Guest guest Posted July 12, 2000 Report Share Posted July 12, 2000 I was interested in the post about osteomyelitis because I can feel an ache in my leg bone, which makes me think that borrelia have taken up residence in the bone marrow. They've found it in dog leg bones, why not people? Wonder what ghastly sort of test it would take to find out--giant needle stuck in the bone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 12, 2000 Report Share Posted July 12, 2000 Hi , Pain in the shins is common in LD. Maybe after some IV AB's it will go away. Eileen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2000 Report Share Posted July 13, 2000 Hi Lou, For what it's worth, I suffer from severe bone pain when I am herxing, I call it my cancer pain for lack of a better word. I don't know what cancer feels like, but this is how I imagine it would be. It is strange how these severe pains move around my body, sometimes the bone pain is in my feet, or my wrist, or my lower back. And sometimes it is both legs, aching terribly. Since it only occurs this bad when I am herxing I attribute it to the die off toxins somehow settling in that one spot. I take Vioxx 25mg once daily & Oxycontin 20mg 3 x day yet when I am herxing, nothing helps this bone pain. I think x-rays can determine if you have osteomyelitis, or an MRI. Wishing you the best, whatever they call your pain, Marta From: overman74@... <overman74@...> >I was interested in the post about osteomyelitis because I can feel >an ache in my leg bone, which makes me think that borrelia have taken >up residence in the bone marrow. They've found it in dog leg bones, >why not people? > >Wonder what ghastly sort of test it would take to find out--giant >needle stuck in the bone? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2000 Report Share Posted July 13, 2000 IT'S CALLED A BONE MARROW BIOPSY....BMB...GOT ONE TO SEE IF I HAVE BABESIA AND EHRILOISOS...IGENEX IS DOING ON A RESERCH BASIS...had it done may 22 ....no results yet...they put 'reserch' on the back burner..way far back burner... BTW...the BMB was done at base of my spine...from a skilled immunlogist..it was'nt all that bad... it hurt some ...i sweated....cherlyme In a message dated 7/12/00 7:53:13 AM, overman74@... writes: <<Wonder what ghastly sort of test it would take to find out--giant needle stuck in the bone? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2000 Report Share Posted July 13, 2000 FYI....there is an osteomyelitis egroups....they all have hip, ankle , knee, jaw ,skull, face...osteomyelitis/osteonecrosis.. i have that in my jaw bones..two oral surgeies...now i wonder if it's all over...my bone PAIN has gone from a 10 to 5 since on ABX.i did get 2 people interested in that group..all there problems might come from lyme disease....they tested positive. The other were not 'interested' in borellia causing osteomyelits/osteonecrosis In a message dated 7/12/00 7:53:13 AM, overman74@... writes: <<I was interested in the post about osteomyelitis because I can feel an ache in my leg bone, which makes me think that borrelia have taken up residence in the bone marrow. They've found it in dog leg bones, why not people? >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2004 Report Share Posted April 13, 2004 Hi, Margaret. Where were you using the electrodes when the thumb pain stopped? On your sinus? wrist? thumb? I have had some good results using it for a jambed shoulder and other joint and muscle pain, using the electrodes on both sides of the area. Also, you can get some TENS pads on the internet or home hospital supply companies. They are about 2x2 inches and are self sticking. Dick Osteomyelitis > Hi everyone, > I would like to tell you of a bonus I have received while using the > godzilla. > About 14 years ago I was diagnosed with osteomyelitis in my thumb, after > an accident. The result was have the bone removed, or live with the > pain. I chose to live with it. Since using the godzilla for about 6 > weeks now, for the first time in all these years I am pain free. What a > bonus!! > Very best wishes, > Margaret. > > > > The information on this group is not intended as medical advice. Most group members are NOT doctors or health authorities. Please do not request medical advice, lest anyone get into trouble out of human compassion. There are huge fines and issues currently involved with unlicensed medical advice. The group is only here to share experiences according to the theme of the group, namely testing if electrical stimulus might inactivate microbes, as it seems to have done in the Einstein Medical College labs. We are interested in your results, but cannot say anything about repeatability, or whether this might have medical benefits. Thanks, for your understanding, good luck researching. --bG > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Many thanks, Margaret! here's quick primer on it: " Osteomyelitis is an acute or chronic bone infection, usually caused by bacteria. Causes, incidence, and risk factors. The infection that causes osteomyelitis often is in another part of the body and spreads to the bone via the blood. Affected bone may have been predisposed to infection because of recent trauma. In children, the long bones are usually affected. In adults, the vertebrae and the pelvis are most commonly affected. Bone infection can be caused by bacteria or by fungus. When the bone is infected, pus is produced within the bone, which may result in an abscess. The abscess then deprives the bone of its blood supply. Chronic osteomyelitis results when bone tissue dies as a result of the lost blood supply. Chronic infection can persist intermittently for years. Risk factors are recent trauma, diabetes, hemodialysis, and intravenous drug abuse. People who have had their spleen removed are also at higher risk for osteomyelitis. " > Hi everyone, > I would like to tell you of a bonus I have received while using the > godzilla. > About 14 years ago I was diagnosed with osteomyelitis in my thumb, after > an accident. The result was have the bone removed, or live with the > pain. I chose to live with it. Since using the godzilla for about 6 > weeks now, for the first time in all these years I am pain free. What a > bonus!! > Very best wishes, > Margaret. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 clip from the article below. It notes that a trauma occurs (shock to vertebrae, like object falling on one's head) infection from a decaying tooth, cut, bacteria then is carried by blood into the bone and it infects the bone. In adults the vertebrae are more likely to become infected. Jean's friend (cousin?) seems to be presenting some of these attributes found in Osteomyelitis, with her neck injury pain, too. bG > In adults, the vertebrae and the pelvis are most commonly affected. Chronic infection can persist intermittently > for years. > > Risk factors are recent trauma, diabetes, hemodialysis, and > intravenous drug abuse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2004 Report Share Posted April 14, 2004 Dick Rochon wrote: >Hi, Margaret. > >Where were you using the electrodes when the thumb pain stopped? On your >sinus? wrist? thumb? > >I have had some good results using it for a jambed shoulder and other joint >and muscle pain, using the electrodes on both sides of the area. > >Also, you can get some TENS pads on the internet or home hospital supply >companies. They are about 2x2 inches and are self sticking. > >Dick > > Hi Dick, I was using the electrodes on my wrist, I didn't notice any change until I stopped, and at once noticed the pain had reduced. Since then, the pain has become less and less, and now I am only getting an ache now and then. ( I accidentally chopped off part of my thumb). I did get a set of tens pads from V, I would like to use them on my lymph nodes. Thank you for your help Best wishes to all, Margaret. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 I'm getting very interested in osteomyelitis. It seems to be rather under-studied. Heres what I'm picking up so far, much of which I'm sure is known to Penny. Osteomyelitis has acute and chronic forms. I am concerned only with the chronic. About 80% of cases are caused by S aureus, but theres also no shortage of mycobacterial, etc etc etc cases. The bacteria can be introduced by injury, but microbes can also reach the bone via the blood. Treatment is traditionally debridement (removal of necrotic bone) plus long-term antibacterial therapy. Many total treatment failures occur and amputation is sometimes the result. Also, successful cases can sometimes reactivate after years. This diagram of bone tissue structure is pretty unintelligable to me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Illu_compact_spongy_bone.jpg ....but it seems like the osteoblasts and osteoclasts surround vasculature, and are in turn surrounded by the noncellular hard bone material. The classic thinking about osteomyeltis is, that bone is hard, and hence has a fixed volume. Thus, when bone becomes inflamed (edematous with fluid), the space taken up by the edema fluid has to be relinquished by the blood vessels, which constrict in order to do so. As a result, the blood flow is said to be reduced under edematous circumstances, and this may impair abx penetration, as well as penetration of blood-borne immune elements. This is generally cited as a major cause of treatment failure, altho physiological resistance due to slow growth rate is also well-recognized as a probable major contributer. I'm not certain how much I believe this stuff about poor antibiotic penetration. If theres little blood flow to a