Re: Re: Are There Naturally Occurring Pleomorphic Bacteria

[Guest guest]

Dear Penny

Not so weird when you look at the history of optical microscopy. First the persecution of Royal Rife who , among other things, developed a superior microscope and imaging theory. This microscope was, of course, a victim of the pursuit of his less mainstream medical devices. Following Rife, was Gaston Naessens in France and later, Canada, who was also pilloried for his unorthodox theories and practices but who also developed superior microscopes and techniques. Both of these researchers were pioneers of the visualisation of pleomorphic bacteria at a time when this was considered the lunatic fringe.

Naessens was a little luckier than Rife in some respects , that his optics were commercially developed, though not widely taken up in a time when biochemical and genetic analysis techniques were becoming the cutting edge. Maybe there will be a renewed interest now that pleomorphs are legitimate subjects for orthodox enquiry.

Regards

Windsor

[infections] Re: Are There Naturally Occurring Pleomorphic Bacteria

You know what's weird? In most places in the U.S. it's illegal for a doctor to have a dark field microscope on his premises, or to use it for dxing patients, unless it's being used for research. My doctor friend died and left his df microscope to my regular doctor. My doctor then found out he could get shut down if he had the thing on the premises. Pretty strange.penny" Jaep" <Jaep@L...> wrote:> Try this Penny , It begs the question why are they pathogenic in some? Back to the gut perhaps...> >