Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Sound familiar?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

My husband's Mom called yesterday

to tell us about a friend's daughter. She was dx'd with an established

case of Lyme and SUNY STONY BROOK HOSPITAL (home of Dattwyler) treated

her with only 4 weeks of IV abx. After that, she complained of

continuing symptoms and was told, " You're cured! The Lyme is gone. Your

symptoms are from having HAD Lyme. " !

Of course, not knowing any better, she accepted this. My husband told

Mom to have her find a LLMD ASAP!!!....it never ends!

Frustrated,

Joan LI NY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

<<<One parent's trajectory with the special ed system:

http://www.tourettesyndrome.net/Files/bharris2.htm

>

thanks for the site...

here the news are busy with an 11 year old in the South of the country

against whom the school filed a complaint.... the school claims the child

violently attacked the principal and two teachers. the father claims the

child has TS and it is known that he has uncontrollable movements as well

as a sensitivity to being touched. and those teachers were trying to get him

out of class by force which is what he was respoding to......

I just feel so sad.... recalling what happened to my own child in the

previous school ..........

Our children are often SOOOOOOOO misunderstood

F

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there anyone here with experiences with

special education in the Canadian school system?

I'm starting to hit a brick wall with the

principal and I don't know my rights in BC.

=====

Stupid signature

DragnFlye

______________________________________________________________________

Post your free ad now! http://personals..ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, I'm in Ontario. Would be happy to respond if you can outline your

problem.

/ 4makelas@...

Way, Way Up in Northern Ontario

----- Original Message -----

From: " DragnFlye " <peacerivergoddess@...>

> Are there anyone here with experiences with

> special education in the Canadian school system?

> I'm starting to hit a brick wall with the

> principal and I don't know my rights in BC.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My son currently attends school for 2.5 hours/day

with a TA. The original plan was that he be

gradually integrated into full time attendance.

The principal has made it clear that extending

the hours is " non-negotiable " . Tomorrow we see

the psychiatrist and I'm going to ask her to

write a letter to him and to the superintendent

outlining a schedule for extending hours. He was

supposed to be in full time by last June, but all

we're getting are delays and excuses.

--- the 4 makelas <4makelas@...> wrote:

> , I'm in Ontario. Would be happy to

> respond if you can outline your

> problem.

>

> / 4makelas@...

> Way, Way Up in Northern Ontario

>

=====

Stupid signature

DragnFlye

______________________________________________________________________

Post your free ad now! http://personals..ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, the problem may be that the school is not funded/allocated for more

than 2.5 hours/day. Do you have it in writing that the plan is to extend the

hours? I'd ask the principal if funding is a problem and how you can help

him apply for more/get the school board to allocate more. It isn't

unreasonable to expect to extend the hours if your child is of the age where

kids go to school for a full day.

In Ontario, special education dollars are allocated to the school board

itself, based on the applications made on behalf of all the identified

exceptional students. Then it is up to the school board to divvy up the

dollars in terms of staff support according to where the kids are placed and

how much need each is demonstrating.

/ 4makelas@...

Way, Way Up in Northern Ontario

Re: ( ) Sound familiar?

>

>

> My son currently attends school for 2.5 hours/day

> with a TA. The original plan was that he be

> gradually integrated into full time attendance.

> The principal has made it clear that extending

> the hours is " non-negotiable " . Tomorrow we see

> the psychiatrist and I'm going to ask her to

> write a letter to him and to the superintendent

> outlining a schedule for extending hours. He was

> supposed to be in full time by last June, but all

> we're getting are delays and excuses.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

For Online Parents' Group, a Legal Scare

Published: November 13, 2005

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/13/nyregion/13slope.html

....But as Mr. Safran's threats of a lawsuit continued, the moderators

were scared into shutting down the message group's entire archives this

month. The action prompted an outpouring of messages from members, many

of them angry. Alquist, a father of two teenage daughters,

complained about people who are " trying to intimidate and silence us. "

....Last week, a local parent helped recruit Wolf, chairman

of the Internet law group at the law firm Proskauer Rose in Washington,

to give pro bono advice to the Park Slope moderators.

Mr. Wolf said that he had told the moderators that under federal law

they were not liable for Ms. Meyer's post and that he had called Mr.

Safran to tell him he had no case.

Mr. Wolf added that under the federal Communications Decency Act,

Internet service providers, Web site operators and bulletin board hosts

were exempted from liability for the statements of others. People who

post libelous statements can be subject to defamation suits, he said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
Guest guest

hi madison...good point...ssris do have their downside...there is a whole new school of orthomolecular psychiatry developing on the theory that the way to go is to provide the brain with the best chemical natural substrate we can so it can function at its highest level without drugs... it is interesting that when heroin first came out it was marketed by the manufacturer as the non-addictive cure for morphine addiction especially for women and was additionally listed as the drug of choice for the disease of "poor complexion'...doctors of the day based on good research provided by the drug companies wrote it like gangbusters...i have seen the ads... ..more will be revealed...regards,robin madisonxyz2000 <madisonxyz2000@...> wrote: The only difference is, these people are permitted to continue to take the drugs they have become physically addicted to. Wonder why people can't be weaned off of other drugs as well, or permitted to continue them? Why are some drugs eveeeeeel and some are not? Could it have anything to do with the racist drug laws that came into effect in the late 19th and early 20th century? Will these people someday be a whole new class of criminal addicts for the DEA to persecute?http://news./s/ap/20060806/ap_on_he_me/stuck_on_meds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...