Guest guest Posted November 17, 2005 Report Share Posted November 17, 2005 The Spirochete is very small not large at all. What kind of Microscope are you looking through? It is very difficult to see if grown out and stained with Acrodean Orange much less on a drop of blood. What is your background? Mine is in Laboratory Education with a heavy concentration in Microbiology. Prof. Carol a message dated 11/17/05 10:24:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, dumbaussie2000@... writes: JillThis whole thread is on antibody response and bands? You gotta get your labs to stop bullshitting you guys with these useless tests. The oraganism is the size of a freight train in microbiology.Something that shows up clearly under fresh blood microscopy should NOT BE EXPLORED ANY OTHER WAY, your all involved in a crap shoot with Igenex and the other labs. The live cell microscopy can monitor your bugs there response to certain antimicrobials- juts the bells and whistles anyone needs to get on the right track to healing.Why do all the roads lead knowhere with the lyme preachers.Please change the way your getting diagnosed, this thing is almost visable to the human eye under a magnifing glass.You gotta get away from preaching the literature and get into preaching the healing.The other big thing is everyone that attaches strongly to lyme is just ignoring the 20 other symptoms that are gnawing away at them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2005 Report Share Posted November 18, 2005 Prof. Carol Nice to meet you again. I just have a normal biological scope. My problme is that spiro's span 4 red blood cells in size, streps and staphs are 50 to 100 times smaller than a red blood cell.Borrelia swimming alongside red blood cells AIN'T SMALL.I am big on autoimmune disease and infection and believe nothing else, but the amount of poor science to get someone a positive lyme- remember most here can't even buy a positive for the love of money.How can anyone claim a huge victory with this type of pathetic science. My background is ignore the way you've been taught and just go about scanning the patient for ACTUAL BUGS.The blood culture is my favourite if your in my neck of the woods, I wan't to know what grows from your blood.Otherwise I wan't to scan you looking for toxin producing organisms. My many books on microbiology show borrelia species to be parasitic in size???Didn't they opriginally want to label it a parasite???What harmfull aspect does the borrelia display in it's armary???.Staphs, streps dump there toxins ?What do borrelia do to harm there hosts? Where is the correct drug treatments ???What are you doing? When I was an absolute dumb ass sick patient I knew my only way forward is with the CORRECT DRUGS- all I do is test my pathogens for correct drug protocols???What's wrong with your teams- " we can see it " but we can place it in a test tube with some amoxacillin to see if it goes away and doesn't come back.Proffesor please get onto your researchers and change the pattern of behaviour- people are dyeing out there. > > The Spirochete is very small not large at all. What kind of Microscope are > you looking through? It is very difficult to see if grown out and stained with > Acrodean Orange much less on a drop of blood. What is your background? Mine is > in Laboratory Education with a heavy concentration in Microbiology. Prof. Carol > > > > > > a message dated 11/17/05 10:24:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, > dumbaussie2000@y... writes: > Jill > This whole thread is on antibody response and bands? You gotta get > your labs to stop bullshitting you guys with these useless tests. > The oraganism is the size of a freight train in > microbiology.Something that shows up clearly under fresh blood > microscopy should NOT BE EXPLORED ANY OTHER WAY, your all involved > in a crap shoot with Igenex and the other labs. The live cell > microscopy can monitor your bugs there response to certain > antimicrobials- juts the bells and whistles anyone needs to get on > the right track to healing.Why do all the roads lead knowhere with > the lyme preachers.Please change the way your getting diagnosed, > this thing is almost visable to the human eye under a magnifing > glass.You gotta get away from preaching the literature and get into > preaching the healing. > The other big thing is everyone that attaches strongly to lyme is > just ignoring the 20 other symptoms that are gnawing away at them. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2005 Report Share Posted November 18, 2005 Carol: I think Tony meant that it's LONG as compared to other bacteria. But since it doesn't much live in the blood- and I think the Bradford Method (from my experience with it - is less than desirable) I agree with you completely.. Since no one IDs (even Bowen) what they see in the blood - there's LOTS of mistakes. At least if you have a reference lab (Igenex) or a diagnostic lab (MDL) do a blot- you can be pretty sure the antibody is the molecular weight they say it is. Barb > > The Spirochete is very small not large at all. What kind of Microscope are > you looking through? It is very difficult to see if grown out and stained with > Acrodean Orange much less on a drop of blood. What is your background? Mine is > in Laboratory Education with a heavy concentration in Microbiology. Prof. Carol > > > > > > a message dated 11/17/05 10:24:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, > dumbaussie2000@y... writes: > Jill > This whole thread is on antibody response and bands? You gotta get > your labs to stop bullshitting you guys with these useless tests. > The oraganism is the size of a freight train in > microbiology.Something that shows up clearly under fresh blood > microscopy should NOT BE EXPLORED ANY OTHER WAY, your all involved > in a crap shoot with Igenex and the other labs. The live cell > microscopy can monitor your bugs there response to certain > antimicrobials- juts the bells and whistles anyone needs to get on > the right track to healing.Why do all the roads lead knowhere with > the lyme preachers.Please change the way your getting diagnosed, > this thing is almost visable to the human eye under a magnifing > glass.You gotta get away from preaching the literature and get into > preaching the healing. > The other big thing is everyone that attaches strongly to lyme is > just ignoring the 20 other symptoms that are gnawing away at them. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2005 Report Share Posted November 18, 2005 Tony, borrelia makes folks sick in much the same way syphilis does-- though I don't want to be too strict about the comparison as borrelia's genome is far larger and more complex. It likes collagen matrices. Not to say it won't be found in blood sometimes but, all the literature indicates it prefers tissue. It would be better to do a tissue biopsy to look for it. This is not necessarily an either/or situation. As I said, there are many different catastrophic events that initiate the cascade toward chronic infection, borrelia, and tickborne coinfections, are a huge one here, in endemic areas anyway. But once you've got an immune system struggling under the weight of that, you surely could get staph and strep and all kinds of crap taking advantage. Why do we have to " fight " over it. You're doing good work and you reach out to help people. It isn't an either-or, dude. Unfortunately all these bugs can cause trouble. > > Prof. Carol > Nice to meet you again. I just have a normal biological scope. My > problme is that spiro's span 4 red blood cells in size, streps and > staphs are 50 to 100 times smaller than a red blood cell.Borrelia > swimming alongside red blood cells AIN'T SMALL.I am big on > autoimmune disease and infection and believe nothing else, but the > amount of poor science to get someone a positive lyme- remember most > here can't even buy a positive for the love of money.How can anyone > claim a huge victory with this type of pathetic science. > My background is ignore the way you've been taught and just go about > scanning the patient for ACTUAL BUGS.The blood culture is my > favourite if your in my neck of the woods, I wan't to know what > grows from your blood.Otherwise I wan't to scan you looking for > toxin producing organisms. > My many books on microbiology show borrelia species to be parasitic > in size???Didn't they opriginally want to label it a parasite??? What > harmfull aspect does the borrelia display in it's armary???.Staphs, > streps dump there toxins ?What do borrelia do to harm there hosts? > Where is the correct drug treatments ???What are you doing? When I > was an absolute dumb ass sick patient I knew my only way forward is > with the CORRECT DRUGS- all I do is test my pathogens for correct > drug protocols???What's wrong with your teams- " we can see it " but > we can place it in a test tube with some amoxacillin to see if it > goes away and doesn't come back.Proffesor please get onto your > researchers and change the pattern of behaviour- people are dyeing > out there. > > --- In infections , EJFISCH@a... wrote: > > > > The Spirochete is very small not large at all. What kind of > Microscope are > > you looking through? It is very difficult to see if grown out and > stained with > > Acrodean Orange much less on a drop of blood. What is your > background? Mine is > > in Laboratory Education with a heavy concentration in > Microbiology. Prof. Carol > > > > > > > > > > > > a message dated 11/17/05 10:24:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > dumbaussie2000@y... writes: > > Jill > > This whole thread is on antibody response and bands? You gotta get > > your labs to stop bullshitting you guys with these useless tests. > > The oraganism is the size of a freight train in > > microbiology.Something that shows up clearly under fresh blood > > microscopy should NOT BE EXPLORED ANY OTHER WAY, your all involved > > in a crap shoot with Igenex and the other labs. The live cell > > microscopy can monitor your bugs there response to certain > > antimicrobials- juts the bells and whistles anyone needs to get on > > the right track to healing.Why do all the roads lead knowhere with > > the lyme preachers.Please change the way your getting diagnosed, > > this thing is almost visable to the human eye under a magnifing > > glass.You gotta get away from preaching the literature and get > into > > preaching the healing. > > The other big thing is everyone that attaches strongly to lyme is > > just ignoring the 20 other symptoms that are gnawing away at them. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2005 Report Share Posted November 18, 2005 ---Hi On treating syphilis www.oceanplasma.org shows how purified injected seawater was used in the past to treat it successfully. Sunny thoughts, Wallace .. GENERAL SYPHILIS All by itself, and to the exclusion of any other treatment, the Marine Treatment can give first class results to the syphilitically challenged nursling. By means of its unique influence, ulcerations, if they exist, diminish rapidly; the drained appearance disappears, and right from the very first injection, the scarring process appears. With those specific nurslings that have weight retardation, as with those afflicted with commonplace hypotrophia due to undernourishment, the weight rises right away, in almost all cases. Weight improvement, however, does not always have the usual intensity. In 25% of syphilis cases, the weight increase is only 400 to 600 gr per month; at least the weight rises right away, even if it had been stagnant for a long time. At the same time as the weight picks up, we also see the height increase, as well as the frontal and parietal venous ectasia diminish. It is normal that the hydrocephalia continues its evolution during the first weeks of the Marine Treatment; but this too invariably moderates itself, as is proven by successive cranial measurements (total perimeter, biparietal diameter and antero-posterior). The syphilitic nursling should be treated with the Marine Treatment for at least six months to a year. Conducted with regularity, this treatment progressively leads the child to a state of visceral perfection that is simply astonishing when later one looks for the taints and stigmata and when one sees how vast the extent of benefit this Marine Action really is. Infantile syphilis can be accommodated by ordinary doses of 30 to 50 grams of Marine Plasma, three times a week. Nevertheless, strong doses (100 grams of Plasma, three times a week) could be necessary. The weight increase remains the criterium of the posology. It is possible to inspect numerous observations of specific nurslings with whom all the morbid phenomena have disappeared with one single use of seawater. But that does not mean that the Marine Method is oblivious to failure in the treatment of syphilis. In certain cases, we had only checkmates. 7. ECZEMA The eczema lesions of children, as is the case with those of adults, respond very well to Marine Treatment. In the majority of cases (60%), the first injection of Plasma responds with an immediate but temporary aggravation of the lesion that suppurates and weeps abundantly for one or two days, sometimes three, only to dry up and diminish thereafter. The next injections follow the same pattern, a little less obviously in general, until complete disappearance of the weeping with following erythema. This definite disappearance of the morbid symptoms happens, in certain cases, at about the eighth or tenth injection, sometimes a little later; and there are some tenacious cases as well. With nurslings, the six first injections should be practiced at a volume of 10 cubic centimeters. Stronger doses provoke sudden reactions that are too severe. These sudden reactions are without inconvenience if the eczema is located elsewhere than on the face. It is preferable to avoid these if the cheeks, the eyelids and frontal region are invaded by the lesions. The abundant weeping that can happen could reach the eyes and cause conjunctivitis. This is usually without consequence. It is better to avoid the reaction by using weak doses and by plenty of humid dressings. Keep the latter in place on forehead and cheeks. In 40% of cases, the improvement comes right away, and without any reactional upsurge. One can see the erythema (redness) diminish, primitive weeping reduce, the lesions dry up and become like dry leaves, then pale and disappear. If, by contrast, the doses of 10 cc are not succeeded by neither an improvement nor a reaction, it would be best to proceed right away to doses of 30 cc and, if needed to 50 cc so as to promote a regression of the lesions without an acute reaction even though a reaction is always a sign of healing. In all cases, one should repeat the injection three times a week. The humid dressings should be done with boiled water and applied to the areas affected by the eczema. In every case it would be advantageous to replace the use of water by Ocean Plasma (Marine Plasma), especially on the raw lesions. When children's eczema is accompanied by serious gastro-enteritis phenomena (i.e. choleriform enteritis or summer aqueous enteritis), one needs to hurry; one needs to ignore the eczema and apply the treatment, with massive doses to address the diarrhea and dehydration while simply dress the eczema lesions with humid dressings. One can see, in the majority of cases, that the eczema improves with astonishing rapidity. I insist on the point that the weak doses that are recommended by Quinton in the treatment of eczema have but one purpose, and that is to limit the reactional worsening of healing symptoms for facial eczema. Do not have any apprehension to apply stronger doses; their effect is more energetic and faster; one should employ these higher doses whenever there is slow improvement in acute cases or also when eczema is generally dry. The rule is to push the doses until the lesions weep under the influence of the Plasma injections; improvements can only happen under those circumstances. Quinton and Variot did just the same recommend 30 cc doses and more. Quinton only recommended the 10 cc doses later, in order to avoid the slight visual complication that can happen with children having facial eczema. 8. BRONCHO-PNEUMONIA Broncho-pneumonia of the nursling is an affection for which the Marine Treatment seems fail; but seawater remains an interesting adjunctive remedy, particularly when the child is dehydrated by aqueous stools. I happen to have combined a special broncho-pneumonia- specific treatment to the Marine Treatment. This cannot be explained in these pages; but after one year of experience, I cannot remain silent on the remarkable success rate that the Marine Treatment has given me. Neither can one deny the fantastic effect that seawater has with children with broncho-pneumonia. When we see that the children continue feeding, even with fever, despite the most pessimistic clinical signs and finally heal without any significant loss of weight. 