Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

holy crap! qPCR of EM!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I sooo looked for this before, but didnt find it cause I used the

alternative term qtPCR.

This is of great importance for understanding lyme.

" For those specimens in which B. burgdorferi was detectable by qPCR,

the mean ± standard deviation number of spirochetes present in a 2-

mm skin biopsy specimen was 2,462 ± 2,942, the median number of

organisms was 1,450, and the number of spirochetes in positive

specimens varied over 3 orders of magnitude (Fig. 1). "

Why are 1/2 of such biopsies negative for Bb by microscopy, the rest

showing only a few organisms (see Hulinska, see Aberer)? This may be

hefty evidence that most borrelia are suboptical in size and do not

express OspA, the common antigen used in IEM. There are other

possible interpretations, such as lots of dead organisms with intact

DNA... which seems unlikely to me.

http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?

tool=pubmed & pubmedid=11923340

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...