Guest guest Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Ok, your back on the streptococci. So what is the treatment? How is it different then what others are already doing? Again, if I have streptococci, and am now in remission, any ideas how I got there, " if " I'm not on the right ABX? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 Jelly I've just thrown in the streptococci for the first time, I just want people to learn that the common guys are causing the biggest problems.In heart valve replacement and endocarditis the oral streptococci that everyone on the planet has are the bad guys. What you did and resolved symptoms is what people 'need' to do, your basically after learning as much as possable about all your own ills so you best uderstand your mission at hand.Many here have some luck to thank for there therapy successes, if you don't have a pseudonomads which is highly resistant to most antibiotics and your infection stayed on course with your drug choices your a lot more likely to get well.Just a small factor in getting better. Many will swear that the minocycline resolves fatigue- but many can't tolerate it's interaction with there bacterial groups. tony > Ok, your back on the streptococci. So what is the treatment? How is it > different then what others are already doing? Again, if I have > streptococci, and am now in remission, any ideas how I got there, " if " > I'm not on the right ABX? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 You are right, my mistake. You were talking about staph before. You said, " Many will swear that the > minocycline resolves fatigue- but many can't tolerate it's interaction > with there bacterial groups. " Are you refering to what I would call a herx? With what you have said below, I don't understand what the big debate is. Are you merely trying to get people to think outside the box? What I have gotten from past posts is that you believe staph is the problem for ALL of us. Again, maybe I miss understood. If you are asking people to think outside the box, then I agree 1000%. I don't think that Staph or Mycos, or Lyme, etc are the final key to all of us. Many are testing positive for Mycos and Lyme and many are getting well treating them. For those who aren't getting well, then it could well be that their bug hasn't been even identified yet or there is some other factor that is preventing recovery maybe not identified yet. In trying to get people outside of the box we ALL including myself need to NOT get stuck in our own boxes. > > Ok, your back on the streptococci. So what is the treatment? How is > it > > different then what others are already doing? Again, if I have > > streptococci, and am now in remission, any ideas how I got > there, " if " > > I'm not on the right ABX? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 29, 2005 Report Share Posted June 29, 2005 Most of what your saying is right on.I just need people to get focused on the job at hand in there own case. it's virtually also not a one size fits all. The other big thing is there's no way your immune system is going to get you well.We' ve had 80 years of vaccinating for this very reason. So basically strategies that don't attack all corners of the problem are flawed and can't possably have success.The next thing to consider is what is the most important of thing's to do. > > > Ok, your back on the streptococci. So what is the treatment? How > is > > it > > > different then what others are already doing? Again, if I have > > > streptococci, and am now in remission, any ideas how I got > > there, " if " > > > I'm not on the right ABX? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.