Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 In case Penny doesn't pipe up since your personal attacks seem tolerated here, Tony, I mostly ignore your drivel EXCEPT when you personally attack someone. Post all the flotsam and jetsam you care to, but kindly take the name calling elsewhere. It may not be beneath you, but the board can certainly do without it. BTW, wasn't it you who verbally assaulted for " posting a book " that was, oh say, about the same length of this post of yours.... > > > > This statement right here is a big problem that is only > clouding > > > the > > > > issue: > > > > > > > > At first, Mr. Courcier did not know whom to trust, and he > > remained > > > > on the antibiotics therapy prescribed by his doctor in Texas. > > But > > > by > > > > July he concluded that he did not have Lyme disease and > stopped > > > > taking the antibiotics, which he said were only making him > feel > > > > worse. > > > > > > > > I read this same rationale all the time, that because a person > > > > reacts badly to one abx, it's some kind of proof that there's > no > > > > infection involved. > > > > > > > > When is the medical community going to shine some light on > this > > > > entire antibiotic/infection debaucle? When are they going to > > > educate > > > > the public that all antibiotics do not work for all people or > > all > > > > bugs due to individual organism mechanics or resistance? > > > > > > > > Right now, the vast majority of the population has no clue > when > > it > > > > comes to this topic while the medical community perpetuates a > > > total > > > > myth about the use of antibiotics, claiming it's > their " overuse " > > > by > > > > patients that's the problem, when it's really MISUSE, endorsed > > by > > > > the doctors themselves! > > > > > > > > And while we're being lectured by an ignorant media not to use > > > > antimicrobial handsoap, millions of abx are pumped into our > feed > > > > animals on a daily basis. > > > > > > > > What's wrong with this entire picture? > > > > > > > > This is why I think we need to remember that most people don't > > > > understand bacteria or antibiotics at all, and that we need to > > > > continuously put information out there to help correct all the > > > > misperceptions when it comes to antibiotic treatment. > > > > > > > > penny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 I agree, we don't tolerate personal attacks, BUT...do you know what it really comes down to? Tony's " attacks " just aren't as skillful or as passive agressive as some people's. He talks off-the-cuff, and is definitely politically incorrect, but he's never calculating or conniving and he'd do absolutely anything to help anyone who needed it, regardless of the cost to himself. He'd never hold back anything that he thinks might help even a single person. Because of that, and because I've actually seen him help a lot of people in a very real way, more than anyone else I know, I've never had a problem with his antics. They don't really hurt anyone, except perhaps they bruise some people's egos. So, as I've said many times, if you don't like a post, either s.o.b. (scroll on by) or take it back channel with that person. Don't waste space here arguing about speaking styles. Argue the facts or theories, not the personalities. Arguing about arguing is a complete waste of energy and time. And, just as a little FYI before claiming I give Tony special treatment, I've had people on this list call me " pathetic " , " dumb " , even a " nazi " among many more derogatory terms, and what do you know, they're still posting here, just like Tony is. IMO, being called a " smarty pants " is pretty tame, in comparison. But if someone feels personally wronged or targeted by anyone else, and they don't want to deal with that person directly, then they can write me off-list and I will try to help solve the problem. But that goes for the people directly involved only. I would only hope that the rest of us are just mature enough to deal. So saying that, Tony, even if your offensive remarks sound more like grade school name calling to me than serious attacks, please control yourself so that others don't react and everything gets sent careening off course. (Either that or learn to be more passive agressive. --No, of course I don't REALLY mean that.) Maybe everyone who has a problem with this stuff can try thinking of Tony, or ANYONE who annoys or irritates them, as a " herx " . Everything else that causes us discomfort seems to get that tag, and it's considered a good thing. :-) penny > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Penny, Time and again I am amazed by your defense of Tony's rhetoric. Do you think it is just a crude style of writing when he tells someone to get their head out of their arse. I can tell the difference. The reason I read Tony's posts is because I hope to learn something although I do POB most of his posts. Often his posts are so toxic and offensive that I have a hard time sifting through the obnoxious stuff to glean anything good or constructive. I know there has not been any direct attack on me but I am offended when he slams my friends.That hurts me too. I am angered by your response so I will come right out and say it. I am not passive aggressive. I suspect others who you call passive aggressive are being sensitive, sensible and diplomatic. I wish Tony would give names and addresses of those he has cured or at least tell them to post here so we can see the proof of what he claims. Tony's obnoxious, racist remarks set the tone on this forum. Often much energy is wasted by people trying to calm him down or defend themselves. I don't think the folks here have the extra energy to spare. You have said that this is a forum for facts and is not a support forum, we should go someplace else if we want support. But what about verbal abuse. If you can't see the blatant verbal abuse and attacks then something is wrong, very wrong. Respectfully, Mariepenny <pennyhoule@...