Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Something I didn't know but learned from this presentation is that you can take a LOT of vitamin D all at once,and it will not be wasted. It will ALL be used by the body to bring your blood levels up. So you can take 7 doses a week and be done for the week, or even more and be done for months at a time. I'm becoming more and more convinced that the folks at mp.com may be right in their view that we have a vitamin D dysregulation, but that perhaps they've got it backwards. We now know that the 1,25d test is not reliable, and we're seeing more reports lately of benefits to pwc who are supplementing with D. MY 25d tested low, despite living in a sunny clime (and this presentation gives me a better idea why that is the case). I started supplementing with D, but I'm going to increase my intake. penny > > From another list: > > http://www.insinc.com/onlinetv/directms13oct2005/softvnetplayer.htm > > penny > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Penny There's just something missing from both camps in my opinion.I have a cousin with MS that's been throwing in the D like crazy for 20 years and it did nothing to alternate his disease progression.I honestly feel the D angle is only important in a very functional body.I'm sure someone carrying themselves supremely all there life should supplement this -but the jury is still out as far as autoimmune people go. I still think leave it alone for now- with your group of therapies focused on other evils instead of this one. > > > > From another list: > > > > http://www.insinc.com/onlinetv/directms13oct2005/softvnetplayer.htm > > > > penny > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 Tony, I don't know about that. I tested low in D and considering the bone problem I've got in my jaw, I think regrowing some bone could possibly be helped by increasing D. After my surgery for the infection in my jaw which took a chunk of bone out where the wisdom tooth was, the bone never filled back in as it should have. I still have a big hole there in my jaw. This is exactly what happened to Carolyn, remember? She's the one who wrote the medical text book and is fanatically methodical in recording all of her test results and analyzing them. She saw a big increase in bone density after taking large amounts of D. I'm also hearing how people's body temperatures are changing when on D, etc. It may help fight inflammation, and that's why it's converting to 1,25d so quickly. Getting used up. It's possible that having our bodies 95% covered or more, and working indoors etc. that we really could be deficient in d. Add an infection to the mix and who knows what kind of dysregulation is going on? The good news is, I don't think it's likely to hurt people, the way we were all warned off of it. Obviously, everyone's mileage will vary. > > > > > > From another list: > > > > > > > http://www.insinc.com/onlinetv/directms13oct2005/softvnetplayer.htm > > > > > > penny > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Gosh, I am almost ready to take the stuff, after having followed the deprivation course for months previously. So far I have just gone back to voraciously eating eggs and salmon etc. -- and was gardening in the sun during the summer, but not getting any sun these days.... - Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Boy oh boy, that topic is so intriguing. I did love the bit of the presentation when he explains it's role in determining the dna to make a particular type of cell intsead of just running an ill defined set of commands.But I still just don't know because I think inflammation makes calcifications all over the body and not necessarily the bone where it's needed.Are we going to feed this other monster? > > > > > > > > From another list: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.insinc.com/onlinetv/directms13oct2005/softvnetplayer.htm > > > > > > > > penny > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 The whole Vit D controversy that 'you know who' started will probably take years to filter out what's true and what's not. People in the northern latitudes can store enough vit D in their tissues to last about 5 or 6 months of D deprivation - so the people who are depriving themselves of all D (including sunlight) may not see the effects for a long time- and if they are adverse - they'll not know it's attributal to D deprivation... and there seems to be no way of measuring the benefits of avoiding D (I'm not so sur the D ratio thingy has been proven at all to mean anything). So WHERE ARE the people getting better on the unmentionable protocol? It's been over a year that the sites been up now - so there should be plenty of people out there that can extoll the virtues of Benicar, D deprivation and low dose abx... Barb > > Gosh, I am almost ready to take the stuff, after having followed the > deprivation course for months previously. So far I have just gone back > to voraciously eating eggs and salmon etc. -- and was gardening in the > sun during the summer, but not getting any sun these days.... > > - Kate > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 I don't know either. But I was inflammed internally (verified by tissue Pathology during surgery) and was chronic for over 25 years. I never had calcium out of range- and my last bone density tests showed I was still ok for someone as post menopausal as I am (went tru menopause at 38 and I'm 57 now) and don't need medication. Interestingly, I went UP a tenth instead of progressively