Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 Wow, well this certainly confirms my own observations with my osteomyelitis and the way I react to abx. Why low dose, sporadic abx dosing is a very bad idea if you've got bugs in the bone, which I believe many of us have. penny > > J Orthop Res. 2006 Jan;24(1):87-93. Related Articles, Links > > > Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic resistance: > implications for treatment of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. > > Ellington JK, M, Hudson MC, Vishin S, Webb LX, Sherertz R. > > Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 > Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, USA. > > Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for 80% of human osteomyelitis. > It can invade and persist within osteoblasts. Antibiotic resistant > strains of S. aureus make successful treatment of osteomyelitis > difficult. Null Hypothesis: antibiotic sensitivities of S. aureus do > not change after exposure to the osteoblast intracellular > environment. Human and mouse osteoblast cultures were infected and > S. aureus cells were allowed to invade. Following times 0, 12, 24, > and 48 h ( +/- the addition of erythromycin, clindamycin, and > rifampin at times 0 or 12 h), the osteoblasts were lysed and > intracellular bacteria enumerated. Transmission electron microscopy > was performed on extracellular and intracellular S. aureus cells. In > mouse osteoblasts, administration of bacteriostatic antibiotics at > time 0 prevented the increase in intracellular S. aureus. If the > antibiotics were delayed 12 h, this did not occur. When rifampin > (bactericidal) was introduced at time 0 to human and mouse > osteoblasts, there was a significant decrease in number of > intracellular S. aureus within osteoblasts compared to control. If > rifampin was delayed 12 h, this did not occur. Significant time- > dependent S. aureus structural changes were observed after exposure > to the osteoblast intracellular environment. These studies > demonstrate that once S. aureus is established intracellularly for > 12 h, the bacteria are less sensitive to antibiotics capable of > eukaryotic cell penetration (statistically significant). These > antibiotic sensitivity changes could be due in part to the observed > structural changes. This leads to the rejection of our null > hypotheses that the antibiotic sensitivities of S. aureus are > unaltered by their location. > > PMID: 16419973 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.