> wrote: I agree, we don't tolerate personal attacks, BUT...do you know what it really comes down to? Tony's "attacks" just aren't as skillful or as passive agressive as some people's. He talks off-the-cuff, and is definitely politically incorrect, b but he's never calculating or conniving and he'd do absolutely anything to help anyone who needed it, regardless of the cost to himself. He'd never hold back anything that he thinks might help even a single person. Because of that, and because I've actually seen him help a lot of people in a very real way, more than anyone else I know, I've never had a problem with his antics. They don't really hurt anyone, except perhaps they bruise some people's egos. So, as I've said many times, if you don't like a post, either s.o.b. (scroll on by) or take it back channel with that person. Don't waste space here arguing about speaking styles. Argue the facts or theories, not the personalities. Arguing about arguing is a complete waste of energy and time.And, just as a little FYI before claiming I give Tony special treatment, I've had people on this list call me "pathetic", "dumb", even a "nazi" among many more derogatory terms, and what do you know, they're still posting here, just like Tony is. IMO, being called a "smarty pants" is pretty tame, in comparison. But if someone feels personally wronged or targeted by anyone else, and they don't want to deal with that person directly, then they can write me off-list and I will try to help solve the problem. But that goes for the people directly involved only. I would only hope that the rest of us are just mature enough to deal.So saying that, Tony, even if your offensive remarks sound more like grade school name calling to me than serious attacks, please control yourself so that others don't react and everything gets sent careening off course. (Either that or learn to be more passive agressive. --No, of course I don't REALLY mean that.)Maybe everyone who has a problem with this stuff can try thinking of Tony, or ANYONE who annoys or irritates them, as a "herx". Everything else that causes us discomfort seems to get that tag, and it's considered a good thing. :-) penny> > > Start your day with - make it your home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour days sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the one drug I have rarely paused is doxy. METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem to overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard to credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming cure over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people are never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? Are you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of infecting humans and running them into the ground? RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, typically require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but that doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong disease model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease bacillus being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How bout leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they decided, but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate parasites here with their reduced genomes. CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode to work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to pure culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 I also use tetracyclines and keep telling people they keep on working.I just don't see them as getting the job done completely on autoimmune ilnesses.I also tell people to keep rotating them so the can distributre to all parts of the anatomy. Also there's 1 million hospital visits a day with people going down to bugs that are there and if treated early the response is brilliant.The whole post was about Igenex- and there also under investigation for giving so many people false hope.I don't have a problem believing anything it's just that I have the toxins and the damaging bacteria up my sleeve not some test that you seem to support as brilliant science. > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour days > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the one > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem to > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard to > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming cure > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people are > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? Are > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of infecting > humans and running them into the ground? > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, typically > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but that > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong disease > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease bacillus > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How bout > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they decided, > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode to > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to pure > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 It's this type of testing and cross reactivity that gets no-one anywhere in the system. Actually Tarello has just given up as seem to have the newcastle group with all there studies since 1989.The fact that you can't sit there and give yourself an ilness to meet criteria for a crappy diagnosis see's the real researchers not bother anymore.Tarello works the animal models beautifully and meets the crappy criteria required and yet he also gets this type of song and dance. I'm just fortunate that one day when the truth comes out at least I had the score on the board.Blood culture, real urine cultures, stool cultures and you want me to do what? Also the helicobacter a recent discovery is tested for gas, has a culture media to grow it in, and all bases loaded, why don't Igenex move forward. Actually jason really put Igenex thru the ringer last time this come up and he claimed they are working on cultures and sensitivities according to his back door emails. > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour days > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the one > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem to > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard to > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming cure > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people are > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? Are > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of infecting > humans and running them into the ground? > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, typically > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but that > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong disease > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease bacillus > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How bout > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they decided, > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode to > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to pure > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 THats true, I am a combo therapy person myself, you wont find me taking one drug only. IGeneX just does tests. They are free to scratch their heads as little or as much as they like over why cures are uncommon. By the way I've read some claims that Mattman cultured spiros from some ALS-dxd patients and this got them abx treatment that improved them. As they were dx'd with ALS I think you can assume most