Guest guest Posted August 28, 2005 Report Share Posted August 28, 2005 , the second of those abstracts points to something hopeful, the success in experiments at using compounds that inhibit efflux pumps and increase the effectiveness of antibiotics that bugs use efflux pumps to spit back out. Any follow up on that, indicating that there are available substances that perform just this function and are safe for human consumption would of course be very welcome. Cheers, > Heres are 2 interesting meeting abstracts, basically pure data, from > ICAAC, the Am Soc Microb conference on therapy. > > http://www.asm.org/memonly/abstracts/AbstractView.asp?AbstractID=415 > > http://www.asm.org/memonly/abstracts/AbstractView.asp? AbstractID=69690 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2005 Report Share Posted August 28, 2005 The spectrum of most known MDR pump inhibitors (not many have been examined) appears to be moderate. That is, it seems alot of them inhibit multiple MDR pumps, but not all. Alot of organisms have multiple MDR pumps, each with a very broad but unique spectrum of substrates; therefore a potential problem is one MDR efficiently extruding an inhibitor you deployed to clog another pump. But experiment clearly shows that this complication is not always fatal to the goal of MDR inhibition. I am not seeing much yet on mammal toxicity of any of these compounds being assayed. Research/development in this area does not seem to be gaining much momentum, tho it is getting significant scholarly attention. There appears to be more than one plant species and even some antibiotic- producing microorganisms employing the antimicrobial/antiMDR combo strategy to protect themselves from bacteria, so nature may be a good place to look for antiMDR compounds. Good thing we humans are making room for cheap beef etc by casually shouldering various biological species into the void. Unfortunately the next Penicillium notatum could be restricted to a 10-square-mile range as many rainforest organisms are/were. Whoops, hope that wasnt one of the really important ones. There were some firms like Microcide working on this... I think Microcide has been re-named/re-born which is not necessarily a very good sign... I dont think they have found much. The chances of efflux being pivotal to the refractoriness of our infections of interest is still mostly a matter of pure logic/theory. I did find out from Tasha at eurolyme that Bb may have a LPS functional analog, which is a boon to this area of speculation, especially as the substance appears to be immunogenic, thus providing motivation for its downregulation. They could use some stronger efflux pumps right now in New Orleans, much of which is below sea level. Looks like theres a hefty chance the entire city will flood with extreme destruction. > > Heres are 2 interesting meeting abstracts, basically pure data, from > > ICAAC, the Am Soc Microb conference on therapy. > > > > http://www.asm.org/memonly/abstracts/AbstractView.asp? AbstractID=415 > > > > http://www.asm.org/memonly/abstracts/AbstractView.asp? > AbstractID=69690 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.