9. NERVOUS SYSTEM AFFLICTIONS I think that, in the near future, it will be possible to show what immense services that seawater can provide to patients that are afflicted with diseases of the nervous system. Today, it would be premature to talk about definite assertions such as to define the limits of action that seawater might have in the vast domain of neuro- pathology. But it is possible to already state a few general facts, even if somewhat disconnected. In all meningitis cases, seawater is certainly capable of favorable action. First of all, seawater upholds the patient's strength, his appetite, his general state. One assists, by injecting the tubercular meningitis patients with such unexpected results that, in general, happen where one would have predicted with certitude a continual and intense loss of weight. The child succumbs to the nervous debilitation, among the usual signs, but without losing any weight, without stopping to feed himself as long as swallowing is possible [this sentence is convoluted in French and possibly inadequately rendered in the English language by the translator - sorry]. One can image what kind of help can be provided for all the non-tubercular meningitis patients where one can add to a specific or general infection medication an adjunctive therapeutic agent with such power. But there is more. The Marine Action is not limited to an eutrophic effect. Seawater has neurotrophic properties that are quite evident if one judges by the good effects that are obtained with adults in cases of neuralgia, neuritis and paralysis, as well as with sciatic neuralgia (Jarricot), with alcoholic neuritis (Plantiel), with children of all ages having enuresis [involuntary discharge of urine] (Plantier, Jarricot), and even with all those stubborn cases on which all kinds of other treatment had been tried. In this way, we also see seawater proving itself with favorable action in cases of infantile paralysis where one can sometimes see a unilateral action, or at least a predominance that is attested by the circumferential measurement of the atrophied member and the return of mobility in those cases where function seems to be compromized forever. I can cite results of the same kind that were obtained with familiar amyotrophia, myatonia and chorea. I know of no contraindication that would prompt one to abstain [from using this treatment] due to scepticism. And finally, how can one doubt the efficacy of this seawater action on the nervous system when one observes with one's own eyes, and in a relatively short time, the head of a nursling modify itself; hydrocephalia, for instance, to become more moderate; isocephalia cede to a shaping of the face; the entire head to stop swelling while the height continues to augment; or, by contrast, a microcephalia with a prognostic of death to improve; the brain to develop and, at the same time, the intelligence to awaken, speech to appear, and the whole psychic life to blossom? In infections , " jill1313 " <jenbooks13@h...> wrote: > > Tony, borrelia makes folks sick in much the same way syphilis does-- > though I don't want to be too strict about the comparison as > borrelia's genome is far larger and more complex. > > It likes collagen matrices. Not to say it won't be found in blood > sometimes but, all the literature indicates it prefers tissue. It > would be better to do a tissue biopsy to look for it. > > This is not necessarily an either/or situation. As I said, there are > many different catastrophic events that initiate the cascade toward > chronic infection, borrelia, and tickborne coinfections, are a huge > one here, in endemic areas anyway. But once you've got an immune > system struggling under the weight of that, you surely could get > staph and strep and all kinds of crap taking advantage. > > Why do we have to " fight " over it. You're doing good work and you > reach out to help people. It isn't an either-or, dude. Unfortunately > all these bugs can cause trouble. > > > > > > > > The Spirochete is very small not large at all. What kind of > > Microscope are > > > you looking through? It is very difficult to see if grown out and > > stained with > > > Acrodean Orange much less on a drop of blood. What is your > > background? Mine is > > > in Laboratory Education with a heavy concentration in > > Microbiology. Prof. Carol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a message dated 11/17/05 10:24:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > > dumbaussie2000@y... writes: > > > Jill > > > This whole thread is on antibody response and bands? You gotta > get > > > your labs to stop bullshitting you guys with these useless tests. > > > The oraganism is the size of a freight train in > > > microbiology.Something that shows up clearly under fresh blood > > > microscopy should NOT BE EXPLORED ANY OTHER WAY, your all > involved > > > in a crap shoot with Igenex and the other labs. The live cell > > > microscopy can monitor your bugs there response to certain > > > antimicrobials- juts the bells and whistles anyone needs to get > on > > > the right track to healing.Why do all the roads lead knowhere > with > > > the lyme preachers.Please change the way your getting diagnosed, > > > this thing is almost visable to the human eye under a magnifing > > > glass.You gotta get away from preaching the literature and get > > into > > > preaching the healing. > > > The other big thing is everyone that attaches strongly to lyme is > > > just ignoring the 20 other symptoms that are gnawing away at them. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.