of them had been deteriorating. DOnt know for sure if thats so but its something to look into if you think she never did anything pragmatic for anyone. I also read she got arrested for doing work like that, again not certain that is a fact. Meanwhile Steere says chronic lyme cant be caused by Bb because it is not consistently cultured from chronic lyme by every worker (whereas it can be cultured from erythema migrans in 25-75% of cases by most workers). This is a wrong argument, simply based on an incorrect assumption, as anyone can see by looking at Nanagaras work on culture- negative chlamydia persister states in ReA. > > > I also use tetracyclines and keep telling people they keep on > working.I just don't see them as getting the job done completely on > autoimmune ilnesses.I also tell people to keep rotating them so the > can distributre to all parts of the anatomy. > Also there's 1 million hospital visits a day with people going down > to bugs that are there and if treated early the response is > brilliant.The whole post was about Igenex- and there also under > investigation for giving so many people false hope.I don't have a > problem believing anything it's just that I have the toxins and the > damaging bacteria up my sleeve not some test that you seem to > support as brilliant science. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Tony: People work with the tools they have. There aren't many people that can prepare a slide and CORRECTLY identify a pathogen. If one can ID the organism CORRECTLY then I agree that there's no better way (then run to run an abx sensitivity test - Ohmygod - are we in Heaven?). It's just not a viable option for everyone. And what's this about Igenex giving " false hope " ???? I think their WB tests yield the best raw data in the country - cuz you can't GET that data from the other labs - even if they have it. Barb > > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour > days > > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the > one > > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem > to > > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard > to > > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming > cure > > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people > are > > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? > Are > > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of > infecting > > humans and running them into the ground? > > > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, > typically > > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but > that > > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong > disease > > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease > bacillus > > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How > bout > > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they > decided, > > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode > to > > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to > pure > > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Tony wrote: " Actually jason really put Igenex thru the ringer last time this come up and he claimed they are working on cultures and sensitivities according to his back door emails. " Tony - Whaddya mean here? Barb > > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour > days > > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the > one > > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem > to > > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard > to > > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming > cure > > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people > are > > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? > Are > > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of > infecting > > humans and running them into the ground? > > > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, > typically > > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but > that > > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong > disease > > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease > bacillus > > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How > bout > > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they > decided, > > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode > to > > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to > pure > > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Yeah, I've been hearing this culturing thing is going to happen any minute, for over a year now. What IS up with that? penny > " Actually jason really put Igenex thru the ringer last time this > come up and he claimed they are working on cultures and > sensitivities according to his back door emails. " > > Tony - Whaddya mean here? > Barb > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Barb Using a microsocope and commonense is very hard to beat. ACTUALLY, A picture is worth a thousand words- in the business of ill health as well.There's no bacteria in medical circles that threatens lives that's treated like this Bb thing. The tools they have that's all they can work with? I can't say that's even close to true, most mycoplasma labs know they are running semi scams and generally hide behind closed doors when it comes to all this stuff.Exercise your phone finger like I learned early in the disease, and believe me I was fortuante on many occasions to speak to the lab person doing the PCR work.The first query I asked was what mycoplasma's are you finding in your arthritic tests. She couldn't answer this question.I mean they do PCR for mycoplasma infections in arthritis patients for at least a few years and the tech can't give you any idea as to what is beiung found. 50 patients from a canadian group do the nicholson protocol exactly like it's been taught and 48 fare no better if not lots worse and 2 possbly note improvement after six months. Trev from the other side has his sarc friends dying only doing doxy (often long term). These are facts and worth a lot of consideration before we blindly give these mycoplamsarols any credit.I also recall penny going to california's best mycoplasma doctor and he no longer bothers to torture his patients with antibiotic treatments preffering to sell them mycoplasma supplements.What, don't you guys come across these types of posts? You know yourself where modern medicine sits, but it'a actualluy not true they won't do cultures, a gran friend from san diego had to have sinus surgery (polyps), anyways the doctor cultures and cultures and cultures till she gets her well. The usual culprits that discomfort us- surprisingly are discomforting her. > > > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > > > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour > > days > > > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the > > one > > > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > > > > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem > > to > > > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its > hard > > to > > > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming > > cure > > > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many > people > > are > > > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? > > Are > > > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of > > infecting > > > humans and running them into the ground? > > > > > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, > > typically > > > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > > > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but > > that > > > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong > > disease > > > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease > > bacillus > > > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How > > bout > > > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > > > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they > > decided, > > > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > > > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > > > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > > > > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode > > to > > > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to > > pure > > > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 They can cultivate Bb at Igenex and possably when the money dries up may actually startgrowing the Bb instead of guesstimating your Bb. > > > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > > > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour > > days > > > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the > > one > > > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > > > > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem > > to > > > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its > hard > > to > > > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming > > cure > > > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many > people > > are > > > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? > > Are > > > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of > > infecting > > > humans and running them into the ground? > > > > > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, > > typically > > > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > > > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but > > that > > > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong > > disease > > > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease > > bacillus > > > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How > > bout > > > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > > > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they > > decided, > > > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > > > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > > > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > > > > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode > > to > > > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to > > pure > > > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Tony, you know very well it's not that easy. We're all in shock that we have even found an ENT in San Diego who will culture and follow through the way this doc does. Barb's right. It takes a lot of persistence and tenacity to find such docs. But they do exist, like needles exist in hay stacks. Well, maybe needles in toupees. You still have to search carefully if you don't want to get gouged. However, if people didn't keep harping on getting cultures, then nobody would even know to try, which is even worse than getting gouged. I'm grateful that Tarello and NewCastle harped for as long as they did, even if they've given up. My treatment success is a direct result of their efforts. And also allows me to recognize the tremendous service this San Diego doc is doing us. penny > > Barb > You know yourself where modern medicine sits, but it'a actualluy not true they won't do cultures, a gran friend from san diego had to have sinus surgery (polyps), anyways the doctor cultures and > cultures and cultures till she gets her well. The usual culprits > that discomfort us- surprisingly are discomforting her. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 How do you know? Most people (researchers) have only 25-75% success culturing from EM (whether the center or the leading edge), and from the chronic disease lower success would be expected. Theres a lab in Cali offering Bb culture right now. > They can cultivate Bb at Igenex and possably when the money dries up > may actually startgrowing the Bb instead of guesstimating your Bb. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Whoa, really? Where? Who are they? I'd definitely be interested in looking into this. If you could culture the organisms and see how they respond to various abx, that would put us light years ahead when it comes to treatment. penny " " <usenethod@y...> wrote: > Theres a lab in Cali offering Bb culture right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2005 Report Share Posted September 2, 2005 - Hear, hear! It takes only cursory knowledge of microbiology lets you know that much that ails us can't be readily cultured, seen with a microscope or on a smear. Tony- your insistence that nothing but cultures and smears has validity is as reductionistic and simplistic as the ignorant doc's who won't accept that anything is wrong with a patient if it doesn't fit into their predetermined box. Your logic is syllogistic: because you have helped people through your methods, only those methods are the helpful ones? I think your tone and put downs of others are obfuscation and excuse for bullying. If you're questioned, you go off on a rant, as if your email screaming will drown out what you don't like to hear. Penny- I get you (ie your postings make sense to me), but I don't get your constant defense of Tony's obnoxiousness. I'm a big boy, and I can S.O.B. and do, often. I also can take whatever reaction or rant I am likely to trigger in Tony. And he can post as much as he wishes. But all too many times that the " discussion " degenerates on this list and Tony is part of that. So is 's sarcasm, and whatever elementary school sandbox those two get in whenever they address each other. Tone does matter, at least to me. It's what creates the spirit of a community. It's what makes it possible to raise questions, question information and approaches, and sort the information from the personalities. It's not irrelevant. Witness where a lot of you folks came from, the MP list, and how the authoritative turned authoritarian and bullying. You excuse Tony's " antics " while calling others " passive aggressive " (why? because they don't scream and yell?) Is " You sound like a turkey the way you carry on. " and " Also Mr. smarty pants " " Wake up and get your finger out of your arse " and " Also Mr. wiseman " all okay just because he''s " off-the-cuff " or " less literate? " Everything is bullshit because he thinks so, and it's okay because he's helped people, but others who wish to have normal discourse are passive-aggressive? Come on. My two cents, Jim Message: 16 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:38:52 -0000 From: " " <usenethod@...