given site, its true that penetration of a drug should be slowed. But, blood is a two-way street. Diffusion of drugs from tissue back into the blood also takes place, and when blood flow is reduced, this process should should also be slowed. Thus, tissue with little blood supply should eventually build up to about the same concentration found in the blood - provided that the drug is present long enough in the blood, and the drug is not extensively consumed/destroyed/metabolized in tissue as it comes in. So I've been looking at measurements of abx penetration into inflamed/necrotic bone. To get relevant results, the bone examined must be inflamed, for the reasons discussed above. Also, its good if the subject has been taking the drug for a while, since distribution into the inflamed bone may be very tardy compared to other tissues. Finally, its important that the various types of bone tissues be examined separately. I'd be interested in any refs anyone may find on this subject. VANCOMYCIN: can fail to penetrate in some cases. These patients had been on it for 48 hours but some had undetectable concentrations in infected bone: http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/32/9/1320 ENOXACIN: looks like this one gets in OK, but may not reach the MIC/MBC for S aureus in some cases. Cortical bone oncentration in osteomyelitis patients was 40% of the simultaneous serum concentration, on *average* - this is in equally good penetration as what was found in osteoarthritis patients. Unfortunately the concentration *range* for osteomyelitis patients is not given; however the range for the entire set of subjects including osteoarthritis patients had a minimum of 0.4 ug/mL which should still give a pretty good penetration percentage. Osteomyelitic cancellous bone was not studied, but in the osteoarthritis patients it was higher than in cortical bone. http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=172291 & blobtype=pdf MIC/MBC: http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/picrender.fcgi? artid=284183 & blobtype=pdf So, so far its two points for inadequate penetration, zip for adequate. I've browsed some other ones out there last week, and eventually I will go thru em and add em to this thread. I've had enough fun for right now. The final caveat here is that there might be microenvironments where the drugs dont penetrate, where the bacteria thrive. For instance, a particular bone channel that is more edematous and less blood- supplied than its neighboring channels. This might not be noted by these abx assays, as the material, including any microenvironments, would be homogenized prior to the abx assay. Necrotic, anoxic mircofoci exist in pulmonary tuberculosis, but Mitchison reports that these have been found to achieve adequate drug concentrations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 , it's awesome that you're looking into chronic osteomyelitis. I think the more we understand what's going on with such a difficult to treat infection the more we'll understand in general. This has certainly been my experience regarding my own health. You're so right in saying that many bugs can cause osteomyelitis, but staph makes up the majority of the disease. This is why I get so frustrated that our community just ignores the destructive nature of these common bugs and all the research done by the docs who treat this disorder on a daily basis. We could learn so much from them. Dr. Gleuck, the coagulation expert, says that approximately 80% of people with chronic osteomyelitis have coagulation disorders. Almost every osteomyelitis patient I know who has had their blood tested for clotting disorders has tested positive. I think it would be awesome if more PWC would get their blood tested and see if they also test positive. There's already so much speculation that we do suffer from hypercoagulation. In my experience, people seem to most often develop osteomyelitis and osteonecrosis at bone trauma sites. Dentistry can obviously cause a lot of bone trauma (but they won't admit it). But the sinuses develop osteomyelitis as well, probably due to constant infection and inflammation. The forms that get the most attention, naturally, are hip, knee and foot infections, thanks to orthopedic and infectious disease docs who see it all the time. It's especially common in diabetics (so are amputations). You probably noticed in your research that many of the studies are done on children with osteomyelitis, but I never see any explanation for why they have it. The only thing I can think is that perhaps they develop it after breaking a bone, or perhaps after bone trauma suffered during childbirth. I've always found it interesting that many, many FMS/CFS patients say that they had a sudden onset of their illness after suffering from whiplash or an accident. Also strange how athletes will suddenly develop it. Whiplash, bone trauma and broken bones would be the perfect opportunity for organisms to enter the bone and settle in, tipping the scales against the immune system and creating chronic illness symptoms. penny <usenethod@...