down a tenth my last test... so post abx I'm apparently not losing bone at the rate I was - need for data though, I'll get the heel scan every year I guess for a while. Barb > > > > > > > > > > From another list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.insinc.com/onlinetv/directms13oct2005/softvnetplayer.htm > > > > > > > > > > penny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Barb Aren't all of them home herxing themselves back to good health.Oops my left leg fell off -aussie bob reply's (not his real name)- it must be a herx. > > > > Gosh, I am almost ready to take the stuff, after having followed > the > > deprivation course for months previously. So far I have just gone > back > > to voraciously eating eggs and salmon etc. -- and was gardening in > the > > sun during the summer, but not getting any sun these days.... > > > > - Kate > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Barb said- But I was inflammed internally (verified by tissue Pathology during surgery) and was chronic for over 25 years. This is the other thing everyone else on our sister forum should start to examine before running around like headless chooks blaming everything and the kitchen blinds for causing cfs.Inflammation is the KEY-glutathione supplementation till the cows come home ain't going to fix inflammation. > > > > > > > > > > > > From another list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.insinc.com/onlinetv/directms13oct2005/softvnetplayer.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > penny > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 Pretty funny. Yes- every one knows that if your on that protocol everythings a herx. It has muddied the waters between what is and what is not. Barb > > > > > > Gosh, I am almost ready to take the stuff, after having followed > > the > > > deprivation course for months previously. So far I have just > gone > > back > > > to voraciously eating eggs and salmon etc. -- and was gardening > in > > the > > > sun during the summer, but not getting any sun these days.... > > > > > > - Kate > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 Barb, that sums the protocol up so well! Benicar, D deprivation & low dose abx. Well, I suppose for me, 1 out of 3 ain't bad (pretty darn good in fact) but what a joke to push that as a cure-all for everyone even after it's quite obvious that not everyone thrives on it! If only it were so easy. One of my friends, who had numerous conversations with the creator of said unmentionable protocol, was advised to just stick with the protocol, despite her problems with it, and even though later scans showed a major hole in the floor of her sinuses and maxilla, along with major bone deterioration. The only abx that's holding this infection at bay is I.V. Unisyn and major anti-fungals, and that's only a stop gap until they can figure out some way to fix the problem, which is basically that the infection is rotting her head. She's finally consulting with plastic surgeons (oral surgeons and ENTs are basically helpless), who seem to have the best grasp of how to tackle the problem, but still no guarantees and a great deal of risk. So can you imagine if she had followed the advice she received to stick with low dose minocyline and all her troubles would fall away. Yeah, fall right into the grave. This is what people don't understand. These infections can manifest in numerous ways, preying on our weaknesses. When you're trying to fix something, you've got to have more than one tool in your tool box, or you're not going to get very far. That's why I like people like Stratton who are flexible with treatment and covering a lot of bases with their protocol. They seem to have a much better grasp of infection in general. I think everyone who focuses on one treatment or one diagnosis is setting themselves up for failure, unless they get really lucky. penny > > > > > > > > Gosh, I am almost ready to take the stuff, after having > followed > > > the > > > > deprivation course for months previously. So far I have just > > gone > > > back > > > > to voraciously eating eggs and salmon etc. -- and was gardening > > in > > > the > > > > sun during the summer, but not getting any sun these days.... > > > > > > > > - Kate > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 Well, that's a really good point. You've always got to wonder WHY you're depleted in a particular nutrient. It may be a protective mechanism in itself. hmmmmm. I'm going to keep experimenting with the D for now. I've heard a number of good reports which makes this guinea pig ready for another go-round. :-) <dumbaussie2000@y...> wrote: > > Boy oh boy, that topic is so intriguing. I did love the bit of the > presentation when he explains it's role in determining the dna to > make a particular type of cell intsead of just running an ill > defined set of commands.But I still just don't know because I think > inflammation makes calcifications all over the body and not > necessarily the bone where it's needed.Are we going to feed this > other monster? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 On Saturday, November 12, 2005, at 09:32 AM, Barb Peck wrote: > So WHERE ARE the people getting better on the unmentionable protocol? > It's been over a year that the sites been up now - so there should be > plenty of people out there that can extoll the virtues of Benicar, D > deprivation and low dose abx... I noticed that the time period after which one should expect to see significant improvement has been extended again. - Kate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 Kate I noticed that the time period after which one should expect to see > significant improvement has been extended again. What by a millenium maybe.There's no way on this earth that a protocol which JUST DOESN " T ADDRESS the size of the problem is going to succeed.To me the guy is pissing on bushfires while fanning them. > > > So WHERE ARE the people getting better on the unmentionable protocol? > > It's been over a year that the sites been up now - so there should be > > plenty of people out there that can extoll the virtues of Benicar, D > > deprivation and low dose abx... > > I noticed that the time period after which one should expect to see > significant improvement has been extended again. > > - Kate > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 Clearly the possibility that interruption of 1,25-d and ATR1 signalling will broadly render these diseases curable by abx can now be excluded, by looking at the (scattered) observational data. However, in the online community there are those who had used many months of strong treatment in the past but enjoy greater success with the _____ protocol. Joyce, and to a greater extent, Lonestar, and this older pilot/farmer (both?) guy who posted once, come to mind. I certainly may be missing some people. But they are few indeed compared to the very large number who attempted the treatment. > > So WHERE ARE the people getting better on the unmentionable protocol? > > It's been over a year that the sites been up now - so there should be > > plenty of people out there that can extoll the virtues of Benicar, D > > deprivation and low dose abx... > > I noticed that the time period after which one should expect to see > significant improvement has been extended again. > > - Kate > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 Yes, and there are many on the RA protocol, using low dose mino, who seem to benefit greatly from the protocol, and many of those people have numerous " autoimmune " issues as well. There's just no black and white in these illness, which is the truth that the ______ protocol refuses to acknowledge. penny > > Clearly the possibility that interruption of 1,25-d and ATR1 > signalling will broadly render these diseases curable by abx can now > be excluded, by looking at the (scattered) observational data. > > However, in the online community there are those who had used many > months of strong treatment in the past but enjoy greater success with > the _____ protocol. Joyce, and to a greater extent, Lonestar, and this > older pilot/farmer (both?) guy who posted once, come to mind. I > certainly may be missing some people. But they are few indeed compared > to the very large number who attempted the treatment. > > > > > So WHERE ARE the people getting better on the unmentionable > protocol? > > > It's been over a year that the sites been up now - so there should > be > > > plenty of people out there that can extoll the virtues of Benicar, > D > > > deprivation and low dose abx... > > > > I noticed that the time period after which one should expect to see > > significant improvement has been extended again. > > > > - Kate > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 <dumbaussie2000@y...> wrote: 'Oops my left leg fell off' - aussie bob replies. (not his real name)- 'it must be a herx'.' LOL! Yeah, what was your first clue again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 It's somewhat exciting to read that Penny. I found that one chap having only staph areus dominating his arthritic condition IMO would jump ahead leaps and bounds on any minocycline protocol. The low dose was possably aimed at the- highly responsive-adverse effects group.The sad part was he was only interested in knocking out his immune system with some whippy do new thing. tony > > > > Clearly the possibility that interruption of 1,25-d and ATR1 > > signalling will broadly render these diseases curable by abx can > now > > be excluded, by looking at the (scattered) observational data. > > > > However, in the online community there are those who had used many > > months of strong treatment in the past but enjoy greater success > with > > the _____ protocol. Joyce, and to a greater extent, Lonestar, and > this > > older pilot/farmer (both?) guy who posted once, come to mind. I > > certainly may be missing some people. But they are few indeed > compared > > to the very large number who attempted the treatment. > > > > > > > > So WHERE ARE the people getting better on the unmentionable > > protocol? > > > > It's been over a year that the sites been up now - so there > should > > be > > > > plenty of people out there that can extoll the virtues of > Benicar, > > D > > > > deprivation and low dose abx... > > > > > > I noticed that the time period after which one should expect to > see > > > significant improvement has been extended again. > > > > > > - Kate > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2005 Report Share Posted November 14, 2005 Yep, gotta watch out for the whippy doos. :-) > > It's somewhat exciting to read that Penny. I found that one chap > having only staph areus dominating his arthritic condition IMO would > jump ahead leaps and bounds on any minocycline protocol. The low > dose was possably aimed at the- highly responsive-adverse effects > group.The sad part was he was only interested in knocking out his > immune system with some whippy do new thing. > tony > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.