impair enzymes (in quantity or in quality, I don't know) and help raise H2O2 levels in the body. From my personal experience, I didn't have burning in the legs (free-radicals) before I used abx against Lyme disease. Nor did I feel pinpoints all over my skin when ozone was in the atmosphere at an unusual level (I am presently a walking ozonometer...) As I wrote before, my burning sensations due to H2O2 free-radicals have improved using MSM, much more than with other antioxidants like GSH, SOD or ginkgo. But I am unable to reach a conclusion there. I have bought my Lyme brain a biochemistry book about enzymes, now it has to read it... Sylvie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi Sylvie, I've been completely flumuxed by the burning in my palms and soles of my feet since treating lyme with antibiotics. I NEVER had this symptom before in the past few decades of this illness. Your post is a revelation for me. Do you really think it's the babesia critter that can cause all this even if one has been infected with it for so many years? And why after antibiotics? Did the lyme control it somehow or did the antibiotics change the terrain? I also get a strong prickling sensation in my; hands when I take a deep breath. Does this happen to you? This symptom has got me guessing for too long. I was tested for the babesia and my LLMD said it was cleared. Edy Sylvie <funnyb1331@...> wrote: Hi Rich, Thanks for your hypothesis which is probably one of the clues of the Lyme problem. As Jill wrote, unfortunately, the sickest chronic Lymies are those who catch a soup of different micro-organisms. In my case, after I had tried the anti-malaria treatments, it became evident that the BIG devil inside my body is babesiosis. Maybe there is also a mechanism which allows babesiosis to raise levels of H2O2 or something else that put the two of them bugs out of reach of antimicrobials. Worse: I assume antibiotics contribute to impair enzymes (in quantity or in quality, I don't know) and help raise H2O2 levels in the body. From my personal experience, I didn't have burning in the legs (free-radicals) before I used abx against Lyme disease. Nor did I feel pinpoints all over my skin when ozone was in the atmosphere at an unusual level (I am presently a walking ozonometer...) As I wrote before, my burning sensations due to H2O2 free-radicals have improved using MSM, much more than with other antioxidants like GSH, SOD or ginkgo. But I am unable to reach a conclusion there. I have bought my Lyme brain a biochemistry book about enzymes, now it has to read it... Sylvie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Can one's H2O2 levels be tested for? davidhall2020 <davidhall@...> wrote: Hi, Rich. Okay. So here is my response for you regarding this Lyme-Yasko treatment scenario, with some info about my case you may or may not have forgotten. Of course I've long been diagnosed with CFS. I also was diagnosed with lyme by one LLMD, by one non-LLMD as well as had lyme ruled-out for me by another LLMD and a CFS specialist who happened to be Dr Cheney. Aside my many other tests and history indicating CFS as my primary diagnosis, I had three western blots from three seperate testing labs show positivity for lyme in me while tests for lyme co-infections showed negative. Long story short, I did lots of many several antibiotics intended to treat chronic lyme to no avail, except one, a sulfa antibiotic(the name illudes me at the moment). And the outstanding benefit from this one abx lasted just one day on the fifth day of use after an oral surgery when I also happen to be on my sixth month of ampligen and had completed my 26th of 40 dives of hyperbaric oxygen therapy(HBOT). As I had not noticed any benefit like this one day from ampligen, a previous oral surgery(same kind) and HBOT up to this point, it seem as if they didn't directly cause the herx that I experienced for ten minutes on this fifth day of the sulfa abx use resulting in a complete release of my key right side brain pain and fatigue, which allowed for one very good refreshing night of sleep and an excellent following day(I literally felt like I popped completely out of the CFS hole, albeit short lived). I think connected to this moment is the fact that I do now know I have a CYP2C9 SNP which makes several drugs, including specifically sulfa abxs, more potent and potentially more toxic at normal recommended doses. This makes me think, given the back drop of your glutathione depletion-methylation block hypothesis for CFS and the current symptom benefit RenewPro provides me now similar to what Ampligen provided then, that the sulfur based sulfa abx at souped-up levels in my body may have indeed caught an infection of some sort, perhaps lyme, off guard. As I do now as I was then, I was taking a daily multi with selenium in it and I can conceive of how glutathione peroxidase might have come up a bit and hydrogen peroxide brought down a bit in this overall scenario temporarily, causing lyme to go to spriochette form just long enough for my immune system with the sulfa abx to do some killing of it. I can also conceive that my glutathione status overall must still have been low at that time, despite Ampligen's downstream benefit to my RnaseL enzyme system and the sulfur provided by this one sulfa abx, and this combined with now suspected heavy metal toxin build-up might be why this amazing pop out the CFS hole could not hold despite continuing on with these efforts. As far as the HBOT, I think I've read since doing it that it can potentially increase oxidation which seems to rule it out as a good help for CFS, but perhaps there is another take on it that I'm not aware? Whatever the case, as you can see I like many PWCs haven't been afraid of throwing everything, including the kitchen sink, the bathtub and The House(a good down payment for one at least!), at CFS inorder to get well, but more importantly, do my connections jibe with what you're thinking may be possible with Yasko treatments for lyme? I've never felt confident that lyme must be THE infection in me connected to my symptoms, but I see a potential for it given this new information about higher hydrogen peroxide levels encouraging its stealthy cystic form. " rvankonynen " <richvank@...> wrote: > > Hi, all. > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects them from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi, Edy. Probably the best indicator would be a test for malondialdehyde. This is a lipid peroxide. When hydrogen peroxide is elevated, it tends to react with lipids, and that should raise this parameter. It can be measured in the urine. Rich > > Can one's H2O2 levels be tested for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi Edy, I have met many other babesiosied Lymies who had the burning feet syndrome. It gets better with anti-malaria treatments like Mepron or quinine or artemether. I usually have burning soles too, my palms are so and so. Till I was treated for Lyme disease, I was in a state of equilibrium, having a suffering but still normal life. I was diagnosed for borreliosis only, and treated for it. Then my body's equilibrium broke, I developped FM, CFS, full blown babesiosis, and the Lyme was not even eradicated. As you write, I think abx modify the terrain. I think they are weapons studied on people previously in good health, not on chronic depleted unbalanced cases like us. I have almost been killed by the Bactrim-Rulid protocole and I still don't know why (nobody knows). When it happened, I thought of enzyme poisoning (my own enzymes), I even discussed it with my university biochemistry teacher, but he couldn't say if I was right or wrong. I don't have your hand prickling sensation, but I have a weird itching of a very precise place in the right palm (on the heart line between the two last fingers). Sometimes it can be so unbearable I scratch till the skin peels off... The point is an acupuncture one, located on the lung meridian. I don't know what it means and why it itches, except that it could be related to breathing. How could you doc say that your babesiosis has cleared? Sylvie > > Hi Sylvie, > > I've been completely flumuxed by the burning in my palms and soles of my feet since treating lyme with antibiotics. I NEVER had this symptom before in the past few decades of this illness. Your post is a revelation for me. Do you really think it's the babesia critter that can cause all this even if one has been infected with it for so many years? And why after antibiotics? Did the lyme control it somehow or did the antibiotics change the terrain? I also get a strong prickling sensation in my; hands when I take a deep breath. Does this happen to you? This symptom has got me guessing for too long. I was tested for the babesia and my LLMD said it was cleared. > > Edy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Right: I'm almost 100% convinced that anybody with chronic " lyme " also has babesia. This is why I think a responds to zithromax but can't get off it--it suppresses enough borrelia and babesia but does not kill them. Vulnerable genetics also plays a definite role--my friend works out with a 70 year old guy who has had lyme six or seven times and babesia once and got over them all.... Nonetheless, babesia is a much overlooked foe in this 'tickborne' syndrome. And its a known oxidizer of glutathione in the red blood cell. > > Hi Rich, > > Thanks for your hypothesis which is probably one of the clues of the Lyme problem. As Jill > wrote, unfortunately, the sickest chronic Lymies are those who catch a soup of > different micro-organisms. In my case, after I had tried the anti-malaria treatments, it > became evident that the BIG devil