Re: Dr Schardt on low dose cyclines again

June 7, 2005

> Dr Schardt emailed me this morning:

>

> Dear Mrs.[i've deleted my last name here},fluconazole will be

normally

> better tolerated than lamisil or antibiotics.The only weak point is

> the faculty for interactions with others substances.The report of

the

> veterinarian I can not support because of the low dosage and the

> simultaneous application of tetracycline.For you I recommend a high

> dosage as possible to reach an effective level in the nervous

> system.Sincerely F.Schardt

> ---

>

> I know someone on this list told me that the doctor(s) adapting his

> protocol had consulted with him and he knew about it, though when I

> asked him he said he didn't. Herein above it's clear he does not

> support that protocol. Just fyi.

Thanks for posting this update, I am trying very hard to get up

consistently to a higher dose of flucanzole but notice after the 2nd

day of the higher dose I get definite troubling symptoms which I

recognise from old and then often have to cut back a bit for some

recovery before ramping up again.

Pam

June 7, 2005

Can someone please refresh our memories on the specifics of the

Schardt protocol and how he happened upon that particular

combination? (we could list this in the files, if anyone has the

official protocol or link).

Is Dr. Shardt using abx that are different from the cyclines or is

he against all abx? Either way, what is his reasoning?

Also, how is the question of building resistance to Diflucan dealt

with?

I have to say, resistance is a concern for me, but I do believe the

Diflucan is benefitting me for now, after I got through my initial

discomfort. I'm only doing 200 mg per day though, because I can't

get more until I see my doc. Sometimes, I think I could up the dose

a little bit.

penny

Recommended Posts