Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Barb- Message: 18 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:41:58 -0000 From: " Barb Peck " <egroups1bp@...> Subject: Re: Amoxy... Jim: Yes- from what I've read of him - I was very impressed with his thinking. That's why after you get the load down to a managable number, serial high dose changing abx classes ( or combo's rotated correctly) is very effective, at hunting down, damaging, then killing the ones that managed to get away with monotherapy... The you have to alkalize the cell vacuole - and really get the rest of them. Barb Say a bit more about " combo's rotated correctly " and " alkalize the cell vacuole. " I know you've referred to using plaquinal to do the latter, what else does this? Why do it? Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2005 Report Share Posted August 13, 2005 Hi Jim: I;m talking about applying to Lyme (or any other chronic infection) the serial, or combo rotation of abx classes that seem to be working for some other hard to treat infections. Latest news for h. pylori is instead of long term triple or quadruple antibioticcombo's they've found that using them, each for a shorter term, but one right after the other (serially, but changing class) works better. Theory is that this gets the classical form and the variants (as they morph to avoid being killed). And I suspect this gets other bacteria that you don't know you have, and are causing problems. And there's good stuff now being published on the results for alkalizing the cell compartment so that the antibiotic is effective inside the cells where bacteria hide and are usually safe (Nelly posted a good paper on Q fever (Hydroxychloroquine(HCQ) and Doxy shortening the therapy from 3 years to 18 months). I don't know of any other drug (besides HCQ or chloroquine) that is considered a cell alkalizing agent. I like the shoter bursts of high dose, serial method - because there's always something else going on with these abx that I consider collateral damage (and I don't know the extent of what that might be). (I call it short - but it's still quite a bit longer than conventional treatment- but shorter than Lyme standards). There is evidence that candida actually grows in the presence of some abx (irrespective of the die off of the good bacteria) - and some bacteria create more than one variant - and build resistance. All I know is that this worked for me, and no one is more amazed than I am. I am still using coconut oil about 3 times per week (I switched from Lauricidin becuase I think it metabolizes better) and I still take vit/min. (and brewers yeast) supplements several times weekly - but no more ibuprofen. I'm getting Lyme tested again in a few months and I'll have a blood chemistry, and a candida panel - just to see where am - I just got done riding my 4 year old colt this morning.. YeeHAaaaaaaaa and am feeling great!. I think for some reason - I either just picked the right abx/combos and my bugs were susceptible to them or AT LAST my luck has changed and I got lucky. You'd think my Docs would be just a little more interested in my case. Since my symptoms, blood work and (mis dx's) are all documented.. My new eye doc at Dartmouth did ask me to forward my documented Drs. summaries from 1954 to the present - so maybe he'll take an interest - I just sent them out last week. Barb > Barb- > Message: 18 > Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:41:58 -0000 > From: " Barb Peck " <egroups1bp@y...> > Subject: Re: Amoxy... > > Jim: > Yes- from what I've read of him - I was very impressed > with his > thinking. > That's why after you get the load down to a managable > number, serial > high dose changing abx classes ( or combo's rotated > correctly) is > very effective, at hunting down, damaging, then > killing the ones that > managed to get away with monotherapy... > The you have to alkalize the cell vacuole - and really > get the rest > of them. > Barb > Say a bit more about " combo's rotated correctly " and > " alkalize the cell vacuole. " I know you've referred to > using plaquinal to do the latter, what else does this? > Why do it? > Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.