inside my body is babesiosis. Maybe there is also a > mechanism which allows babesiosis to raise levels of H2O2 or something else that put the > two of them bugs out of reach of antimicrobials. > > Worse: I assume antibiotics contribute to impair enzymes (in quantity or in quality, I don't > know) and help raise H2O2 levels in the body. From my personal experience, I didn't have > burning in the legs (free-radicals) before I used abx against Lyme disease. Nor did I feel > pinpoints all over my skin when ozone was in the atmosphere at an unusual level (I am > presently a walking ozonometer...) As I wrote before, my burning sensations due to H2O2 > free-radicals have improved using MSM, much more than with other antioxidants like GSH, > SOD or ginkgo. But I am unable to reach a conclusion there. I have bought my Lyme brain > a biochemistry book about enzymes, now it has to read it... > > Sylvie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi Sylvie, I took mepron for about 3 or 4 months and then was retested through Igenex. Still had the BB big time, but the babesia was gone, or so my doc thought so the plan was to then totally focus on the Lyme. Unfortunetly my body had had enough of the ABX and I simply cannot tolerate them anymore. We've tried many different ones and the result is always the same. I now have an epi pen by the bed as I have now become so sensitized to so many things I simply cannot believe it. The most recent being the nightshade family of food! If it weren't so uncomfortable I'd make a joke about it. So now I'm only doing Hyperbaric and some cats claw. One thing I've gotten from this list is some undecidedness. I know I have lots of pathagens and through testing lots of methylation issues and genes missing or working badly. The Yasko protocol has my attention, but I just don't know what to address first. I can't seem to find a guide and my brain can't show me the way to go, so.........I read and read and read. Edy Sylvie <funnyb1331@...> wrote: Hi Edy, I have met many other babesiosied Lymies who had the burning feet syndrome. It gets better with anti-malaria treatments like Mepron or quinine or artemether. I usually have burning soles too, my palms are so and so. Till I was treated for Lyme disease, I was in a state of equilibrium, having a suffering but still normal life. I was diagnosed for borreliosis only, and treated for it. Then my body's equilibrium broke, I developped FM, CFS, full blown babesiosis, and the Lyme was not even eradicated. As you write, I think abx modify the terrain. I think they are weapons studied on people previously in good health, not on chronic depleted unbalanced cases like us. I have almost been killed by the Bactrim-Rulid protocole and I still don't know why (nobody knows). When it happened, I thought of enzyme poisoning (my own enzymes), I even discussed it with my university biochemistry teacher, but he couldn't say if I was right or wrong. I don't have your hand prickling sensation, but I have a weird itching of a very precise place in the right palm (on the heart line between the two last fingers). Sometimes it can be so unbearable I scratch till the skin peels off... The point is an acupuncture one, located on the lung meridian. I don't know what it means and why it itches, except that it could be related to breathing. How could you doc say that your babesiosis has cleared? Sylvie > > Hi Sylvie, > > I've been completely flumuxed by the burning in my palms and soles of my feet since treating lyme with antibiotics. I NEVER had this symptom before in the past few decades of this illness. Your post is a revelation for me. Do you really think it's the babesia critter that can cause all this even if one has been infected with it for so many years? And why after antibiotics? Did the lyme control it somehow or did the antibiotics change the terrain? I also get a strong prickling sensation in my; hands when I take a deep breath. Does this happen to you? This symptom has got me guessing for too long. I was tested for the babesia and my LLMD said it was cleared. > > Edy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 >In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic Lyme >disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so that Bb >will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by the immune >system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity of >glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be brought up >to normal. How do we do this? Rich, The production of hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils is inhibited by the imidazole class of abx (and by some other abx like minocycline-see many studies on acne). I guess this observation is the basis for the old refrain from non-LLMDs: "it's the anti-inflamatory effects of the abx that is suppressing your symptoms although all the bugs are gone and you're just producing inflammation in the absence of bacteria" Quote from the acne study below: "Metronidazole, which is effective in the treatment of acne, markedly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils. The drug is known to have no significant effect on the growth of Propionibacterium acnes." Many chronic Lyme patients and treating physicians have, in recent years, found the imidazoles to be a valuable addition to the abx regimens for their cyst busting properties (as per Brorsons) but the suppression of the production of hydrogen peroxide by PMN might indeed be part of the reason for the good results seen with the imidazoles. I personally notice a very rapid improvement in my most obvious inflammatory symptoms after starting an imidazole (within hours) FWIW Rich, do you have specific refs to the relationship btwn Bb and selenium depletion? Nelly http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search & DB=PubMed Report Increased hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils from patients with acne inflammation Hirohiko Akamatsu, MD, PhD, Takeshi Horio, MD, PhD, and Kazuhiro Hattori, MD, PhD Abstract BackgroundReactive oxygen species generated by neutrophils are closely correlated with the pathogenesis of a variety of inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible role of reactive oxygen species generated by neutrophils in the mediation of acne inflammation. MethodsBacterial phagocytotic stimuli, mediated by opsonin activity, were applied to whole blood, and neutrophil hydrogen peroxide production was measured. ResultsPatients with acne inflammation showed a significantly increased level of hydrogen peroxide produced by neutrophils compared to patients with acne comedones and healthy controls. There were no marked differences in the level of hydrogen peroxide produced by neutrophils between patients with acne comedones and healthy controls. In addition, patients with acne inflammation treated by oral administration of minocycline hydrochloride, a drug that inhibits hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils, showed a significant decrease in the ability of neutrophils to produce hydrogen peroxide in accordance with a decrease in the inflammatory activity of acne lesions. ConclusionsThe present study seems to suggest that acne inflammation is mediated in part by hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search & DB=pubmed The Possible Role of Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Neutrophils in Mediating Acne InflammationH. Akamatsu, T. HorioDepartment of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan Dermatology 1998;196:82-85 (DOI: 10.1159/000017876) Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by neutrophils in mediating acne inflammation. Antibiotics used for the treatment of acne significantly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils, when compared to other antibiotics. Metronidazole, which is effective in the treatment of acne, markedly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils. The drug is known to have no significant effect on the growth of Propionibacterium acnes. The proportion of linoleic acid is markedly decreased in acne comedones. Linoleic acid significantly suppressed ROS generated by neutrophils. The ability of neutrophils to produce ROS was significantly increased in patients with acne inflammation. These results seem to reveal the involvement of ROS generated by neutrophils in the disruption of the integrity of the follicular epithelium, which is responsible for inflammatory processes of acne. Author Contacts Hirohiko Akamatsu, MDDepartment of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University10-15, Fumizono-choMoriguchi 570 (Japan)Tel. 6 992 1001, Fax 6 992 5965 Free Abstract Article (Fulltext) Article (PDF 69 KB) [infections] Chronic Lyme disease and the Yasko treatment program Hi, all.Here's a repost from the Experimental list. Maybe it will be of interest to some people here:I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful to someone with this disorder.As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long time. So what's going on here?As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at the end of this message for those who would like to review it. In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after antibiotic treatment.With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide.O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976).Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to assume the cystic form. This protects it from the immune system and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out.As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy metals.In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be brought up to normal. How do we do this?I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase.What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program.What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme disease might also be brought under the "Yasko tent." This might be the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more effectively.I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis.RichHere is my earlier post from last January:Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group.Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to CFS.First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see.Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must have some aspects of pathophysiology in common.Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology.Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (monocytes and lymphocytes) is "identical" in CFS and Lyme disease. This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the two is the same.)As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the people do not have normal glutathione function.As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine and sulfate.So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the glutathione system in Lyme disease as well.With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references that support these statements.(PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present in the culture medium.(PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it into the bacterium.(PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with a mass of 34 kilodaltons.(PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells.(PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells.(PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase activity was still significantly below normal, and the malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase.I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or chronic or post-) Lyme disease.One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for Lyme had your selenium level measured?It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the similarities in symptomatology and the "identical" gene expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this is exciting!If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long-term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long-term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long-term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly.Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi, Nelly. Thank you very much for this information. This action of thess specific antimicrobials may indeed be giving a clue that there is something to this idea. No, I don't have any references about selenium and Bb. I sure wish I did. I'm only inferring that Bb manipulates selenium in order to suppress glutathione peroxidase, because that is one way it could do it. Have you (or other Lymies you know of) tried supplementing selenium in significant dosages, such as up to 600 micrograms per day? Rich > > >In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic Lyme > >disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so that Bb > >will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by the immune > >system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity of > >glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be brought up > >to normal. How do we do this? > > Rich, > > The production of hydrogen peroxide by neutrophils is inhibited by the imidazole class of abx (and by some other abx like minocycline-see many studies on acne). I guess this observation is the basis for the old refrain from non-LLMDs: " it's the anti- inflamatory effects of the abx that is suppressing your symptoms although all the bugs are gone and you're just producing inflammation in the absence of bacteria " > > Quote from the acne study below: > " Metronidazole, which is effective in the treatment of acne, markedly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils. The drug is known to have no significant effect on the growth of Propionibacterium acnes. " > > Many chronic Lyme patients and treating physicians have, in recent years, found the imidazoles to be a valuable addition to the abx regimens for their cyst busting properties (as per Brorsons) but the suppression of the production of hydrogen peroxide by PMN might indeed be part of the reason for the good results seen with the imidazoles. > > I personally notice a very rapid improvement in my most obvious inflammatory symptoms after starting an imidazole (within hours) FWIW > > Rich, do you have specific refs to the relationship btwn Bb and selenium depletion? > > Nelly > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? CMD=search & DB=PubMed > > Report > Increased hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils from patients with acne inflammation > Hirohiko Akamatsu, MD, PhD, Takeshi Horio, MD, PhD, and Kazuhiro Hattori, MD, PhD > > Abstract > BackgroundReactive oxygen species generated by neutrophils are closely correlated with the pathogenesis of a variety of inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible role of reactive oxygen species generated by neutrophils in the mediation of acne inflammation. > > MethodsBacterial phagocytotic stimuli, mediated by opsonin activity, were applied to whole blood, and neutrophil hydrogen peroxide production was measured. > > ResultsPatients with acne inflammation showed a significantly increased level of hydrogen peroxide produced by neutrophils compared to patients with acne comedones and healthy controls. There were no marked differences in the level of hydrogen peroxide produced by neutrophils between patients with acne comedones and healthy controls. In addition, patients with acne inflammation treated by oral administration of minocycline hydrochloride, a drug that inhibits hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils, showed a significant decrease in the ability of neutrophils to produce hydrogen peroxide in accordance with a decrease in the inflammatory activity of acne lesions. > > ConclusionsThe present study seems to suggest that acne inflammation is mediated in part by hydrogen peroxide generation by neutrophils. > > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? CMD=search & DB=pubmed > > The Possible Role of Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Neutrophils in Mediating Acne Inflammation > H. Akamatsu, T. Horio > > Department of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan > > > Dermatology 1998;196:82-85 (DOI: 10.1159/000017876) > > Abstract > > The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by neutrophils in mediating acne inflammation. Antibiotics used for the treatment of acne significantly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils, when compared to other antibiotics. Metronidazole, which is effective in the treatment of acne, markedly inhibited ROS generated by neutrophils. The drug is known to have no significant effect on the growth of Propionibacterium acnes. The proportion of linoleic acid is markedly decreased in acne comedones. Linoleic acid significantly suppressed ROS generated by neutrophils. The ability of neutrophils to produce ROS was significantly increased in patients with acne inflammation. These results seem to reveal the involvement of ROS generated by neutrophils in the disruption of the integrity of the follicular epithelium, which is responsible for inflammatory processes of acne. > > Author Contacts > > Hirohiko Akamatsu, MD > Department of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University > 10-15, Fumizono-cho > Moriguchi 570 (Japan) > Tel. 6 992 1001, Fax 6 992 5965 > > > Free Abstract Article (Fulltext) Article (PDF 69 KB) > > > > > > > [infections] Chronic Lyme disease and the Yasko treatment program > > > Hi, all. > > Here's a repost from the Experimental list. Maybe it will be of > interest to some people here: > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects it from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich > > Here is my earlier post from last January: > > Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group. > > Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my > thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to > CFS. > > First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult > to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The > symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do > not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see. > > Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, > i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal > as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms > of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must > have some aspects of pathophysiology in common. > > Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene > expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression > is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the > misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology. > > Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila > reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that > the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells > (monocytes and lymphocytes) is " identical " in CFS and Lyme disease. > This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in > these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything > about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two > disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that > happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not > saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these > mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the > two is the same.) > > As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset > of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks > as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use > of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione > peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much > the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the > second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the > people do not have normal glutathione function. > > As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I > now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in > autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion > brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops > that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe > (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine > and sulfate. > > So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use > glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is > depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal > activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed > identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the > glutathione system in Lyme disease as well. > > With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the > literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my > attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references > that support these statements. > > (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found > that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that > causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present > in the culture medium. > > (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively > into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it > into the bacterium. > > (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in > three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The > others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with > a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with > a mass of 34 kilodaltons. > > (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a > substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release > their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a > cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in > order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells. > > (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the > principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or > sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high > concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). > Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the > responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it > can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced > nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism > of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human > cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose > phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) > In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione > peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells. > > (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected > with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye > rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found > to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione > peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a > marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After > antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute > symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione > levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase > activity was still significantly below normal, and the > malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested > that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and > inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > > I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates > acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the > Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione > peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or > chronic or post-) Lyme disease. > > One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione > peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor > for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that > Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS > (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the > literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether > anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured? > > It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes > glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein > thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute > phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, > but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium > level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though > it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this > lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of > glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the > similarities in symptomatology and the " identical " gene expression > in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. > It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by > other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, > once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this > is exciting! > > If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long- > term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this > remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism > treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the > treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I > think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, > selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with > positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some > experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other > treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of > neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria > themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme > disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these > treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks > for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly. > > Rich > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Rich, I am supplementing selenium but "only" 100 or 200 mcg/day as well as often eating high selenium foods (garlic for eg). Can't tell if it's having any effect. In fact the ONLY thing that has had a striking effect in my case is imidazoles, I have been trying to understand why for ever. Other meds or supps or any other interventions like massages help some but not in the same league. Problem is after a few days the toxic shock hits and the headaches I get are out of this world! If I manage to stay on for a few weeks (sometimes I can) then I feel toxic all over, yet I also feel it is getting to the core of my problem. Worried about liver toxicity issues when on tinidazole for any length of time, so I really want to know what it is doing exactly, if it is doing smthng directly antimicrobial or if it is doing smthng indirectly like suppressing some inflam process for eg which I could achieve differently Nelly [infections] Chronic Lyme disease and the Yasko treatment program> > > Hi, all.> > Here's a repost from the Experimental list. Maybe it will be of > interest to some people here:> > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder.> > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here?> > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment.> > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide.> > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976).> > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects it from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out.> > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals.> > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this?> > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase.> > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program.> > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the "Yasko tent." This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively.> > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis.> > Rich> > Here is my earlier post from last January:> > Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group.> > Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my > thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to > CFS.> > First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult > to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The > symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do > not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see.> > Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, > i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal > as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms > of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must > have some aspects of pathophysiology in common.> > Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene > expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression > is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the > misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology.> > Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila > reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that > the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells > (monocytes and lymphocytes) is "identical" in CFS and Lyme disease. > This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in > these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything > about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two > disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that > happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not > saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these > mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the > two is the same.)> > As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset > of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks > as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use > of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione > peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much > the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the > second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the > people do not have normal glutathione function.> > As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I > now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in > autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion > brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops > that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe > (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine > and sulfate.> > So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use > glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is > depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal > activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed > identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the > glutathione system in Lyme disease as well.> > With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the > literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my > attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references > that support these statements.> > (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found > that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that > causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present > in the culture medium.> > (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively > into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it > into the bacterium.> > (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in > three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The > others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with > a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with > a mass of 34 kilodaltons.> > (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a > substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release > their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a > cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in > order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells.> > (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the > principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or > sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high > concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). > Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the > responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it > can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced > nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism > of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human > cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose > phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) > In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione > peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells.> > (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected > with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye > rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found > to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione > peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a > marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After > antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute > symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione > levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase > activity was still significantly below normal, and the > malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested > that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and > inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase.> > > I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates > acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the > Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione > peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or > chronic or post-) Lyme disease.> > One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione > peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor > for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that > Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS > (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the > literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether > anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured?> > It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes > glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein > thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute > phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, > but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium > level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though > it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this > lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of > glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the > similarities in symptomatology and the "identical" gene expression > in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. > It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by > other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, > once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this > is exciting!> > If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long-> term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this > remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism > treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long-> term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the > treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I > think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, > selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with > positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some > experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long-> term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other > treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of > neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria > themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme > disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these > treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks > for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly.> > Rich> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006  Rich, What dose of Selenium do you recommend per day? What about NAC?  Patrice From: infections [mailto:infections ] On Behalf Of rvankonynen Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 9:59 PM infections Subject: [infections] Chronic Lyme disease and the Yasko treatment program Hi, all. Here's a repost from the Experimental list. Maybe it will be of interest to some people here: I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful to someone with this disorder. As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long time. So what's going on here? As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at the end of this message for those who would like to review it. In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after antibiotic treatment. With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to assume the cystic form. This protects it from the immune system and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy metals. In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be brought up to normal. How do we do this? I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more effectively. I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. Rich Here is my earlier post from last January: Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group. Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to CFS. First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see. Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must have some aspects of pathophysiology in common. Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology. Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (monocytes and lymphocytes) is " identical " in CFS and Lyme disease. This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the two is the same.) As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the people do not have normal glutathione function. As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine and sulfate. So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the glutathione system in Lyme disease as well. With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references that support these statements. (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present in the culture medium. (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it into the bacterium. (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with a mass of 34 kilodaltons. (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells. (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells. (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase activity was still significantly below normal, and the malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase. I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or chronic or post-) Lyme disease. One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for Lyme had your selenium level measured? It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the similarities in symptomatology and the " identical " gene expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this is exciting! If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long- term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long- term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long- term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly. Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Rich, I had my minerals, including selenium tested. All came back normal. I don't know if the tests were accurate though. For magnesium at least, it was the red-blood-cell level that was measured. I have had a positive Lyme western blot IgM and have been ill for ten years. - Kate D On Sep 3, 2006, at 11:58 PM, rvankonynen wrote: > Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi, Kate. Thanks for the information. Do you know whether you have Babesia as well? Rich > > Have any of you who are positive for > > Lyme had your selenium level measured? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 My selenium tested a little low, but no surprise. Everyone who's hypothyroid supposedly tests low. Supplementing with selenium can be tricky if you take too much. Kate <KateDunlay@...> wrote: Rich, I had my minerals, including selenium tested. All came back normal. I don't know if the tests were accurate though. For magnesium at least, it was the red-blood-cell level that was measured. I have had a positive Lyme western blot IgM and have been ill for ten years.- Kate DOn Sep 3, 2006, at 11:58 PM, rvankonynen wrote:> Have any of you who are positive for> Lyme had your selenium level measured? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 forgot to mention, since the question was relating selenium to lyme disease, that I have not been d'xd with lyme, tests were negative with two possible equivocal bands. But selenium supplementation has long been touted as an aid for hypothyroid people who seem to also be suffering from cfs. Kate <KateDunlay@...> wrote: Rich, I had my minerals, including selenium tested. All came back normal. I don't know if the tests were accurate though. For magnesium at least, it was the red-blood-cell level that was measured. I have had a positive Lyme western blot IgM and have been ill for ten years.- Kate DOn Sep 3, 2006, at 11:58 PM, rvankonynen wrote:> Have any of you who are positive for> Lyme had your selenium level measured? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hi, Patrice. The Institute of Medicine recommends an upper limit for adults of 400 micrograms per day of selenium. I would go with that. On NAC, it depends. If a person has a high body burden of mercury, I wouldn't recommend taking NAC, because published work has shown that it can move mercury into the brains of rats. If a person has an upregulation polymorphism in their cystathionine beta synthase (CBS) enzyme (which nine out of the eleven PWCs for whom I currently have Yasko panel data do), then I wouldn't recommend NAC for that person, either, because it is likely to raise their sulfite level and give them headaches. This may not leave very many, but for the rest, I would say about 1 gram per day of NAC. Rich > > Rich, What dose of Selenium do you recommend per day? What about NAC? > Patrice > > > > _____ > > From: infections > [mailto:infections ] On Behalf Of rvankonynen > Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 9:59 PM > infections > Subject: [infections] Chronic Lyme disease and the Yasko > treatment program > > > > Hi, all. > > Here's a repost from the Experimental list. Maybe it will be of > interest to some people here: > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects it from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich > > Here is my earlier post from last January: > > Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group. > > Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my > thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to > CFS. > > First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult > to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The > symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do > not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see. > > Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, > i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal > as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms > of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must > have some aspects of pathophysiology in common. > > Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene > expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression > is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the > misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology. > > Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila > reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that > the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells > (monocytes and lymphocytes) is " identical " in CFS and Lyme disease. > This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in > these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything > about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two > disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that > happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not > saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these > mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the > two is the same.) > > As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset > of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks > as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use > of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione > peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much > the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the > second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the > people do not have normal glutathione function. > > As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I > now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in > autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion > brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops > that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe > (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine > and sulfate. > > So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use > glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is > depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal > activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed > identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the > glutathione system in Lyme disease as well. > > With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the > literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my > attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references > that support these statements. > > (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found > that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that > causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present > in the culture medium. > > (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively > into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it > into the bacterium. > > (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in > three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The > others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with > a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with > a mass of 34 kilodaltons. > > (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a > substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release > their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a > cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in > order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells. > > (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the > principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or > sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high > concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). > Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the > responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it > can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced > nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism > of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human > cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose > phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) > In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione > peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells. > > (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected > with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye > rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found > to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione > peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a > marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After > antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute > symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione > levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase > activity was still significantly below normal, and the > malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested > that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and > inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > > I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates > acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the > Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione > peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or > chronic or post-) Lyme disease. > > One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione > peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor > for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that > Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS > (http://www.hdfoster <http://www.hdfoster.com> .com). I could not find any > reference in the > literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether > anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured? > > It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes > glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein > thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute > phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, > but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium > level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though > it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this > lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of > glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the > similarities in symptomatology and the " identical " gene expression > in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. > It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by > other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, > once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this > is exciting! > > If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long- > term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this > remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism > treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the > treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I > think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, > selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with > positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some > experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other > treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of > neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria > themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme > disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these > treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks > for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly. > > Rich > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hi Rich, What's the GSH peroxidase all about, as opposed to catalse- peroxidase? I asked my lecturer about this yesterday and he said the GSH peroxidase and vit C peroxidase have their significance at lower [H2O2], whereas catalse-peroxidase is more important at high [H2O2]. I'm not sure why this would be, since catalse-peroxidase is itself so powerful an enzyme, but it might be of some use to think about. Presumably one takes it from Pall and (separately) Spence that there is oxidative stress in CFS, tho I haven't read those myself (by the way, have you ever found a disconfirming followup of that work? I haven't). I guess one possibility might be that the host might inhibit it's own GSH peroxidase in the course of an inflammatory response, in order to increase the delivery of reactive intermediates to microbes. If so, then the prediction would be that the diminution of GSH peroxidase activity would also be found in other infections. I am not too clear yet on reactive intermediates. Here's what I've learned: 1. The hydroxyl radical probably doesn't diffuse too well because it is so reactive. 2. Myeloperoxidase is considered by some to convert other reactive intermediates to hypohalites, which are more stable and are considered highly toxic (perhaps because they have time to diffuse into a bacterial cell?). The oddity is that a lesioned myeloperoxidase doesn't seem to cause any phenotype, whereas a lesion in NADPH oxidase yields chronic granulomatous disease, ie recurrant infections with fungi, etc. I'm not sure exactly where iNOS and NADPH oxidase are located and which reactive intermediates can cross membranes. Temporal matters are also something to wonder about; presumably the long-term production of reactive intermediates is different from what's seen during the " oxidative burst " (alas, there's not so much investigation into *chronic* intracellular bx, except Mtb). The thing about the ultrastructure of chronic Bb infection is, there's only one paper to my knowledge, and that's Nanagara. As I recall, she tagged both apparantly cytosolic and apparantly endosomic antigens. > > Hi, all. > > Here's a repost from the Experimental list. Maybe it will be of > interest to some people here: > > > > I've been doing some more study of chronic Lyme disease and have > been thinking about why the Yasko treatment program might be helpful > to someone with this disorder. > > As we know, Sue T. has been reporting considerable improvement on > the Yasko treatment program, and as we also know, she has tested > positively for Lyme disease in the past and has been ill for a long > time. So what's going on here? > > As some of you may recall, I posted some information about Lyme > disease and glutathione depletion back in January. I've pasted it at > the end of this message for those who would like to review it. > > In that earlier post, I reviewed published literature showing that > Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease) > depletes glutathione in the host, and it appears to suppress the > activity of glutathione peroxidase over the longer term, even after > antibiotic treatment. > > With glutathione peroxidase suppressed, we can expect that the > levels of hydrogen peroxide would be higher in the host, because the > job of glutathione peroxidase is to eliminate hydrogen peroxide. > > O.K., here's something I just found out: Borrelia burgdorferi is > encouraged to assume its cystic form when hydrogen peroxide is > elevated, and when the cystic forms are placed back in a medium with > low hydrogen peroxide, they revert back to the spirochete form. (R. > Murgia and M. Cinco, 2004, PMID: 14961976). > > Now, I think this is really interesting. I think it suggests that > the reason Borrelia burgdorferi is able to hang on in a person's > body and produce chronic Lyme disease is that it suppresses the > activity of glutathione peroxidase, which allows hydrogen peroxide > to build up, and then the hydrogen peroxide signals the bacteria to > assume the cystic form. This protects it from the immune system > and, to a large extent, from antibiotics as well, and that's why > chronic Lyme is such a difficult disease to knock out. > > As I said in my earlier post (below), I don't know how Bb suppresses > glutathione peroxidase, but I suspect that it might do it by > hoarding selenium, as Prof. Harry has theorized as the > pathogenesis mechanism for some viruses, including HIV. Of course, > as we know, the buildup of mercury, as occurs when glutathione is > depleted and a person is exposed to mercury from amalgams, fish, or > other sources, will tie up selenium as well. This may be part of > the synergism that Dr. Yasko has found between pathogens and heavy > metals. > > In any case, it seems to me that the key to knocking out chronic > Lyme disease might be to lower the levels of hydrogen peroxide, so > that Bb will revert to the spirochete form and can be attacked by > the immune system and by antibiotics. To do this, both the activity > of glutathione peroxidase and the level of glutathione must be > brought up to normal. How do we do this? > > I think supplementation with selenium would be a good thing to try > for restoring the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > What about glutathione? Well, in the case of many of the people > with chronic Lyme disease, I suspect that we are dealing with a set > of polymorphisms in the enzymes impacting the methylation cycle that > enable the development of a vicious circle mechanism when the > glutathione level drops low enough, i.e. the same mechanism that > occurs in many cases of autism and chronic fatigue syndrome. (This > certainly seems to have been true in the case of Sue T.) If this is > true, then it will be necessary to deal directly to bypass these > polymorphisms, such as is done in the Yasko treatment program. > > What I'm suggesting then, is that the people with chronic Lyme > disease might also be brought under the " Yasko tent. " This might be > the key to making the Borrelia more vulnerable to the immune system > and to the antibiotics, so that this disease can be knocked out more > effectively. > > I would appreciate comments on this hypothesis. > > Rich > > > Here is my earlier post from last January: > > Hi, Nelly, Sue, Sheila and the group. > > Thanks very much for posting this. It has really stimulated my > thinking about why Lyme disease is symptomatologically so similar to > CFS. > > First, some review. As we all know, it has been terribly difficult > to do the differential diagnosis between Lyme disease and CFS. The > symptoms overlap considerably, and even the best of the