Guest guest Posted July 5, 2005 Report Share Posted July 5, 2005 Concerning vitamin D, I finally came across an article that states some important items very clearly based on actual studies -- instead of speculative theories. I have been frustrated because I have seen the same thing stated in many articles -- but it has not been sufficiently simply stated that a CFIDS mind could understand it. Source:Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 79, No. 3, 362-371, March 2004 The full text is available at: http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/79/3/362 " neither increased exposure to sunlight nor increased oral intake of vitamin D raised blood concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D " (3 studies cited) Furthermore, the author states: " as a person becomes vitamin D-deficient, there is an increase in the concentration of parathyroid hormone (PTH), which increases the renal production of 1,25(OH)2D, the circulating concentrations of which often become normal or even elevated " So 1,25D increases with Vitamin D deficiency has been established in medical literature. It seems clear that Vitamin D supplementation until Vitamin D is at the optimal levels should be done before you can be sure of meaningful 1,25D levels * 45-50 ng/ml or 115-128 nmol/l. Mercola, MD http://www.mercola.com/2002/feb/23/vitamin_d_deficiency.htm I found it interesting that low levels of Vitamin D may induce a false elevation of 1,25D levels (even a HIGH reading). This is what medical science study states and have found to be the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.