> Subject: Re: Igenex targeted, Tony stuff. BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour days sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the one drug I have rarely paused is doxy. METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem to overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard to credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming cure over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people are never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? Are you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of infecting humans and running them into the ground? RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, typically require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but that doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong disease model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease bacillus being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How bout leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they decided, but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate parasites here with their reduced genomes. CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode to work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to pure culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2005 Report Share Posted September 2, 2005 Jim 'Half the autoimmune people can't STEAL a lyme positive from anyone and they have the exact same symptoms?I'm sure if you see a picture that's worth a thousand words you'd find it hard to walk on by and follow conspiracy rhetoric. Basically most of what I have added has gone on by. BUT the fact that people are more aware to do multiple antibiotics and not take the herxing thing as gospel is possably the only thing that rings good. Also the fact that we have been fortunate to have had plenty of information as to people's bone biopsies is also something ignored- .. But this paints a different picture. The distant sites yield identical bone marrow bacteria in all that have been biopsied.MAny do correct science and everyone is ignoring it.Also treatment isn't easy many need many surgeries, and even then you can't cut out the damage the infection has caused. You then have a university team with 16 years of going after the bacteria, explaining the toxins and there relationships to pain and depression and doing the most microbiology on thousands of patients around the world...How much clearer can anyone make the microbiology of cfs and damaging toxins than this group. If there was acid fast or other species of bacteria there was no way they could be missed.There explanation of the toxic molecule being produced and it's size is also unique- you have the smoking gun. The problem for me was that they were only interested in research and not BIG TREATMENT.I came to the same conclusion after testing thru normal channels and only after an 8 to 12 month period of ilness did I discover that this group existed. You then spend the last few years on forums that get to the core of the problem by doing plenty of pathology and scanning and you become advanced as to what's going on.It's unfortuante that western medicine has gone away from third world medicine drawing a line in the sand as far as there belief being we don't get problems in our blood streamIMO.Unfortuantely we do and it stems from our bone marrow often.IMO. > - > Hear, hear! It takes only cursory knowledge of > microbiology lets you know that much that ails us > can't be readily cultured, seen with a microscope or > on a smear. > > Tony- your insistence that nothing but cultures and > smears has validity is as reductionistic and > simplistic as the ignorant doc's who won't accept that > anything is wrong with a patient if it doesn't fit > into their predetermined box. Your logic is > syllogistic: because you have helped people through > your methods, only those methods are the helpful ones? > I think your tone and put downs of others are > obfuscation and excuse for bullying. If you're > questioned, you go off on a rant, as if your email > screaming will drown out what you don't like to hear. > > Penny- I get you (ie your postings make sense to me), > but I don't get your constant defense of Tony's > obnoxiousness. I'm a big boy, and I can S.O.B. and do, > often. I also can take whatever reaction or rant I am > likely to trigger in Tony. And he can post as much as > he wishes. But all too many times that the > " discussion " degenerates on this list and Tony is part > of that. So is 's sarcasm, and whatever elementary > school sandbox those two get in whenever they address > each other. Tone does matter, at least to me. It's > what creates the spirit of a community. It's what > makes it possible to raise questions, question > information and approaches, and sort the information > from the personalities. It's not irrelevant. > > Witness where a lot of you folks came from, the MP > list, and how the authoritative turned authoritarian > and bullying. You excuse Tony's " antics " while calling > others " passive aggressive " (why? because they don't > scream and yell?) Is " You sound like a turkey the way > you carry on. " and " Also Mr. smarty pants " " Wake up > and get your finger out of your arse " and " Also Mr. > wiseman " all okay just because he''s " off-the-cuff " or > " less literate? " Everything is bullshit because he > thinks so, and it's okay because he's helped people, > but others who wish to have normal discourse are > passive-aggressive? Come on. > > My two cents, > Jim > > Message: 16 > Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:38:52 -0000 > From: " " <usenethod@y...