Guest guest Posted July 5, 2005 Report Share Posted July 5, 2005 Very interesting tho I liked the previous impenetrable article even better -g. I think their hypothesis makes sense. Interesting that OspC might be resopnsible for adhesion. I didn't know some larvae ticks don't finish a blood meal and find antoher host. Is this also ever true of nymph ticks I wonder. As for species diversity decreasing % of bb species with OspC's that can infect us, I don't know. Some researcher in the upper midwest tested the squirrels adn chipmunks there...they aren't thought to be common reservoirs...they were hugely infected. Seems like whatever's around, bb will use as a reservoir. > These guys > > http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/168/2/713 > > find that OspC allele classes are different in different vertebrate > hosts. > > They say there are 22 OspC allele classes in Bb sensu stricto, that > are all very sharply defined. Four classes can infect humans. X > number of different ones can infect a given vertebrate species, while > the rest cannot. Of non-human mammals, White-footed Mouse carries a > particularly high number of classes which are able to infect man. It > appears that very many wild vertebrate individuals carry every or > almost every class its species is capable of accomodating. > > The function of OspC is unknown. > > One possible explanation they present for these observations is that > the adaptive immune system of vertebrate N might be particularly good > at recognizing a certain class of OspC, and therefore it is able to > blast the crap out of any Bb carrying that class, thus rejecting > infection. This strikes me as very unlikely given the great allelic > diversity, in mice and humans alike, of the MHC molecules that govern > adaptive immunity. > > That leaves only one of the explanations they present, which is that > OspC pertains to adhesion. So maybe there is some unifying thing > going on with adhesion to all the different human substrates - or > maybe something else is going on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2005 Report Share Posted July 5, 2005 These guys point is, tho, that if the strains found in animal X are from the wrong OspC allele groups, they apparently wont infect humans (if you believe these guys). Ticks that feed on X will then miss one of their few chances to acquire a human-infecting strain. But White-footed Mouse isnt the only mammal that shares strain suceptibilites with humans... its just the one that shares the most. So maybe squirrels and chipmunks share one or two strains with us too. > As for species diversity decreasing % of bb species with OspC's that > can infect us, I don't know. Some researcher in the upper midwest > tested the squirrels adn chipmunks there...they aren't thought to be > common reservoirs...they were hugely infected. Seems like whatever's > around, bb will use as a reservoir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.