Guest guest Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Kalman writes: With respect to creatine and these " new " forms of creatine such as CEE, it should be pointed out that there are NO published studies of safety, efficacy, absorption, pharmacokinetics or anything close to what these marketers claim. In fact, the FDA has rejected two or three New Dietary Ingredient submissions by Ed Byrd's company ( " MRI " , makers of NO2) last I checked. Doug: In my past academic career, I was involved in drug synthesis (making and testing such things as glutathione derivatives such as glutathione ethyl ester etc. as scavengers of free radical created either by ionizing radiation and/or drug metabolism). One thing that I haven't seen addressed by these companies is the byproduct of creatine ethyl ester metabolism is ethanol (that's why you won't see such things and CM (methyl) ester ie. methanol is toxic). So if you're taking CEE in sufficient quantities, you could conceivably have a sizable amount of ethanol created as a metabolic byproduct! I personally have had success with Actijube (there was a recent article noting its efficacy in JSCR) and it has proven beneficial in my O-L. Basically one thing one must be concerned with when using creatine is its pH instability. Some liquid unbuffered forms have been shown to have no activity because all the creatine has been broken down to creatinine. Myles B. Astor, PhD Personal Trainer Equinox Fitness Clubs New York, NY US Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.