> > Subject: Re: Igenex targeted, Tony stuff. > > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed > with > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working > 12, 14 hour days > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time > student) and the one > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. > Since you seem to > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and > Barb its hard to > credit that you have really made a good survey of > people claiming cure > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so > many people are > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that > " fashionable " ? Are > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae > of infecting > humans and running them into the ground? > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone > else, typically > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single > organism in > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent > understood, but that > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously > strong disease > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple > disease bacillus > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in > 2000? How bout > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human > uveitis that > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure > how they decided, > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that > most *soil* > organisms are presently inculturable - not even > talking obligate > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing > is he rode to > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate > pertaining to pure > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2005 Report Share Posted September 2, 2005 Tony, I think you are brilliantly right in everything but the tickborne illnesses, you'd have to GET one to know what it does to hijack your system, particularly if you get babesia AND borrelia in one dose or in a couple tickbites, either way, if you get those two together its like getting syphilis and malaria, essentially. They are so globally debilitating and so suppressive to immunity and overall body function that they devastate, disable and sometimes kill. Take the example of Wyatt Sexton, here http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/sports/college/a1c_sexton_09 01.html He was fine, a healthy football player before he got lyme. It shouldn't even be called lyme, that is the most idiotic name. Names have such power to alarm or stupefy. " West Nile " --the name alone scares people, like " SARS " , but " FLU " which is more dangerous, doesn't. " Lyme " is much less scary than " tickborne syphilis " or " tickborne malaria " or some name that would really explain what it is. That is my opinion. YOu understand SO MUCH about microbiology but really, these bugs are very bad. > > BACKGROUND: Tony ask Barb if she wishes shed dispensed with > > tetracyclines. I dont think so. I am back to working 12, 14 hour > days > > sometimes after only 11 months, (am a full time student) and the > one > > drug I have rarely paused is doxy. > > > > METHODS: FOr me a year of doxy seems to kick ass. Since you seem > to > > overlook whats going on in your backyard with me and Barb its hard > to > > credit that you have really made a good survey of people claiming > cure > > over at lymenet or whatever. How do you explain why so many people > are > > never the same after erythema migrans? How is that " fashionable " ? > Are > > you referring to the current fashion amongst borreliae of > infecting > > humans and running them into the ground? > > > > RESULTS: Lemme know if you dont/wouldnt, like everyone else, > typically > > require hours at the scope to demonstrate a single organism in > > tertiary syphilis. The spirochetoses just arent understood, but > that > > doesnt mean the evidence doesnt make for a seriously strong > disease > > model nonetheless. What do you think of the whipple disease > bacillus > > being cultured repeatably for the first time only in 2000? How > bout > > leprosy? How about the unculturable microbe of human uveitis that > > killed inoculated mice after 6 months? I'm not sure how they > decided, > > but most people with microbio PhDs seem to think that most *soil* > > organisms are presently inculturable - not even talking obligate > > parasites here with their reduced genomes. > > > > CONCLUSION: Koch was definitely the man, thing is he rode > to > > work in the morning on a dinosaur and his postulate pertaining to > pure > > culture is now one zillion percent obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2005 Report Share Posted September 3, 2005 Hear Hear, Penny. I have to really wonder somethimes how and why our world became so darned intolerant? Tony is unique, special, so are you Penny, and Jill and everyone here. Some people have style and others have... well, style, and like you said, we're all here to figure this mess out. I may be showing my age here, but I remember when people were a heck of a lot more tolerant and compasionate and understanding of each other's quirks. Maybe it's the cookie cutter schools we have now that breed it. Anyway, thanks. *S* > I agree, we don't tolerate personal attacks, BUT...do you know what > it really comes down to? Tony's " attacks " just aren't as skillful or > as passive agressive as some people's. He talks off-the-cuff, and is > definitely politically incorrect, but he's never calculating or > conniving and he'd do absolutely anything to help anyone who needed > it, regardless of the cost to himself. He'd never hold back anything > that he thinks might help even a single person. Because of that, and > because I've actually seen him help a lot of people in a very real > way, more than anyone else I know, I've never had a problem with his > antics. They don't really hurt anyone, except perhaps they bruise > some people's egos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2005 Report Share Posted September 3, 2005 Sue Thanks for that. It's this type of attitude I also take into my doctors office and I can't change what has been success.By the way my rant with you come about becuase we were smarter than sitting in cfs lala land and went onto informative forums where people shared there disastrous discoveries.(dental) I also posted you that one person that claimed if she left well enough alone (amalgam removal) she would have been fine.Plus there where many others. Our passions moved away from fibro/cfs/candida/lyme forums to where the explanations came in graphical detail. We then felt absolutely comfortable to have the INFLAMMATION INFECTION label added to the mess we are all so comfortable with. Cheers tony > > I agree, we don't tolerate personal attacks, BUT...do you know > what > > it really comes down to? Tony's " attacks " just aren't as skillful > or > > as passive agressive as some people's. He talks off-the-cuff, and > is > > definitely politically incorrect, but he's never calculating or > > conniving and he'd do absolutely anything to help anyone who > needed > > it, regardless of the cost to himself. He'd never hold back > anything > > that he thinks might help even a single person. Because of that, > and > > because I've actually seen him help a lot of people in a very real > > way, more than anyone else I know, I've never had a problem with > his > > antics. They don't really hurt anyone, except perhaps they bruise > > some people's egos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.