> wrote: I'm getting very interested in osteomyelitis. It seems to be rather under-studied. Heres what I'm picking up so far, much of which I'm sure is known to Penny.Osteomyelitis has acute and chronic forms. I am concerned only with the chronic. About 80% of cases are caused by S aureus, but theres also no shortage of mycobacterial, etc etc etc cases. The bacteria can be introduced by injury, but microbes can also reach the bone via the blood. Treatment is traditionally debridement (removal of necrotic bone) plus long-term antibacterial therapy. Many total treatment failures occur and amputation is sometimes the result. Also, successful cases can sometimes reactivate after years.This diagram of bone tissue structure is pretty unintelligable to me:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Illu_compact_spongy_bone.jpg...but it seems like the osteoblasts and osteoclasts surround vasculature, and are in turn surrounded by the noncellular hard bone material. The classic thinking about osteomyeltis is, that bone is hard, and hence has a fixed volume. Thus, when bone becomes inflamed (edematous with fluid), the space taken up by the edema fluid has to be relinquished by the blood vessels, which constrict in order to do so. As a result, the blood flow is said to be reduced under edematous circumstances, and this may impair abx penetration, as well as penetration of blood-borne immune elements. This is generally cited as a major cause of treatment failure, altho physiological resistance due to slow growth rate is also well-recognized as a probable major contributer.I'm not certain how much I believe this stuff about poor antibiotic penetration. If theres little blood flow to a given site, its true that penetration of a drug should be slowed. But, blood is a two-way street. Diffusion of drugs from tissue back into the blood also takes place, and when blood flow is reduced, this process should should also be slowed. Thus, tissue with little blood supply should eventually build up to about the same concentration found in the blood - provided that the drug is present long enough in the blood, and the drug is not extensively consumed/destroyed/metabolized in tissue as it comes in. So I've been looking at measurements of abx penetration into inflamed/necrotic bone. To get relevant results, the bone examined must be inflamed, for the reasons discussed above. Also, its good if the subject has been taking the drug for a while, since distribution into the inflamed bone may be very tardy compared to other tissues. Finally, its important that the various types of bone tissues be examined separately. I'd be interested in any refs anyone may find on this subject.VANCOMYCIN: can fail to penetrate in some cases. These patients had been on it for 48 hours but some had undetectable concentrations in infected bone: http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/32/9/1320ENOXACIN: looks like this one gets in OK, but may not reach the MIC/MBC for S aureus in some cases. Cortical bone oncentration in osteomyelitis patients was 40% of the simultaneous serum concentration, on *average* - this is in equally good penetration as what was found in osteoarthritis patients. Unfortunately the concentration *range* for osteomyelitis patients is not given; however the range for the entire set of subjects including osteoarthritis patients had a minimum of 0.4 ug/mL which should still give a pretty good penetration percentage. Osteomyelitic cancellous bone was not studied, but in the osteoarthritis patients it was higher than in cortical bone. http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=172291 & blobtype=pdfMIC/MBC: http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=284183 & blobtype=pdfSo, so far its two points for inadequate penetration, zip for adequate. I've browsed some other ones out there last week, and eventually I will go thru em and add em to this thread. I've had enough fun for right now.The final caveat here is that there might be microenvironments where the drugs dont penetrate, where the bacteria thrive. For instance, a particular bone channel that is more edematous and less blood-supplied than its neighboring channels. This might not be noted by these abx assays, as the material, including any microenvironments, would be homogenized prior to the abx assay. Necrotic, anoxic mircofoci exist in pulmonary tuberculosis, but Mitchison reports that these have been found to achieve adequate drug concentrations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.