lab tests do > not have the sensitivity and selectivity we would all like to see. > > Symptoms are manifestations of the pathophysiology of a disease, > i.e. how the functioning of the body of the sick person is abnormal > as a result of the disease. Therefore, if we see that the symptoms > of two diseases are very similar, we should suspect that they must > have some aspects of pathophysiology in common. > > Pathophysiology is intimately involved with abnnormal gene > expression in the cells of the sick person, because gene expression > is a reflection of how the cell is conducting its business, and the > misconduct of the business of the cell is pathophysiology. > > Because of this, I was quite struck some time ago when Sheila > reported that Dr. Gow said in a recent talk that he had found that > the gene expression pattern in peripheral blood mononuclear cells > (monocytes and lymphocytes) is " identical " in CFS and Lyme disease. > This implies that the pathophysiology of these two disorders in > these cell types is the same. (Note that we can't say anything > about what's going on in other cell types in the body in these two > disorders from this work. There are no doubt different things that > happen in other cell types between Lyme and CFS, and so this is not > saying that the two are identical in every way. But in these > mononuclear cells, this is saying that the pathophysiology of the > two is the same.) > > As you know, I am of the firm view that in at least a large subset > of CFS there is glutathione depletion. In another subset, it looks > as though there are genetic variations in the enzymes that make use > of glutathione (glutathione transferases and glutathione > peroxidases), and the results in terms of pathophysiology are much > the same, even though the first group has low glutathione, and the > second group may have elevated glutathione. In either subset, the > people do not have normal glutathione function. > > As you also know, based on the work by the DAN! project in autism, I > now believe that the basic abnormalities in the biochemistry in > autism and CFS are the same or similar. The glutathione depletion > brings down the methylation cycle, and a vicious circle develops > that produces a host of problems because of the depletion of SAMe > (the main methylator in the body), cysteine, glutathione, taurine > and sulfate. > > So, if the pathophysiology of CFS involves the inability to use > glutathione effectively, whether because glutathione itself is > depleted or because the enzymes that use it have below-normal > activity, and if the pathophysiology of CFS and Lyme are indeed > identical, then it follows that there must be a problem with the > glutathione system in Lyme disease as well. > > With that introduction, let me now review some things I found in the > literature, including the paper to which you (Nelly) drew my > attention. I will give the PubMed ID numbers for the references > that support these statements. > > (PMID 1477785) First, in in vitro experiments it has been found > that the growth of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb), the bacterium that > causes Lyme disease, is decreased by 80% if cysteine is not present > in the culture medium. > > (PMID 147785) It has been found that cysteine diffuses passively > into Bb, i.e. there is no active transporter protein that pumps it > into the bacterium. > > (PMID 1477785) It has been found that Bb incorporates cysteine in > three of its proteins. One has a mass of 22 kilodaltons. The > others have been identified as outer surface protein A (Osp A), with > a mass of 30 kilodaltons, and outer surface protein B (Osp , with > a mass of 34 kilodaltons. > > (PMID 1639493) Bb produces a water-soluble hemolysin. This is a > substance that is able to break down red blood cells and release > their hemoglobin. It is likely that this substance incorporates a > cysteine residue, and this cysteine must be in its reduced state in > order for the hemolysin to break down red blood cells. > > (PMID 16390443) Bb does not produce glutathione, which is the > principal non-protein thiol (substance containing an S-H or > sulfhydryl group) in human cells. Instead, Bb cells have a high > concentration (about 1 millimolar) of reduced coenzyme A (CoASH). > Bb also produces a CoA disulfide reductase enzyme that has the > responsibility to keep CoASH in its chemically reduced form, so it > can function. This enzyme is in turn reduced by NADH (reduced > nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is reduced by metabolism > of Bb's fuel. (This is analogous to glutathione reductase in human > cells, which requires NADPH, which in turn is reduced by the pentose > phosphate shunt on glycolysis, which metabolizes glucose as fuel.) > In Bb, CoASH is able to reduce hydrogen peroxide, as glutathione > peroxidase, together with glutathione, do in human cells. > > (PMID 11687735) It has been found that when people were infected > with Bb and had the characteristic erythema migrans (bulls-eye > rash), the total thiol and glutathione in blood analysis were found > to be significantly decreased. The activity of glutathione > peroxidase was also significantly decreased. Malondialdehyde, a > marker for lipid peroxidation, was significantly elevated. After > antibiotic treatment with amoxycillin, which eliminated the acute > symptoms of Lyme disease, both the total thiol and the glutathione > levels recovered to normal. However, the glutathione peroxidase > activity was still significantly below normal, and the > malondialdehyde remained significantly elevated. This suggested > that Bb lowers the thiol and glutathione levels in its host, and > inhibits the activity of glutathione peroxidase. > > > I think this also suggests that while antibiotic therapy eliminates > acute Lyme symptoms and brings recovery of glutathione levels, the > Bb infection may still be suppressing the activity of glutathione > peroxidase, and this may be a mechanism involved in long-term (or > chronic or post-) Lyme disease. > > One way in which a pathogen can inhibit its host's glutathione > peroxidase activity is to hoard selenium, because this is a cofactor > for that enzyme. You may recall that that is the mechanism that > Prof. Harry has hypothesized for HIV and AIDS > (http://www.hdfoster.com). I could not find any reference in the > literature connecting Bb and selenium, and I don't know whether > anyone has looked at that. Have any of you who are positive for > Lyme had your selenium level measured? > > It seems pretty clear that Bb uses cysteine and that it depletes > glutathione and total thiol (which includes cysteine and protein > thiols as well as glutathione) in its host, at least in the acute > phase. It also suppresses the activity of glutathione peroxidase, > but I'm not sure whether it does it by lowering the host's selenium > level, or by some other means. This suppression appears as though > it could be chronic. I think there is a good chance that this > lowering of glutathione and/or suppressing of the activity of > glutathione peroxidase could very well be the explanation for the > similarities in symptomatology and the " identical " gene expression > in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in CFS and Lyme disease. > It may also be that a host whose glutathione has been depleted by > other factors may be more vulnerable to developing Lyme disease, > once inoculated with Bb. I am speculating a little here, but this > is exciting! > > If this is true, what are the consequences for treatment of long- > term Lyme disease, the subject that Sue raised? I think this > remains to be seen, but it does suggest that the DAN! autism > treatments may have a contribution to make in the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease as I've suggested that they also do in the > treatment of CFS. Before we can reach such a conclusion, though, I > think it behooves us to get more data on glutathione levels, > selenium levels, and glutathione peroxidase activity in people with > positive tests for long-term Lyme disease, as well as some > experience trying these treatments as part of the treatment of long- > term Lyme disease. I'm not suggesting that they would replace other > treatments for Lyme disease, such as antibiotic therapy, detoxing of > neurotoxins, or other approaches to deal with the bacteria > themselves or to deal with particular characteristics of Lyme > disease that are not found in autism or CFS. Nevertheless, these > treatments might make a significant impact. Time will tell. Thanks > for rattling my cage about this, Sheila, Sue and Nelly. > > Rich > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 I have no idea what my selenium levels are. What I do know is that whenever I feel an outbreak of Herpes Simplex I coming on, I blast it with selenium, 3-400 mcgs BID-TID. Usually, I can notice a difference in the sensitive area within 3 hours. Halts the outbreak in it's tracks. My husband has a history also and has been prescribed acyclovir which didn't work but selenium does. Neither of us has had a full-blown cold- sore since we started using selenium. Robyn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Oh, they speculated that alot of the downregulations they noted might well have to do with slowed metabolism. I guess slowed metabolism would reduce the amount of oxidatives that the worm produces by its own respiration... thus, the downreg of GSH function (if GST downreg indeed results in that) might *not* imply that the worm is attempting to increase the concentration of oxidative intermediates in order to hit the bugs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.